&w=3840&q=100)
‘Just in case these foolish statements are...': Trump orders nuclear sub deployment after Medvedev's 'provocative' remarks
A day after former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned US President Donald Trump about Moscow's Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities following Trump's remark telling him to 'watch his words', the US President on Friday said he had ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines in response to what he called 'highly provocative' comments by the Russian leader.
'Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances,' he added.
Trump did not clarify the exact location or nature—nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed—of the submarines he said were deployed in response to remarks by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.
The escalating exchange between the two leaders began after Trump labelled Medvedev the 'failed former President of Russia.'
Trump, after announcing a new tariff on India and a penalty for its trade relations with Russia, said, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World.'
He added, 'Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together. Let's keep it that way, and tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!'
Medvedev responded on Thursday via Telegram, writing, 'If a few words from the former president of Russia can provoke such a jittery reaction from the mighty president of the United States, then Russia must be completely in the right.'
'We'll keep moving forward on our own path,' Reuters quoted him as saying.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Mocking Trump's 'dead economies' remark, Medvedev referenced Russia's Cold War-era nuclear deterrent system: 'As for 'dead economies' and 'dangerous territory,' maybe he should rewatch his favorite zombie movies and remember just how dangerous the so-called 'Dead Hand,' which doesn't even exist, can be.'
While Trump did not specify what exactly triggered his nuclear warning, Medvedev had earlier in the week criticised Trump's push for more sanctions, accusing him of escalating tensions.
'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country,' Medvedev wrote on X.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's America First biodiesel policy could cost US companies, consumers, trade groups warn
The Trump administration's push to discourage the use of foreign feedstocks in domestic biodiesel could lead to higher energy prices for US consumers and restricted domestic production, according to some refining and biofuel trade groups. The warning reflects ongoing friction between President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency and the administration's traditional allies in the energy and agriculture industries over biofuels policy. Trump has promised to slash consumer energy costs , but is also trying to advance his America First agenda to support domestic production through trade protectionism - which can often make costs go up instead. At issue is a proposal from the EPA in June that would for the first time allocate only half as many tradable renewable fuel credits to biodiesel that is either imported or made with foreign feedstocks. Under the Renewable Fuel Standard, refiners must blend large volumes of biofuels into the US fuel supply or purchase the credits, called RINs, from those that do. While meant to help domestic farmers and producers, the new proposal - set to be finalized this autumn - would place unprecedented demand on domestic raw materials needed to make biodiesel like soybean oil, used cooking oil, and animal fat, in a market that currently must look abroad to meet its needs. Meanwhile, restricting the number of RINs that can be generated through such imports will raise credit prices, with a potential spillover impact on diesel and home heating oil, according to the industry groups. "This credit restriction ... will jeopardize the economic viability of renewable fuel production assets and raise overall compliance costs for all obligated parties, which ultimately harms US consumers," Chet Thompson, head of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers group representing refiners, said in a July 25 letter to top Republican lawmakers. The Advanced Biofuels Association also said the policy could mean ramped up consumer costs, by putting a $250 per metric ton premium on domestic versus imported feedstocks, according to a study it commissioned. "Economic analysis shows this would impose significant costs on US biorefineries, raise fuel prices for millions of Americans, and benefit only a narrow set of stakeholders," ABFA President Michael McAdams said in a statement. The White House and EPA declined to comment directly on the price concerns, saying the administration is still seeking public comment on the proposal until August 8. Others in the biofuel industry backed the proposal. "American farmers need all the demand they can get. We should be developing our capacity here, rather than relying on imported used cooking oil from China, or giving Brazilian feedstocks preferential treatment at the expense of US producers and their farm partners," said Emily Skor, CEO of Growth Energy. However, US companies such as ADM, Bunge and Cargill that have global assets and process US soy, as well as foreign companies with significant US operations, will likely see negative effects. That includes Australia's Nufarm , which