logo
Louisiana legislators to consider college athletics subsidies

Louisiana legislators to consider college athletics subsidies

Yahoo21-04-2025

The new video display scoreboard in Tiger Stadium's north side as seen from the Pete Maravich Assembly Center on Sept. 13, 2024. (Matthew Perschall for Louisiana Illuminator)
The Louisiana Legislature is considering several proposals that would create tax breaks and new revenue streams for college athletes and their sports programs.
If passed in their current state, the proposals would exempt college athletes from income taxes on their name, image and likeness (NIL) deals and would create a new fund to give tax dollars to NCAA Division I athletics programs like LSU's.
But critics say the Republican-backed proposals are doing something antithetical to their party's free-market philosophy. They also argue the bills could further widen the divide — cultural and fiscal — between academics and athletics.
The change could also come at the expense of priority services the state provides, such as early childhood education
House Bill 639 by Rep. Neil Riser, R-Columbia, would increase the tax on sports gambling from 15% to 32.5%, aligning it with the tax on video poker machine wagers. Increasing the tax rate on sports gambling has support from both conservative and progressive corners, both of whom want to use the revenue to offset the 'social ills' of gambling.
But Riser's bill goes further, altering the revenue split and putting 25% into a fund that would benefit student-athletes at public schools that compete at the NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision and Football Championship Subdivision levels. That includes UL Lafayette, UL Monroe, Louisiana Tech, LSU, Grambling, McNeese, Nicholls, Northwestern, Southeastern and Southern.
The University of New Orleans, which does not have a football program, would be left in the cold.
'The need is so high,' Riser said in an interview with the Louisiana Illuminator and Tiger Rag. 'When you start talking about the SEC, talking about any level of athletics right now, it's changed so dramatically.'
'Even like ULM … just to be competitive [in recruiting], it takes facilities, when you're dealing with [athletes] they require you to have all those things,' Riser said.
A frequent adage about LSU athletics is that it doesn't get any state funding, which isn't strictly true. The department notably received $1 million in cash from the state in 2023 to plan for improving or replacing the Pete Marravich Assembly Center and occasionally receives small-dollar amounts for various state-funded projects.
But Riser's fund could change that. The state currently brings in approximately $54 million annually in sports gambling revenue. If his bill passes, the state's take would increase to approximately $116 million, with about $30 million dedicated to college athletics.
That's a huge amount of money in the context of college athletics in Louisiana. Only LSU has a budget larger than that, with most other FBS and FCS schools in Louisiana bringing in only half or a third as much.
Even with heavy subsidies to small programs like Nicholls and Grambling, you can expect LSU to line up to receive its share of the revenue.
Presently, the state's split for sports gambling tax revenue calls for 25% to go toward early childhood education, 10% to local governments and the rest goes to gambling addiction programs and other projects.
Under Riser's bill, after college athletic departments get their 25%, an additional 3% goes to the Louisiana Postsecondary Inclusive Education Fund, which finances programs for students with disabilities, and the rest goes into the state general fund that can be used for a variety of government needs.
Taking money away from early childhood education and gambling addiction programs is certain to ensure a fight over Riser's bill.
'Legalized mobile gambling has created or exacerbated many social and cultural problems, including addiction, bankruptcies, and even increases in domestic violence,' said Peter Robins-Brown, executive director of the progressive organization Louisiana Progress. 'New tax revenue should be used first and foremost to address some of those problems before we talk about spending more money on college sports.'
And dedicating state money to college athletics might be a hard sell at a time when lawmakers are digging into couch cushions to find the change necessary to prevent a K-12 teacher pay cut.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Two pending bills would exempt athletes' NIL compensation from state income tax.
