Timing of JS-SEZ a lot more promising than some previous attempts: CIMB
Chu said there are not many good global examples of successful cross border special economic zones, 'simply because you need good timing' for them to succeed.
'In partnership, it's very easy for us to say, we must be win-win on both sides, but it's often not easy to really craft out a win-win proposition,' Chu said at a panel on Monday (Jul 21).
The panel was part of CIMB's media day held in Kuala Lumpur. Also with him on the panel were Haniz Nazlan, CEO of group consumer banking, and Lawrence Loh, co-CEO of group commercial & transaction banking.
From a cost perspective, Chu noted that the cost divergence between Singapore and Malaysia has become a lot bigger, especially after the Covid-19 pandemic.
It has reached a point where it is no longer just a cost issue, but a capacity constraint, he said.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'It's not about how much you can pay; the supply is just not there.'
Attracting foreign investment
While Johor might not be the cheapest state in Malaysia to operate in, the cost differential continues to make a viable business case between Malaysia and Singapore, he said.
Furthermore, Chu noted the SEZ is not just about relocating from the industrial zones of Singapore into Johor, but also attracting foreign direct investments (FDI) from around the world.
'Geopolitical developments globally have prompted a lot of FDI inflows into Asean, and naturally, the SEZ becomes one of the attractive potential destinations for that,' he said.
A bright spot would be outbound flows from China flowing into the special financial zone within the JS-SEZ, he added.
Meanwhile, Chu is optimistic that most activities in the JS-SEZ today are from private sector business enterprises, since private sector players are more inclined towards optimal decision-making than public sector players.
In April, CIMB announced that it would commit RM10 billion (S$3 billion) in funding facilities to drive economic integration and unlock cross-border opportunities in the JS-SEZ.
In a separate session, CIMB group CEO Novan Amirudin said the commitment will cover all market segments – apart from data centres, which is the sector that is currently receiving one of the largest FDI.
He noted other opportunities, including family offices in the special financial zone, real estate development, and people movement after completion of the Rapid Transit System link.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
PBOC finds consumer mood is turning darker even as economy grows
[BEIJING] Chinese households became more pessimistic last quarter and their view of the jobs market fell to the worst ever, according to a survey by the central bank, a worry for an economy that risks a slowdown ahead after growing faster than the government's target for much of this year. Consumers turned increasingly negative about income, employment, and prices in April to June, the poll showed. The release of the survey results has become unpredictable in recent years, with the data for the first and second quarters published at the same time on Friday (Jul 25) instead of at a regular interval as in the past. The figures throw a spotlight on a worsening vulnerability for China, whose economy powered through US President Donald Trump's trade war largely on the strength of its exports. The data also revealed that people's willingness to consume dropped to the weakest since the outbreak of the pandemic, with almost two-thirds of respondents saying they want to save more, while an employment index fell to a record low. 'The latest data paint a downbeat picture,' Goldman Sachs economists led by Yuting Yang said in a note. Deepening household pessimism about income and employment likely means that faster retail sales growth since late last year was mostly thanks to government subsidies, instead of improving consumer sentiment. It underlines the challenge for Chinese policymakers to prop up consumption in a sustainable way in the absence of an improvement in the labour market. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Retail sales grew 5 per cent in the first half of the year, an improvement from 2024 but still weak compared with an 8.2 per cent expansion in the same period before the pandemic in 2019. That drop in demand has created an oversupply of many goods, pushing prices down. The data also showed a shrinking percentage of respondents expecting consumer and housing prices to rise. It's an outlook that spells more trouble for the property sector, which has seen home prices falling since 2022 and continues to erode people's wealth as the value of their assets drops. Loan demand from companies of all sizes fell in the second quarter from the first three months of the year, according to a separate survey of banks, with the indicator of overall loan appetite dropping by more than 16 points to the weakest level since at least 2009. The GDP deflator, a broad measure of prices across the economy, declined for the ninth consecutive quarter, extending the longest streak since the quarterly data began in 1993. Little relief appears in sight, with the price expectation index falling again in the second quarter. The People's Bank of China (PBOC) surveyed 20,000 bank depositors in 50 cities across the country, about 3,200 banks and over 5,000 companies for the surveys. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
