Citizen science water tests reveal ‘really concerning' pollution in Windermere
Surveying saw 350 volunteers collecting more than 1,000 samples of water from Windermere, in the Lake District, during 10 sessions that took place over two and a half years at more than 100 locations – many of which had never previously been tested for water quality.
The findings from the Big Windermere Survey show much of the lake's shoreline failed bathing water quality standards for illness-causing bacteria in the summer, when it is popular for activities such as swimming and water sports.
And tests for phosphorus, a pollutant that causes algal blooms and damage to aquatic wildlife and comes from sources such as wastewater and fertiliser run-off from agriculture, revealed levels of the chemical that exceed expected standards.
The Freshwater Biological Association, which co-ordinated the citizen science project with the University of Lancaster, warned that rare and threatened freshwater species in the lake such as Arctic char would face a 'steady and devastating decline' without action to improve water quality.
In the light of the findings, the charity's executive director Simon Johnson said: 'The evidence is clear and must lead to decisive action to improve water quality'.
He said Windermere was one of the world's most famous lakes, and if the issues could not be solved on this 'totemic' lake, it did not bode well for the future of other equally important but less famous sites such as Coniston Water.
He told the PA news agency: 'Its scientific, ecological, cultural importance, whether you are an artist, a poet, wild swimmer, motorboat owner, it's just intertwined in the whole kind of social and ecological fabric of the Lake District.
'If we can't get this right on Windermere, where are we going to do it?'
He added: 'When you see a place you love so much, that is so important, when the water quality of that place is below what I think society expects and demands, then that's really concerning.
'I hope that these results will spur people on into better and faster action to rejuvenate this incredible place.'
Windermere, part of the Lake District National Park Unesco World Heritage Site, is home to more than 14,000 people, and its scenery, rare species and cultural heritage attract seven million visitors a year, generating £750 million for the local economy.
But it has been the focus of concerns over pollution, from sources including wastewater from United Utilities and private sewage treatment and rural and urban land use, with the Government pledging to 'clean up Windermere' from the high levels of pollutants it faces.
The citizen science testing which took place from June 2022 to November 2024 aimed to address concerns about water quality and fill in gaps in traditional monitoring.
The Environment Agency currently monitors water quality through the summer months at four sites around the lake as part of its bathing water assessments, with all receiving 'excellent' ratings in the last annual classification.
But the Big Windermere Survey used data from 71 sample sites around the lake's shoreline, to assess the prevalence of two types of bacteria that can cause illness, with tests taken throughout the year.
The data show that overall Windermere's levels of bacteria give it a 'good' water quality rating, but pollution gets worse in the summer, with the north-east, north-west, and south-west areas of the lake having bacteria levels that would lead to a 'poor' or failing rating for bathing water quality.
Only the south-east lake basin has concentrations of these bacteria – which are found in faeces and can come from treated wastewater, untreated sewage, livestock and wildlife – consistent with excellent bathing water quality in the summer, a report on the surveying found.
Both the north and south basins of Windermere were classified as having 'good' levels of phosphorus in the latest official assessment, as part of standards that should see all water bodies reach good ecological status by 2027.
But the report shows that all areas of the lake – when sampled around the shoreline – had 'moderate' levels of phosphorus, which mean they are higher than what is needed to ensure a 'good' rating.
The report also reveals that some sample sites had consistently demonstrated high concentrations of both phosphorus and at least one of the bacteria.
These include Waterhead, Millerground, Bowness Bay, Belle Isle, Mitchell Wyke Bay, south-west shore sites and near the River Leven outflow on the lake, and river locations on the Rothay, Stock Ghyll, Black Beck, Mill Beck, and Wilfin Beck.
The Freshwater Biological Association is calling for the pollution hotspots identified by the testing to be investigated and resolved urgently, and for the Environment Agency to increase the number of bathing water sites and monitor them through the year.
The charity also wants to see investment to ensure wastewater facilities are fit for purpose and adequately monitored and regulators are able to tackle pollution risks, and it wants funding to allow the Big Windermere Survey to continue.
An Environment Department (Defra) spokesperson said: 'This Government shares the nation's fury at unacceptable levels of pollution pumped into this national treasure.
'We have committed to ending sewage pollution into Windermere entirely, boosted monitoring of sewage spills nationwide and are increasing enforcement to hold polluting companies to account.
