logo
Why Bangladesh Army Chief's Russia Tilt May Be Good For Indiaa

Why Bangladesh Army Chief's Russia Tilt May Be Good For Indiaa

NDTV19-05-2025
While Indian attention has been focused on our western borders since the Pahalgam tragedy of April 22, some major geopolitical shifts have been taking place on India's eastern front.
First is the banning of the Awami League party by Bangladesh's interim government. The party, founded by Bangladesh's founder Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, has been ruling the country for much of its existence as a sovereign state since December 1971, till the uprisings in the country last August forced Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to flee to India, where she remains since.
The second major geopolitical shift, which has far-reaching ramifications for India, is the Bangladesh interim government's apparent plan to create a "humanitarian corridor', with the US and the UN backing the Rakhine state in Myanmar. The entire state's border with Myanmar is controlled by the rebel Arakan Army. And, since Rohingya refugees have been fleeing the state due to the atrocities committed by the Arakan Army, the corridor, it is alleged, is less a humanitarian undertaking and more of a passage intended to facilitate supplies to the Arakan Army to help it fight Myanmar's junta.
Parallel to these have been rumours circulating about a possible "coup" within the army, that is, against the current army chief, General Waqar uz Zaman. Seen in this context, the General's visit to Moscow last month becomes particularly significant, especially to India.
On April 7, Zaman paid an official visit to Russia, where he met with the Russian Deputy Defence Minister, General A. Fomin, and the Army Chief General, Oleg Salyukov, along with representatives of defence firms Rostec, Rosoboronexport, and Rosatom, the Russian state nuclear agency overseeing the construction of the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant, Bangladesh.
The Russian Defence Ministry said the sides "discussed prospects for cooperation in the defence sector and expressed mutual determination to further strengthen the existing friendly relations between the armies and peoples of Russia and Bangladesh'.
Soon after, Russian ships Admiral Tributs, Admiral Panteleyev, and the tanker Pechenga, from the Russian Pacific Fleet Squadron, docked at Chattogram Port. This was the first time Russian naval ships had visited Bangladesh in 50 years, in a "goodwill" visit, marking a significant milestone in the relationship between the two countries, according to the Russian Embassy in Bangladesh.
The visit is significant for its timing, context and subtext too. First is the fact that it comes under the watch of an interim government. Following the tumultuous events of last August, Bangladesh remains under a caretaker government headed by Mohammed Yunus. The Yunus administration is closely aligned with Bangladesh's Islamist lobby. Increasingly, radical outfits and elements have been gaining power and control in the country under Yunus's watch.
The trip also comes after two high-profile visits to and from Bangladesh. The first was the visit to Dhaka by a top US Army officer, the Pacific Deputy Commanding General, Lt Gen Joel P. Vowell, who held meetings with Zaman. There has been a lot of speculation regarding the visit, with rumours swirling around for a long time about US interest in Myanmar and the stationing of American bases in the region as part of the West's Indo-Pacific strategy. The Bangladeshi media reported that Vowell and Zaman's discussions revolved around military interoperability, security cooperation, and potential defence procurement from the US.
Soon after, Muhammad Yunus left for China on a four-day visit.
Yunus owes much of his power and pelf to the US, particularly to the Democratic administration of former President Barack Obama. Now, the deposed Sheikh Hasina had on occasions voiced fear about the US wanting to set up bases in Bangladesh, which she would not have allowed and due to which, she says, the US wanted her ouster. To that end, though closely aligned with India, the Hasina government also tried to hedge itself by opening up Bangladesh to Chinese investments, defence deals and joining the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
The current Trump administration in the US is not too fond of Yunus, their dislike dating back to 2016, when the latter had made a huge donation to the Clinton Foundation at a time when Hillary Clinton was running for president against Trump. He had also made unsavoury remarks when Trump won. Well into his new term in office, Trump has not demonstrated any particular interest in Dhaka, while calling it out for attacks against minorities. Given the uncertainty surrounding the current US administration's approach to the interim government, Yunus has been courting China.