The most notable proposal is House Bill 166 by Rep. Dixon McMakin, R-Baton Rouge, which would exempt the entirety of athletes' NIL income from the state taxes. McMakin, an LSU alum whose father played baseball for the Tigers in the 1970s, said he proposed the legislation because LSU is competing for athletes against states like Texas that don't have a state income tax.
McMakin said the measure is appropriate in light of the economic impact athletes have on the state. LSU athletics generated $500 million for the state in the 2021-22 academic year, according to a university study.
But what might be considered the academic parallel to paid student-athletes — graduate assistants — would still be subject to state income tax.
Several graduate students interviewed raised objections to this double standard, which Jan Moller, executive director of Invest in Louisiana, said is a valid concern. His organization advocates for policies that benefit lower- and middle-class citizens.
LSU covers tuition for graduate assistants and pays them a stipend for the work they do, such as teaching freshman classes and conducting research. Unlike student-athletes, grad assistants have to pay for their own housing, meals and health care on their meager stipends – expenses that are all paid for college athletes on full scholarships.
'They are subsidizing entertainment over academics at the expense of academics,' said biology graduate student Cullen Hodges.
'It's not the government's role to subsidize millionaire college athletes when we can't provide basic services to our citizens,' Moller said.
McMakin said if graduate assistants wanted to present evidence of their economic impact, he'll 'happily' add them to his bill. In 2022, LSU research, much of it done or assisted by graduate students, had a $1.3 billion economic impact.
The proposal is bad tax policy, Moller said.
'It's conservatives who will always say that we shouldn't pick winners and losers with our tax policy,' Moller said. 'What is this if not picking winners and losers?'
A second proposal, House Bill 168 by Rep. Rashid Young, D-Homer, would exempt the first $12,500 of athletes' NIL income from state taxes. That aligns the exemption with the standardized deduction offered to every other Louisiana resident. It's not clear if this legislation is necessary for the athletes to receive the deduction, but Young said he wanted to make sure they get it.
Young, a former Grambling football player, said he also supports McMakin's bill.
'Top athletes are leaving the state of Louisiana because they're getting better deals in other states that … don't have any income tax,' Young said in an interview. 'We need to start trying to get in the game.'
Young's bill also creates an income tax deduction for taxpayers who enter into NIL deals with college athletes. It was designed to encourage small businesses to get in the name, image and likeness game, he said
Young has also proposed a resolution that would create a task force to study the need for increased transparency on NIL and related issues. LSU Athletic Director Scott Woodward, and other Division I athletic directors in Louisiana, would be members of the task force, as well as student-athletes, state legislators and three representatives of the private sector.
Sen. Jeremy Stine, R-Lake Charles, wants to 'Make American Athletics Great Again.' His proposed Senate Bill 200 would prohibit athletic departments in Louisiana from giving more than 25% of their scholarships and financial assistance to international athletes.
About 23% of LSU's scholarship athletes are international students, according to data LSU athletics spokesman Zach Greenwell provided.
Just three schools — McNeese, ULM and UNO — are above the proposed 25% rate. Stine's bill does not address what would happen to these athletes. He did not respond to an interview request for this report.
House Concurrent Resolution 13 by Rep. John Illg, R-River Ridge, calls on the Southeastern Conference to schedule LSU home games in September after 6 p.m. to account for the intense heat. Illg's resolution only mentions LSU, ignoring the other football programs in Louisiana that also compete in the heat.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will Musk unfollow Trump? Here are the 6 most intriguing wagers gathering steam on betting markets.
Will Musk unfollow Trump? Here are the 6 most intriguing wagers gathering steam on betting markets.

