
PC sacked for arresting teen scrote with knife is everything that's wrong with this country – criminals have more rights
IF you want a very quick insight into what is wrong with this country, just take a look at the case of Police Constable Lorne Castle.
Lorne, 46, worked for the plod in Bournemouth. Twice decorated for bravery. A popular policeman with the public and within the force.
6
6
And then, one day, his career was over. Sacked for 'gross misconduct'.
What happened was this. Lorne was called to make an arrest of a teenager suspected of assaulting two people.
He turned up and the 15-year-old resisted arrest. He continued to resist even when the PC had hold of him.
This scrote was carrying a knife, by the way.
Lorne shouted at the boy to stop screaming and resisting arrest. He pushed him to the floor and put a hand over his face. He swore at him. Swearing is of course very rude. None of us should swear.
The result was that after a 16-month inquiry, during which he was suspended from his duties, Lorne was sacked.
He was placed on the police debarred list, which stops him ever working with the police again.
His life has been ruined. The panel that sacked him claimed he had failed to treat the suspect with 'respect and courtesy'. Incredible, no? 'Hello old chap! I hope you are living your best life! I wonder if I could ask you . . . Oh, OK, goodbye then.'
The panel also said that Lorne's behaviour made the boy feel 'frightened and intimidated'. Good! How was he meant to feel? Elated and relaxed? Warm and comfortable?
A whip-round among officers has provided him with some of his wages. And a retired Chief Inspector has spoken in his favour.
DID HIS JOB
But what did his boss have to say? Dorset police's deputy chief Rachel Farrell said the sacking was right.
She added: '(Officers) do a tough job and when their actions are proportionate, necessary and reasonable they will always be supported.'
That, it turns out, was a lie. The constabulary even issued footage of the arrest in an attempt to make Lorne look more aggressive. Stripped out of context, the film is quite brutal.
But here's the point. The boy was not hurt. And an armed suspect was arrested. Maybe Lorne shouldn't have called him a bitch. We can argue over that.
But the truth is that Lorne did a wholly effective job in what was a very dangerous situation. And then got dragged through the mire for doing what he thought was his duty.
To keep the public safe from hoodied scrotes carrying knives.
But today our society is on the side of the skanks and the scrotes. They have their Yuman Roights which must not be transgressed. Doesn't matter what they do. They must be respected.
The truth is that Castle did a wholly effective job in what was a very dangerous situation.
Rod Liddle
And so we let shoplifters go free, cos they're poor innit.
Almost no burglars are caught because society today doesn't think crimes against property are terribly important.
Judges and tribunals tell asylum seekers they can remain here no matter what heinous crimes they have committed.
Because their rights trump our right not to be raped or stabbed or burgled.
And the few people who try to do the right thing? Like Lorne Castle, they end up being sacked.
TAXING FUTURE FOR US
ONE way or another we're about to get clobbered with a tax rise.
It's the only way Rachel from Accounts can get the books to tally.
And my guess – based upon observing her previous interventions in the economy – is that she will raise precisely the wrong taxes.
There will be taxes on the very people who might otherwise spend money and get the economy moving.
Her Budget last autumn sent the British economy into a sharp downward spiral.
She had stressed that her priority was for growth.
And then she went and slapped National Insurance on the very people who should be responsible for that growth – the small and medium businesses.
How long before Sir Keir Starmer has had enough of Reeves?
We've all had it up to here.
An E.T. solution for gloomy-moon mob
6
6
APPARENTLY there's a colony of aliens living secretly on the dark side of the moon.
The Americans know all about it, but have been sworn to secrecy.
They look like us and have built a tower bigger than the Empire State Building. (The aliens, I mean. But the Americans too I suppose).
This all comes from the diaries released by a psychic American man called Ingo Swann, who claims the CIA got him to train his powers on the moon's far side.
And what I want to know is did these spies do this exercise for a laugh in their lunch hour?
And if not, shouldn't we point out to the aliens that the other side of the moon is far nicer?
BIAS AT BEEB IS CLEAR
GOOD for Karoline Leavitt.
Donald Trump's communications chief may spell her name funny, but she can also spot bad journalism from a mile away.
And so she turned her attention to the BBC. Which had filed a report blaming Israel for an attack. When it wasn't Israel.
As Leavitt said, the Beeb just took the word of Hamas at face value. No querying or fact checking.
If the lovely little squirrels of Hamas say something happened, then something happened.
Karoline, we've had to put up with this standard of reporting ever since Hamas invaded.
Thank you for noticing.
ONE LAW FOR ISLAM?
HAMIT Coskun burned a copy of the Koran outside the Turkish embassy.
Hamit was protesting about the increasing Islamisation of the country of his birth.
6
While he was making his protest he was attacked by a man with a knife.
A delivery driver then kicked him in the back as he lay on the ground.
Remarkably, the fact he was attacked was used by the judge to support his guilty sentence to the crime of 'using disorderly behaviour within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress.'
The judge is, I think, an idiot. And no matter how they try to word it, we now have a blasphemy law in this country – but only for Islam.
Burn a Bible and nobody will turn a hair.
6
DOES anybody, anywhere, understand when the UK is to raise its defence spending to three per cent of GDP?
Sir Keir Starmer, who made the announcement, clearly doesn't have a clue.
It looks very much like it won't be by the end of this Parliament, for a start.
There is talk of the UK needing to raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP by 2034.
But it wouldn't surprise me if 2034 is far too late.