In Beijing, Yunus secured a pledge for $2.1 billion in Chinese investments, loans and grants for Bangladesh. Numerous Chinese companies pledged $1 billion to the Chinese Industrial Economic Zone in Chattogram. China also promised $400 million in loans to upgrade the deep-sea Mongla port and accelerate talks on a potential free-trade agreement.
On the same trip, Yunus also roiled India by inviting China to invest in Bangladesh, positioning the country as the 'only guardian of the ocean for all this region' and the gateway to 'landlocked' India's Northeast. In response to that posturing earlier this month, India cancelled a transhipment agreement that had allowed Bangladesh's exports to transit through Indian ports. This is not all. As much as 70% of Bangladesh's defence procurements come from China.
Meanwhile, Bangladesh has also seen an abysmal descent into radicalism and extremism. Minorities are being targeted, and what had seemed like just a fringe movement till some time ago - the demand to establish a Sharia state in Bangladesh - is increasingly taking centre-stage. Along with the main Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh, sundry affiliated groups have also sprung up, often armed. Women, in particular, are at the receiving end of the tensions. At the time of writing this piece, Islamist groups in Bangladesh were issuing threats and warnings to the interim government against implementing the proposals of a women's reforms commission.
Bangladesh's institutions lie broken, and the police is a spent force. Only the army is intact, anti-radical, and is often left facing off with the Islamists. Zaman has several times hinted at the failing law and order in the country. Numerous army meetings were followed by the deployment last month of military personnel and security forces across the country, especially in Dhaka, sparking rumours about an imminent coup. In fact, rumours also swirled about Zaman facing a coup from Islamist sections in the army itself. In a video that has now gone viral, Zaman was found saying, "Later you will say I did not warn you, so I am warning you. If you cannot forget your differences and work together, if you keep mudslinging at each other, fighting each other and killing each other, the country's and this community's freedom will go in vain."
Bangladesh's interim government has opened up doors for greater engagement with Pakistan, including contacts between the militaries of the twocountries and the ISI. Given the Islamist tilt that the Pakistani army has taken under its current chief, General Asim Munir, who earlier headed the ISI, it is quite possible that Zaman may be pitted against more Islamist elements within the Bangladesh army. This would be welcomed by both Yunus and his backers.
Against this backdrop, Zaman's Moscow visit fulfilled three objectives. One, it threw a gauntlet to Yusuf, challenging the interim government, and signalling that the army was in charge and could take over if necessary. The second goal was to balance China's presence, especially in Bangladesh's defence sector; as much as 70% of Bangladesh's military procurement has been from China. The third thing the visit did was demonstrate that Bangladesh does not wish to align itself with any block and wants to retain its strategic autonomy, while diversifying the country's military alliances and strengthening defence ties with Russia.
In this context, and especially in the wake of the Pulwama attacks and Operation Sindoor, the entry of Russia in this equation can be beneficial. Both India and Russia have a long history of cooperation in Bangladesh. Indeed, the Liberation of Bangladesh in 1971 owed its success partly to Russian support in the UN Security Council, and militarily too. The Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant, being built by Russia in Bangladesh - according to reports, it's the country's most expensive infrastructural project - has some Indian component too. When sanctions on Russian oil were imposed in the wake of the Ukraine war in 2022, Dhaka used Indian ports to offload Russian oil. The two nations can once again cooperate together with General Zaman to keep Islamists at bay, ensuring Dhaka's multipolar approach in its external relations.
Against Russia's boycott by the West, developing relations with Bangladesh converges neatly with Moscow's pivot to the global south, including Asian countries. The army is the only institution battling the rising tide of Islamism in Bangladesh, and India should support it. The Yunus-led government has already enabled Pakistan's entry into Bangladesh, strengthened ties with Turkey, and has now asked Azerbaijan, another country inimical to India, to open its embassy there. A Russian presence in Bangladesh, instead of resurrecting Cold War alignments, might just enable multipolarity in the Bay of Bengal region, balancing out the presence of extra-regional actors here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After Muslim World, Netanyahu Gets Snubbed By Tiny Nation On Bid To KICK OUT Palestinians From Gaza
After Muslim World, Netanyahu Gets Snubbed By Tiny Nation On Bid To KICK OUT Palestinians From Gaza