'We know that there is a lot of damage to undo, but we are getting on with the work to ensure that the British people will be able to see genuine results.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Dramatic slowdown in melting of Arctic sea ice surprises scientists
The melting of sea ice in the Arctic has slowed dramatically in the past 20 years, scientists have reported, with no statistically significant decline in its extent since 2005. The finding is surprising, the researchers say, given that carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning have continued to rise and trap ever more heat over that time. They said natural variations in ocean currents that limit ice melting had probably balanced out the continuing rise in global temperatures. However, they said this was only a temporary reprieve and melting was highly likely to start again at about double the long-term rate at some point in the next five to 10 years. The findings do not mean Arctic sea ice is rebounding. Sea ice area in September, when it reaches its annual minimum, has halved since 1979, when satellite measurements began. The climate crisis remains 'unequivocally real', the scientists said, and the need for urgent action to avoid the worst impacts remains unchanged. The natural variation causing the slowdown is probably the multi-decadal fluctuations in currents in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, which change the amount of warmed water flowing into the Arctic. The Arctic is still expected to see ice-free conditions later in the century, harming people and wildlife in the region and boosting global heating by exposing the dark, heat-absorbing ocean. Dr Mark England, who led the study while at the University of Exeter, said: 'It is surprising, when there is a current debate about whether global warming is accelerating, that we're talking about a slowdown. 'The good news is that 10 to 15 years ago when sea ice loss was accelerating, some people were talking about an ice-free Arctic before 2020. But now the [natural] variability has switched to largely cancelling out sea ice loss. It has bought us a bit more time but it is a temporary reprieve – when it ends, it isn't good news.' The research, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, used two different datasets of Arctic sea ice levels from 1979 to the present day. The scientists analysed the sea ice area for every month of the year and the slowdown was seen in all cases. To see if such a slowdown could be a result of natural variation, they examined the results of thousands of climate model runs. 'This is not an extremely rare event – over a century, it should happen a couple of times,' said England, now at the University of California, Irvine. Furthermore, all the simulations showed sea ice loss accelerating again after the slowdown. Prof Julienne Stroeve, of University College London, said: 'We know climate records, be it in global temperatures or sea ice, can remain the same for several years in a row as a result of internal climate variability.' Stroeve's analysis of the long-term trend from 1979 to 2024 shows that about 2.5 sq metres of September ice is lost for every tonne of CO2 emitted. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Prof Andrew Shepherd, of Northumbria University, said: 'We know that the Arctic sea ice pack is also thinning, and so even if the area was not reducing, the volume still is. Our data show that since 2010 the average October thickness has fallen by 0.6cm per year.' The rate of the rise in global surface temperature has also slowed down in the past, before resuming a rapid rise. A major El Niño event in 1998 was followed by a decade or so of similar global temperatures, which was nicknamed 'the pause'. However, the planet continued to accumulate heat throughout and global temperatures have since risen rapidly. England rejected any suggestion the sea ice slowdown suggested climate change was not real. 'Climate change is unequivocally real, human-driven, and continues to pose serious threats. The fundamental science and urgency for climate action remain unchanged,' he said. 'It is good to explain to people that [the slowdown] is happening, else they are going to hear it from someone who is trying to use it in bad faith as a way to undermine our very solid understanding of what's happening with climate change.'
Rhyl Journal
10 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Citizen science water tests reveal ‘really concerning' pollution in Windermere
Following the results, which showed levels of harmful bacteria and phosphorus that fail water quality standards and identified 'hotspots' for pollution, campaigners have called for 'decisive action' to improve the lake for people and the environment. Surveying saw 350 volunteers collecting more than 1,000 samples of water from Windermere, in the Lake District, during 10 sessions that took place over two and a half years at more than 100 locations – many of which had never previously been tested for water quality. The findings from the Big Windermere Survey show much of the lake's shoreline failed bathing water quality standards for illness-causing bacteria in the summer, when it is popular for activities such as swimming and water sports. And tests for phosphorus, a pollutant that causes algal blooms and damage to aquatic wildlife and comes from sources such as wastewater and fertiliser run-off from agriculture, revealed levels of the chemical that exceed expected standards. The Freshwater Biological Association, which co-ordinated the citizen science project with the University of Lancaster, warned that rare and threatened freshwater species in the lake such as Arctic char would face a 'steady and devastating decline' without action to improve water quality. In the light of the findings, the charity's executive director Simon Johnson said: 'The evidence is clear and must lead to decisive action to improve water quality'. He said Windermere was one of the world's most famous lakes, and if the issues could not be solved on this 'totemic' lake, it did not bode well for the future of other equally important but less famous sites such as Coniston Water. He told the PA news agency: 'Its scientific, ecological, cultural importance, whether you are an artist, a poet, wild swimmer, motorboat owner, it's just intertwined in the whole kind of social and ecological fabric of the Lake District. 'If we can't get this right on Windermere, where are we going to do it?' He added: 'When you see a place you love so much, that is so important, when the water quality of that place is below what I think society expects and demands, then that's really concerning. 