Succession, scandal and bottled water – the real battle at the heart of Wahaha court case
IN THE heat of a Hong Kong summer, a courtroom clash over a billionaire's estate sent shockwaves through China's corporate landscape and poured fresh fizz into one of the country's most legendary homegrown brands. When three previously unknown individuals, claiming to be the children of the late Wahaha founder Zong Qinghou, filed suit to freeze US$1.8-billion-worth of trust-linked assets, the legacy of China's so-called 'Water King' turned from a succession fairytale into a full-blown family drama. At the centre of the storm is 42-year-old Zong Fuli, long regarded as the sole heir to her father's empire and one of China's most high-profile 'rich second gens'. Overnight, she found her grip on Wahaha's crown threatened, not by competitors or regulators, but by half-siblings from overseas and ghosts from her father's past. With litigation erupting and speculation mounting, Zong faced scrutiny not only of her legitimacy and business authority but over the narrative that once seemed watertight. Wahaha, the bottled water giant once known for its clean-cut nationalism and wholesome family branding, was suddenly China's juiciest soap opera. Questions rippled across the market: Who truly controls Wahaha? What skeletons were buried beneath its boardroom carpet? And how did a brand built to quench thirst become ground zero for one of China's messiest inheritance battles? The began after the death of Zong Qinghou in February 2024. His daughter Zong Fuli, backed by a notarised will, appeared to be the natural successor. She moved swiftly to claim her father's 29.4 per cent stake and began urging senior staff to move from Wahaha to her own beverage group, Hangzhou-based Hongsheng Beverage Group. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But resistance emerged. Many employees baulked at signing new contracts that would jeopardise their rights under Wahaha's longstanding employee stockholding platform, a cornerstone of the company's egalitarian ethos. Then came July, and with it a bombshell: a resignation letter from Zong Fuli leaked to Chinese social media. In it, she claimed that government-linked shareholders and the Hangzhou district government had questioned her leadership, leaving her 'unable to fulfil her duties'. The letter went viral. Markets panicked. And within a week, negotiations behind closed doors led her to rescind the resignation. But the damage was done. Public curiosity about Wahaha exploded into open speculation. Did Zong Fuli truly have the boardroom backing she claimed? Was the state-owned capital, the largest shareholder, plotting a silent coup? And who were these new heirs from America with their eyes on Zong Qinghou's offshore assets? New claimants, old power struggles By mid-August, Zong Fuli had regained some ground. She was formally named chairman of Wahaha Group and took control of the board. She quickly initiated high-level personnel changes, updated to the company's bylaws, and pushed forward the integration of Wahaha employees into her Hongsheng empire, even if it meant slashing salaries by up to 50 per cent and moving offices eight kilometres across town. The historic Wahaha Tower in Hangzhou, once a bustling symbol of corporate pride, now echoed with emptiness, locals have begun calling it 'the employee graveyard'. Meanwhile, more than 50 lawsuits were filed by disgruntled former employees, all demanding restoration of their stock rights. Then came the real twist: court documents filed in Hong Kong named the three foreign challengers to the succession, Jacky Zong, Jessie Jieli Zong and Jerry Jisheng Zong, all US citizens claiming to be Zong Qinghou's children from his relationship with Wahaha's once-powerful executive Du Jianying. Du, a behind-the-scenes powerhouse in Wahaha's early days, was vice party secretary, second only to Zong himself. She owned shares in several companies indirectly tied to Wahaha's operations and faded from public view after resigning in 2008. Her children's legal challenge reignited longstanding rumours: Was Zong Fuli ever the only true heir, or just the one in the spotlight? As tabloid speculation met corporate intrigue, Wahaha's 'national champion' image began to fade. Was Zong Qinghou really the faithful husband and self-made tycoon the media had lionised for decades? And just how much of the empire had been quietly parcelled out behind the scenes? By the time the inheritance lawsuits were unsealed in Hong Kong, it was clear: Wahaha was not just facing a family feud. It was confronting a full-scale legacy audit, one playing out in courtrooms, boardrooms, and social feeds alike. For Zong Fuli, what started as a seemingly smooth handover has morphed into a high-stakes survival test. And for the business world, Wahaha's drama is a