Time of India

time22 minutes ago

  • Time of India

After Muslim World, Netanyahu Gets Snubbed By Tiny Nation On Bid To KICK OUT Palestinians From Gaza

BIG! Putin To Meet Zelensky? Trump Vows 3-Way Meeting Without Asking After Warning On 'Russia Bluff' U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed that he will arrange a rare three-way meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky. The announcement follows a private virtual call between Trump, Zelensky, and European leaders, during which Zelensky reportedly said Putin is 'bluffing." The proposed meeting could mark a dramatic turning point in the ongoing conflict, with Trump positioning himself as a direct mediator between Moscow and Kyiv. This high-stakes diplomatic gamble comes at a critical moment, with the world watching to see if the confrontation will de-escalate—or explode. Watch. 83 views | 55 minutes ago

West Bengal migrant worker repatriated from Bangladesh after family moves Calcutta HC
West Bengal migrant worker repatriated from Bangladesh after family moves Calcutta HC

The Hindu

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

West Bengal migrant worker repatriated from Bangladesh after family moves Calcutta HC

Amir Sheikh, a 19-year-old migrant worker from Kaliachak in West Bengal's Malda district who was allegedly detained from Rajasthan in May and 'pushed back' into Bangladesh, was reunited with his family on Wednesday. Mr. Amir's family members said the Border Security Force (BSF) personnel handed him over to the Basirhat police in the State's North 24 Parganas district. Earlier this month, Ziyem Sheikh, the father of Mr. Amir, had filed a habeas corpus petition before the Calcutta High Court. The matter was heard before the Division Bench of Justices Tapabrata Chakraborty and Reetobroto Kumar Mitra. The counsel appearing for the BSF said Mr. Amir attempted to cross over to Indian territory on Tuesday and since he could not produce appropriate identification documents, he was apprehended and handed over to the officer in charge of the Basirhat police station. Speaking to The Hindu, his family contested the BSF's claims. 'I got a call this morning asking me to pick up my son from Basirhat. All this is happening because we approached the court,' Mr. Ziyem said. Refuting BSF's claims Trinamool Congress MP and chairperson of the West Bengal Migrant Welfare Board Samirul Islam also refuted the BSF's claims of the migrant worker 'inadvertently crossing the border'. He said an attempt was being made to 'cover up the pushing back of the migrant worker into Bangladesh by the BSF and the Union government by repatriating him'. 'Amir Sheikh from Kaliachak in Malda was deported to Bangladesh by the Rajasthan police with the help of the BSF. From the very beginning, we stood by his family. We helped Amir's father file a habeas corpus petition in the Calcutta High Court. Under pressure, the BSF has brought Amir back to West Bengal,' the MP said, adding that they even have the video Mr. Amir had recorded from Bangladesh. 'He was deported' 'We will legally prove that Amir was deported by the BSF and that he did not go there voluntarily,' Mr. Islam said. He also pointed out that the migrant worker was in the custody of Bangladeshi authorities and had the family not approached the court, he would have continued to languish in detention in the neighbouring country. The matter will come up for hearing on August 27. Hundreds of Bengali-speaking migrant workers have faced alleged detention and harassment in different States and asked to produce documents to prove they are not Bangladeshi nationals. Some migrant workers from West Bengal have claimed that they were 'pushed into' the neighbouring country but later repatriated with the help of Indian authorities.

