US stock market prediction: Will Nasdaq, S&P 500, Dow Jones slip or rise on Monday? Check lucrative stocks
Nasdaq
-- will look to maintain its positive run at the Wall Street. However, investors will keep close eyes on the Federal Reserve and Fed Chair Jerome Powell to check whether there will be interest rate cut or not. U.S. stocks edged back from their record levels on Friday in a quiet finish to another winning week. The S&P 500 slipped 0.3 per cent from the all-time high it set the day before, as it closed its fourth winning week in the last five. The
Dow Jones
Industrial Average flirted with its own record, which was set in December, before ending just below the mark with a rise of 34 points, or 0.1 per cent. The Nasdaq composite dipped 0.4 per cent, though it's still near its record set on Wednesday.
The U.S. stock market reached all-time highs this past week as expectations built that the Federal Reserve will deliver a cut to interest rates at its next meeting in September. Lower rates can boost investment prices and the economy by making it cheaper for U.S. households and businesses to borrow to buy houses, cars or equipment, but they also risk worsening inflation.
US Stock Market Outlook
Companies likely to benefit most from lower borrowing costs have been among the big winners in recent Wall Street trading, said Andrew Slimmon, head of Applied Equity Advisors at Morgan Stanley Asset Management.
Shares of leading homebuilders such as PulteGroup, Lennar, and D.R. Horton are up between 4.2 per cent and 8.8 per cent in the last week, as of midday Friday, thanks largely to the recent drop in mortgage lending rates.
Live Events
Their gains trounced the 1 per cent rally in the Standard & Poor's 500 index over the last week. The group has outpaced the broader market more dramatically over the last month, with gains of 15 per cent to 22 per cent compared to 3.3 per cent for the S&P 500. But their future gains hinge on mortgage rates continuing to fall, something that a recent uptick in 10-year Treasury bond yields puts into question.
FAQs
Q1. What are US Stock Market indexes?
A1. US Stock Market indexes are Dow Jones, S&P 500, and Nasdaq.
Q2. Which stocks have gone up?
A2. Shares of leading homebuilders such as PulteGroup, Lennar, and D.R. Horton are up between 4.2 per cent and 8.8 per cent in the last week, as of midday Friday, thanks largely to the recent drop in mortgage lending rates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
S&P Global Upgrades Ratings Of 10 Indian Financial Institutions, Including SBI, HDFC Bank
Last Updated: S&P raises long-term credit ratings on SBI, ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank, Axis Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Union Bank of India, Indian Bank, Bajaj Finance, Tata Capital, and L&T Finance. S&P Global Ratings on Friday upgraded the ratings of India's 10 financial institutions, including State Bank of India, HDFC Bank, and Tata Capital, after it raised the country's sovereign credit rating. 'India's financial institutions will continue to ride the country's good economic growth momentum. These entities will benefit from their domestic focus and structural improvements in the system such as in the recovery of bad loans," S&P said. The US-based agency raised long-term issuer credit ratings on seven Indian banks — SBI, ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank, Axis Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Union Bank of India, and Indian Bank — and three finance companies — Bajaj Finance, Tata Capital, and L&T Finance. 'We expect India's banks to maintain adequate asset quality, good profitability, and enhanced capitalisation over the next 12-24 months. This is despite some pockets of stress," S&P noted, adding that overall credit risk in the financial system has eased. On August 14, the agency had upgraded India's sovereign rating to 'BBB' after more than 18 years, citing strong economic fundamentals that are likely to support growth in the next two to three years. It also pointed out that monetary policy has become 'increasingly conducive to managing inflationary expectations". S&P highlighted that ratings of several Indian financial institutions remain capped by the sovereign rating, given the 'direct and indirect influence that the sovereign has on financial institutions operating in the country". The agency also credited the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), introduced in 2016, for strengthening the payment culture and rule of law. 'The code has tilted the balance in favour of the creditors. It has also promoted a credit culture that encourages restructuring of going-concern entities," it said. Separately, S&P had raised credit ratings of major state-run and private corporations, including ONGC, Power Grid Corporation of India, NTPC, and Tata Power, to 'BBB' from 'BBB-'. The outlooks were marked stable. India Exim Bank and Indian Railway Finance Corporation (IRFC) also received upgrades to 'BBB' from 'BBB-'. view comments First Published: August 17, 2025, 09:26 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hans India
3 hours ago
- Hans India
Celebrate India's rating upgrade with cautious optimism