reminder that in China's sprawling family empires, the real succession struggle often only begins after the patriarch's final breath. Power shift, quiet exit Before the lawsuits cracked open Wahaha's carefully curated legacy, Zong Fuli was cast as the unquestioned heir. But within the company walls, old-timers tell a different story. Long before Zong Fuli entered the scene, it was Du who wielded power, running the company's operations and often seen greeting officials on behalf of Zong Qinghou. Du, born in 1966, was 21 years younger than Zong and more than just a trusted lieutenant. After the company's 1999 restructuring, she was the second-largest individual shareholder behind Zong, owning 0.73 per cent of Wahaha's shares. But when Zong Fuli returned from her US education and joined Wahaha in 2004, a slow power shift began to take place. Du receded from the company's frontline. By 2008, she had resigned her management roles, retaining only a symbolic board seat,and then two years later she launched her own investment firm. Meanwhile, Zong Fuli cut her teeth on Wahaha's children's clothing and personal care divisions, both of which underperformed, before taking control of Hongsheng Group, a private firm that quietly absorbed key Wahaha operations. Her father deployed veteran staff to help her succeed, and by 2018, as his health declined, she was visibly stepping up, first as head of public relations, then as vice-president of sales. By 2021, she was officially installed as general manager of Wahaha. With Du out of the picture and Wahaha's performance holding steady, Zong Fuli's succession seemed secure. But as the courts are now revealing, the story was never that simple. Phantom shares, real tensions At the heart of the family conflict is the company's employee shareholding platform, once a symbol of worker empowerment and now a lightning rod for lawsuits and lingering resentment. Back in 1999, the employee stockholding plan looked like a visionary move. Workers, managers and executives were granted access to shares at favourable terms, with allocations tied to job function, tenure and performance. Zong Qinghou retained a controlling 29.4 per cent stake, state capital held 51 per cent, and the rest, nearly a quarter, was collectively owned by thousands of employees through the scheme. At its peak in 2018, more than 11,000 employees were part of it, and dividends from these shares accounted for up to half of many workers' annual income. But that same year, Zong Qinghou launched what he called a 'second reform': staff shares were bought back, at a 3x premium, and replaced with 'dry shares', which gave employees dividend rights but stripped away actual ownership. Zong was now its sole stakeholder, a Wahaha veteran said. The arrangement held until Zong Fuli took over. When she pushed employees to transfer to Hongsheng, many found that doing so meant losing their dry share dividends, which for many meant a 50 per cent cut in income. Promises of performance-based bonuses did little to quell the unease. Veteran employees began questioning the legality of the 2018 buyback, and more than 50 lawsuits were filed, with workers demanding reinstatement of their original ownership. Meanwhile, the shareholding platform's influence diminished. Though still technically entitled to recommend three of Wahaha's board members, most now appear aligned to Zong Fuli. Efforts to manage the optics have had limited effect. At a town hall meeting, Zong Fuli promised to maintain dividend payments and announced record pay increases for frontline workers during the 2024 Chinese New Year celebration. For many veteran staff, it was too little, too late. Profits off the books Behind the headlines, a quiet transformation is reshaping the company: a shift of profits and control from Wahaha Group into a network of privately held 'off-the-books' companies, now under Zong Fuli's command. Insiders point out this is not entirely new. Wahaha's off-structure ecosystem, factories, distributors, and sales companies, not listed under the Group's formal ownership, began under Zong Qinghou. But since his death, Zong Fuli has moved aggressively to absorb these entities into her personal empire. In one 2024 deal, the employee platform handed over a 34.53 per cent stake in a key packaging company, free of charge. Among the crown jewels is Zhejiang Qili Investment, which holds equity in a dozen factories and sales hubs across China. Zong Fuli inherited her father's stake and months later acquired the employee platform's share, becoming the sole owner. She then folded major regional sales arms, companies such as Hangzhou Wahaha Qili Foods Group and Hangzhou Wahaha Honghui Food & Beverages, into Hongsheng and another of her companies Hangzhou Hongchen Marketing, cutting Wahaha Group out of substantial downstream profits. The most glaring example came in the bottled water business. Once a reliable revenue stream, it now sells its product through Xuner Chengtong Trading a third-party distributor fully owned by Hongsheng. Margins are routed outside Wahaha's balance sheet. Production costs average 1.6 yuan (S$0.29) to 1.7 yuan