contracts with farmers in South America to grow new oilseed crops. Uncertain numbers The biofuel industry had not been seeking the import shift in EPA's June proposal, according to multiple renewable fuel lobbyists and company officials. The White House has since held several meetings with industry officials to hear about potential unintended consequences of the changes, according to multiple sources. The EPA's proposal in June was meant to set out biofuel blending mandates for the next two years. It included a quota of 7.12 billion biomass-based diesel RINs for 2026 - a measurement of the number of tradable credits generated by blending the fuel - and projected that mandate would lead to the blending of 5.61 billion gallons. The biofuels industry and the American Petroleum Institute, an oil trade group, had banded together to lobby the administration to set biomass-based diesel mandates to at least 5.25 billion gallons. The mandate was just 3.35 billion gallons in 2025. Still, there are scenarios in the EPA's accounting that could lead to a lower volume outcome. If all the biodiesel and renewable diesel used in the US next year came from domestic feedstocks, for example, the RIN mandate would yield just 4.45 billion gallons, according to several industry analyses reviewed by Reuters. Ditching the penalty on imported feedstocks could help raise that number, according to the analyses. "That probably aligns with what the administration was trying to do in terms of supporting the agricultural side and farmers," said one industry analyst, who asked to remain anonymous to speak candidly.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Guns, Jeans, and Republican: How Syndey Sweeney became MAGA's new muse – and a Conservative icon
In the first of the Republican National Conservative debates, when Trump steadfastly refused to participate to show Fox who was the man, his surrogate attack dog summed up the inflection point that was about to overshadow America: 'You want to be a rebel? You want to be a hippie? You want to 'stick it to the man'? Show up on your college campus and try calling yourself a conservative. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now ' It's true. Being liberal used to be an act of rebellion. But that rebellion became mainstream, corporatised, and institutionalised. It now lives on as HR slideshows, Twitter mobs, and avocado ad campaigns. Being young and Republican in 2025 is an act of defiance. And today's protestants become tomorrow's mainstream—evidenced by the fact that there are now more young people who identify as Republican than Democrat in America. It's not clear when the Left lost the youth. Perhaps it was the cascade of madness: the woke craze of pushing trans behaviour in grammar schools. Demanding biological males be allowed to play in women's sports. Saying illegal immigrants should have unfettered access to welfare. Shouting 'Defund the Police' while shoplifting turned into organised retail looting. Declaring obesity a form of body positivity. Telling working-class white kids that their skin colour was an inherited sin. Declaring that whiteness ought to be apologised for. Slowly, the country shifted. Not by campaign ads or policy briefings—but by exhaustion. And as America began tuning out the moral lectures from elites, late-night comedians, and Hollywood, a new icon quietly emerged. Not a pundit. Not a senator. Not a firebrand. A muse. . In an era where even a sneeze can be interpreted as a political statement, Sydney Sweeney has become the conservative darling of the year—without attending a single rally or issuing a single press release. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The star of Euphoria and The White Lotus has, quite by accident, become a MAGA icon. All it took was a leaked Republican voter registration, a denim ad campaign misread as a white supremacist dog whistle, and a shooting range video that could've doubled as NRA propaganda. Welcome to 2025, where political identity is crafted less by what you say, and more by which side claims you. The Republican Registration That Launched a Thousand Memes It recently emerged that That was it. She didn't make a political speech. She didn't wear a MAGA hat. She didn't retweet Ben Shapiro. All she did was file the correct paperwork, and the internet found it. Her name. Her address. Her party. Suddenly, the Right had its new pin-up girl. The Left had a meltdown. For conservatives, this was a cultural coup. A beautiful, talented Hollywood starlet—young, blonde, wildly popular—was officially red. Not pink. Not centrist. Red. And best of all? She wasn't saying sorry for it. The silence was glorious. No apology tour. No clarifying tweet. No 'I was hacked' statement. Liberals demanded answers. Progressives called it a betrayal. But Sydney Sweeney didn't flinch. And in an age where even Instagram captions are pored over for political subtext, saying nothing is a weapon. 'Great Jeans' and the Eugenics Panic of Summer 2025 Then came the American Eagle campaign. Sydney Sweeney, in tight denim and a tank top, staring into the camera under the caption: 'Great Genes.' That's it. That's the ad. Within hours, the internet exploded. Not because of the fashion. Not because of the cut. But because of the word: 'genes.' Not jeans. Genes. The Left read it as a eugenics dog whistle. A blonde-haired, blue-eyed woman fronting a brand with a tagline that sounded suspiciously like white supremacy. Satirical Twitter lit up: 'This is Leni Riefenstahl for Gen Z.' 