
Bangladesh struggles to contain the fallout of an uprising that toppled its leader last year
As the head of a new interim government, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus promised to hold a credible election to return to democracy, initiate electoral and constitutional reforms and restore peace on the streets after hundreds were killed in weeks of violence that began on July 15, 2024.
A year later, the Yunus-led administration has struggled to contain the fallout of the uprising. Bangladesh finds itself mired in a growing political uncertainty, religious polarization and a challenging law-and-order situation.
Here's what to know about Bangladesh a year after the protests that toppled Hasina.
Chaotic political landscape
Uncertainty about the future of democracy looms large in Bangladesh.
The student protesters who toppled Hasina formed a new political party, promising to break the overwhelming influence of two major dynastic political parties — the Bangladesh Nationalists Party, or BNP, and Hasina's Awami League.
But the party's opponents have accused it of being close to the Yunus-led administration and creating chaos for political mileage by using state institutions.
Meanwhile, Bangladesh's political landscape has further fragmented after the country's largest Islamist party, the Jamaat-e-Islami, returned to politics more than a decade after it was suppressed by Hasina's government.
Aligned with the student-led party, it's trying to fill the vacuum left by the Awami League, which was banned in May. Its leader, Hasina, is facing trial for crimes against humanity. The strength of Jamaat-e-Islami, which opposed Bangladesh's independence from Pakistan in 1971, is unknown.
Both BNP and the Jamaat-e-Islami party are now at loggerheads over establishing supremacy within the administration and judiciary, and even university campuses.
They are also differing over the timing of a new parliamentary election. Yunus has announced that the polls would be held in April next year, but poor law and order situation and a lack of clear-cut political consensus over it have created confusion. The chief of Bangladesh's military also wanted an election in December this year — a stance Yunus didn't like.
'Post-revolution honeymoons often don't last long, and Bangladesh is no exception,' says Michael Kugelman, a Washington-based South Asia analyst and senior fellow of Asia Pacific Foundation. 'The interim government faced massive expectations to restore democracy and prosperity. But this is especially difficult to do as an unelected government without a public mandate.'
Yunus wants reforms before election
Yunus has delayed an election because he wants reforms — from changes to the constitution and elections to the judiciary and police. Discussions with political parties, except Hasina's Awami League, are ongoing.
Some of the reforms include putting a limit on how many times a person can become the prime minister, introduction of a two-tier parliament, and appointment of a chief justice.
There appears to be little consensus over some basic reforms. While both the BNP and the Jamaat-e-Islami parties have agreed to some of them with conditions, other proposals for basic constitutional reforms have become a sticking point.
The Jamaat-e-Islami also wants to give the interim government more time to complete reforms before heading into polls, while BNP has been calling for an early election. The student-led party mostly follows the pattern of the Jamaat-e-Islami party.
Kugelman says the issue of reforms was meant to unite the country, but has instead become a flashpoint.
'There's a divide between those that want to see through reforms and give them more time, and those that feel it's time to wrap things up and focus on elections,' he says.
Human rights and the rise of Islamists
Human rights in Bangladesh have remained a serious concern under Yunus.
Minority groups, especially Hindus, have blamed his administration for failing to protect them adequately. The Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council says minority Hindus and others have been targeted in hundreds of attacks over the last year. Hasina's party has also blamed the interim government for arresting tens of thousands of its supporters.
The Yunus-led administration denies these allegations.
Meenakshi Ganguly, deputy Asia director for Human Rights Watch, says while the interim government has stopped enforced disappearances and extrajudicial executions that had occurred under the Hasina government, 'there has been little progress on lasting security sector reforms or to deliver on the pledge to create robust, independent institutions.'
Meanwhile, Islamist factions — some of whom have proposed changes to women's rights and demanded introduction of Sharia law — are vying for power. Many of them are planning to build alliances with bigger parties like the BNP or the Jamaat-e-Islami.
Such factions have historically struggled to gain significant electoral support despite Bangladesh being a Muslim majority, and their rise is expected to further fragment the country's political landscape.
Diplomatic pivot and balancing with global powers
During Hasina's 15-year rule, Bangladesh was India's closest partner in South Asia. After her ouster, the Yunus-led administration has moved closer to China, which is India's main rival in the region.
Yunus' first state visit was to China in March, a trip that saw him secure investments, loans and grants. On the other hand, India is angered by the ousting of its old ally Hasina and hasn't responded to Dhaka's requests to extradite her. India stopped issuing visas to Bangladeshis following Hasina's fall.
Globally, Yunus seems to have strong backing from the West and the United Nations, and it appears Bangladesh will continue its foreign policy, which has long tried to find a balance between multiple foreign powers.
