Overseas students using higher education as ‘backdoor' to stay in UK
In May, the Labour Government announced plans to reduce the graduate visa route, which allows overseas students to live and work in the UK for up to two years after their studies, to 18 months.
Under changes introduced by the former Conservative government in January 2024, international students in the UK have been banned from bringing dependants with them since – apart from some postgraduate research courses or courses with government-funded scholarships.
But the report said the changes do not go 'far enough' and it called for bolder action to ensure study at UK universities is not 'a migration backdoor'.
The paper said: 'Most fundamentally, the purpose of student migration should be to study, not to provide a backdoor route to longer term migration or settlement.
'Yet increasingly studying in the UK has become a pathway for widespread and sustained immigration.'
The number of international students in the UK increased by 66% between 2014/15 and 2023/24, the report suggested.
Two in five (40%) of those who arrived on student visas transferred to a different visa type within one year in 2023 – up from just 3% in 2019, according to the paper.
Zachary Marsh, research fellow in education at Policy Exchange and author of the report, said: 'UK universities must return to the business of selling education, not immigration.
'Whilst international students can provide valuable economic benefits, the current system drives migration by those who have no interest in study but instead see the student and graduate visa as an open door to working in the UK.
'The Government and universities must go further to clamp down on those gaming the system.
'A more muscular approach is needed to restore public confidence that international students are good for our universities and wider economy and society.'
The report has also suggested that overseas students 'may be crowding out UK students' at some universities.
Shadow education minister Neil O'Brien is due to address a Policy Exchange event in London on Wednesday on higher education and migration to coincide with the launch of the think tank's report.
Mr O'Brien is expected to say: 'It's not just taxpayers who are losing out.
'The current system isn't working for too many students, who are promised great things but find themselves having to pay back huge sums on very low wages.
'Too many students are being ripped off and we have to ask whether there are better uses of taxpayers' money that will leave young people better off.'
Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group, a group of 24 research-intensive universities, said: 'In an increasingly competitive global market, the UK needs to maintain an attractive offer for international students.
'This includes the graduate visa route, which allows international graduates to remain in the UK to work and contribute to the economy for a period after their studies.
'We know that international student recruitment, like any immigration policy, needs to be robust and fair to maintain people's trust in the system.
'Our universities are committed to working with Government to eliminate any abuse of the system and ensure places go to those who are here to study and meet the standards needed to succeed on their course.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'A series of measures have already been laid out in the Immigration White Paper to restore control over the system, including reducing the graduate visa from two years to 18 months.
'We will also ensure international graduates move into graduate level roles. This is what the Graduate route was created to facilitate access to, and will also help meet the UK's workforce needs, as part of our Plan for Change.
'We will also crack down further on abuse of our immigration system by strengthening requirements for universities, requiring tighter enforcement on visa approvals, course enrolments and student completions whilst continuing to welcome international students that support our world-leading universities.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why inflation has risen above expectations – and what it means for you
UK inflation climbed by more than expected in July, official figures reveal, as soaring air fares for summer holidays and food prices continue to rise. The Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rose to 3.8 per cent last month, up from 3.6 per cent in June, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). This marks the highest rate since January 2024, when inflation stood at 4 per cent. The ONS highlighted transport costs as the primary driver behind the increase, particularly a significant surge in flight prices. Air fares jumped by 30.2 per cent between June and July, the largest monthly rise recorded since data collection began in 2001, as families booked trips during the school summer break. Here's everything you need to know about the latest figure: What is inflation? Inflation is the term used to describe the rising price of goods and services. The inflation rate refers to how quickly prices are going up. Put simply, July's inflation rate of 3.8 per cent means that if an item cost £100 a year ago, it would now cost £103.80. Chancellor Rachel Reeves acknowledged that there was 'more to do to ease the cost of living' following the latest figure. She said: 'We have taken the decisions needed to stabilise the public finances, and we're a long way from the double-digit inflation we saw under the previous government, but there's more to do to ease the cost of living. 'That's why we've raised the minimum wage, extended the £3 bus fare cap, expanded free school meals to over half a million more children and are rolling out free breakfast clubs for every child in the country.' Rail fares set to rise by more than expected Another lesser-known figure that tends to rise and fall in line with CPI is Retail Price Inflation (RPI). This rose to 4.8 per cent in July up from 4.4 per cent. This is significant as it was last years' July RPI (3.6 per cent) that set the 4.6 per cent rail fare rise in March 2025, at exactly one percentage point higher. If the same formula is used this year, then fares could rise by a massive 5.8 per cent next March. Campaigners have reacted negatively to the possibility, calling on the government for clarity. Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Today's inflation figure could mean a big fare rise for rail passengers next year, especially if the Government decides to go with an above-inflation increase like we saw this year. 'With the railways now moving under public control, the fundamental question for the Government is how to use its role in setting fares policy to deliver a more affordable rail network and encourage more people to travel on it. 'Next year's annual rise represents the first real opportunity for the Government to show passengers – both current and future – just how it plans to do this.' Why did inflation rise again in July? Grant Fitzner, the ONS's chief economist, explains: 'The main driver was a hefty increase in air fares, the largest July rise since collection of air fares changed from quarterly to monthly in 2001. 'This increase was likely due to the timing of this year's school holidays. 'The price of petrol and diesel also increased this month, compared with a drop this time last year. 'Food price inflation continues to climb – with items such as coffee, fresh orange juice, meat and chocolate seeing the biggest rises.' Will inflation rise again? The Bank of England is expecting CPI inflation to continue rising to a peak of 4 per cent in September, before price rises start to ease. The central bank is tasked with keeping inflation at 2 per cent. Elliott Jordan-Doak, senior UK economist for Pantheon Macroeconomics, suggested the Bank's policymakers could be concerned by rising inflation in the UK services sector, but that it was 'partly driven by a sharp move in the erratic airfares component, which could unwind in August's data'. The annual rate of services CPI inflation rose to 5 per cent in July from 4.7 per cent in June. 'The big picture remains that inflation is set to stay miles above target for the foreseeable future,' he said. The economist is forecasting that CPI will remain above 3 per cent until April 2026, meaning the Bank could keep interest rates on hold for the rest of the year.
Daily Mirror
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
How many people are in asylum hotels and who is to blame for the UK using them
A 'failure of public policy' under the Tories saw former immigration minister Robert Jenrick brag about how fast he was securing hotel rooms as the asylum backlog grew and grew The Government faces an asylum hotel crisis as councils line up to launch legal challenges which could see thousands of people kicked out. On Tuesday the High Court granted a temporary injuction preventing the Bell Hotel in Epping from housing migrants after weeks of tension. Home Office lawyers had warned that such a ruling 'could put Britain's asylum hotel scheme at risk of falling apart' as ministers grapple to shut down venues. Dozens of local authorities are now exploring similar challenges, with the Government now drawing up contingency plans. Labour has vowed to end the use of hotels by the end of this Parliament after the Tories resorted to using them when the asylum system descended into chaos. Experts said a "failure of public policy", with years of not processing asylum claims by the Conservatives, led to people being put in expensive accommodation. In 2023, when the asylum backlog was a mammoth 175,000, more than 400 hotels were in use, housing over 56,000 people. At the time Robert Jenrick, who was immigration minister, bragged at the speed he was securing rooms. He said, in a quote dug up by Labour this week: "More hotels have been coming online almost every month throughout the whole of this year. So Suella Braverman and her predecessor Priti Patel were securing more hotels. What I have done in my short tenure is wrap that up and secure even more." The brazen Shadow Justice Secretary has been vocal on the issue of asylum hotels in recent weeks, joining demonstrations outside the Bell Hotel to protest about problems his party caused. The backlog swelled after the UK lost its legal right to return migrants to Europe after Brexit, while a string of botched laws under the Tories failed to drive down small boat crossings. The Conservatives pinned their hopes on being able to send people to Rwanda as the number of people in the asylum system grew and grew. Labour has pledged to get a grip of the chaos, but says it will take time to see the results. At the end of March this year there were 32,345 people living in asylum hotels, Home Office figures show. This was up from 29,585 when Labour came to power. It means 31% of asylum seekers were receiving asylum support earlier this year. Security Minister Dan Jarvis said the Government accepts that hotels are not the most appropriate place for asylum seekers to be housed. And in the immediate aftermath of the Epping judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said Labour had "inherited a broken asylum system". Dame Angela said the Government would "continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns" around asylum hotels. Imran Hussain, from the Refugee Council, told Sky News: "Nobody thinks asylum seekers should be kept in hotels while their case is being assessed. "It's very expensive. It's not good for the asylum seekers. It's isolating. It's an isolating experince I think even before the protests, with the protests it's incredibly terrifying for people. "And of course as we've seen for local communities, there's a lot of tension, some of which is being exploited by people on the far- right. So no one thinks it's a good idea." And explaining how hotels came to be used, Mr Hussain continued: " This isn't a planning issue, really. This is a failure of public policy. For 20 odd years that we've supported asylum seekers through, the system worked perfectly well. "We had accommodation for people without using hotels. But the last few years there's been a huge backlog of cases that's grown up because the previous government (the Tories) stopped making decisions on cases because it wanted to send people to Rwanda. "The backlog has meant the accommodation that was existing was full and people have had to use hotels."
