
KE's two-decade journey: a privatisation that delivered—I
Perhaps it's time we shift focus and sift myth from reality, from blame to improvement, from assumptions to accountability, and from outdated narratives to informed dialogue, and view Karachi's energy story through a lens of improvement and shared responsibility.
When K-Electric was privatized in 2005, the promise was simple: inject capital, modernize an aging infrastructure, and bring efficiency to a system long strained by operational and financial inefficiencies.
Two decades on, the record is clear. Shareholders have brought in USD 700 million in foreign direct investment, and the company has invested over USD 4.6 billion in infrastructural improvements, equivalent to six times its profits, over the same period to rebuild generation, transmission, and distribution.
The result? T&D losses have been cut in half, from 35 percent to less than 15 percent, while the grid itself has doubled in physical size. A World Bank Public Expenditure Review confirms the fiscal dividend: PKR 900 billion saved for taxpayers and consumers since privatization.
These investments have visibly reshaped Karachi's power infrastructure. The gains manifest in the 30,000 distribution transformers now energising Karachi's neighbourhoods; in the 2,000 plus feeders that keep power flowing; and in the 3.8 million customers, double the 2005 base, who interact with KE through a bilingual WhatsApp channel or the KE Live app. They are visible in the factories where 100 percent of industrial meters are smart, ensuring time-of-use billing and instantaneous outage alerts, and across the network, where Aerial Bundled Cables (ABCs) have been deployed on over 40 percent of PMTs as part of ongoing efforts to curb theft, an approach that has yielded encouraging results in many areas, while continuing to be refined based on ground realities.
Pakistan's economic slowdown – marked by inflation, reduced demand, and high input costs – affected industries nationwide, regardless of their location or utility provider. If KE were truly the bottleneck, one would have seen some level of pushback. Instead, what we've seen is the opposite; reliance on KE's stable grid supply, letters of support submitted to NEPRA, and public endorsements during hearings, from financial institutions, industrial associations, community leaders, city's social changemakers, etc.
Today, Karachi's industrial zones are completely load-shed exempt. Power systems worldwide are subject to occasional disturbances, often originating from the load side, not the utility.
Voltage spikes, for example, are commonly triggered by machinery tripping, cable faults, or poor internal protection, due to machinery not compliant with the grid. Karachi bustling with around 150,000 small and medium scale industries – that ought to happen.
Owning to its digitization roadmap, KE remains committed to transparency, regulatory compliance, and continuous service enhancement, ensuring that the voices of its customers are heard, addressed, and respected at every level.
Today, over 70% of all customer interactions are handled through digital platforms, including WhatsApp, the KE Live App, and a 24/7 call center, a level of digital engagement unmatched by any other DISCO in Pakistan.
Complaints are tracked through ticketing systems, with escalation protocols and response-time targets monitored internally and by NEPRA. It is also important to highlight that KE operates within a multi-stakeholder accountability ecosystem, which includes not just Nepra but also external forums such as the Federal Ombudsman, PMDU, etc. Complaints escalated to such bodies constitute less than 0.1% of the total complaints received. Even in those cases, 98% decisions have consistently validated KE's processes and resolutions, reinforcing the effectiveness of its internal redressal mechanisms.
Another self-generated rhetoric is that Karachiites 'pay more.' In reality, KE cannot set prices; consumer tariff is determined by NEPRA under the Government of Pakistan's national uniform-tariff policy and it's the same across the country.
Whatever a household pays in Multan is what a household pays in Karachi.
Fuel Charge Adjustments, positive or negative, are similarly applied across Pakistan. In fact, since September 2024, KE has filed seven consecutive negative FCAs, including a relief of Rs 4.69 per kwh for April 2025 provisional FCA, the decision of which has also been issued by NEPRA approving a decrease of Rs 4.03 for customers of KE. Every calculation follows the Economic Merit Order: use the cheapest energy source first, pass the actual fuel cost to the bill, refund the difference when global prices fall.
Critics point to today's generation mix and conclude KE is 'lagging' on renewables. That snapshot ignores KE's already in implementation of 640 MW renewable energy projects, three of which—the 220MW Dhabeji wind–solar hybrid and 150 MW solar projects at Winder and Bela—have gained NEPRA's approval after receiving lowest-in-country bid levels. They will shift the portfolio toward lower-cost, zero-fuel-cost energy.
Under Vision 2030, KE targets 30 percent renewables, a 30 percent cut in outages, and 95 percent load-shedding exemption city-wide, backed by USD 2 billion in fresh investment.
