Let's have a dialogue about B-BBEE policy
It is a great pity that the DA has refused to take part in President Cyril Ramaphosa's National Dialogue.
That's because it would be the ideal place for a debate on the DA's economic plan, which proposes scrapping broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) and employment equity.
It's an opportune moment for a rethink on the policies, because the ANC's stated commitments to them notwithstanding, they are causing us some discomfort when talking to other countries, most notable being the US.
No doubt the ANC and like-minded people will try to play the race card and portray the DA's plans as nothing but a return to apartheid's baasskap – and that would be fair if the policies had been resounding successes.
To say they have been disappointing is probably one of the understatements of the past 30 years.
DA leader John Steenhuisen said yesterday the R1 trillion empowerment spoils were enjoyed by around 100 politically connected persons, as pointed out by Prof William Gumede at Wits earlier this year.
ALSO READ: Here's how to convince Trump of BEE
That much is obvious even to the most dedicated ANC supporter, who sees the chiefs with their fancy cars, mansions and a taste for the Johnnie Walker Blue-fuelled good life.
While there has been an improvement in basic amenities like running water and electricity in many areas of South Africa, B-BBEE has done little or nothing to empower the poor.
And while employment equity promised to level the playing field of employment opportunities, it also generated its own corruption and promoted incompetence.
It has also sparked a brain drain of mainly non-African young people, who don't see a future for themselves here because of the policy.
Those are truths we cannot run away from. And nor will people like US President Donald Trump allow us to.
So, maybe we should have a proper dialogue about them.
NOW READ: Ramaphosa takes aim at employment equity critics, calls for men to 'rise up' in GBV fight
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
31 minutes ago
- IOL News
Civil society groups reject President's National Dialogue as exclusionary
Criticism of President's National Dialogue: A Missed Opportunity for Unity Image: X The President's planned 'National Dialogue' is being sharply criticised by civil society groups, who say it is 'neither national nor a dialogue' as it fails to unite the country. In an interview with IOL on Tuesday, Paul Maritz, Free SA Campaigns Director, contended the national exercise is neither truly national nor a meaningful conversation about the country's future. The organisation stated that divisions can only be overcome through honest dialogue and that the current format excludes entire sectors of society, including key political parties. 'South Africans must remain in constant conversation about our shared future. Unfortunately, in this case, the President's planned National Dialogue is neither national nor a dialogue in any meaningful sense. 'Entire sectors of society, including key political parties, were excluded from the outset. That makes this look far more like a PR exercise than a sincere, open conversation about where we are 30 years into democracy and how we move forward together,' said Maritz. Free SA expressed a pattern of disengagement from prominent foundations that had been expected to back the process. The Steve Biko Foundation, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, the FW de Klerk Foundation, the Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group have all withdrawn, casting a pall over what many hoped would be a more inclusive national conversation. The organisations cited violations of the dialogue's core principles and called for postponement to ensure adequate preparation, coherence, and participatory integrity. Responding to the withdrawal by the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Free SA noted the importance of former President Thabo Mbeki's role in persuading parties and citizens to engage. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'Former President Mbeki's role is significant, both because of his stature and because he represents a tradition of thoughtful political engagement,' the organisation said. 'His withdrawal, or that of organisations he supports, would be a serious blow to the credibility of this process. If respected voices like his are not fully on board, ordinary citizens will rightly question whether this is worth their time.' The Democratic Alliance (DA), the country's second-largest political party and a governing partner in a national unity framework, is among the groups that have rejected the National Dialogue. Free SA assesses that if a ruling coalition partner cannot be won to participate, the broader public is unlikely to be convinced of the process's legitimacy. 'If you cannot convince your coalition partner to participate, how can you hope to convince the rest of the country? The process loses legitimacy without their involvement before it even begins,' Maritz argued. Meanwhile, The MK Party (uMkhonto weSizwe Party) has condemned the National Dialogue as an expensive political stunt, while services are collapsing nationwide. The party described the Dialogue as a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, bypassing Parliament, and granting the Presidency unchecked influence over policy-making without democratic oversight. 