
Here's how the EU system rewards high officials for failure
Every circus needs a clown. And this one has a truly awesome demo reel.
Despite the Greens snagging 85 seats in the current German parliament, it turns out they're about as useful to Friedrich Merz's shiny new right-left establishment coalition with the Christian Democrats as a vegan menu at Oktoberfest. So they're relegated to chilling on the Bundestag backbenches.
Annalena Baerbock, the former German Foreign Affairs Minister in ex-Chancellor Olaf Scholz's government, could have coasted into parliament again via the Greens' party list, even after losing her direct seat to Scholz himself. But she apparently had bigger plans. She's just been tapped as the next President of the United Nations General Assembly.
Before officially packing up at the Foreign Ministry, her own department nominated her for the UN gig – an administrative role, largely ceremonial. Why her? Well, it's Germany's turn to fill the seat for a year starting in September, and a career diplomat was reportedly first in line. You know, someone who hadn't become globally famous for flunking basic geometry. And well, that just can't stand. Not when the face of German diplomacy is no longer being kept by German voters in the manner to which she has become accustomed.
Besides, just check out this CV.
In a moment that will live in infamy alongside Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, MLK's 'I Have a Dream,' Pericles' Funeral Oration, and Churchill's 'We shall fight on the beaches,' Baerbock took the spotlight at the 2023 Munich Security Conference. Asked whether Ukraine would be safe long-term if Vladimir Putin stayed in power in Russia, she replied: 'If Putin doesn't change by 360 degrees, no.'
Apparently, she thinks a dizzy Putin would make all the difference. Perhaps it's not the first time that Baerbock, a former gymnast, confused a 360 with a 180, and landed on her head at some point. Either way, German school-kids usually master this concept by age 10.
In another Baerbockism, during a January 2023 speech at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, she said: 'We are fighting a war against Russia and not against each other.' Cue her foreign ministry hastily clarifying that no, of course Germany hadn't just declared war on Russia. It was just Baerbock talking again.
With all this experience as Germany's walking, talking diplomatic banana peel, she was clearly destined for bigger things on the world stage. So who could possibly object to shipping her off to the UN?
Well, this guy, for one: 'It is outrageous to replace the best and most internationally experienced German diplomat with an outdated model,' grumbled Christoph Heusgen, former chair of the Munich Security Conference, referring to career diplomat, Helga Schmid, reportedly slidelined in favor of Baerbock.
An outdated model? Bold words, Mr. Former Conference Chair! Excuse you, but trusty single-cylinder moped-grade intellectualism never truly goes out of style.
'Ms. Baerbock can learn a lot from [Schmid],' said former German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel. What's he suggesting? That Schmid moonlights as a geometry tutor?
So that makes two critics, including one who previously held Baerbock's job. But surely these bitter old guys are alone in their skepticism towards this pioneer of feminist foreign policy.
No doubt it's just a coincidence that 'Mr. Eighteen Percent Popularity' Scholz beat her in her own riding. And that Statista pegged her approval rating at -0.7 on a scale from -5 to 5. And who really cares about that time she sounded kind of like she was unilaterally declaring war on Russia on behalf of Germany, or when she seemed unsure which country she was representing.
Like at a September 2022 forum when she said: 'If I give the promise to people in Ukraine – 'We stand with you, as long as you need us' – then I want to deliver. No matter what my German voters think.' At the time, Germany was deindustrializing and its citizens were being crushed by energy costs. Both consequences of the very Ukraine policy Baerbock was committed to, with or without voter consent, as she suggested.
But look, Baerbock isn't the only politician to turn a domestic faceplant into a corner office with a view at Global Governance Inc. Take European Commission President 'Queen' Ursula von der Leyen. No, please, take her, as former Chancellor Angela Merkel would say.
Before becoming the unelected President of the European Commission, von der Leyen served as Germany's Defence Minister in Merkel's government from 2013 to 2019. Known more for glamour shots in front of jets than for actually equipping them, her ministry apparently favored pricey consultants over functionality. One report noted: 'There is neither enough personnel nor material, and often one confronts shortage upon shortage. The troops are far from being fully equipped.' Well, unless you count the broomsticks reportedly used during training exercises, and possibly sourced from Ursula's personal garage.