(To be continued)
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
BTS agency HYBE raided over alleged fraud trading
SEOUL: HYBE, the agency behind K-pop superstars BTS, was raided by police on Thursday in connection with alleged fraudulent trading involving its founder Bang Si-hyuk, investigators said. 'We are conducting a search and seizure at HYBE's headquarters in Yongsan District,' Seoul police said in a brief statement. Bang, the mastermind behind BTS, is under investigation over allegations that he misled early investors to reap illicit profits from the company's 2020 initial public offering. He is accused of gaining around 200 billion won (US$146 million) through the process, according to local reports. HYBE has denied Bang committed any wrongdoing. 'We will dutifully clarify that the listing at the time was carried out in compliance with all relevant laws and regulations,' the company said in early July, pledging 'active cooperation' with authorities to get to the bottom of the case. Bang allegedly misled HYBE's early investors, who held pre-IPO shares, by telling them in 2019 he had no plans to take the company public. He then allegedly encouraged them to sell their shares to private equity funds when in fact IPO plan was in the making. HYBE went public in 2020, after the shareholders sold their stakes. Top stars and directors head to Venice for high-powered 2025 festival The 52-year-old is accused of secretly striking a deal with the private equity funds to receive a portion of the profits they made from selling shares after the IPO. 2026 comeback The investigation comes as all seven BTS members complete their mandatory military service and prepare for a comeback next year. HYBE announced this month that a new album and world tour were scheduled for 2026. BTS, known for championing progressive causes, holds the record as the most-streamed group on Spotify and became the first K-pop act to top both the Billboard 200 and Billboard Artist 100 charts in the United States. Before their military service, BTS generated more than 5.5 trillion won ($4 billion) in yearly economic impact, according to the Korea Culture and Tourism Institute. That accounts for roughly 0.2 percent of South Korea's total GDP, according to official data. There had been debate over whether BTS should be granted exemptions from military service – sometimes granted to Olympic medallists and classical artists who win top international awards – but pop stars do not qualify under South Korean laws. With the lack of public consensus on the matter, the members enlisted individually, beginning in late 2022.


Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Minister visits K-IV project to review progress
LAHORE: Federal Minister for Water Resources Mian Muhammad Mueen Wattoo visited Greater Karachi Bulk Water Supply Scheme (K-IV Project) and reviewed the ongoing development works on the project. The federal minister visited in detail various key work fronts, which included intake structure and pumping stations being constructed at Keenjhar lake, water conveyance system consisting of pressurized pipeline from Keenjhar to Karachi as well as water reservoirs and filtration plants in suburbs of Karachi. During the visit, the federal minister was briefed by the project team about the site-wise progress achieved so far, remaining works and timelines for their completion. It was briefed that construction work on all components of the project is in progress at a satisfactory pace. Overall physical progress stands at 63 percent, while a sum of Rs 86.4 billion has so far been spent on construction of the project. Phase-I is planned to be completed in 2026, provided the required funds are made accordingly. Speaking on the occasion, the federal minister expressed satisfaction over the pace of work and reiterated the federal government's full support for the project. K-IV is a vital scheme for supplementing water supplies to Karachi to meet water requirements for the urban use. 'We are committed to ensuring completion of K-IV at the earliest as it is one of the priority projects of the Ministry of Water Resources,' he added. The minister emphasized the need for enhanced coordination among all stakeholders to remove bottlenecks for smooth implementation of the project. He also directed the consultants and the contractors to adhere to the quality standards stipulated for the project. The K-IV project is a critical infrastructure initiative aimed at addressing Karachi's acute water shortage by providing an additional 650 million gallons per day (MGD) water to Karachi from Keenjhar lake. The project is planned to be completed in two phases. At present, WAPDA is constructing Phase-I of to supply 260 MGD water to Karachi. Phase-II, when implemented, will also augment another 390 MGD water to the system for Karachi. Phase-I is being implemented through eight contract packages awarded to different local and international contractors. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
7 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Development 2.0: the case for PPPs in Pakistan
Over the past few years, policymakers and academics have shown renewed interest in Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) as a way of addressing fiscal limitations and speeding up infrastructure construction and the provision of increased yet sustainable public services. Similar to other developing nations, according to Dr Shamshad Akhtar, who was former finance minister of Pakistan, Pakistan will be facing an estimated USD 124 billion infrastructure financing gap by 2040, along with public debt nearing 66.3% of GDP and is projected to rise to 71.4 percent in FY2025, making traditional government-led-financed development increasingly unsustainable. These gaps have forced government to explore other forms of financing vehicles like PPPs to facilitate funding of desirable public infrastructure development using money raised from the private sector. However, PPPs have largely been promoted only as an alternative mode of financing whereas they might actually be an enabling tool to deliver greater efficiencies, innovation and value for money-normally referred in Pakistan as a game changer. The prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, has recognised the successful implementation of PSDP under the leadership and oversight of the federal minister for planning, development and special initiatives, Professor Ahsan Iqbal. He gave this credit due to the fact that PSDP is being strategically used for ensuring development of much-needed infrastructure but also serving to provide a clear