
BYD Shares Extend Losses as Price Cuts Throw Spotlight on Sales
The stock fell as much as 4% in morning trading, following Monday's 8.6% drop. The selloff was sparked after the EV giant announced cuts of as much as 34% on 22 electric and plug-in hybrid models in China until the end of June.
The move came after the company last month posted its slowest year-on-year growth in vehicle deliveries in more than four years. While April sales rose 21% from a year earlier, that was the smallest monthly gain since August 2020, except for a drop in deliveries in February last year, when the Lunar New Year holiday saw nationwide industry sales contract 22%.
Rival Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.'s compact hatchback Xingyuan last month became the top-selling model in China, overtaking BYD's popular Seagull, according to data from the China Automotive Technology and Research Center.
Morgan Stanley analysts said the price competition sparked by BYD is likely to drag on, with ripple effects into the second half of the year.
What Bloomberg Intelligence says:
BYD's latest price cuts across 22 electric vehicle models highlight its 2025 focus on volume, forcing rivals to deepen discounts or concede sales and market share. China's auto price discounts averaged 15%-16% this year and can potentially increase in 2H, despite government subsidies driving industry growth. - Joanna Chen, autos analyst
The steep price cuts have taken some of the gloss off what has so far been a stellar year for BYD. The stock hit a record high last week, it posted its best month of sales in China and outsold Tesla Inc. in Europe for the first time in April, and raised HK$43.5 billion ($5.5 billion) in a Hong Kong share sale in March.
Before this week's slide, BYD Hong Kong-traded shares had surged almost 75% this year, and with a market value equal to around $158 billion, is bigger than Ford Motor Co., General Motors Co. and Volkswagen AG combined.
On the technology front, it has unveiled a lineup of cars it says can charge in five minutes, and started to make its God's Eye advanced driver-assistance system standard in vehicles priced from 100,000 yuan ($13,900) and include it in several lower-cost models such as the popular Seagull hatchback.
Some of the recently discounted models include those equipped with God's Eye.
Investors will get more insight into how BYD is tracking when monthly sales for May are released on Sunday.
--With assistance from Danny Lee and Chunying Zhang.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Canva begins employee stock sale at $42 billion valuation, Bloomberg News reports
Canva has launched an employee stock sale at a $42 billion valuation, according to Bloomberg. Canva has launched an employee stock sale at a $42 billion valuation, according to Bloomberg. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Australian graphic design and collaboration platform Canva launched an employee stock sale at a valuation of $42 billion, Bloomberg News reported on could not immediately verify the report.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Intel's $24 billion rally sends valuation to dot-com levels
Bloomberg Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel After months of turbulence, Intel Corp. bulls are finally being rewarded for their patience. But the stock's sudden rebound comes with a worrying side effect: a valuation so high its most recent precedent is from the dot-com era more than two decades of the struggling chipmaker have rallied 28% this month, adding about $24 billion in market value, on reports that the US government is in talks for a potential equity stake, as well as plans for a $2 billion investment from Japan's SoftBank Group Corp. The jump has Intel trading at 53 times profits projected over the next 12 months, the highest since early 2002, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.'The stock looks incredibly expensive here,' said Wayne Kaufman, chief market analyst at Phoenix Financial Services. 'That kind of multiple is a bet that the government will push Intel so hard on customers that it becomes a winner.'The surge in Intel this month followed a slump in the wake of a disappointing earnings report on July 24 and criticism of Tan earlier by President Donald Trump, who called for the CEO to step down, citing conflicts of interest. After meeting with Tan on Aug. 11, Trump changed his tune, saying Tan's 'success and rise is an amazing story.'Since then, reports have circulated that the Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10% in the company. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview on Tuesday that the talks are aimed at converting US grants already made to Intel under the Chips and Science Act into non-voting equity. Intel shares slid 1.2% in after-hours course, the US's plans regarding Intel haven't been finalized and could still change. Intel declined to comment on Lutnick's Paul Nolte, market strategist and senior wealth manager at Murphy & Sylvest Wealth Management, the potential government involvement could benefit Intel in the short-term but may pose a risk in the long term.'This strikes me as an easy road to get onto, but a hard one to get out of,' Nolte said. 