Premier League could come under pressure to SCRAP Summer Series amid club anger - as major reason for frustration is revealed
Mail Sport understands officials at some top-flight sides are angered at the fact that the tournament is having to be propped up by central funds and believe those who do not take part should not be handing money over to those who do.
It can also also be disclosed that the inaugural version two years ago recorded a net loss of £5.4m.
This year, Manchester United, Everton, West Ham United and Bournemouth have crossed the Atlantic to take part in the competition, which is aimed at growing the international market and giving the US audience the opportunity to watch English sides in the flesh.
United are expected to make the most of those involved, at around £7.5m, thanks to the club's bigger market share.
The Premier League uses its existing 'central' commercial partners to sponsor the competition, although some believe it is struggling to attract title sponsors. It does take hosting fees from the cities involved but the shortfall is made up from the central pot.
Some now believe that such a situation is untenable, with plans to raise the matter for discussion at the next shareholders' meeting in September.
'They're expecting those not involved to prop it up to the tune of £250,000,' said one, well-placed source. 'That shouldn't be happening.'
However, any attempt to end the competition is likely to be met with stiff opposition.
While the Premier League declined to comment, insiders were of the view that most clubs are supportive and 'keen to take part'.
While there is an acknowledgment that cash from central funds is currently needed, they believe the tournament is part of a wider package that enables growth of the Premier League on an international basis – which in turn helps them reach the £4bn a year mark in revenue.
Sources also point out that 10 clubs have taken part in the first two editions and that the budget is signed off by clubs.
The tournament is also viewed as an opportunity for central sponsors and an asset for US broadcast partners NBC, which screens matches, although some clubs have voiced their view that the inability to screen pre-season games on their own channels is not desirable.
This year's version is the second instalment of the series, which began in 2023. Last season's competition was cancelled thanks to the Copa America, which took place in the US and was filmed by NBC and the impact of the Olympics, in Paris.
This summer's event is taking place despite the fact that FIFA's expanded Club World Cup, hosted across the US, concluded earlier this month. Next year, the US will host the World Cup alongside Mexico and Canada.
Organisers had hoped for another big gun to take part alongside United, but with Manchester City and Chelsea in Club World Cup action, Liverpool and Arsenal both decided to launch their own tours elsewhere.
In 2023, Chelsea, Aston Villa, Newcastle United, Brighton, Brentford and Fulham took part.
This year's series kicked off with a double-header at the 82,500-capacity MetLife Stadium in New Jersey on Saturday. Some estimated as few as 10,000 were present to see Bournemouth defeat Everton 3-0, while that number had swelled to around 50,000 by the time United overcame West Ham 2-1.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Australia dodges latest Trump tariff hikes as most imports held at 10%
Australian goods imported into the US will continue to attract the baseline 10% tariff, with Australia dodging any tariff increase in the latest round of Donald Trump's global trade war. On Thursday night US time – Friday morning in Australia – Trump issued an executive order confirming new tariff deals for several trading partners, as well as revised tariffs for a number of other countries. Australia is not mentioned in the order, which stated that any countries not on the new list would remain at a 10% tariff rate. 'The White House has confirmed that no country has reciprocal tariffs lower than Australia,' a spokesperson for Australia's minister for trade, Don Farrell, said on Friday morning. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'While we remain in the best possible position under the United States' new tariff regime, we will continue to advocate for the removal of all tariffs in line with our free trade agreement.' Farrell was due to speak in Adelaide later on Friday. In the executive order issued this week, Trump indicated he was open to further negotiations on tariffs, for countries he saw as aligned to his America First ideology. 'Some trading partners have agreed to, or are on the verge of agreeing to, meaningful trade and security commitments with the United States, thus signaling their sincere intentions to permanently remedy the trade barriers that have contributed to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 14257, and to align with the United States on economic and national security matters.' Executive Order 14257 was Trump's April order, which argued that 'large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the United States'. Trump's latest executive order castigated unnamed countries he felt had shown insufficient fealty to the US on trade. 'Other trading partners, despite having engaged in negotiations, have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances in our trading relationship or have failed to align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national-security matters,' the order read. 'There are also some trading partners that have failed to engage in negotiations with the United States or to take adequate steps to align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national security matters.' The new executive order punishes small economies in particular, who have limited trading relationships with the US: Syria was given a 41% tariff rate, Myanmar and Laos 40%. The EU has a split tariff rate: 0% on some goods, and 15% on others. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion China, one of the US's largest trading partners and a target of Trump's trade ire, is not mentioned in the latest order. It remains at a 30% tariff rate, with some exemptions for goods such as smartphones and semiconductors. A proposed – punitive – 145% tariff on Chinese imports has been paused until mid-August. The US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, told reporters the US has the 'makings of a deal' with China, but that it's not yet complete. 'There's still a few technical details to be worked out on the Chinese side between us. I'm confident that it will be done, but it's not 100% done.' With tariff negotiations still in play, Trump has taken aim at countries that negotiate with American drug companies to pay lower prices for pharmaceuticals, such as Australia. Under Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, the government negotiates directly with drug companies to secure comparatively low prices, a long-standing arrangement, but one which has been a consistent irritant for Trump. Australia has been consistent in its dealings with the Trump administration that 'the PBS is not up for negotiation'. 'Our government is getting on with the job of delivering cheaper medicines for Australians,' a government spokesperson said.