vision of development priorities and growth path of the country. It is commendable, however this should be supplemented or complemented in the PSDP with addition of new models of financing for PPP that will extend the frontiers of fiscal efficiency even more, crowd in additional private funding and lead to institutional reform. A detailed report of 2023 published by the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), Reforming the Federal Public Sector Development Programme, presented a strong case of an urgent reform was established. The report promoted a portfolio cleaning strategy, which advised a reduction of the size of PSDP by 20 to 25 percent and the removal of almost half of all projects underway in this regard. The study indicated that many of such projects are either not backed by institutions or have become low-priority schemes that involve subjecting of the national funds on them without receiving a corresponding reward. PSDP resources are often spread thin over too many unviable projects, thus limiting impact and leading to cost and time overruns. Now this lack of efficiency has crippled the argument in favor of seeking alternative forms of developmental financing only. Beyond financing, frame-work has to be energized and implemented quickly. The greatest of them is the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model that provides a practical and performance-oriented system of project delivery. PPPs, by utilising the privately raised funds, technical excellence, and creativity can aid Pakistan to make important infrastructure, enhance social amenities, even bring in Foreign Direct Investment as a complement and decrease the pressure on the exchequer. The federal government, to its credit, has achieved certain success in institutionalizing the PPP model with the setting up of the Public-Private Partnership Authority (P3A) across provinces and federal government. Since its inception, P3A has developed a project pipeline of PKR 2.5 trillion. Its priorities however are limited to federal infrastructure projects such as roads, bridges and transportation corridors. To make PPPs a real pillar of the national development, the model has to develop both vertically and horizontally, expanding to provinces and sectors like education, health, and housing as well. Sindh's PPP-based Education Node where private firms operate public schools has shown success in underserved areas. The mixed model has produced the following positive results such as better administration, provision, and education achievement, especially in underdeveloped and remote regions. The Sindh experience shows that when well-designed PPPs are implemented with transparency and accountability they result in marked improvement in the quality of public service delivery. Similarly, even in Pakistan, thought leaders have been promoting a paradigm shift for public investment. One of the notable economists and Vice Chancellor of PIDE Dr Nadeem Javaid has stressed on how Pakistan should no longer focus at using public money as a crutch, but should instead reinvent PPPs as a means of managing risks, corporate efficiency, and innovation. He suggested radical reforms: such as the use of inflation-linked bonds, blended finance, and revenue-sharing arrangements so that PPPs could be scaled up and made more marketable. More importantly, he pointed out to the necessity of institutional reforms and better governance in order to have sustainable ecosystem of the collaboration of the private sector. This is what is also embedded in the URAAN Pakistan transformation plan. Around the world, countries like the UK, India, Brazil, and Chile have used PPPs to bridge public service gaps most effectively. The Private Finance Initiative in the UK has been quite revolutionary in the modernisation of hospitals and transport schemes, whereas in Chile there has been a larger access to clean water due to the water and sanitation PPPs. These success stories emphasize that PPPs are not mere financial tools, they are development tools that can transform service delivery and governance. In addition to infrastructure, the scope of PPPs to revolutionize service delivery in the sectors of human development is huge. As it has been reported in Housing Finance Pakistan Report, 2024, Pakistan requires developing 2 million housing units annually to accommodate its growth requirements, which is a situation that cannot be achieved without the involvement of the private sector. PPPs can also help expand healthcare access, digital platforms, and affordable housing. Whether these projects can succeed or not will however be based on the capacity of the government to design transparent contracts, establish accountability and earn the confidence of the people. It is also a change that needs the redefinition of the role of the state. The government should stop acting as the only financier and project implementer but an enabler-designing the rules, tracking the performance, and achieving the results. It has to develop the capacity of PPP design and management, simplify the procedures of procurement, and integrate transparency throughout the project cycle. Procurement procedures need to be sanitized and made corruption free. This matter is most important, particularly after Pakistan has been ranked 135th out of 180 countries by the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index One of the priorities, in this case, should be to decentralize the PPP system into the provinces and local governments. Local governments are in a position to determine contextual demands and have a project that deals with shortages of public services at the community level. The establishment of facilitating legal and regulatory framework of subnational PPPs, coupled with technical assistance and even financial de-risking, will do a lot to stimulating development at the grassroots. The government of Pakistan needs to wade through its development problems with insufficient resources and a huge scope of the problem. Although the PSDP is important, it cannot be used as the single point through which infrastructure and service delivery aspiration is realized in the country. A gap, where vision and performance split, can be narrowed with the help of Public-Private Partnerships provided that they were well thought of and clearly performed. The time to institutionalize PPPs is now — anything less risks repeating past inefficiencies. (Dr Ahmad Fraz is Assistant Professor and Dr Mahmood Khalid is Senior Research Economist at the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE)) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025