Daily Mirror
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Urgent Matalan recall of popular items as women warned 'do not wear'
The high-street retailer has ordered customers to return seven products over fears they could cause cuts and bleeding Women have been warned they are in danger of suffering cuts and other injuries if they wear one of seven types of bikini tops. The items, sold by Matalan, have been urgently recalled after the high-street retailer found serious manufacturing defects within them. The underwiring from seven sets of bikini tops could come loose from their casing when worn, resulting in customers getting scratches and cuts to the skin. The findings were reported in a statement released by the Government's Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS). The timing of the recent recall could not have come at an unfortunate time for Matalan as millions of women are enjoying their summer holidays. It is also the third time this summer the retailer has ordered a recall. Just two days ago, Matalan and Next were forced to take back a range of Miss Summer dresses and outfit sets over fears the dress cords were too long and could pose a "strangulation" risk. In June, Matalan ordered customers to return three types of boys' swimwear – again, because of a strangulation hazard. The latest recall primarily affects bikini tops from the Spring Mainstream and Mainstream Postcard ranges, all of which were sold between November 14, 2024 and June 26 this year. A full list of affected items, together with their barcodes, can be found at the end of this story. Customers have been ordered to return them to their nearest Matalan branch for a full refund. In a further gesture of good will, the retailer confirmed that no receipt would be required to get your money back. Matalan said in a statement: "It has come to our attention that the above bikini tops do not meet our usual high standards for quality and safety, as there is risk that the underwire can protrude from the casing and cause injury. "As customer safety is our highest priority, we are immediately recalling these bikini tops. If you've bought any of the bikini tops shown above, please do not use the product and return it at your earliest convenience to your nearest Matalan store where our staff will be happy to give you a full refund. You will not need to produce a receipt to claim a refund." The retailer has advised affected customers to call its customer care team on 0333 0044444 or email customercareceo@ It also urged those who gifted the items to others to let the affected parties know. "If you have bought the above for someone else or know someone who has one then please let them know immediately about this notice," it added. "We pride ourselves on delivering great quality at great prices and we're really sorry for any inconvenience caused. Please note this recall does not affect any other Matalan product." The OPSS report said: "The products present a risk of injuries as the underwiring can protrude from the casing during use, which may result in the user receiving scratches or cuts to the skin. The products do not meet the requirements of the General Product Safety Regulations 2005." The Mirror has contacted Matalan for further comment. Affected items Spring Mainstream Underwire (UW); Line code: F422691 Barcodes: 3422691000058, 3422691000065, 3422691000072, 3422691000089, 3422691000102, 3422691000119, 3422691000126, 3422691000133, 3422691000140 and 3422691000157 Spring Mainstream DD; Line code: F422690 Barcodes: 3422690000035, 3422690000042, 3422690000059, 3422690000066, 3422690000080, 3422690000097, 3422690000103, 3422690000127 and 3422690000134 Navy Floral Cupped; Line code: F422601 Barcodes: 3422601000055, 3422601000062, 3422601000079, 3422601000086, 3422601000109, 3422601000116, 342260100012, 3422601000130, 3422601000147 and 3422601000154 MS DD Bikini Top Multi; Line code: F422607 Barcodes: 3422607000035, 3422607000042, 3422607000059, 3422607000066, 3422607000080, 3422607000097, 3422607000103, 3422607000110, 3422607000127 and 3422607000134 MS Underwire Bikini Top Multi; Line code: F422627 Barcodes: 3422627000053, 3422627000060, 3422627000077, 3422627000084, 3422627000107, 3422627000114, 3422627000121, 3422627000138, 3422627000145 and 3422627000152 Mainstream Postcard DD; Line code: F422724 Barcodes: 3422724000031, 3422724000048, 3422724000055, 3422724000062, 3422724000086, 3422724000093, 3422724000109, 3422724000116, 3422724000123 and 3422724000130 Mainstream Postcard UW; Line code: F422725 Barcodes: 3422725000054, 3422725000061, 3422725000078, 3422725000085, 3422725000108, 3422725000115, 3422725000122, 3422725000139, 3422725000146 and 3422725000153