'At the end of the day, this raises so many more questions than it answers.'Meanwhile, Intel's premium valuation is largely a reflection of just how much its profitability has collapsed in recent is projected to generate more than $1 billion in adjusted profit over the next four quarters, after losing about $1.3 billion in the previous four, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. From 2018 to 2021 the company generated more than $20 billion in annual profits on average.'We have no idea what Intel can deliver in earnings growth since it is so behind on tech and because you can't cost-cut your way to growth,' said Nancy Tengler, chief executive officer of Laffer Tengler Investments. 'It's hard to have confidence in the estimates, which makes it difficult to assess the valuation. I think it's overvalued, but I also think the picture is so uncertain that it wouldn't be attractive at any price.'Wall Street largely echoes her caution. Fewer than 8% of the analysts tracked by Bloomberg recommend buying the stock, while nearly 80% have the equivalent of a neutral rating. In addition, at its Tuesday close of $25.31, Intel trades notably above the average price target of about $22, representing the weakest return potential among components of the Nasdaq 100 there is optimism that Chief Executive Officer Lip-Bu Tan will be able to turn things around. Much of his focus has been on cost cutting, which has improved Intel's outlook to return to profitability but raised concerns the chipmaker may be bowing out of the race for technological leadership. Part of his effort has also been centered on a costly build out of its foundry operations undertaken by his predecessor, Pat Gelsinger.'Clearly it's going to take a number of years for it to really start operating on a smooth basis,' said Gerrit Smit, lead portfolio manager of the Stonehage Fleming Global Best Ideas Equity fund. 'We've got trust in him, but we think he's got a long slog ahead.'


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Meta splits AI division into 4 teams, job cuts loom after Mark Zuckerberg's big hiring spree
Meta is once again shuffling its artificial intelligence division, this time splitting it into four separate groups. The move, announced internally this week, is being seen as an attempt to bring order to the company's high-stakes race for advanced AI. But alongside the reorganisation, questions are being raised about possible job cuts, a striking change given how aggressively CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been hiring AI talent over the past to Bloomberg, the internal memo was shared by Alexandr Wang, Meta's newly appointed chief AI officer and former Scale AI CEO. In the note, Wang said the company needed sharper focus to work towards its long-term vision. 'Superintelligence is coming, and in order to take it seriously, we need to organise around the key areas that will be critical to reach it — research, product and infra,' he division, called Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL), will now function as four distinct teams. One group will look after large language models such as Llama, which powers Meta's AI assistant. Another will continue long-term research under the FAIR banner, a lab that has been part of Meta for over a decade. A third, led by former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman, will focus on bringing AI models into consumer products. The fourth will handle infrastructure like data centres and computing hardware, under the leadership of Aparna Ramani. This restructuring follows months of heavy investment in AI. Bloomberg reported that Meta has been poaching leading researchers from rivals like OpenAI and Google, offering pay packages worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Zuckerberg has also made it clear that he is ready to spend 'hundreds of billions' over the coming years on both talent and the infrastructure required to build what he calls 'superintelligence' — AI that can outperform humans in complex the big hiring spree could soon give way to downsizing. The New York Times reported that Meta is considering cutting or reassigning roles within the AI division, which has grown into a workforce of several thousand. Some executives are also expected to move on, adding to the churn. Although no final decision has been made, the possibility of layoffs has unsettled employees, especially since the company had positioned AI as its biggest area of Meta, this is yet another restructuring in a series of shake-ups around its AI plans. Earlier this year, the AGI foundations group — which worked on generative AI research — was dissolved, and its leaders were reassigned. Connor Hayes, who previously ran AI products, was moved to oversee Threads, Meta's answer to X (formerly Twitter). And Loredana Crisan, who shifted from Messenger to the generative AI team, has left the company to join design platform constant changes highlight both the urgency and the turbulence inside Meta as it tries to keep up with rivals. Companies like OpenAI and Google have already put advanced consumer-facing models in the market, while Meta is still refining its own systems. The company is also considering a change in approach. The New York Times noted that Meta is now exploring whether to use third-party AI models, including open-source and licensed platforms, instead of relying entirely on its own now, the official line is that the split will bring clarity and focus. But with the division's future size still under discussion and top-level exits continuing, the path ahead is far from smooth.- Ends