logo
US Senate grinds through final votes on Trump's US$4.5t spending bill ahead of July 4 deadline

US Senate grinds through final votes on Trump's US$4.5t spending bill ahead of July 4 deadline

Malay Mail11 hours ago
WASHINGTON, July 1 — US senators were in a marathon session of amendment votes Tuesday as Republicans sought to pass Donald Trump's flagship spending bill, an unpopular package set to slash social welfare programs and add an eye-watering US$3 trillion (RM12.6 trillion) to the national debt.
The president wants his 'One Big Beautiful Bill' to extend his expiring first-term tax cuts at a cost of US$4.5 trillion, boost military spending and fund his plans for unprecedented mass deportations and border security.
But senators eyeing 2026 midterm congressional elections are divided over provisions that would strip around US$1 trillion in subsidized health care from millions of the poorest Americans and add more than US$3.3 trillion to the nation's already yawning budget deficits over a decade.
Trump wants to have the package on his desk by the time Independence Day festivities begin on Friday.
Progress in the Senate slowed to a glacial pace Monday, however, with no end in sight as the so-called 'vote-a-rama' — a session allowing members to offer unlimited amendments before a bill can move to final passage — went into a 17th hour.
Trump defended the bill in a series of Truth Social posts overnight Tuesday, as 'perhaps the greatest and most important of its kind in history' and said failure to pass would mean a 'whopping 68 per cent tax increase, the largest in history.'
With little sign of the pace picking up ahead of a final floor vote that could be delayed until well into the early hours of Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called for Republicans to 'stay tough and unified.'
Vote-a-ramas have been concluded in as little nine or 10 hours in the recent past and Democrats accused Republicans of deliberately slow-walking the process.
'They've got a lot of members who were promised things that they may not be able to deliver on. And so they're just stalling,' Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters.
'But we're just pushing forward amendment after amendment. They don't like these amendments. The public is on our side in almost every amendment we do.'
Given Trump's iron grip on the party, he is expected to eventually get what he wants in the Senate, where Republicans hold a razor-thin majority and can overcome what is expected to be unified Democratic opposition.
That would be a huge win for the Republican leader — who has been criticised for imposing many of his priorities through executive orders that sidestep the scrutiny of Congress.
But approval by the Senate is only half the battle, as the 940-page bill next heads to a separate vote in the House of Representatives, where several rebels in the slim Republican majority are threatening to oppose it.
'Debt slavery'
Trump's heavy pressure to declare victory has put more vulnerable Republicans in a difficult position.
Nonpartisan studies have concluded that the bill would ultimately pave the way for a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest 10 per cent of Americans to the richest.
And cuts to the Medicaid program — which helps low-income Americans get coverage in a country with notoriously expensive medical insurance — and cuts to the Affordable Care Act would result in nearly 12 million more uninsured people by 2034, independent analysis shows.
Polls show the bill is among the most unpopular ever considered across multiple demographic, age and income groups.
Senate Democrats have been focusing their amendments on highlighting the threats to health care, as well as cuts to federal food aid programs and clean energy tax credits.
Republican Majority Leader John Thune can only lose one more vote, with conservative Rand Paul and moderate Thom Tillis already on the record as Republican rebels.
A House vote on the Senate bill could come as early as Wednesday.
However, ultra-conservative fiscal hawks in the lower chamber have complained that the bill would not cut enough spending and moderates are worried at the defunding of Medicaid.
Trump's former close aide Elon Musk — who had an acrimonious public falling out with the president earlier this month over the bill — reprised his sharp criticisms and renewed his calls for the formation of a new political party as voting got underway.
The tech billionaire, who headed Trump's Department of Government Efficiency before stepping down at the end of May, accused Republicans of supporting 'debt slavery.'
He vowed to launch a new political party to challenge lawmakers who campaigned on reduced federal spending only to vote for the bill. — AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tax operations declared as "essential services" in Bangladesh
Tax operations declared as "essential services" in Bangladesh

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Tax operations declared as "essential services" in Bangladesh

DHAKA, July 1 (Xinhua) -- The Bangladeshi interim government has declared tax operations as "essential services," in a bid to better safeguard local and foreign trade and commerce. Bangladesh's Ministry of Labor and Employment issued a gazette notification in this regard Tuesday. According to the notification, tax operations are declared as essential operations for meeting revenue collection targets of the government and for keeping the financial management of the government dynamics. The Bangladeshi interim government last month through an ordinance created two new divisions by abolishing the country's National Board of Revenue in an apparent move to modernize tax administration and boost revenue collection. The ordinance stated that the Revenue Policy Division will monitor the implementation of tax laws while the Revenue Management Division will mainly look into revenue collection. The restructuring reportedly followed a key condition set by the International Monetary Fund to separate tax policy from administration. The Washington-based lender has long pushed for tax reforms to raise Bangladesh's tax-to-GDP ratio, one of the lowest in Asia.

