
Bank Indonesia pauses rate cuts, leaves door open to more easing
JAKARTA :Indonesia's central bank paused its easing cycle on Wednesday, as expected, while urging commercial banks to reduce lending rates and boost credit growth to support the economy.
Economists said the central bank was likely to continue its gradual pace of monetary easing, given headwinds from tariffs and geopolitical uncertainties on Southeast Asia's largest economy. Some predict a further 50 basis points of cuts in the second half of the year.
On Wednesday, Bank Indonesia kept the benchmark 7-day reverse repurchase rate at 5.50 per cent, as expected by 21 of 31 economists polled by Reuters. Its two other main rates were also left unchanged.
BI has cut interest rates three times since September and downgraded its economic growth outlook twice this year, listing challenges such as slowing domestic demand and shaky global growth due to the impact of U.S. tariffs and wars.
BI maintained its 2025 growth forecast at 4.6 per cent to 5.4 per cent, anticipating improving economic activity in the second half.
Governor Perry Warjiyo, speaking at a press conference, said BI remains open to further lowering borrowing costs, as inflation is expected to remain within target this year and next year, while household spending and investment need stimulus.
"The (rate cut) timing of course will depend on global conditions, especially with regard to rupiah stability," he said.
Warjiyo called on banks to align with BI's easing measures and lower their credit interest rates, highlighting that loan growth slowed to 8.43 per cent in May. That rate was the slowest since June 2023, according to LSEG data.
BI has relaxed banks' reserve requirements, a policy that has provided additional liquidity of 372 trillion rupiah ($22.83 billion) to lenders, Warjiyo said.
Annual inflation was 1.6 per cent in May, near the bottom of BI's target range of 1.5 per cent to 3.5 per cent, which some analysts say points to sluggish household spending.
"Despite a benign inflation outlook, policymakers likely view the recent Middle East tensions and its impact on the regional currencies, with trepidation," said DBS economist Radhika Rao, who expects cuts of 50 basis points in total this year to a terminal rate of 5 per cent.
To stimulate demand, the government has launched a $1.5 billion incentive package, including transportation subsidies and cash and food handouts for June and July.
($1 = 16,295 rupiah)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Independent Singapore
2 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
CCCS flags Agoda's 'problematic' website and app features that could mislead Singapore consumers
SINGAPORE: The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) has raised concerns over Agoda's 'problematic' website and mobile app features, saying it could mislead Singapore consumers. One concern the commission pointed out was Agoda's use of the 'Best Match' search results. While the results suggested listings were based 'solely' on a user's search criteria, CCCS found the rankings were also influenced by how much Agoda would earn from the properties. The default ranking of search results was also flagged, as Agoda's Terms of Use states that accommodation providers could boost their visibility by paying Agoda as part of a 'Preferred Partner' programme or by sponsoring their own listings. Another feature flagged was the 'Agoda Preferred' badge shown on some listings as 'trusted and verified properties' that have a long-standing relationship with the platform and 'meet certain criteria'. CCCS pointed out that Agoda does not clearly explain what these criteria are. It also did not disclose that businesses have to pay Agoda more to get the badge. In addition, accommodations with the 'cheapest x-star stay' label were not actually the lowest-priced option when search results were sorted by price for the same star rating, misleading users who are looking for the cheapest option available. CCCS also expressed concern that the five-minute countdown timer that appears during the booking process could create a false sense of urgency for users. 'Agoda has since voluntarily provided an undertaking and cooperated with CCCS to make changes to its website and mobile application to ensure that consumers get accurate and adequate information to consider before they make their purchases,' CCCS said. The 'Best Match' label was replaced with 'Our Picks' to better reflect the platform's recommendations. It also now clearly discloses that 'Agoda Preferred' properties pay an additional commission. In addition, Agoda has extended its website countdown timer to 20 minutes, matching the app, and removed its 'cheapest x-star stay' label to avoid confusing consumers. /TISG Read also: HPL receives green light to acquire entire Concorde Hotel and Shopping Mall strata area at S$821M Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)


Independent Singapore
2 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
‘JB businesses will be happy' — Singaporeans debate pros and cons of Universal Basic Income
SINGAPORE: When a local Redditor asked what Singaporeans think of Universal Basic Income, a commenter took somewhat of a left turn and said it would certainly make business owners in Johor happy. In a June 17 (Wednesday) post on r/askSingapore, u/AjaxCooperwater wrote, 'With people getting retrenched and AI replacing jobs, what do Singaporeans think of Universal Basic Income (UBI)? Can it be implemented in Singapore?' They further explained that UBI 'is a regular, unconditional cash payment given by the government to all citizens, regardless of their income or employment status, to cover basic living costs.' Certain countries around the world have used or launched a trial of one form or another of basic income, such as Brazil, Kenya, and South Korea. The advantages and disadvantages of such a scheme have been widely discussed. On the one hand, UBI would significantly reduce poverty. On the other hand, it may be too expensive for countries to sustain. As for u/AjaxCooperwater's post, many commenters had a lot to say. The top comment, however, was this: 'If you give cash as UBI, the business owners in JB will be very happy.' A Reddit user replied that this illustrates the biggest problem with the scheme. 