'This National Dialogue is a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, not a platform for genuine national problem-solving," the party asserted. The MK Party also highlighted what it calls urgent national failures that deserve attention before any dialogue can yield real progress. It pointed to a litany of service delivery and governance crises across several provinces, arguing that public resources are being diverted to political theatre rather than addressing urgent needs: Free SA and its critics argue that the National Dialogue risks becoming more about optics than addressing root causes such as poverty, inequality, and governance failures. 'From what we can see, it risks being nothing more than a political tool. It does not seriously address the root causes of poverty, inequality, and poor governance. 'A true national dialogue would require a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths and to make space for voices that may disagree with the President's vision,' Maritz said. IOL Politics
Eyewitness News
31 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Steenhuisen: It's been tough to talk shop with US amid demands for concessions on a trade deal
JOHANNESBURG - Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen said it's been tough to talk shop with the US amid demands for concessions on a trade deal that he claims has been negotiated outside of economic parameters. Steenhusien joined Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau at a joint media briefing in Tshwane on Tuesday after a revised offer was drafted for Washington's nod. Last week, South African trade officials failed to secure an agreement with the US administration before the implementation of punitive tariffs. ALSO READ: Tau confirms revised trade offer made to US Imports from South Africa into the US now carry a 30% duty. The Trump administration previously called for sa to relax import regulations on America's pork in exchange for them maintaining duty-free citrus from the country. But this sparked fears that SA's pig farms would be at risk of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome - a devastating and hard-to-contain disease. Regulations for poultry imports from the us - previously banned over a bird flu outbreak - have also been relaxed under the conditional self-ban and self-lifting system. "This will ensure that the us is able to leverage the tariff rate quota of 72,000 tons already agreed in 2016," said Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau. With the US already set to ship containers of poultry and pork to South Africa in two weeks' time from Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, North Carolina and Alabama, SA said bio-security protocols are in place. While the technical aspects are still being negotiated, Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen had this to say about the process. 'It's obviously difficult negotiating when the issues you're negotiating are not only about trade and tariffs, and I think that's why we've had this particular situation.' The US administration previously demanded bee exemptions for us companies, including Elon Musk's Starlink, and sought to sway some of the country's foreign policy and domestic race laws demands SA maintains it won't concede to.
Eyewitness News
31 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
FF Plus 2nd GNU party to pull out of National Dialogue
CAPE TOWN - The Freedom Front (FF) Plus is the second Government of National Unity (GNU) party to withdraw from the National Dialogue, accusing the African National Congress (ANC) of being uncompromising and wanting to hijack the process. Party leader Corne Mulder said that while he firmly believes a dialogue is crucial to finding solutions to the country's myriad problems, the ANC is setting the wrong tone. ALSO READ: AfriForum accuses Ramaphosa of capturing National Dialogue, turning it into ANC monologue The upcoming convention, which starts on Friday, is meant to set the scene for the dialogue. But it's been mired in controversy since several foundations linked to former presidents and struggle stalwarts withdrew from the process last week. Announcing his party's withdrawal from the National Dialogue on Tuesday afternoon, FF Plus leader Corne Mulder accused the Presidency, under the influence of the ANC, of wanting to dictate the direction the National Dialogue will take. Mulder believes civil society should steer the process. "It seems to me that the ANC, with their intent and their utterances, are an obstructive role player in this whole thing." Mulder said recent remarks by the ANC's Secretary General, Fikile Mbalula, that the party is not prepared to back down from its existing policies make the dialogue futile and a waste of money. "There's a need for a dialogue, but perhaps even without the ANC. Because as long as that's the ANC's view, then there's no sense in any other dialogue because they are clearly not prepared to address the challenges." The party said it will send its CEO to attend Friday and Saturday's convention as an observer instead.