Majority of Finns prefer to shift away from U.S. products, investment: survey
Majority of Finns prefer to shift away from U.S. products, investment: survey

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Majority of Finns prefer to shift away from U.S. products, investment: survey

HELSINKI, July 1 (Xinhua) -- A recent survey conducted by Finnish financial services group LahiTapiola reveals that two out of three Finns now prefer to purchase products and services from Europe rather than the United States. The shift is largely attributed to U.S. President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies. According to the survey results released Tuesday, 66 percent of respondents said Trump's policies have made them more inclined to favor European goods and services. Only 16 percent disagreed, while 18 percent remained undecided. The findings also show that 56 percent of Finns believe that avoiding investments in U.S. companies is a responsible value-based choice. Among those who currently hold investments, that figure rises slightly to 59 percent. The accompanying press release cites growing concern over the negative impact of Trump's policies on Europe, particularly regarding economic stability and security, as the main driver behind this shift away from U.S. goods and investments. Beyond economic and political concerns, many Finns expressed frustration with Trump's communication style. The survey indicated that his rhetoric and behavior have fostered an emotional resistance toward American products. This sentiment appears to extend beyond Finland. The press release mentioned Tesla as a notable example, pointing out that its sales have been hit hard. According to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association, registrations of new Tesla vehicles in EU countries dropped by more than 45 percent between January and May 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. Heikki Urpelainen, portfolio manager at LahiTapiola Asset Management, noted that escalating trade restrictions are making the United States a less attractive export market. In response, European companies are increasingly lowering prices and focusing on domestic sales. While this trend may provide short-term advantages for some European firms, Urpelainen warned that the broader impact of Trump's tariffs is detrimental to European exporters overall. The survey, conducted in April 2025, collected responses from 1,100 Finnish residents aged 18 and older.

Road to Middle East peace runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv
Road to Middle East peace runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv

New Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Road to Middle East peace runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv

IRAN stands at the crossroads of history for resisting Israel and the United States that went all out to destroy the Islamic republic's uranium enrichment facilities. With or without nuclear weapons, Teheran can be a force for equilibrium and stability — not just in the Middle East, but across the Eurasian heartland. In hindsight, everything was going well with Iran's nuclear programme until US President Donald Trump decided to dump the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on May 8, 2018. Technically speaking, the US withdrawal from JPOA removed Iran from its obligations and expedited its "breakout time" — the time it would take for Iran to produce enough weapon-grade uranium for a nuclear bomb. By the morning of June 22, when all hell broke loose over the Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan uranium processing sites, Iran had the capacity to enrich uranium to 60 per cent purity, short of the 90 per cent that Israel feared. Incidentally, Israel has nuclear bombs at Dimona that could blow the entire region into pieces, and yet Tel Aviv is fearful of Teheran that has no nuclear bombs? After the US strikes, Trump triumphantly declared that the facilities "were totally and completely obliterated". His assessment was later downplayed by Central Intelligence Agency director John Ratcliffe. The killing of Iran's top nuclear scientists and generals may set back the process for a few years. However, it is unlikely to undermine its technical capacity to weaponise the knowledge, if it wishes to. The current Iran-Israel conflict is no longer based on ideological schisms or differences. Instead, the once-dominant Arab-Israeli conflict has given way to a more complex, dangerous and region-defining rivalry between Iran and Israel — one that reflects shifting alliances, strategic ambition and a new geopolitical architecture in the Middle East. This new fault line is less about identity or religion, and more about regional hegemony, deterrence, and resistance to unilateralism, territorial domination and land grabbing. Lastly, Israel's genocide policy in Gaza is a stark warning to other countries that they, too, could face the same fate if they dare challenge the nuclear state of Israel openly. Israel is a formidable military power and can respond to Iranian attacks — but without the US, it faces high strategic and operational risk. While US involvement provides the margin between military resilience and regional catastrophe, the response from Iran touched the very heart of Middle Eastern geopolitics in that states, however weak they are perceived to be, will stand up to regional bullies, a lesson that Tel Aviv should heed. The recent "12-day war" shows clearly that the Iran-Israel rivalry cannot be managed through bombs and diplomacy alone. What the Middle East needs to prevent further clashes involving the big powers is a new collective security dialogue and an acknowledgement that Iran, with a population of 90 million and sophisticated homegrown hypersonic missile technology, is a force to reckon with. Besides, it controls the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic choke point, through which some 20 million barrels of oil go through daily. Israel's true survival lies not in bombs, walls or foreign guarantees but in reconciliation, restraint and regional trust. Its security comes not from controlling land or stockpiling weapons — it comes from genuine coexistence with neighbours based on mutual respect, shared dignity and resilience. The road to Middle East peace no longer runs through Cairo, Riyadh or Amman — it now runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv. Thus, the Arab-Israeli conflict is no longer the story. The Iran-Israel confrontation is.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store