Ukraine's Alaska agenda: Kiev wants a lasting ceasefire, NATO-backed security, reparations, and sustained sanctions on Russia
Ukraine's Alaska agenda: Kiev wants a lasting ceasefire, NATO-backed security, reparations, and sustained sanctions on Russia

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Ukraine's Alaska agenda: Kiev wants a lasting ceasefire, NATO-backed security, reparations, and sustained sanctions on Russia

As US President Donald Trump prepares to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, August 15, Ukraine hopes for an agreement that will meet its demands of stopping the war and preventing future aggression. But since Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will not attend this meeting, Kyiv fears being left out of negotiations that could decide its fate. Ukraine and its European allies also fear that Friday's Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin could yield a settlement that sacrifices Kyiv's interests for the appearance of peace. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program President Zelensky will hold a pre-summit call with Trump alongside European leaders on Wednesday, August 13, to lay out non-negotiable red lines, including a durable ceasefire, full participation in talks, and compensation for war damage estimated at up to $1 trillion. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Safest Cities Where People can Live in Peace Undo Ukraine's core demands ahead of the Alaska talks Zelensky has warned that any decisions made without Ukraine 'are at the same time decisions against peace,' as quoted by Politico. Ukrainian officials say Putin's ultimate goal is not just holding territory but ending Ukraine's independence. These are Kyiv's longstanding demands, which they are eagerly hoping to meet. Live Events A sustainable ceasefire Kyiv insists on a durable ceasefire before discussing any territorial issues, rejecting US suggestions of 'land swaps' involving the Donbas. Zelenskyy says ceding the region would invite future offensives and undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. NATO 's Mark Rutte has floated a possible compromise in which some areas remain under Russian control but are legally recognized as Ukrainian. 'When it comes to this whole issue of territory, when it comes to acknowledging, for example, maybe in a future deal that Russia is controlling de facto, factually some of the territory of Ukraine, it has to be effectual recognition, and not a political de jure recognition,' he told ABC. Russia must pay for the damage Ukraine insists that Moscow must bear the financial burden for the destruction it has inflicted (by starting a war), a toll estimated between $500 billion and $1 trillion in damages to infrastructure, homes, and livelihoods. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, speaking at the Ukraine Recovery Conference last month, underlined this demand: 'Russia must pay for the approximately €500 billion in damages caused. Until this happens, Moscow must not be granted access to its frozen assets.' Ukraine points to the fact that close European allies hold significant Russian state assets, with almost €200 billion frozen in Belgium alone, as a major source of leverage. Kyiv believes these funds must remain inaccessible to Moscow until full reparations are made. Binding security guarantees via NATO and the EU President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has made clear that only full membership in NATO and the European Union can guarantee Ukraine's long-term security: A Politico article quotes Zewleanskey, 'Will we be in NATO? In the EU? I haven't heard anything — simply not a single proposal that would guarantee that a new war won't start tomorrow. We need security guarantees that will preserve, first of all, our state, a sovereign state, our independence.' However, Ukraine faces pushback: US President Donald Trump has ruled out NATO membership, a stance quietly backed by some European capitals, and Moscow demands a permanent NATO veto for Ukraine. Zelenskyy also criticizes EU member states that are hesitant to admit a large, poor country with a vast agricultural sector. For now, European partners, not the US, are Ukraine's primary source of military assistance. Since the war began, Europe has provided at least €73.9 billion in military aid, compared to €64 billion from the US, according to the Kiel Institute. Return of abducted children and prisoners of war Ukraine demands the immediate return of nearly 20,000 children, who it says were abducted by Russia. Only 1,453 have been returned so far, often through mediation by Qatar and other states. Moscow claims these transfers are evacuations to safety, but refuses to return the children to their families, instead placing them in adoption systems and subjecting them to Russian propaganda. In 2023, the ICC issued an arrest warrant for President Vladimir Putin over the unlawful deportation of children from occupied Ukraine to Russia. On prisoners of war, there has been more progress: more than 2,000 POWs have been exchanged under Trump's mediation, but thousands remain in Russian custody without access for international human rights monitors. No lifting of sanctions on Russia Kyiv, backed by European allies, demands that existing primary and secondary sanctions remain in place and even be strengthened. They argue that easing sanctions or resuming trade with Russia would allow Moscow to rebuild its war machine. Economist Timothy Ash estimates the war has already cost Russia about $2 trillion, nearly equivalent to its annual GDP. The risks for Ukraine are clear. As he told Politico, 'Ukraine could survive the war, but not survive the peace,' if a bad deal undermines its security and sovereignty.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store