'I hope that these results will spur people on into better and faster action to rejuvenate this incredible place.' Windermere, part of the Lake District National Park Unesco World Heritage Site, is home to more than 14,000 people, and its scenery, rare species and cultural heritage attract seven million visitors a year, generating £750 million for the local economy. But it has been the focus of concerns over pollution, from sources including wastewater from United Utilities and private sewage treatment and rural and urban land use, with the Government pledging to 'clean up Windermere' from the high levels of pollutants it faces. The citizen science testing which took place from June 2022 to November 2024 aimed to address concerns about water quality and fill in gaps in traditional monitoring. The Environment Agency currently monitors water quality through the summer months at four sites around the lake as part of its bathing water assessments, with all receiving 'excellent' ratings in the last annual classification. But the Big Windermere Survey used data from 71 sample sites around the lake's shoreline, to assess the prevalence of two types of bacteria that can cause illness, with tests taken throughout the year. The data show that overall Windermere's levels of bacteria give it a 'good' water quality rating, but pollution gets worse in the summer, with the north-east, north-west, and south-west areas of the lake having bacteria levels that would lead to a 'poor' or failing rating for bathing water quality. Only the south-east lake basin has concentrations of these bacteria – which are found in faeces and can come from treated wastewater, untreated sewage, livestock and wildlife – consistent with excellent bathing water quality in the summer, a report on the surveying found. Both the north and south basins of Windermere were classified as having 'good' levels of phosphorus in the latest official assessment, as part of standards that should see all water bodies reach good ecological status by 2027. But the report shows that all areas of the lake – when sampled around the shoreline – had 'moderate' levels of phosphorus, which mean they are higher than what is needed to ensure a 'good' rating. The report also reveals that some sample sites had consistently demonstrated high concentrations of both phosphorus and at least one of the bacteria. These include Waterhead, Millerground, Bowness Bay, Belle Isle, Mitchell Wyke Bay, south-west shore sites and near the River Leven outflow on the lake, and river locations on the Rothay, Stock Ghyll, Black Beck, Mill Beck, and Wilfin Beck. The Freshwater Biological Association is calling for the pollution hotspots identified by the testing to be investigated and resolved urgently, and for the Environment Agency to increase the number of bathing water sites and monitor them through the year. The charity also wants to see investment to ensure wastewater facilities are fit for purpose and adequately monitored and regulators are able to tackle pollution risks, and it wants funding to allow the Big Windermere Survey to continue. An Environment Department (Defra) spokesperson said: 'This Government shares the nation's fury at unacceptable levels of pollution pumped into this national treasure. 'We have committed to ending sewage pollution into Windermere entirely, boosted monitoring of sewage spills nationwide and are increasing enforcement to hold polluting companies to account. 'We know that there is a lot of damage to undo, but we are getting on with the work to ensure that the British people will be able to see genuine results.'
Daily Mirror
19 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Lake District holidaymakers warned of harmful bacteria in pollution 'hotspots'
Most of Lake Windermere polluted with sewage bacteria, biggest survey of its kind finds after a Citizen Science Project finds Concerning levels of pollution have been found in England's largest and most famous lake, a citizen science project has found. High levels of bacteria found in human faeces – Escherichia coli (E coli) and intestinal enterococci (IE) – indicating sewage pollution, were found to be highest in the summer months, when Windermere in the Lake District is used heavily by holidaymakers for swimming and watersports. Following the results, which showed levels of harmful bacteria and phosphorus that fail water quality standards and identified "hotspots" for pollution, campaigners have called for "decisive action" to improve the lake for people and the environment. Surveying saw 350 volunteers collecting more than 1,000 samples for the Big Windermere Survey during 10 sessions that took place over two and a half years at more than 100 locations - many of which had never previously been tested for water quality. Tests for phosphorus, a pollutant that causes algal blooms and damage to aquatic wildlife and comes from sources such as wastewater and fertiliser run-off from agriculture, revealed levels of the chemical that exceed expected standards. The Freshwater Biological Association, which co-ordinated the citizen science project with the University of Lancaster, warned that rare and threatened freshwater species in the lake such as Arctic char would face a "steady and devastating decline" without action to improve water quality. In the light of the findings, the charity's executive director Simon Johnson said: "The evidence is clear and must lead to decisive action to improve water quality". He said Windermere was one of the world's most famous lakes, and if the issues could not be solved on this "totemic" lake, it did not bode well for the future of other equally important but less famous sites such as Conniston Water. He said: "Its scientific, ecological, cultural importance, whether you are an artist, a poet, wild swimmer, motorboat owner, it's just intertwined in the whole kind of social and ecological fabric of the Lake District. "If we can't get this right on Windermere, where are we going to do it?" He added: "When you see a place you love so much, that is so important, when the water quality of that place is below what I think society expects and demands, then that's really concerning. I hope that these results will spur people on into better and faster action to rejuvenate this incredible place." Windermere, part of the Lake District National Park Unesco World Heritage Site, is home to more than 14,000 people, and its scenery, rare species and cultural heritage attract seven million visitors a year, generating £750 But it has been the focus of concerns over pollution, from sources including wastewater from United Utilities and private sewage treatment and rural and urban land use, with the Government pledging to "clean up Windermere" from the high levels of pollutants it faces. million for the local economy. Matt Staniek, who founded the Save Windermere campaign, said the results were damning. 'Finally we're seeing science in the catchment that hasn't been manipulated by vested interests or shaped by those taking money from the water company,' he said. A United Utilities spokesperson said it is ' wholeheartedly committed to playing our part in continuing to improve the water quality in the lake. 'Our teams are working at pace to complete multiple projects to treat wastewater to the highest standards possible as well as significantly reducing discharges from the six storm overflows that discharge into the Lake. "This builds on our previous investment that has helped cut the amount of phosphorus entering the lake from our own operations by half. We are also working with all other organisations and individuals that impact water quality in the lake to help deliver the step change we all want to see.'