S&P's upgrade is anchored in India's fiscal discipline — deficit control and monetary prudence. The fiscal deficit is projected to fall from 9.3 per cent of GDP in 2020–21, driven by pandemic stimulus, to about 4.4 per cent for 2025–26. The government adopted a 'glide path' approach to fiscal reduction, increasing capital expenditure from 1.6 per cent of GDP in 2014–15 to over three per cent in 2025–26, while consolidating welfare and infrastructure spending. The total workforce declined by about 15 million from 2011–12 to 2018 — a revealing setback in a country where demographics demand relentless job creation."Make in India," the flagship manufacturing initiative, aimed to restore industrial dynamism and boost exports. Yet, manufacturing's share in GDP has fallen from 15 per cent in 2014 to nearly 13 per cent in 2022, with little evidence of lasting job creation or export growth. Instead, the service sector and informal economy continue to dominate — a vulnerability that was exposed during recent crises. S&P Global Ratings on August 14 upgraded India's sovereign credit rating from 'BBB-' to 'BBB' — ending an 18-year stretch at the lowest rung of investment grade. This long-awaited lift has produced a wave of celebration in financial circles and corridors of power, with the ruling party representatives and supporters hailing it as proof of India's economic resilience. But for many seasoned observers, including myself, having journeyed through India's economic transformation as both a financial journalist and a corporate lawyer, this rating upgrade stirs guarded optimism, shadowed by a history of contested numbers, dodgy data, and unfulfilled socio-economic promises. The significance of S&P's upgrade: India's climb from 'BBB-' to 'BBB' is not mere symbolism. It signals to global investors and lenders that India's public finances and creditworthiness have decisively improved. In practical terms, Indian companies may now find cheaper funding on global markets; foreign direct investment (FDI) is likely to surge; the rupee and sovereign bonds stand to gain in credibility; and overseas borrowing costs should fall. Importantly, the timing is crucial — India faces newly imposed 50 per cent tariffs from the US, complicating the trade terrain and heightening the importance of robust credit standing. S&P's rationale rests on robust macroeconomic fundamentals, improved monetary credibility, and 'sustained fiscal consolidation.' The agency expects India's debt-to-GDP ratio to ease from 83 per cent today to 78 per cent by fiscal 2029. Meanwhile, the government projections tout average GDP growth of 6.8 per cent for the next three years, riding a wave of post-pandemic resurgence and strong infrastructure investment. But beneath the celebratory headlines, India's economic story is more complicated. Economic growth: Fact, fiction and manipulation: Beneath India's apparent transformation since 2014 lurk controversies around official data reporting and policy outcomes under the ruling BJP. The party's narrative showcases buoyant growth, strong investment, and ambitious reform: GST, public sector divestment, capex drive, and financial inclusion. Yet, independent analysts and former high-ranking officials have consistently questioned the integrity of headline statistics. Notably, Arvind Subramanian, India's former Chief Economic Advisor, argued that GDP growth figures post-2012 may be overstated by up to 2–2.5 per cent due to methodological tweaks. Official records claim average GDP growth of seven per cent, but alternative estimates suggest it is closer to five per cent, a significant gap with profound implications for policy and politics. Unemployment, manufacturing and the real economy: Prime Minister Narendra Modi's repeated vow to deliver 20 million new jobs annually has not materialised. The leaked 2017–18 National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) survey showed unemployment at 6.1 per cent—the highest in 45 years. While the government delayed the data's release and highlighted subsequent Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) improvements, critics contend that urban and youth unemployment remain underestimated. The total workforce declined by about 15 million from 2011–12 to 2018 — a revealing setback in a country where demographics demand relentless job creation. "Make in India," the flagship manufacturing initiative, aimed to restore industrial dynamism and boost exports. Yet, manufacturing's share in GDP has fallen from 15 per cent in 2014 to nearly 13 per cent in 2022, with little evidence of lasting job creation or export growth. Instead, the service sector and informal economy continue to dominate — a vulnerability that was exposed during recent crises. Poverty and inequality: Claims vs reality: The government's NITI Aayog claims poverty dropped to five per cent — an oft-repeated talking point. But independent assessments, including those by the World Bank and Oxfam, offer a less sanguine view. The World Bank estimates poverty closer to 12–15 per cent, while Oxfam reports India's richest one per cent now enjoy 40 per cent of national wealth, up from 22 per cent in 2014, a dramatic rise in inequality. The prosperity boom has not trickled down as