'Are they selling pants or the master race?' But the Right? The Right cackled. This was proof. Proof that the outrage industry had gone too far. That even a pun could be labelled fascist. That Sydney Sweeney, just by existing in her natural body and not issuing trigger warnings, was now enemy number one. American Eagle didn't back down. Sales spiked. The controversy became the campaign. Sydney didn't write the tagline. She was just the face. But once again, the narrative moved around her. She became the accidental symbol of conservative resistance to liberal hysteria. Shooting Range Superstar: From HBO to the NRA And then the final seal was pressed: the shooting range video. Sydney, in casualwear and earmuffs, loading a Glock like she was born in Fort Benning. First-time shooter? Didn't look like it. Her stance, her focus, her shot grouping—it was enough to make half of Republican Twitter swoon. Clips went viral: 'Sydney Sweeney: America's New Annie Oakley .' .' 'She can shoot AND act? Wife me.' 'Meanwhile your favourite liberal thinks Nerf is a hate crime.' The symbolism was perfect. A young woman in Hollywood, not just pretending to shoot in a Netflix movie—but actually firing rounds at a paper target, calmly, confidently. No virtue signalling. No trembling hands. Just recoil and resolve. The Right didn't need words. The imagery was enough. Mainstream Republicans quickly rallied behind Sydney Sweeney. Vice President JD Vance criticised Democrats for 'calling everyone who thinks Sydney Sweeney beautiful a Nazi,' saying it showed how out of touch the party had become with young voters. Senator Ted Cruz also weighed in, posting on X: 'Wow. Now the crazy Left has come out against beautiful women. I'm sure that will poll well. ' Inside the White House, officials saw the controversy as a win, saying it helped highlight what they view as liberal overreach and cultural policing. For many Republicans, Sweeney's party registration wasn't just a detail—it was confirmation that the culture war was breaking their way. The Power of Saying Nothing What makes Sydney Sweeney such a potent figure is precisely her ambiguity. She doesn't tweet about taxes. She doesn't complain about feminism. She doesn't post 'I Voted' stickers or abortion fundraisers. She doesn't do red carpet activism. And in 2025, that absence speaks louder than any hashtag. Hollywood thrives on performative wokeness. Stars compete to signal their virtue—whether it's climate guilt on private jets or apologies for being cast as straight characters. Sydney Sweeney has opted out. That, to a large chunk of America, makes her radical. Because silence is now seen as alignment. Refusing to bend the knee is tantamount to opposition. And that's why both sides are fighting to frame her. To liberals, she's naive at best, complicit at worst. To conservatives, she's a unicorn: the apolitical star who still represents everything they believe in—beauty, freedom, guns, and denim. The Post-Woke Celebrity Archetype What Sydney Sweeney represents is something new: the post-woke Hollywood icon. Not a right-wing activist. Not a left-wing darling. But someone who has managed to float above the trench warfare. This new archetype is defined by: Ambiguity over affirmation Style over slogans Presence over preaching She's not talking about CRT, climate change, or colonialism. She's talking about her dog. Or her workout. Or her skincare routine. And yet, her silence makes her subversive. She isn't against the Left in any direct sense. She's just not of it. And that distinction matters. Why MAGA Can't Stop Posting Her There's a reason conservative media can't get enough of her: She's young. The GOP's problem has always been youth appeal. Sydney solves that. She's beautiful. Liberal feminists would call that 'problematic.' The Right calls it reality. She's talented. Awards, praise, and prestige roles, all without being preachy. She's silent. No need to cancel. No need to apologise. No moral panic. Just vibes. In other words, she's the anti-Lena Dunham. The anti-Alyssa Milano. The anti-everything that drove red-state Americans away from Hollywood. The Culture War's Most Valuable Pawn Sydney Sweeney didn't ask to be drafted into the culture war. She just voted. Then modelled. Then fired a gun. But in the content economy, you don't get to choose how you're used. She became a screen onto which America projected its anxieties and aspirations. And the fact that she never pushed back made her more powerful. The Right turned her into a meme. The Left turned her into a warning. And Sydney? Sydney went back to work. To movies. To photo shoots. To her life. That may be the most radical thing of all. The Mirror, Not the Mouthpiece Sydney Sweeney is not giving speeches. She's not asking for your vote. She's not applying to be the next Kayleigh McEnany. She is simply existing. But in 2025, that's all it takes. She is a mirror—reflecting everything America wants to believe, or fears to acknowledge. To the Right, she's the proof that Hollywood doesn't own the narrative. To the Left, she's a reminder that silence can be resistance too. And in a country where every movie, every tweet, every ad campaign becomes a battleground, Sydney Sweeney has done the unthinkable. She said nothing. And everyone heard it.
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
This Week in Explainers: Is Trump embracing Pakistan at the cost of India?