Former European Parliament President Martin Schulz offered this glowing review of the current de facto Queen of the EU: 'One thing is true, she ran in 2019 – but not for the European Parliament, but she ran away from her ministry in Germany.' He also tweeted in 2019: 'Von der Leyen is our weakest minister. That's apparently enough to become Commission president.'
Apparently, flunking your domestic portfolio is the new fast track to international prestige.
Just ask Mark Rutte. The Dutch Prime Minister became so politically radioactive that his coalition partners were getting scorched by mere proximity. He resigned twice: first over a child welfare scandal, then after failing to maintain unity on asylum policy. His solution? Bail and become NATO's new Secretary General – essentially, the West's chief weapons lobbyist.
Or consider Estonia's Prime Minister Kaja Kallas. Her Reform Party slipped to third place under her leadership, dropping below 20 percent approval. As her coalition sank, she jumped ship and landed in Brussels as the EU's chief diplomat. Voters back home were apparently less impressed, especially after her government's tax hikes and perceived focus on Ukraine over Estonia.
Even more awkward: while Kallas was calling for Europe to cut all ties with Russia, her husband's company, Stark Logistics, was still doing business there. But apparently, that kind of conflict of interest now screams 'diplomatic credentials.'
So no, Baerbock's story isn't a bug in the system. It's effectively the blueprint. The fall from grace at home just gives more momentum for the launch to cushy international posts. The moral of the story is clear: stumble locally, ascend globally. Even if your personal GPS is so busted that you can't tell a U-turn from a 360.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
13 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU allows members to spend Covid cash on arming Kiev
The European Commission has allowed member states to redirect funds they have struggled to claim from the joint pandemic recovery pot for national development projects into bloc-wide security and defense initiatives – with significantly less oversight and fewer bureaucratic hurdles. The EU established the €650 billion ($740 billion) Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) in 2021 to support green energy and growth-oriented projects in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. However, to receive the funds, member states must prove their projects meet specific benchmarks. Roughly half of the fund remains unspent, with the deadline to 'provide evidence' looming in September 2026, according to the Commission's communique on Wednesday. In order to 'easily secure' their share of the remaining funds before time runs out, countries can now instead channel RRF-backed money into various security programs, such as the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) or satellite communications initiatives, Politico reported on Wednesday. 'These alternatives could help the Recovery Facility to deliver additional important benefits from common European priorities, including in the areas of security and defense,' EU Trade Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis said. The Commission's memo claimed that 'specific projects would subsequently be selected and supported under EDIP, for the benefit of the Member State concerned, with implementation occurring over a longer time horizon.' Kiev is specifically listed as one of the main beneficiaries of EDIP, an initiative designed to subsidize the bloc's defense industry and enhance 'joint procurement with and for Ukraine,' according to an EC factsheet. Originally a €1.5 billion program, EDIP also aims to 'use windfall profits from frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine.' Brussels has spent almost €50 billion supporting Kiev through various EU programs since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, in addition to billions contributed by individual member states, according to data from Germany's Kiel Institute. In March, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen presented a plan to mobilize up to €800 billion ($875 billion) in debt and tax incentives for the military-industrial complex to 'rearm' the bloc against the perceived 'Russian threat.' Last month, the Council of the European Union endorsed a €150 billion ($170 billion) militarization plan, dubbed SAFE (Security Action for Europe), to raise funds for military purposes without direct approval from the European Parliament. Russia has repeatedly dismissed claims it plans to attack Western Europe as 'nonsense,' accusing the West of using scare tactics to justify diverting public funds toward military spending. Moscow has warned that foreign involvement—including arms deliveries—will obstruct peace efforts and ultimately fail to stop Russia from achieving its military objectives. The Kremlin has also criticized the EU's militarization drive, warning it risks triggering a broader conflict in Europe.