promised; vast segments remain excluded from India's growth narrative. Fiscal discipline and its controversies: S&P's upgrade is anchored in India's fiscal discipline — deficit control and monetary prudence. The fiscal deficit is projected to fall from 9.3 per cent of GDP in 2020–21, driven by pandemic stimulus, to about 4.4 per cent for 2025–26. The government adopted a 'glide path' approach to fiscal reduction, increasing capital expenditure from 1.6 per cent of GDP in 2014–15 to over three per cent in 2025–26, while consolidating welfare and infrastructure spending. However, critics point out that the headline progress conceals accounting maneuvers. Off-budget borrowing, subsidies shifted outside budgetary oversight, and optimistic nominal GDP assumptions have all masked real debt and deficit levels. Despite GST revenues increasing 9.4 per cent year-on-year in FY2024–25, collections have often missed targets, fueling aggressive compliance drives but straining the formal sector. Public debt — at 88 per cent of GDP in 2020, now eased to 82 per cent — remains daunting, especially as the government continues to rely heavily on domestic borrowings to finance welfare and infrastructure expansion. Interest costs are high, and the revenue-to-GDP ratio remains one of the lowest among peer economies, exposing India to future fiscal risks. Reform, resilience and revenue: Reform efforts — public sector divestment, digitalization, labor codes — have advanced, but are sometimes undermined by slow implementation, bureaucratic resistance, and changing political winds. The FY26 Union Budget reaffirmed India's commitment to fiscal consolidation, balancing growth with discipline. Yet, to sustain trajectory, income levels and productivity must rise faster, and capex needs quantum boosts. Policy consistency and infrastructure investment are S&P's justification for confidence, but dissenting voices worry that these improvements are more concentration than diffusion. Both fiscal and monetary policy credibility continue to be vulnerable to shifting political priorities and global shocks. The political equation: Data integrity and governance: Since 2014, the BJP's consolidation of power created a centralised approach to economic management. But critics — including opposition parties, economists, and former bureaucrats — warn of eroding data independence. Instances of suppressing unfavorable indices before elections have triggered resignations from the National Statistical Commission and raised fears of statistical governance eroding into political leverage. Transparency has become a flashpoint: credible economic governance demands empowering statistical agencies, clear methodology, independent audits, and honest reporting. The controversies surrounding data integrity cast a shadow over S&P's confidence — numbers must reflect real progress, not wishful projections. The legal perspective: Risk, compliance and diligence: For corporate India and global investors, a rating upgrade is a passport to improved access, lower capital costs, and promising FDI — $81billion inflow in FY2024–25 underscores that potential. But seasoned diligence is essential. Beyond macro numbers, scrutiny of fiscal health, legal reforms, policy consistency, and institutional strength is non-negotiable. The BJP's loss of an outright majority in the 2024 elections has injected policy uncertainty, complicating legal and economic reforms. Businesses need to rely on independent labor market data, sectoral performance indices, and private audits rather than government figures alone. Conclusion: A milestone; but the journey continues: S&P's upgrade is a welcome marker of growing global confidence. But it does not certify deep structural transformation or inclusive economic success. India's development narrative under the BJP is fraught with contradictions: glossy growth statistics, persistent unemployment, increasing inequality, and compromised statistical governance. The progress is real — but so are the doubts. India must now move from headline achievement to substantive reform. That means restoring integrity in data, empowering independent agencies, promoting transparent methodologies, and a robust auditing of official figures. Only then can India's growth be broad-based, durable, and truly inclusive. For now, the ratings move is a milestone, not the finish line. The message for policymakers, investors, and citizens alike: celebrate India's ascent, but do so with cautious optimism, vigilant diligence, and unwavering insistence on transparency and accountability. Only then will India's economic story be fully and convincingly told. (The author is former Senior Editor, The Economic Times, and currently practicing as an Advocate at the Telangana High Court)
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Jerome Powell will make his last stand at Jackson Hole