Donald Trump proudly announced this week that he had signed a deal to jointly develop 'massive oil reserves' with Pakistan. This move came as the US president announced a 25 per cent tariff on India along with an added penalty for trading with Russia. We discuss this and more in our weekly wrap of the news read more It's been a hectic, hectic past seven days. Donald Trump unleashed a new tsunami of tariffs on several of America's trading partners, including India whom he even referred to as a 'dead economy'. This week, also saw a further change in Trump's stance in connection to Pakistan. He has signed a new trade deal with India's neighbour, which includes developing 'massive oil reserves' in Pakistan. It's a far cry from calling it one that has 'given us nothing but lies and deceit' as Trump did back in 2018 during his first term at the White House. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking of a tsunami, a powerful 8.8 earthquake in Russia's far Eastern Kamchatka Peninsula, also triggered concern as well as tsunami waves across several countries, including America's Hawaii and Japan. In the week gone by, New York has also garnered headlines — albeit for the wrong reasons. The city's controversial mayoral candidate, Zohran Mamdani faced fury for his lavish wedding celebrations in Uganda. The city was also shocked when a gunman barged into a midtown Manhattan office, killing four people – including a New York Police Department officer – before turning the gun on himself. Now, as we wind down from the busy happenings from the week, we discuss these big stories from across the world and much more. 1. Since Trump returned to power in January, he has spoken of tariffs and used them as a pressure tactic to get countries negotiate trade deals with the US. And with just hours before the August 1 deadline on trade deals, the US president announced a new set of tariffs for countries across the world, with the levies ranging from as low as 10 per cent to as high as 41 per cent. Among those on the list was India — with a 25 per cent tariff imposed. Notably, this makes India among the worst hit in Asia. Neighbouring countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh fared much better; Trump levied a 19 per cent tariff on Islamabad whereas Dhaka saw a 20 per cent tariff. Here's more about this in our report. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 2. On the topic of trade and tariffs, this week also saw Trump announcing a new deal with Pakistan in which Washington and Islamabad would jointly 'develop massive oil reserves' in the Asian nation. Many note that this is a clear indicator that the US president is further embracing Pakistan, at the cost of India. After all, this new move comes amid the 25 per cent tariff on India as well as after Trump invited Pakistan army chief Asim Munir to the White House for a lunch in June. But the question that many are asking is does Pakistan have the oil that it claims? What does data show on Pakistan's oil reserves? Where are these sites that it claims to develop along with Trump? A woman watches the sea during an evacuation of the coast following a tsunami warning issued by local authorities after an earthquake struck the Kamchatka Peninsula in the far east of Russia, triggering warnings and evacuations across the South Pacific, in Dichato near Concepcion, Chile. Reuters 3. On Wednesday, one of the most powerful earthquakes ever recorded struck Russia's remote Kamchatka Peninsula, sending tsunami waves hurtling across the Pacific Ocean and putting nations from Japan to the United States to Chile on high alert with millions urged to evacuate. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The waves hit Russia and Japan first and then the US states of Hawaii, California, Oregon, Washington, and Alaska. The tsunami waves led many to believe that New Baba Vanga's prediction of Japan's destruction would come true. However, less than 24 hours after the quake first struck, most tsunami alerts around the world had already been lifted. But how much damage did the quake and tsunami waves cause? Our explainer has the answers for you. 4. In this week gone by, another Indian was attacked in Ireland by a gang of teenagers. This time, Santosh Yadav, an Indian-origin techie was assaulted by the teens in Dublin, leaving him with a fractured cheek bone. The shocking incident comes just a week after another gang attacked an Indian-origin man in Dublin in the evening, leaving him bloodied and without any pants by the side of the road. It was a woman, who finally helped him get the aid he required. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Interestingly, the same time the 40-year-old was beaten in Dublin, an Indian student was being assaulted in Australia's Adelaide following a parking lot dispute. These incidents in quick succession have got many asking — are Indians being targeted abroad? A police officer stands next to the glass window with a bullet hole near the scene of a deadly mass shooting in Manhattan, New York City. Reuters 5. Half of 2025 is over but somethings just don't change. For instance, gun violence in America and the latest instance emerged on Tuesday (July 29) when a gunman stormed into a high-rise office building in Midtown Manhattan, home to heavyweight firms like Blackstone, the National Football League, and KPMG, and opened fire, killing four people before turning the gun on himself. The gunman was later identified as Shane Devon Tamura, a 27-year-old from Las Vegas, acted alone, armed with an around $500 assault rifle. But who was he? We have the full story here. Hidaya, a 31-year-old Palestinian mother, carries her sick 18-month-old son Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq, who is displaying signs of malnutrition, inside their tent at the Al-Shati refugee camp, west of Gaza City. This image has become symbolic of a famine in Gaza. AFP 6. They say a picture speaks a thousand words. However, a viral photo from Gaza, which has become a symbol of the hunger crisis that emanates from the ongoing Israel war, has now come under a cloud of suspicion. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A pro-Israeli journalist has questioned the image, slamming it to be propaganda carried out by some Western media. But what's the full story behind the image? Is there more to it than meets the eye? 7. On the topic of war, we turn our focus to the Russia-Ukraine war. This week, data has emerged that HIV rates among enlisted personnel skyrocketed since the outbreak of the Ukraine war. The number of HIV cases in the military has shot up since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, including a fivefold increase by autumn that year. By the end of 2023, there were 20 times more HIV diagnoses among Russian soldiers compared with before the war. But what's the cause for the soaring numbers? What's to blame for the rise in HIV cases among Russian soldiers? Read our full essay for the answers. That's all from us this week. Bookmark this page, if you liked what you read and seek more such reports. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Happy reading!