But Kugelman says the country's biggest challenge may be the 'Trump factor.'
In January, the Trump administration suspended USAID funds to Bangladesh, which had sought significant levels of U.S. support during a critical rebuild period post Hasina's ouster.
'Dhaka must now reframe its relations with an unconventional U.S. administration that will largely view Bangladesh through a commercial lens,' Kugelman says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
14 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump says Coca-Cola has agreed to use real cane sugar in Coke
President Trump said Wednesday that Coca-Cola has agreed to use "REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States." Why it matters: The beverage giant has been under pressure to reduce sugar in its drinks. The company currently uses high fructose corn syrup in the original soda recipe, according to its website. What they're saying: Trump said he's been speaking with the Atlanta-based company about using cane sugar, which it does in its Mexican Coke. " I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. Zoom in: Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey told investors in April that "we continue to make progress on sugar reduction in our beverages." He noted that the company has "done this by changing recipes as well as by using our global marketing resources and distribution network to boost awareness of and interest in our ever-expanding portfolio." The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday.


Gizmodo
14 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Trump Sues to Fire Big Bird's Boss
Back in April, Donald Trump fired three Democratic members of the board at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), a move similar to his efforts to oust Democrats from the Federal Trade Commission and the Kennedy Center, among others. The board members—Laura Ross, Thomas Rothman, and Diane Kaplan— simply never left. Now, the Trump administration is suing to remove them from their seats. Trump gave notice of the attempted firings on April 28, which led to the CPB and its would-be unemployed board members suing the administration. In the eyes of the organization, the CPB is not a federal agency in the way the FTC or FCC is. Instead, it is a private corporation and, it argued, its board members 'cannot be affected, controlled, or disturbed by the actions of the government.' Additionally, the CPB added rules to its bylaws that prevent its board members from being removed and ousting any Trump-appointed member whom they do not want. Unfortunately, it seems the CPB adopted that rule after Trump issued the firing notices. And herein lies the complications around this case. A judge rejected the CPB's request for an injunction to prevent the firings, but said the organization has legal grounds for rejecting the firings based on corporate law. The CPB took that as a win and said the three fired board members would stay in their seats. Shockingly, the Trump administration has a different view. In its lawsuit, the Department of Justice argues that the three board members 'have been usurping and purporting to exercise unlawfully the office of board member of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting' and accuses them of continuing to operate in office 'despite their removal and subsequent failure to obtain legal relief protecting their old positions.' They are seeking the removal of the board members, as well as trying to claw back salary that they've taken during this purgatory period where they live in limbo of being fired and not fired. Notably, the DOJ points to a recent Supreme Court ruling as part of its argument that found the President has the power to remove agency heads without cause. The controversial ruling, which was issued in an unsigned order from the court, stemmed from Trump's removal of the heads of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merits Systems Protection Board. Both argued that they could not be fired without good cause under federal law. And that was the case…until now. The suit may be the first time the Supreme Court's ruling is tested. For now, Big Bird's bosses remain in place—though if Congressional Republicans have their way, they won't have much to oversee once NPR and PBS get defunded.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MAGA is coming for Trump over lost Epstein files. Bondi may pay the price.