per bottle. Xuner buys at 2.75 yuan and resells for seven yuan, a significant spread now invisible to Wahaha's accounts. After this restructuring, revenues for the bottled water business fell by more than 60 per cent. Alarmed by the drain, Hangzhou's district finance bureau ordered a third-party audit of 18 affiliated beverage companies, including the water division. This probe is still going on. Meanwhile, a proposed transfer of the 'Wahaha' trademark to one of Zong Fuli's companies was abruptly halted after internal resistance. Trademark records confirm the name still belongs to Wahaha Group. In the end, while the spotlight remains fixed on the inheritance feud and courtroom theatrics, the real game-changing shift may be happening in the background, where profit centres are quietly migrating out of public view, leaving behind a shell of the once-mighty empire Zong Qinghou built. Trusts, secrets, showdown Just as Zong Fuli moved to tighten her grip on Wahaha's sprawling domestic empire, the bombshell lawsuit landed in Hong Kong, threatening to expose Zong Qinghou's offshore holdings. In December 2024, Jacky, Jessie and Jerry Zong filed a suit seeking control of a US$1.8 billion HSBC account they say was promised to them in handwritten instructions and verbal assurances made by their father. The account is held by Jian Hao Ventures, a British Virgin Islands shell company whose sole director is Zong Fuli. She assumed the role weeks after her father's death, at the same time as she was moving to claim his domestic shares via notarised inheritance. The plaintiffs argue that Zong Qinghou issued handwritten instructions a month before his death, instructing aides to establish trusts for each of his three children with Du, worth US$700 million each. Their lawyers say the HSBC account was intended to fund these trusts. Zong Fuli, they alleged, has already transferred more than US$1 million out of it, and they are demanding an injunction to freeze the rest. Zong Fuli's legal team contests the claim, saying no formal trust structure was ever created. But Yang Xiang, a civil and commercial law expert, said that in Hong Kong, oral trusts are legally recognised. If the siblings can prove Zong Qinghou clearly intended to establish the trust, even informally, the court may still validate its existence, he said. The case is currently limited to freeze request with a hearing scheduled for Aug 1. Complicating matters further is the anatomy of offshore trusts themselves. Typically set up in the British Virgin Isles, Hong Kong or Singapore, they allow wealthy families to pass assets discreetly across generations. These arrangements often involve complex corporate layering. Experts say if Jian Hao is a 'bottom-tier' company in a longer offshore chain, Zong Fuli's role could technically bypass trustee oversight – at least until challenged in court. For now, Hong Kong courts are not ruling on the trust's validity, only on whether to freeze the HSBC account. But regardless of the outcome, the case is peeling back the curtain on how China's ultra-wealthy navigate succession, secrecy and offshore power plays. It's not a first for the Zongs. Back during Wahaha's infamous war with Danone in the 2000s, at least 10 offshore companies tied to the family were named in asset-freezing orders. Among them: Ever Maple Trading, a British Virgin Isles-registered company that today owns 100 per cent of Zong Fuli's Hongsheng Group. The roots of this offshore maze run deep. And those roots now raise tough questions. Where did the offshore money come from? Were proper tax and forex compliance procedures followed? If not, legal experts warn, any trust, no matter how cleverly built, could be 'pierced' by authorities, especially if public assets or national interests are involved. It is not just about the money. This lawsuit is strategically aimed at unravelling Zong Qinghou's carefully designed cross-border inheritance blueprint, Yang told Caixin. With lawsuits now active in both Hangzhou and Hong Kong, this is a coordinated assault from Du's side, he said. 'This is more than a claim. It's a challenge to the entire succession plan.' Meanwhile, Zong Fuli is not sitting still. As she consolidates domestic operations, she is also rebranding. Companies once named after 'Wahaha Changsheng' are being renamed under the 'Hongsheng' label. Curiously, 'Chang' and 'Sheng' happen to be the given names of her two half-brothers. The legal hierarchy here is unforgiving: in most jurisdictions, trust arrangements trump wills. And if no trust or valid will is proved, Chinese law grants equal inheritance rights to both marital and non-marital children. Which makes this battle as much about legacy as it is about legality. At stake is not just Wahaha's fortune, it is its future. Tsinghua University's Family Business Research Center has rated this conflict a level 6 to 7 on its proprietary 'family war' severity scale, signalling a destructive phase already in motion. If left unchecked, it could escalate into a level 8 or 9 conflict, where both sides seek mutually assured destruction and the company itself becomes collateral damage.
