logo
Where are the resettled Afghans living in Britain?

Where are the resettled Afghans living in Britain?

Spectator4 days ago
This week, we learned that three years ago a Ministry of Defence official accidentally released details of 18,714 Afghans who had applied for relocation to the UK. The Afghans, who had worked with British armed forces, feared retribution from the Taliban, so the Conservative government introduced a new scheme, alongside existing programmes, to resettle some of these people. The Spectator's leading article this week argues that Britain had a moral responsibility to help them. But how many have arrived so far? And where are they living in Britain?
As of May, 35,245 people had been relocated to the UK through the Afghan resettlement programme made up of several schemes such as the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP), the Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme (ACRS), and the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR). The latter is the recently-revealed scheme for those deemed at risk but not eligible for ARAP or ACRS. Half of those resettled – some 16,156 – were affected by the data leak. All of the schemes were closed to new applicants on 1 July.
ARAP focussed on Afghans who worked with the UK government and classified applicants into four categories. Category one covered UK government employees at immediate risk; category two was for Afghans who mostly worked as translators or cultural advisers; categories three and four covered those considered at lower risk.
ACRS had a slightly wider criteria than ARAP (only 5 per cent of those who applied for ARAP in August 2021 were deemed eligible). It aimed to resettle around 20,000 Afghans – those who helped Britain but did not necessarily work with the armed forces, stood up for democracy or are members of minority religions or groups at risk. Like ARAP it had three categories, or 'pathways' which granted indefinite leave to remain, work rights, and eligibility for welfare benefits. Pathway one covered those evacuated during Operation Pitting in 2021; pathway two included referrals by the UNHCR; and pathway three targeted the 'at-risk individuals' who supported British efforts. ACRS also covers spouses, partners, and dependent children under the age of 18.
The Afghan resettlement programme also assisted some British nationals (960) and other foreign nationals (120), though the vast majority were Afghans.
Around two-thirds of the 34,308 resettled Afghans live in England, ranging from 5,541 in the south-east to 1,163 in the East Midlands. Scotland has 1,735; Wales, 772; and Northern Ireland, 305. No location data is available for the remaining 7,716.
Among local authorities, Crawley (including Gatwick Airport) hosts the largest group (1,026), followed by Leeds (616), Birmingham (605), and Edinburgh (563). Fifteen local authorities, including Torridge in Devon, South Derbyshire, and the Isles of Scilly, have no resettled Afghans.
Besides the resettlement schemes, many Afghans migrate to the UK for better economic prospects, as the UK's per capita GDP is 25 times higher than Afghanistan's. In 2024 alone, more than 5,700 Afghans arrived by small boat across the English Channel, making them the most common nationality using this route. Since 2018, 27,285 Afghans have arrived via small boats or other forms of irregular migration.
As the scandal over the government's leak and cover-up continues, it's worth noting that some 5,400 more Afghans who have received invitation letters under ARR will be arriving in the UK over the next few months. The rest will be left in Afghanistan.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission
Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

North Wales Chronicle

time25 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

The Live Aid campaigner was instrumental in persuading Mr Blair to set up the commission to examine the problems of the continent ahead of a crucial summit of the G8 at Gleneagles in Scotland, which the UK was chairing. But official papers released to the National Archives in Kew, west London, show he was outraged when – after just one meeting – the commissioners were sent a document setting its 'emerging conclusions'. In an angry letter to the commission's director of policy, the economist Sir Nick Stern, dated August 9 2004, he said it was impossible to have come to any conclusions it such a short period of time. The former rock star warned that he was not prepared to serve on a body which was simply there to push 'pre-determined government policy'. 'To be clear, policy must be determined by the commission independently sitting and independently deliberating and concluding of its own volition. This distinction is vital. If I have got this wrong please inform me so I may tender my resignation,' he wrote. 'More broadly, the whole notion of emerging solutions is laughable. If the solution to the misery of Africa can be 'concluded' within a mere six week time span, it is a truly remarkable feat. 'How blind we must all have been these past years. The fact is that there are not and cannot as yet be any emerging conclusions. 'The commission will lose all credibility if it is not clearly seen to be an independent entity. If it seems to advance pre-determined government policy it will be correctly viewed as a laughable grotesque.' Geldof went on to complain that the involvement of some of the commissioners – including some of those from Africa – appeared to have been 'minimal'. 'Is it not the secretariat's function, on behalf of the chair, to ensure that this is not the case? Or is this all some farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor? If so, I ain't playing.' Sir Nicholas wrote back hurriedly to assure him the that the document was not an attempt pre-empt the commission's findings, and that the input from British politicians had been 'comparatively minor'. 'Far from being an attempt to rush conclusions the paper is intended to to be a tool to help promote discussion and ensure a real interchange between commissioners at the second meeting in October,' he wrote. 'I would be very keen to sit down and discuss these questions with you; perhaps we could meet for a drink as soon as we are both around?' Geldof's reply is not recorded in the files, but he was sufficiently placated to carry on. After the Gleneagles summit the following year agreed to double aid to Africa and extend debt relief, he hailed it as 'mission accomplished'.