Starmer was strong on defence for a while. But that interest now seems to have deserted him. Meanwhile, our enemies are looking on and sniggering.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people
Labour support for legalising assisted dying appears to be falling as more MPs publicly question the law change. The Commons will next week debate changes to the plan to allow terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. But fresh concerns have been raised about the The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that is being led through Parliament by backbencher Kim Leadbeater. Opponents have complained the Bill does not have enough protections and has been rushed through, with the criticism coming days after two royal medical colleges voiced their doubts on the legislation in its current form. And now even supporters of the principle of legalising assisted dying are questioning the process. Labour MP Markus Campbell-Savours, who voted for the bill in a preliminary vote last year, told the BBC he now planned to vote against it because in its current form it crossed his 'red lines for protecting the vulnerable'. 'I want to see safeguards that will ensure that assisted dying is not overextended to include those in situations where there are alternative ways to improve the quality of their lives,' said Campbell-Savours. 'I would also be very concerned if legislation produced a situation where people who considered themselves a burden on their families and friends felt pressured to end their life.' The Commons will next week debate changes to the law allowing terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. And fellow Labour MP Josh Fenton-Glynn told the broadcaster he will vote against the bill, having abstained last year. 'We see quite a few of the amendments which are specifically aimed at stopping coercion being opposed by the supporters of the bill,' he said. 'I don't think chances to make the bill safer have been taken.' At the end of November last year, the Commons backed the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill by 330 votes to 275, a majority of 55 votes. But campaigners believe enough have changed their mind to put its chances of becoming law onto a knife-edge. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The terminally ill person would take an approved substance, provided by a doctor but administered only by the person themselves. The implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years from royal assent, rather than the initially suggested two years. If the Bill was to pass later this year that would mean it might not be until 2029, potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's parliament, that assisted dying was being offered. A Government impact assessment published last month estimated that between 164 and 647 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10. The establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million to £13.6 million per year, the document said. It had 'not been possible' to estimate the overall implementation costs at this stage of the process, it added. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years.


Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Drug dealer who ran over and killed 'respected' man thinking his prone body lying in the road was a 'Halloween prank' is jailed
A drug dealer who ran over and killed a 'loyal' and 'respected' man after thinking his body lying in the road was a Halloween prank has been jailed. Karl Twyford, 29, knocked down Steve Day, 67, shortly before 10pm on October 30, 2021, in Sutton Bonington, Nottinghamshire. Mr Day, a keen motorcyclist, was walking in the village at the time he was run over. He suffered catastrophic injuries to his chest and head and died at the scene. At Nottingham Crown Court, prosecutor Esther Harrison revealed Twyford saw an 'obstacle' as he drove down the road in his silver Ford Ranger. She said: 'He said he did not know what it was and by the time he saw it he was unable to avoid it and drove over it. He said he thought it was a Halloween prank.' Miss Harrison said other people had stopped and saw Mr Day's body lying in the road, but Twyford made impact and drove on. She said: 'A witness was driving her car with a passenger and she saw something lying in the road and realised it was a person. 'She said he was laying on his back in the road with his hand over his chest and she slowed down and maneuvered around it. 'The defendant's silver Ford Ranger followed and drove over Mr Day causing catastrophic injuries to the chest and head. That vehicle stopped, reversed back and then drove off.' Twyford handed himself into police two days after the horror collision. There is no suggestion as to why Mr Day was lying in the road at the time. When police searched Twyford's home in Kegworth, they found three rooms set aside for growing cannabis and nearly a kilo of the Class B drug - worth £11,000. High purity cocaine worth £2,000 was also discovered. Following a retrial earlier this year, a jury took just an hour to unanimously find Twyford guilty of causing the death of Mr Day by careless or inconsiderate driving. The 29-year-old also pleaded guilty to charges of possession with intent to supply drugs and production of cannabis. Richard Thatcher, mitigating, said Twyford, now of Ashbourne in Derbyshire, works as a self-employed bricklayer and became a father in October last year. He said: 'He has perhaps matured and now has something of a family life. He made money (from drug dealing) but that does not mean he had an extravagant lifestyle.' In a victim impact statement read out in court, Mr Day's wife Gina said she was 'distraught and empty' without her husband, calling him a 'well-respected' man in Sutton Bonington where he had lived for almost four decades. She said: 'As his wife I am so distraught and empty. He had so much more living to do, he loved life, especially walking in Cornwall and Scotland with his dogs and loved motorcycling. 'He was kind, loving, loyal and would help anyone. He loved village life and was well known and respected in Sutton Bonington where he had lived for 38 years. He was my life and it will be so hard without him.' Judge Michael Auty KC jailed Twyford for four-and-a-half-years. He received a nine-month sentence for causing Mr Day's death and three years and nine months for the drug offences. The judge also disqualified him from driving until he passes a further test following his release. Judge Auty said: 'Steven Day's wife, Gina, describes her husband as a happy, kind and loving man who enjoyed life to the full. 'That does not surprise me because I have seen photographs of him which reveal a smiling gentleman utterly at peace with the world. 'Precisely why it was that you did not see him or slow down must be, as the jury found, inattentiveness and tragedy followed. You then panicked and left the scene leaving Mr Day.'


BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man seriously injured in hit-and-run crash in Reigate
A man in his 20s has been left with "life-threatening" injuries after a hit-and-run crash, according to Surrey Police. The force said it was investigating the crash, involving a silver Mercedes and the male pedestrian, which happened just before 17:45 BST on Hornbeam Road in Reigate on Thursday. It said the driver left the scene, however officers later found the car. Officers said they were pursuing a "number of active lines" of inquiry. Surrey Police said Hornbeam Road was closed between the junction with Holly Road and Willow Road while officers attended the force urged anyone with information to get in touch.