Donald Trump is eager to warehouse the Epstein files in some obscure federal hideaway, right next to his QAnon compendium and his research project on Barack Obama's birth certificate. But the president has a problem ‒ MAGA influencers can't let go of this particular conspiracy theory, which has been driven for years by Trump's camp, until he cut off that fuel recently. Those MAGA influencers also have a problem ‒ they can't let go of Trump, adored by their audiences as he fuels content, which they convert into profits. Advantage Trump here. Will MAGA actually turn on Donald Trump? Trump is, in all things, transactional. But he also has an extensively documented history, from long before he entered politics, of not honoring his side of a transaction. Stiffed vendors on construction projects. Unpaid loans from big banks. Jilted wives. Trump just walks away when he no longer needs them. So MAGA can't really turn on Trump here. But those influencers can exact a price ‒ or a prize ‒ from the president. They can demand a sacrifice in the name of thwarted conspiracy theories: the firing of Attorney General Pam Bondi. That's a big ask. Trump, who fired plenty of people during his first term, is now reluctant to hold anyone in his Cabinet accountable because it would equal an admission that he should not have appointed them. But as much as Trump wants the MAGA influencers to move on, they're standing firm on this. For now. Opinion: Musk can spend a fortune on the 'America Party.' But can he have an impact? The fabled Epstein list could be the straw that broke MAGA's back The source of this controversial conundrum, wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein, has been dead for six years come this Aug. 10. That's no help to Trump. Epstein's 2019 death by suicide, during Trump's first term, while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, is a subject of debate among the MAGA influencers who question if he was killed in a "deep-state" cover-up. Epstein, who used to pal around with Trump, had already won a cotton-candy conviction in Florida in 2008 by pleading guilty to soliciting minors for sex. His punishment, it's fair to say, was not so punishing. That adds more fuel to the conspiracy. Why did a MAGA boogeyman get such a sweet deal? This has been brewing for a long time. And MAGA finally lost it on July 7 when Bondi's department issued a memo refuting two key points in the conspiracy theory: Epstein really did kill himself and did not leave behind a "client list" of wealthy, powerful perverts he had blackmailed. Opinion newsletter: Sign up for our newsletter on people, power and policies in the time of Trump from columnist Chris Brennan. Get it delivered to your inbox. Trump tried to tamp down the furor in a July 8 Cabinet meeting, with Bondi hanging on every word, both of them clearly frustrated that the Epstein conspiracy would not fade away. That only made things worse. Conservative commentator Megyn Kelly, who has come full circle from Trump critic to Trump sycophant, declared Bondi's "days are numbered as a member of the Trump administration." Steve Bannon, a top aide in Trump's first term and now a MAGA broadcaster, cast the Epstein controversy as a "deep state" threat against America. Charlie Kirk, founder of MAGA-aligned Turning Point USA, complained that he was "profoundly confused" by the Trump administration's treatment of the Epstein files. Heck, even Roseanne Barr ‒ remember her? ‒ told Trump to "read the damn room" when it comes to Epstein. Trump has a history of using movements and then dropping them Trump has always enjoyed peddling conspiracy theories for political gain. He is not accustomed to being held accountable for that. And this is a guy who hates being held accountable for anything. He spent five years, from 2011 to 2016, circulating the ludicrous smear that Barack Obama, America's first Black president, was not really born in America. That appealed to racists in his MAGA base. So Trump stuck to that story until he didn't need it anymore. Opinion: Did Donald Trump eat Jeffrey Epstein's client list? Logic suggests he did. But Trump didn't take responsibility for any of that when he acknowledged two months before the 2016 presidential election that Obama was born in America. Instead, he tried to blame Hillary Clinton for his smear and then tried to take credit for Obama releasing his birth certificate back in 2011, after Trump first started circulating his lies. It gets even weirder with QAnon, the grotesque cult that adhered to anonymous internet preaching that Democrats operated a secret satanic organization for pedophiles and cannibals. Trump openly flirted in 2020, from the White House, with that cult's belief that he was saving the world from all that. After losing the 2020 election, Trump used his social media website Truth Social to post and promote QAnon-affiliated material more than 800 times while seeking another term as president. And when QAnon was no longer useful? Trump dropped the conspiracy theory like a hot rock. All eyes are on Pam Bondi and her job security Does Bondi survive this? Or does MAGA take her down? With Trump as erratic as ever, who knows? He's been all over the place on his website, Truth Social. In a July 7 post, the day after Bondi's Epstein memo dropped and infuriated MAGA, Trump lavished praise on FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino but didn't mention her. Then came a flurry of weekend stories about Bongino thinking about quitting if Bondi didn't get fired. Trump on July 12 posted a 398-word screed that rehashed just about every conspiracy theory he's ever flogged, mentioning Bondi twice while insisting she's "doing a fantastic job." Trump was clearly talking to the MAGA pitchforks-and-torches crowd screaming for her head. "We're on one team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening," Trump wrote in the post, which also mentioned Patel once but did not include Bongino's name. Opinion: Trump and Musk renew their feud. Will Elon drop an Epstein 'bomb' again? Trump, who appointed Patel and Bongino, knows that they spent the years between his first and second term pushing the Epstein conspiracy theory on every platform they could find. But, after only a few months on the job, both now say Epstein really did kill himself. Boxed in by his own history of courting conspiracy and appointing people who debunk those theories, Trump did exactly what you might expect during this weekend's MAGA turmoil. He desperately tried to distract his followers by trying to pick a fake fight with an old foe, Rosie O'Donnell, calling her a "threat to humanity" while ludicrously threatening to strip her of her American citizenship. Here, he found consensus — social media scoffed at his pathetic attempt to change the subject. Follow USA TODAY columnist Chris Brennan on X, formerly known as Twitter: @ByChrisBrennan. Sign up for his weekly newsletter, Translating Politics, here. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Lost Epstein list has MAGA fuming at Trump. Will he react? | Opinion