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Will Musk unfollow Trump? Here are the 6 most intriguing wagers gathering steam on betting markets.

Online bettors are placing wagers on possible outcomes of the feud between Musk and Trump. The two have been embroiled in a public fight this week about the Republican tax bill. Bets on whether Musk will unfollow Trump or suspend his X account popped up on sites like Polymarket. Elon Musk's squabble with the US President has investors racing to place bets on potential outcomes. Online betting forums like Polymarket and Kalshi saw a flurry of wagers on Thursday and Friday revolving around the billionaire and President Donald Trump, who have been publicly sparring on social media over the Republican tax and spending bill. The feud, which started earlier this week after Musk called the sweeping GOP budget bill an "abomination"," and culminated with Musk amplifying calls for Trump's impeachment, represents a major turning point in their relationship — something that's alarmed Tesla investors. Here are some of the wildest wagers that have appeared on betting platforms this week: Investors think it's unlikely. The priced-in odds of the scenario hovered around 27% on Friday on Polymarket. The odds that Donald Trump's X account will be suspended were initially 7.5%, but they dropped to 1% on Friday. As their feud raged on Thursday, Musk created a poll on X asking if it was time to create a new political party in the US "that actually represents the 80% in the middle." By Friday, the poll had garnered more than 5 million responses, with more than 80% of users voting yes. Bettors on Polymarket think the odds that Musk will create a new political party by June are 7%, but higher as the year goes on, rising to 21% for him to form a new party by the end of 2025. Musk and Trump have each signaled some openness to making amends. On X, Musk replied to a post by Bill Ackman, which suggested that the two should "make peace." "You're not wrong," Musk said in a post. Speaking to Politico Thursday night, Trump downplayed the public conflict to reporters, adding that his relationship with Musk was "going very well, never done better." White House aides said that Trump and Musk had a call scheduled on Friday, Politico reported, but separate reports on Friday said that no such call had been scheduled and that Trump is "not interested" in speaking with Musk. On Kalshi, the odds that Trump and Elon will publicly reconcile by the end of next week dropped to 14% on Friday, down from 36% earlier in the day. The priced-in odds that Trump will end up suing Elon Musk this year hovered around 17% on the betting platform Kalshi. One of the wildest bets—that Trump would have Musk sent to jail—had surprisingly high odds on Polymarket as the fight between Trump and Musk dragged on. The percent chance of such an outcome dropped, however, from 10.5% to 4% on Friday. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump says he has no plans to speak to Musk as feud persists
Trump says he has no plans to speak to Musk as feud persists

CNBC

time39 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump says he has no plans to speak to Musk as feud persists

President Donald Trump said on Friday that he has no plans to speak with Elon Musk, signaling the president and his former ally might not resolve their feud over a sweeping tax-cut bill any time soon. Addressing reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said he wasn't "thinking about" the Tesla CEO. "I hope he does well with Tesla," Trump said. However, Trump said a review of Musk's extensive contracts with the federal government was in order. "We'll take look at everything," the president said. "It's a lot of money." Trump may get rid of the red Tesla Model S that he bought in March after showcasing Musk's electric cars on the White House lawn, a White House official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Musk, for his part, did not directly address Trump but kept up his criticism of the massive Republican tax and spending bill that contains much of Trump's domestic agenda. On his social-media platform X, Musk amplified remarks made by others that Trump's "big beautiful bill" would hurt Republicans politically and add to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt. He replied "exactly" to a post by another X user that said Musk had criticized Congress and Trump had responded by criticizing Musk personally. Musk also declared it was time for a new political party in the United States "to represent the 80% in the middle!" People who have spoken to Musk said his anger has begun to recede and they think he will want to repair his relationship with Trump, according to one person who has spoken to Musk's entourage. The White House statements came one day after the two men battled openly in an extraordinary display of hostilities that marked a stark end to a close alliance. Tesla stock rose on Friday, clawing back some losses from Thursday's session, when it dropped 14% and lost $150 billion in value, the largest single-day decline in the company's history. Musk's high-profile allies have largely stayed silent during the feud. But one, investor James Fishback, called on Musk to apologize. "President Trump has shown grace and patience at a time when Elon's behavior is disappointing and frankly downright disturbing," Fishback said in a statement. Musk, the world's richest man, bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Trump named Musk to head a controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. Trump feted Musk at the White House a week ago as he wrapped up his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk cut only about half of 1% of total spending, far short of his brash plans to axe $2 trillion from the federal budget. Since then, Musk has denounced Trump's tax-cut and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination." His opposition is complicating efforts to pass the bill in Congress where Republicans hold a slim majority. Trump's bill narrowly passed the House of Representatives last month and is now before the Senate, where Republicans say they will make further changes. Nonpartisan analysts say the measure would add $2.4 trillion in debt over 10 years. House Speaker Mike Johnson said he has been texting with Musk and hopes the dispute is resolved quickly. "I don't argue with him about how to build rockets and I wish he wouldn't argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it," Johnson said on CNBC. Trump had initially stayed quiet while Musk campaigned to torpedo the bill, but broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters he was "very disappointed" in Musk. Musk, who spent nearly $300 million in last year's elections, said Trump would have lost without his support and suggested he should be impeached. Trump suggested he would terminate government contracts with Musk's businesses, which include rocket company SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. The billionaire then threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, the only U.S. spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. Musk later backed off that threat. Musk had been angered when Trump over the weekend revoked his nomination of Musk ally Jared Isaacman to head the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Two sources with direct knowledge of the dispute said White House personnel director Sergio Gor had helped turn Trump against Isaacman by highlighting his past donations to Democrats. Musk and Gor had been at odds since the billionaire criticized Gor's pace of hiring at a March cabinet meeting, the two sources said. A White House spokesperson, Steven Cheung, praised Gor's efforts to staff the administration but did not address his relationship with Musk. A prolonged feud could make it harder for Republicans to keep control of Congress in next year's midterm elections if Musk withholds financial support or other major Silicon Valley business leaders distance themselves from Trump. Musk had already said he planned to curtail his political spending, and on Tuesday he called for "all politicians who betrayed the American people" to be fired next year. His involvement with the Trump administration has provoked widespread protests at Tesla sites, driving down sales while investors fretted that Musk's attention was too divided.

