Tesla sales are nosediving in California, and it's dragging the state's entire EV market down
The automaker's registrations in the West Coast state fell more than 20% in the second quarter compared to the previous year, according to data from the California New Car Dealers Association released on Tuesday.
It's Tesla's seventh consecutive quarterly decline in the US's largest EV market, and comes despite California's new car sales growing in the first half of the year.
The California Dealers Association warned that Tesla's woes were dragging the rest of the state's EV market down. Zero-emission vehicles accounted for 18.2% of new cars sold in California in the second quarter of 2025, compared to 22% in 2024, the association's data showed.
Tesla has been struggling with lacklustre sales this year. The electric vehicle giant is battling consumer backlash over CEO Elon Musk's high-profile interventions into US politics.
The sales data suggest that the brand damage has been acute in California, which leans liberal and was the birthplace of the Tesla Takedown protest movement.
Tesla is set to report second-quarter earnings after the market closes on Wednesday. Earlier this month, the carmaker reported that its deliveries for the second quarter had fallen by around 13.5% compared to last year, its second consecutive decline in global sales.
In addition to the brand damage caused by Musk's work on DOGE and his support for the Trump administration — which seemingly ended with a high-profile public spat last month — Tesla is also facing fierce competition and a dearth of new products.
A refreshed version of Tesla's best-selling Model Y, launched earlier this year, has failed to boost sales. The automaker has not rolled out a new model since the Cybertruck in 2023. The polarizing pickup has sold only 11,000 units so far this year, according to data from Cox Automotive.
Tesla faces additional challenges from recently passed legislation that is set to end the $7,500 tax credit for new US-made electric cars in September.
The company recently introduced a wave of new incentives and offers, including free supercharging for some Model 3 purchases and free Full Self-Driving transfers, as it looks to drive sales before the end of the tax credit.
Tesla did not respond to a request for comment sent outside normal working hours.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘His income is limited': Should I pay $800 a month towards my husband's $67,000 student debt?
My husband is 40 and I am 44. When we got married a year ago, I was aware that he had about $67,000 in student-loan debt as well as credit-card debt from living paycheck-to-paycheck. He never consolidated his student loans and they all have varying interest rates between 5% to 8%. I did not have him consolidate the loans as there were potential benefits under the Biden administration for him not doing so. In the meantime, I was able to get him to change his spending habits and pay off all his credit cards by helping him understand the principles behind how interest and payments work. He also has his own business, which has a small financial footprint supported by his income. As for myself, my income allowed me to purchase a house in 2020 with a 2.6% interest rate. I am able to pay all the bills to support us both and then some. Wall Street braces for deluge of Treasury bills, a crucial test of market demand Why Tesla analysts are mostly upbeat about earnings, but investors aren't happy 'If I was writing the checks at Coke, I wouldn't write the check for this,' one expert says about cane-sugar Coke Related: The 5 huge changes coming for student-loan borrowers and colleges under GOP megabill I have stopped short of paying for his business, his car payment and health insurance. Yes, there are a few incidentals he also helps support for our family, such as food, but his income is limited due to his new business and part-time work. I would like to grow my retirement and emergency funds some more, but I am very aware of my husband's student-loan debt, which he is not paying down in a timely manner. I graduated with about $57,000 worth of student loans in the early 2000s. A modest lifestyle on an income that rarely topped $15 per hour and low rent helped me pay off my own student-loan debt in 10 years. I have been working for the same company for over 15 years and I have built a career path that has led me to making almost six figures annually. I have an estimated retirement income of about $6,500 per month. I believe I can contribute about $800 per month to paying off my husband's student-loan debt. From what I understand, I am not legally responsible for his student debt, which was all taken out by him before we were married. We also keep our bank accounts separate so that if something should happen where the government lands on student loans, my income is in no way touched and all the normal bills could be paid like normal. Am I better off paying toward my husband's student-loan payments, or should I take this monthly amount and invest it elsewhere? Thank you for your kind attention. Student Loans Are Killing Us All Don't miss: 'Why am I so afraid to retire?' I'm 60 and lost $1.2 million in a divorce. Can I rebuild my life? I have a funny feeling you're going to do what you're going to do. But since you asked… You married this man, who may be a wonderful guy, and appear to be paying the lion's share of the bills. You are now considering crossing that imaginary line and helping him pay off other extraneous expenses, and are now giving serious consideration to paying off his student debt. Paying your husband's bills won't teach him to make smarter financial decisions in the future, nor will it help you in your own retirement goals. The fact that he would actually accept $800 a month from you to pay off his student debt also gives me pause. It tells me: He ain't gonna change his financial habits. You are not responsible for these loans, as I'm sure you are aware, given that they were taken out before your marriage. So I wonder why you have the 'disease to please' or, in this context, the 'fret about his debt,' and see it as much your obligation to pay off as his. Why do you see his debts as your duty to pay? You don't have to pay his bills. You don't have to make up the shortfall because his business is not performing. You don't have to take money from your own retirement fund in order to pay off his student loan because he didn't do what you did —live far below your means and work a $15-an-hour job. You didn't clear your own loan so you would have the time/money to clear his debts. If you paid off this loan solo — let's say your husband became overwhelmed with other expenses, which would not be so farfetched given his current and previous financial situation — it would take you more than 10 years and end up costing you nearly $100,000, including roughly $33,000 in interest. If you and he paid $800 each, it would take half that time (five years) and cost just over $76,000, including $9,000 interest. Related: My husband and I are 40. I have $200,000 in student debt, while he has $600,000 in retirement savings. Are we in trouble? It's important to see what you are giving up by paying your husband's debts: Let's say you invested $800 a month in the S&P 500 SPX for 10 years and 4 months — the same amount of time it would take you to pay off his student loan alone. At