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell will take the stage next Friday at the Fed's annual Jackson Hole Economic Symposium to deliver what may be the defining speech of his career. The speech won't be lengthy—last year's version clocked in at just over 15 minutes—but with his term as chair ending next May and the Fed's performance under attack by the Trump administration, Powell may see Jackson Hole as his last or, at least, his best chance to cement his legacy and make the case for the central bank's independence. The annual symposium, hosted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, attracts the world's most influential central bankers, who will meet on Aug. 21-23 at the Jackson Lake Lodge in Wyoming's Grand Teton National Park. This year's conference, titled 'Labor Markets in Transition," will focus on structural forces such as demographics, productivity, and immigration that are reshaping the U.S. job market and the broader economy. The theme also speaks to the central challenge of Powell's term: how to navigate structural changes in the economy while fulfilling the Fed's dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment. Steering monetary policy in the face of political hostility has become a parallel challenge this year. President Donald Trump, whose second term began on Jan. 20, has berated Powell for the Fed's failure to cut interest rates, calling him a 'stubborn MORON" and 'Too Late." Trump has also accused Powell of mismanaging the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's Marriner S. Eccles building in Washington, D.C., and suggested firing the Fed chair before his term ends. The White House is already vetting potential replacements, focusing on candidates willing to cut rates quickly and, in some cases, restructure the Fed. Powell's reluctance until now to lower the federal-funds rate from a current target range of 4.25%-4.50% stems chiefly from concerns that Trump's tariff policy may worsen inflation, which ran at an annual rate of 2.7% in July, as measured by the consumer price index. Political interference in central-bank affairs has precedent. Pressure from the Nixon administration in the 1970s helped push then–Fed Chair Arthur Burns to keep interest rates low despite rising inflation, a decision that contributed to double-digit price growth. Burns' successor, Paul Volcker, was forced to raise rates to nearly 20% to break inflation, sparking a deep recession. More recently, Turkey's president repeatedly ousted central-bank governors who raised interest rates, sending inflation above 80% and eroding the Turkish lira's value against the dollar. The lira has fallen by 82% in the past five years. Once a central bank is seen as an extension of the ruling party, its ability to control prices can quickly collapse. Powell joined the Fed Board of Governors in 2012, and was nominated as chair by Trump in 2017. He assumed the role in February 2018, and was later reappointed by President Joe Biden to a term that began in May 2022. This will be Powell's 13th year attending Jackson Hole, and it may be his last. Although his term as chair runs until May 2026, few expect him to stay on as a Fed governor until that term ends in January 2028. Powell's tenure as chair has been defined by shocks, in particular the eruption of the Covid-19 pandemic in the U.S. in early 2020, which triggered the fastest and deepest economic contraction since World War II. The Fed was forced to take extraordinary policy actions, including emergency rate cuts and unprecedented bond buying, to prop up the economy and infuse liquidity into the financial system. When inflation surged in 2021—as a result of these actions, critics say—Powell's initial assessment that it would be 'transitory" proved wrong. Inflation eventually hit a high of 9.1% in June 2022, damaging the Fed's credibility and necessitating one of the most aggressive tightening campaigns in Fed history. Fed officials hiked rates 11 times, starting in March 2022, lifting the federal-funds rate from near zero to more than 5%. The effort was largely successful. The Fed's preferred inflation gauge, the core personal consumption expenditures, or PCE, price index, has fallen to 2.8% annually without triggering the recession that many economists feared, although inflation remains stubbornly above the central bank's 2% annual target. Unemployment, meanwhile, has ranged from 4.1% to 4.3% in recent months. By the Fed's own standards, this qualifies as a version of the elusive soft landing. The path forward looks more challenging, however, and less certain. Wage growth has slowed from a 6% annual rate in 2022 to about 3.9%. U.S. employers added just 73,000 jobs in July, and payroll totals for May and June were revised downward by more than a quarter-million. Inflation readings have moved higher this summer, and tariffs are beginning to push up some import prices. Core CPI, which excludes food and energy, rose by 0.3% in July, the largest increase since January, while the annual rate of inflation hit 3.1%. The producer price index, a measure of wholesale inflation, jumped 0.9% last month, the largest monthly increase in more than three years, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported on Thursday. The data indicated that tariffs could be causing businesses to raise the prices they charge one another, which probably will lead to higher consumer prices over time. 