With $122M spent, the 2025 governor's race is already New Jersey's most expensive
With $122M spent, the 2025 governor's race is already New Jersey's most expensive

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

With $122M spent, the 2025 governor's race is already New Jersey's most expensive

Spending totals for this campaign have already more than doubled those in every gubernatorial primary since at least the turn of the millennium. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor) Candidates and outside groups have spent more than $122.5 million on this year's gubernatorial primary, a total greater than any other in state history and one that stands to rise in the race's closing days, the New Jersey Election Law Commission said Friday. The spending total includes $54.9 million from the candidates themselves and $67.7 million from outside groups. Between them, $14 million remained unspent, and that number could swell from late-arriving donations to independent expenditure groups, which face no contribution limits. Voting is underway and ends Tuesday. Spending totals for this campaign have already more than doubled those in every gubernatorial primary since at least the turn of the millennium and have outpaced even the most expensive gubernatorial general election. That November 2005 race between Democrat Jon Corzine and Republican Doug Forrester cost about $98 million after adjustments to inflation, the commission said. This year's 11 gubernatorial candidates had about $6.7 million left in reserves on May 27, the last date covered by regular pre-election campaign finance disclosures. The commission credited the number of candidacies and a larger gubernatorial fund match for the increase. Candidates who meet fundraising and spending thresholds can receive up to $5.5 million in matching public dollars for the primary in exchange for observing an $8.7 million primary spending cap and participating in debates hosted by the commission. Five of the eight candidates have maxed out or nearly maxed out their matching funds. Of the $54.9 million spent by the candidates, Democrats Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop and Rep. Mikie Sherrill lead the pack, with Fulop spending nearly $8.7 million and Sherrill shelling out $8.5 million as of May 27. Republican Jack Ciattarelli, who unsuccessfully ran for governor in 2017 and 2021, spent $8 million, followed by Rep. Josh Gottheimer, a Democrat, at $7.9 million. Spending by outside groups is dominated by Working New Jersey, a super PAC funded by an independent expenditure group linked to statewide teachers union the New Jersey Education Association. It is responsible for more than half of the outside spending in the race, with at least $37.5 million boosting Democrat Sean Spiller, the union's president. Spiller's own campaign has spent only $342,059. Spiller's Democratic rivals have seen less but still sizable support from independent expenditure groups. They have boosted Rep. Josh Gottheimer to the tune of $11.6 million; Fulop, $7.4 million; former state Sen. Steve Sweeney, $4.3 million; and Sherrill, $3.8 million. A group run in part by Trump ally Kellyanne Conway has spent $1.3 million supporting Ciattarelli's campaign. Gubernatorial totals far exceed fundraising and spending on this year's Assembly races (all 80 seats in the chamber are on the ballot this year). Not counting independent expenditures, Assembly candidates have raised nearly $26.3 million and spent about $15.4 million, the commission said. Most of that money, $20.8 million, has flowed to incumbents. Collectively, challengers have raised just under $5.5 million. The ratio is similarly split along party lines. Democratic candidates account for $21.6 million of the funds raised, while only $4.7 million went to Republicans. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store