'For an economy like Singapore, a lot of such money will flow out. Be it foreign investments or overseas trips/shopping. We will be essentially paying taxes to stimulate other countries' economies. I would very much prefer CDC vouchers. At least we keep the money within the country,' they wrote. Another seemed to agree, writing, 'I'm starting to think of things like CDC and NS Home credits as extremely limited forms of UBI, with the limitation that we need to use it in the local economy. Yes, they're not universal, but if I'm not wrong, it's actual usable currency, which is very different from tax rebates, etc. Plus, receiving these is very hard to game, and at the very least it's NOT disproportionately putting money in the hands of the rich, which is a very common complaint for how governments redistribute wealth.' Others also said that they believe Singapore already has a form of UBI. 'Your CDC vouchers, GST credits, and the slew of new fanciful vouchers are UBI dressed in different names. The government won't suddenly announce that everyone will get $x unconditionally because they don't like sudden shifts. They like to give a bit, look-see monitor, then shift a bit more, etc. Evolution, not revolution. Who's gonna pay for it? We are. That's why they had raised GST ahead of time,' one wrote. A commenter, however, was blunt in declaring that they are not in favour of UBI at all. 'Money is not free; you are just taxing more on those who are productive and not in a good way. Prefer for the government to actually invest more in education, financial literacy, and support schemes to help uplift those who are in need. At least these have very clear ROI and impact. Also with the mindset that some SG people have, confirm will have some that will exploit it/be damn entitled kpkb too little, want these and that. Very hard to determine a good threshold and will breed complacency. Our only resource is people and hard work, take away the motivation and SG is gonna lose competitive edge.' /TISG Read also: Universal basic income: is it really what today's youth need?


Independent Singapore
2 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Man earning S$2K a month asks: How much do you need to earn in Singapore before you're ready to date?
SINGAPORE: A man in his late 20s recently turned to social media to ask how much money someone should be making before they feel ready to start dating. Posting on the r/askSingapore subreddit, he shared that he had just landed a short traineeship in data analytics within the finance sector. However, he revealed that his current pay is only in the mid-S$2,000 range. He added that he plans to search for a full-time role both during and after the traineeship, in hopes of securing a better-paying position. As for his finances, he shared that while his savings are not substantial, he has managed to set aside enough for an emergency fund and to repay his student loans. He also mentioned that he has invested in well-established companies and exchange-traded funds. 'Different girls, different expectations…' His question prompted several responses from other Reddit users, many of whom shared their own experiences and perspectives on how money factors into modern relationships. See also Artist claims he has sex with Mona Lisa One user pointed out that there's no one-size-fits-all answer, as expectations differ widely among individuals. They wrote, 'Different girls, different expectations. There are girls who do not mind their partner earning little as long as they have a proper job and always look to improve themselves. Likewise, you can be earning five digits per month, but if your personality sucks, I am sure no girls will date you.' Another user, identifying as female, shared that in her early 20s, income wasn't something she paid much attention to since she and her peers were still students. But by her mid- to late 20s, her expectations had evolved. At that point in life, she wanted a partner who could at least match her financial standing She added. 'Finance affects lifestyle, and I don't see myself lowering my lifestyle much. By the way, I'm in the same field as you. The market is not good. If it gets better, it is not an issue at all for you to earn well. Just keep hustling! No need to worry.' A third user reflected on his own experience, saying that it all comes down to whether the woman is willing to grow with her partner. He said, 'Hmm, actually, it's more of if the lady is willing to be there for you, ba.' I did not earn a lot when my wife first dated me. I progress along the way.' When is the right time to talk about income? Talking about money, especially salary, can feel awkward in the early stages of dating. Many people might avoid the topic on a first or second date, fearing it might come off as too forward or transactional. However, experts suggest that this conversation shouldn't be put off for too long. Ideally, it should take place after a few dates or before the relationship becomes official, as financial compatibility can play a big role in long-term success. In fact, a study by Lunch Actually found that more than half of singles (52%) believe it's important to understand their partner's financial situation once they enter a relationship. Similarly, a separate study by Syfe revealed that 44% of Singaporeans think it's acceptable to ask about someone's salary before becoming a couple. Around one in three also said they would be comfortable sharing how much they earn within the first five dates. Read also: 'Why is this allowed to happen, and why is there no enforcement?' — Singaporean dismayed by the state of Lazarus Beach after migrant workers' day-off gathering Featured image by freepik (for illustration purposes only)