Straits Times
8 hours ago
- Straits Times
World's biggest passenger planes keep breaking down
SYDNEY – The world's largest commercial passenger jet, the Airbus A380, enjoyed an unexpected resurgence hauling full loads of passengers when global travel rebounded after the Covid-19 pandemic. But keeping the ageing superjumbo safely airborne is becoming an increasingly expensive headache for airlines. Two decades after its maiden flight, regulatory bulletins ordering repairs, inspections or replacement parts for the massive four-engined plane are piling up. While some are procedural, such as a demand for timely equipment checks, others are more serious. Leaking escape slides, cracked seals and a ruptured landing-gear axle feature among 95 airworthiness directives for the A380 listed by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency since January 2020. That's about double the number of directives for large Boeing aircraft in the same period. With newer, more fuel-efficient jets in short supply, airlines committed to the twin-deck A380 have little choice but to keep flying it. In its youth, the A380 was a triumph of international collaboration, with four million parts made by 1,500 companies worldwide. Now, in old age, the aircraft's complexity is testing aviation's fractured supply chains in the post-Covid era. 'The A380 is a complex aeroplane whose scale does make it more demanding to maintain compared to other aircraft,' the European Union Aviation Safety Agency said in a statement. 'It is very important for safety that there is no stigma attached to publishing an airworthiness directive -– safety must come first.' The agency said such directives, which mandate actions to make an aircraft safe, 'can vary hugely in scope and urgency.' The volume of airworthiness directives for different planes 'is not a good basis for comparison,' EASA said. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says many are starving in Gaza, vows to set up food centres Asia Cambodia, Thailand agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row World US, China hold new talks on tariff truce, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting Asia Giant algal bloom off South Australia devastates marine life, threatens seafood exports Sport Dare to dream, urges Singapore's first International Swimming Hall of Famer Joseph Schooling Singapore 44 suspects under probe for involvement in SIM card fraud Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole: Road recovery works progressing steadily, tests under way Singapore ST Explains: What we know about the Tanjong Katong sinkhole so far Stranded passengers However, with the capacity to carry 485 passengers or more, delays caused by mechanical failures can be costly and create a cascade of scheduling headaches. A Qantas Airways A380 on the flagship Sydney-London route broke down in Singapore on May 7 with fuel-pump problems. The onward flight to London was pushed back more than 24 hours and passengers accommodated in hotels. That was at least the second fuel-pump issue to delay QF1 in Singapore since Qantas reactivated its A380s. More recently, Qantas passengers who were due to depart Singapore on July 14 for Sydney on an A380 were delayed for days because of technical difficulties. Plans to retrieve them sooner were complicated by damage to another A380 at Sydney airport, when an aerobridge slammed into one of the engines. A British Airways A380, G-XLEB, recently spent more than 100 days in Manila. After returning to London Heathrow in mid-June, it flew just seven days of the next 30, according to Flightradar24. Still, British Airways from 2026 will embark on an interior upgrade programme, including overhauling A380 cabins, suggesting the airline will keep flying the plane for years. For airlines using the A380, large-capacity alternatives are scarce. Boeing's new 777X is years behind schedule and Airbus can't make long-haul A350s fast enough. Meanwhile, A380 operators are left with an out-of-production superjumbo that will only become more needy and more expensive to run. In online aviation forums, some services are gaining a name for breakdowns, cancellations or overnight delays. In a statement, Airbus said the A380 'continues to operate scheduled services with a high level of operational reliability, standing at 99 per cent for the global fleet over the past 12 months. Airbus is committed to providing full technical support to customers to ensure that they can optimize operations with their A380 fleets, and this will continue as long as the aircraft remains in service.' 60,000 hours Meanwhile, A380s are taking up space and manpower in workshops around the world, exacerbating a shortage of repair facilities for the wider commercial fleet. A comprehensive check of the massive plane can consume 60,000 hours of labour, according to aircraft repairer Lufthansa Technik. Qantas is sending some double-deckers to Dresden in Germany to be overhauled; British Airways flies its to Manila for repairs; and Emirates, the world's biggest operator of A380s, maintains some in China. Supply chain constraints have increased the price of parts, servicing and engine repairs on all major aircraft, said Eddy Pieniazek, Ishka's head of advisory. 'With the A380 being of its size and having four engines, this escalation in maintenance costs has become even more noticeable,' said Mr Pieniazek. In a statement, British Airways called the A380 'a vital part of our long-haul fleet. Through working closely with Airbus, we've seen consistent year-on-year improvements in its reliability.' Qantas said the plane 'is a key part of our international network, and we'll continue to fly them for years to come. All Qantas A380s have gone through a scheduled major maintenance overhaul in recent years, as well as significant upgrades to the cabin interiors.' Asiana Airlines said 'issues related to aircraft operations and maintenance are difficult to disclose externally.' Korean Air Lines said it 'maintains its A380 fleet to the highest safety standards, in strict accordance with all regulatory requirements and manufacturer guidelines.' Singapore Airlines said its 12 A380s are important to operations but it was 'unable to comment on specifics.' The company said it works closely with 'Airbus and our suppliers to ensure the ongoing reliability and serviceability of our A380 fleet.' To be sure, the A380 still has fans. Emirates, which has cannibalized some A380s for spare parts, plans to keep flying the aircraft until the end of the next decade. The airline's president, Tim Clark, has likened the jet to a huge vacuum cleaner capable of gobbling up passengers like no other plane. BLOOMBERG