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission
Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

South Wales Argus

time26 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

The Live Aid campaigner was instrumental in persuading Mr Blair to set up the commission to examine the problems of the continent ahead of a crucial summit of the G8 at Gleneagles in Scotland, which the UK was chairing. But official papers released to the National Archives in Kew, west London, show he was outraged when – after just one meeting – the commissioners were sent a document setting its 'emerging conclusions'. In an angry letter to the commission's director of policy, the economist Sir Nick Stern, dated August 9 2004, he said it was impossible to have come to any conclusions it such a short period of time. The former rock star warned that he was not prepared to serve on a body which was simply there to push 'pre-determined government policy'. 'To be clear, policy must be determined by the commission independently sitting and independently deliberating and concluding of its own volition. This distinction is vital. If I have got this wrong please inform me so I may tender my resignation,' he wrote. 'More broadly, the whole notion of emerging solutions is laughable. If the solution to the misery of Africa can be 'concluded' within a mere six week time span, it is a truly remarkable feat. 'How blind we must all have been these past years. The fact is that there are not and cannot as yet be any emerging conclusions. 'The commission will lose all credibility if it is not clearly seen to be an independent entity. If it seems to advance pre-determined government policy it will be correctly viewed as a laughable grotesque.' Bob Geldof with Bono and Tony Blair in Downing Street (PA) Geldof went on to complain that the involvement of some of the commissioners – including some of those from Africa – appeared to have been 'minimal'. 'Is it not the secretariat's function, on behalf of the chair, to ensure that this is not the case? Or is this all some farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor? If so, I ain't playing.' Sir Nicholas wrote back hurriedly to assure him the that the document was not an attempt pre-empt the commission's findings, and that the input from British politicians had been 'comparatively minor'. 'Far from being an attempt to rush conclusions the paper is intended to to be a tool to help promote discussion and ensure a real interchange between commissioners at the second meeting in October,' he wrote. 'I would be very keen to sit down and discuss these questions with you; perhaps we could meet for a drink as soon as we are both around?' Geldof's reply is not recorded in the files, but he was sufficiently placated to carry on. After the Gleneagles summit the following year agreed to double aid to Africa and extend debt relief, he hailed it as 'mission accomplished'.

George Bush was determined to ‘rid world of evil-doer Saddam Hussein'
George Bush was determined to ‘rid world of evil-doer Saddam Hussein'

South Wales Argus

time26 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

George Bush was determined to ‘rid world of evil-doer Saddam Hussein'

In January 2003 – two months before US and UK forces launched their fateful invasion – Tony Blair to flew to Camp David to urge the president to allow more time for diplomacy to work. However, files released to the National Archives at Kew, west London, show that Britain's ambassador to the US, Sir Christopher Meyer, warned it had become 'politically impossible' to draw back from war unless Hussein surrendered. British officials were still hoping that the the United Nations Security Council would agree a new resolution specifically authorising the use of military force against Iraq. Mr Blair's foreign policy adviser, Sir David Manning, said that when he met the president he should make the point that a new resolution was 'politically essential for the UK, and almost certainly legally essential as well'. However, the Americans were becoming increasingly impatient with the unwillingness of France and Russia – which both had a veto on the council – to agree a resolution so long as UN inspectors were unable to find any evidence of Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, the supposed justification for war. Following Mr Bush's annual State of the Union address to Congress, shortly before Mr Blair's visit, he warned that the options for a peaceful solution had effectively run out. Sir Christopher Meyer, Britain's ambassador to the United States (Kirsty Wigglesworth/PA) 'It is politically impossible for Bush to back down from going to war in Iraq this spring, absent Saddam's surrender or disappearance from the scene' he wrote. 'If Bush had any room for manoeuvre beforehand this was closed off by his State of the Union speech. 'In the high-flown prose to which Bush is drawn on these set-piece occasions, he said in effect that destroying Saddam is a crusade against evil to be undertaken by God's chosen people.' In a cable sent the previous month, Sir Christopher said that much of the impulse for deposing Hussein was coming from the president, a born-again Christian, who was scornful of what he saw as the 'self-serving' reservations of the Europeans. 'His view of the world is Manichean. He sees his mission as ridding it of evil-doers. He believes American values should be universal values,' Sir Christopher wrote. 'He is strongly allergic to Europeans collectively. Anyone who has sat round a dinner table with low-church Southerners will find these sentiments instantly recognisable.' In the event, the US and UK abandoned their efforts to get agreement on a new Security Council resolution, claiming French president Jacques Chirac had made it clear he would never agree.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store