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil steadies as concerns about tariff impacts vie with Russian supply threats
Aug 1 (Reuters) - Oil prices were little changed on Friday after falling more than 1% in the previous session as traders digested the impact of new higher U.S. tariffs that may curtail economic activity and lower global fuel demand growth. Brent crude futures rose 4 cents, or 0.06%, to $71.74 a barrel by 1201 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude rose 1 cent, or 0.01%, to $69.27. Still, Brent prices are set to gain 4.9% for the week while WTI is set to climb 6.4% after U.S. President Donald Trump earlier this week threatened to place tariffs on buyers of Russian crude, particularly China and India, to coax Russia into halting its war against Ukraine. On Friday though, investors were more focused on Trump's imposition of new, and mostly higher, tariff rates on U.S. trading partners set to go into effect on August 1. Trump signed an executive order on Thursday imposing tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on U.S. imports from dozens of countries and foreign locations including Canada, India and Taiwan that failed to reach trade deals by his deadline of August 1. Some analysts have warned the levies will limit economic growth by raising prices, which would weigh on oil consumption. On Thursday, there were signs that existing tariffs are already pressuring prices higher in the U.S., the world's biggest economy and oil consumer. U.S. inflation increased in June as tariffs boosted prices for imported goods such as household furniture and recreation products. This is supporting views that price pressures would pick up in the second half of the year and delay the Federal Reserve from cutting interest rates until at least October. Maintaining interest rates would also impact oil as the higher borrowing costs can limit economic growth. At the same time, Trump's threats to impose 100% secondary tariffs on Russian crude buyers have supported prices because of concerns that would disrupt oil trade flows and remove some oil from the market. JP Morgan analysts said in a note on Thursday Trump's warnings to China and India of penalties on their ongoing purchases of Russian oil potentially puts 2.75 million barrels per day of Russian seaborne oil exports at risk. The two countries are the world's second- and third-largest crude consumers, respectively. "The Trump administration, like its predecessors, will likely find sanctioning the world's second-largest oil exporter unfeasible without spiking oil prices," the analysts said, referring to Russia.
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Rwanda, Congo hold first meeting of joint oversight committee under peace deal
July 31 (Reuters) - Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo held the first meeting of a joint oversight committee on Thursday, taking a step toward implementing a peace deal agreed last month in Washington even as other commitments are yet to be fulfilled. The African Union, Qatar and the United States joined the meeting of the committee in Washington, which was established as a forum to deal with implementation and dispute resolution of the peace agreement. The deal in June between Rwanda and Congo marked a breakthrough in talks held by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration, which aims to bring an end to fighting that has killed thousands and attracted billions of dollars of Western investment to a region rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper, lithium and other minerals. In the Washington agreement, the two African countries pledged to implement a 2024 deal that would see Rwandan troops withdraw from eastern Congo within 90 days. It also said Congo and Rwanda would form a joint security coordination mechanism within 30 days and implement a plan agreed last year to monitor and verify the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers within three months. Congolese military operations targeting the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), a Congo-based armed group that includes remnants of Rwanda's former army and militias that carried out a 1994 genocide, are meant to conclude over the same timeframe. But 30 days from the signing has passed without a meeting of the joint security coordination mechanism, and operations targeting the FDLR and the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers have yet to begin. The joint oversight committee meeting, due to meet within 45 days of the signing, was on schedule. Trump's senior Africa adviser, Massad Boulos, told reporters on Wednesday that the deal was not off track, adding that a meeting of the security mechanism was due to be announced in coming days. Asked about lack of progress on operations against the FDLR and withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers, Boulos said: "There was no timeline for that... if you look at the chronology of what we've been able to do since April, it's been extensive, and it's been very much on point and very much in line with our aspirations. So it's not off track in any way." But sources with knowledge of the negotiations recognised delays in the implementation of the deal, but added it was not yet threatening the deal as a whole. Military and diplomatic sources told Reuters that the parties in conflict, including armed groups as M23 and militia fighters known as Wazalendo, have strengthened their military presence on the front lines.