Russia Today
19 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU state's PM refutes Zelensky's latest ‘Russian threat' claim
There is no indication that the upcoming Russian-Belarusian military exercises pose a threat, Lithuanian Prime Minister Gintautas Paluckas has said, rejecting concerns raised by Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky. Speaking in Vilnius on Tuesday, Paluckas responded to comments made by Zelensky at the NATO Eastern Flank Summit, also in the Lithuanian capital, where he urged European leaders to ask their intelligence agencies 'what Russia is planning in Belarus this summer' and suggested that Kiev and its backers might require additional joint forces. 'I don't know what information the Ukrainian intelligence service or the Ukrainian president have at their disposal,' Paluckas told reporters. 'As regards the Zapad exercise, information is being gathered not only by our intelligence agencies, but also by NATO's intelligence agencies, and all the conclusions are the same: the exercise, which is currently being organized, does not pose any problems or additional threats in terms of its scope and other aspects,' he stressed. 'There's no need to be alarmed,' he added. The Lithuanian prime minister noted that Ukraine isn't the only country collecting information about the upcoming Zapad-2025 exercises and that NATO is also monitoring the situation. 'NATO does not view these drills as dangerous,' Paluckas stressed Last week, Belarusian Defense Minister Viktor Khrenin announced that the Zapad-2025 exercises, scheduled for September, would be reduced in scale and moved further inland, away from the country's western borders. The relocation is intended to reduce regional tension, demonstrate Minsk's readiness for dialogue, and to counter what he called 'stereotypical speculations' by NATO member states, he stated. Both Moscow and Minsk have stressed that the exercise is defensive in nature. Zelensky's suggestion that the upcoming exercises pose some sort of threat to the West comes as a number of European nations have recently taken to drastically increasing their military budgets citing the supposed threat posed by Russia. Moscow, however, has repeatedly dismissed claims it plans to attack Western Europe as 'nonsense,' accusing the West of using scare tactics to justify shifting public funds toward military spending.


Russia Today
19 hours ago
- Russia Today
Top French robotics firm goes into liquidation
Aldebaran, a French company that blazed the trail in the field of 'empathetic' humanoid robots in the late 2000s, has been put into liquidation, local media has reported. The tech pioneer was placed into bankruptcy proceedings in January, and then in receivership the following month. On Monday, the receiver, along with the auctioneer, announced the 'immediate cessation of activity' and termination of their contracts to the company's remaining 106 employees, according to Othman Meslouh, deputy secretary of Aldebaran's social and economic committee (CSE). The Paris Commercial Court passed the verdict earlier in the day. The receiver is now expected to start selling off the company's profitable assets, including its patents, to settle Aldebaran's outstanding debts that have exceeded €60 million ($68 million). In recent months, two takeover contenders, Franco-Swiss businessman Jean-Marie Van Appelghem and Canadian investor Malik Bachouchi, had made bids for the company. However, the former's overture was not backed by the receiver and Aldebaran's management, while the latter was rejected by the court, as Bachouchi earlier told Le Monde. From 2012 to 2022 – considered the company's heyday – it was owned by Japan's Softbank Robotics Group. Some time after it was acquired by the German company United Robotics Group (URG), a subsidiary of the RAG-Stiftung, the situation began to deteriorate, according to Meslouh. He told AFP that the new owner 'no longer wanted to invest in the company.' This claim was echoed by another anonymous employee cited by Le Monde, who said URG 'asked us to be profitable within two years' even though development 'cycles take five to seven years.' The unnamed engineer also lamented that the owner had underinvested in Aldebaran's research and development. In the late 2000s, the company rolled out Nao, its first humanoid robot, touted as a 'versatile educational companion, widely used in classrooms and research labs for its ability to teach programming, foster social learning, and support research projects.' The model was followed by Plato, designed to support healthcare and hospitality environments, and Pepper, capable of recognizing and responding to human emotions and specifically tailored for customer-facing roles. According to the company's website, its robots have found application in more than 70 countries over the years. However, the total number of units sold was a mere 30,000, L'Express estimated.