an average annual return of 7%, compounded monthly, you would end up with $138,000 for your retirement and/or emergency fund by the time you're 54. Nice work, if you can get it. If you do the math, it makes more sense for you to invest that $800 and tell your husband that he should put together a plan to pay his student loan just like you did. If you don't pay his student loans, it doesn't mean that you don't love him. It doesn't make you a bad person or an uncaring or unsympathetic partner. It does make you somebody who values their own financial independence and intends to lead by example. Let me share a story with you that I have not thought about in many years. When I was a kid, I had a paper route. It was, you might say, my first job in journalism. I finished school early on a Wednesday afternoon and I delivered newspapers for exactly one penny per paper. It sounds like I grew up in Dickensian times, but it was Ireland before the economic boom. It was my first taste of earning my own money and it felt bloody great. One week, I finished my paper route shortly after lunch and my friend who lived on my street neglected to do his route until late in the day, so I suggested helping him. It never occurred to me to ask for money and, if he did offer, I refused. Either way, I arrived home empty handed feeling pretty good about my good deed. My mother went through me for a short cut. She told me I should not have done half of his route in addition to my own. That's a roundabout way of saying: Allow your husband to deliver his own newspapers. Related: My daughter has $500K in med-school expenses. Can my wife and I afford to pay it off? My daughter has $500K in med-school expenses. Can my wife and I afford to pay it off? Can my husband contest his late brother's $600K will? He experienced oxygen deprivation due to COPD before he died. I have early Alzheimer's and my husband has stage 4 kidney disease. We just inherited $50K. How can this help us? . 'I'm already up $45,000 in about an hour' — Reddit traders boast about wins as meme-stock mania returns Dow cuts dividend in half in reaction to 'lower-for-longer' earnings The S&P 500 just did something it's only done four times in 50 years. Here's what happened next. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Xiaomi expands smart home range with new advanced robot vacuums
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. QUICK SUMMARY Xiaomi's new robot vacuum cleaners are now available in Singapore. The H40 and the S40 have very similar capabilities, but the S40 is more affordable and has a smaller capacity. There's no word on whether they'll hit shelves in Europe or the US. However, they are listed on Xiaomi's global website, which is always a good sign. As you probably already know – mostly because I mention it in nearly everything I write about Xiaomi – we've been absolutely spoiled lately with new product launches. From compact washer-dryers to a range of sleek indoor air conditioning units, Xiaomi's been rolling out smart home gear like it's going out of style. Xiaomi has now done it again, and has just officially launched two brand new robot vacuums in Singapore – the H40 and the S40. These new additions continue the brand's expansion into the smart home space, both featuring vacuuming and mopping capabilities. Right now, both models are available at various retailers in Singapore, and there's no word on whether they'll hit shelves in Europe or the US. However, they are listed on Xiaomi's global website, which is always a good sign. The H40 is the higher-end of the two, priced at S$319/US$219 – or just over £150. It boasts a huge 10,000Pa suction power and a huge 4-litre dust bag that Xiaomi says can last up to 90 days without needing to be emptied. It also features a five-stage anti-tangle system designed to deal with hair without clogging everything up, and an LDS smart navigation system. Meanwhile, the S40 is the more budget-friendly optionn at S$229/US$180/£130-ish. You get the same 10,000Pa suction, mopping capabilities, a generous 5200mAh battery, and Xiaomi's anti-tangle magic. It also comes equipped with an LDS (laser distance sensor) system to map out your home for efficient cleaning paths. However, instead of the H40's 4-litre dust bin, you get a 520ml bin and a 270ml water tank. So, it's a good idea to consider the size of your home and how often you plan to use the vacuum before deciding which model is the right fit for you
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire who called cash 'trash' has a warning
Billionaire who called cash 'trash' has a warning originally appeared on TheStreet. Billionaire investor Ray Dalio believes the feud between U.S. President Donald Trump and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell comes down to one thing: the value of money. In a post on X, Dalio said: "While good central bankers try to get the balance right between being too easy and being too tight, looking at indicators of which way things are leaning to 'lean against the wind.' So, there is a natural tension between central bank leaders and those in office who want to make people happy and get re-elected." He explains that every country that takes on too much debt often lowers its interest rates and devalues its currency, which benefits people who borrow money but disadvantages those who save or lend a July 24 post, Dalio explains: "The classic way of dealing with it is to push real interest rates down and devalue money, which is bad for creditors and good for debtors. That is what Donald Trump is pushing for and what Jay Powell is defending against." This type of friction isn't unique, said the founder of Bridgewater Associates. Presidents often favour loose monetary policy - low interest rates and a high level of money in the economy - because it has a positive impact on the economy in the short term. Central bankers have the mandate to maintain low inflation and manage the economy, acting as an independent force. Dalio has a harsh message Dalio also points out how much the U.S. dollar has lost value when compared to other assets over the past year. He says: 'Over the last year, the dollar was down 5% against a basket of other major currencies, down 27% against gold, and down 45% against Bitcoin.' Over the past year, Bitcoin has surged by more than $52,911, reflecting growing investor interest in alternative stores of value amid ongoing economic uncertainty, as per charts. In contrast, the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY), which measures the dollar's strength against a basket of major currencies, has slipped by 0.02% during the same further cautioned that the government will not take action to correct things until it is a real crisis. "History shows that strong steps to protect money's value usually only happen after serious pain," he wrote. Dalio has never been a cheerleader for the future of the dollar. Dalio told the media in 2023 that he owned Bitcoin and 'cash is trash' and said that he preferred Bitcoin to bonds. Later, that year, he also said that he "owns some Ethereum,".He views both assets as alternative forms of money in a world where the dollar is depreciating. Billionaire who called cash 'trash' has a warning first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 24, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 24, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