'You have to think of this as still quite early days" for tariff-related inflation, Powell said in July. Reciprocal tariffs on U.S. imports, which the White House has imposed in stages this year, are 'likely to generate a rise in inflation, a slowdown in economic growth, and an increase in unemployment," Powell has said. Trump and his advisors notably disagree. In Powell's view, tariffs complicate every decision the Fed might make from here. Cut rates too aggressively and risk fueling inflation. Hold rates steady at current levels and risk further erosion in job growth and higher unemployment. All of this should make for a 'live," or undecided meeting when the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed's policy arm, convenes again on Sept. 16-17. The fed-funds futures market currently puts more than 92% odds on a quarter-percentage-point rate cut in September, which would be the first reduction this year, although two Fed governors dissented from the FOMC's decision in July to leave rates unchanged, arguing the Fed should have cut rates at that meeting to prevent further deterioration of the labor market. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested on Wednesday that the Fed might consider cutting rates by half a percentage point in September, given recent job-market data. At the same time, some prominent investment analysts and economists aren't convinced of the need for a September rate cut. Given the latest inflation reports, 'we see risk of the Fed potentially cutting fewer times than market expectations," wrote Chris Senyek, chief investment strategist at Wolfe Research, in a note on Aug. 14. Jackson Hole, he added, may be seen 'as a chance for Fed Chair Powell to take a hawkish stance on interest-rate policy." Every five years the Fed undertakes a review of its monetary-policy framework. As part of this year's review, officials are contemplating a potential change in how the Fed evaluates employment. William English, a former senior Fed official and current professor at the Yale School of Management, expects the central bank to return to describing 'deviations" from maximum employment, rather than 'shortfalls," a small semantic change that matters. It implies that both an overheated and a cooling labor market are problems to be addressed, giving the Fed equal justification to raise rates when the job market is too hot or cut them when it cools. Powell won't preview the Fed's September interest-rate decision at Jackson Hole. But his speech, titled 'Economic Outlook and Framework Review," can still send important signals about how the Fed will assess the economy, account for tariffs, and communicate in the future. Powell will spend much of his Aug. 22 speech, which begins at 10 a.m. Eastern Time, addressing that framework review, which the 19 members of the FOMC will vote on at some point later this summer. Past reviews have led to lasting changes such as formal inflation targeting, changed forward guidance, and altered labor-market goals. This year's review could establish principles for how to deal with supply shocks, and re-evaluate the balance between the two sides of the Fed's dual mandate. Any adjustments to the framework could enshrine policy changes that last beyond Powell's tenure. That is one way to protect the Fed's ability to act on its mandate without having to argue for its independence. Trump's public pressure campaign has made monetary policy a national political story. That is just fine with Fed critics, who disdain Powell's 'data dependent" approach to setting rates, the Fed's asset-buying binge, and what they consider the institutional bloat of recent years. But the attention also carries risks, in particular the risk that any policy decision will be seen as politically motivated. If the Fed loses credibility, its rate moves may become less effective and the dollar may suffer. Fed officials declined to comment. To be sure, the Fed's independence has never been absolute. The central bank exists at the pleasure of Congress, and ultimately depends on public support. The Fed operates within the political system, not outside it. Powell seems to understand what's at stake. 'My sense is that he sees his legacy as preserving the independence of the Fed," says Joe Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM US. That legacy won't be sealed at Jackson Hole, but the conference will showcase how Powell balances three separate and increasingly intertwined roles: managing an economy in transition, navigating political hostility, and refining a decision-making framework strong enough to withstand interference by any politician or party. If he can show that the Fed will continue to judge the economy on its merits, explain its reasoning clearly, and preserve the tools it needs to do its job, he may achieve more in the long run than timing rate changes perfectly. Jackson Hole sits at an elevation of 6,200 feet, where the thin air sharpens some minds and makes others lightheaded. This coming week, it will test more than altitude tolerance. It will measure whether the U.S. central bank can still breathe on its own. English, for one, is unsure. 'People may look back wistfully at the Powell Fed as a central bank that was independent, hard-thinking, and trying to do the right thing," he says. As in the mountains, everything depends on your view. Write to Nicole Goodkind at
