Islamabad Declaration approved: Landmark dialogue on judicial wellbeing held
Marking the International Day for Judicial Wellbeing, a national symposium was held at the Federal Judicial Academy, here on Friday, under the theme 'The Human Dimension of Responsive Justice.'
The event brought together judges of the superior and district judiciary, legal experts, development partners, and institutional stakeholders for a landmark dialogue on judicial wellbeing in Pakistan.
In his keynote address, Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi underscored the urgent need to humanise judicial reforms by recognising the emotional, psychological, and institutional pressures faced by judges, particularly at the district level. 'A judge who is institutionally supported is better able to be fair, focused, and effectively responsive,' he remarked, affirming his unwavering commitment to ensure dignity, protection, and institutional support for the judiciary.
Chief Justice Afridi outlined a series of judicial reform initiatives led through the National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee, including the establishment of Model Criminal Trial Courts, timelines for speedy disposal of civil and criminal matters, development of a Professional Excellence Index, and formulation of ethical guidelines for the use of Artificial Intelligence in the judiciary.
The special focus was placed on the wellbeing of the district judiciary, with reforms addressing extraneous influence, performance evaluation, standardised recruitment, parity in service terms, and enhanced access to international exposure. In a promising development, he announced forthcoming Memoranda of Understanding with the Supreme Court of China and the Constitutional Court of Türkiye for judicial cooperation, including the exchange of judicial officers.
The symposium concluded with the unanimous adoption of the Islamabad Declaration on Judicial Wellbeing, calling judicial wellbeing a 'structural imperative' for a responsive and sustainable justice system.
The declaration affirmed the need to embed judicial wellbeing in all areas of reform—case management, digital integration, infrastructure, and staffing—while fostering a culture of empathy, collegiality, and institutional care.
The declaration urged the stakeholders at the national and provincial levels to integrate judicial wellbeing into policy and training and calls upon development partners to collaborate in the design and implementation of a National Judicial Wellbeing Framework.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Opposition alliance urges CJP to act on Rs300bn sugar scandal
The Tehreek Tahaffuz-e-Ain has written to Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi, urging him to take suo motu notice of an alleged sugar industry scandal in which mills reportedly profited by Rs300 billion due to recent price fluctuations. In a letter addressed to the CJP, Vice Chairman Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar called for the formation of a commission under Article 184(3) of the Constitution to investigate suspected policy manipulation and regulatory failures. Khokhar requested that the issue be urgently referred to a three-member committee or that the letter be treated as a formal petition to initiate judicial proceedings. "The future of the country's economic stability and citizens' trust in governance hinges on prompt and decisive action," the letter added. It further highlighted that the Public Accounts Committee was informed on Tuesday, July 29, that sugar mills had earned Rs300 billion through recent rate hikes. CCP reschedules hearing The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has postponed the hearing of the sugar cartel case after over 70 sugar mills requested a delay, citing the unavailability of legal counsel due to the Supreme Court's summer recess. In a statement issued on Monday, the CCP announced that the hearing will now take place from September 22 to 25. The decision follows multiple adjournment pleas submitted by sugar mills. More than 50 mills have also filed appeals in the Supreme Court challenging the tribunal's decision directing the CCP to rehear the case. The commission clarified that the hearing has been deferred once to fulfil the requirements of a fair trial. However, it emphasised that no further delay or adjournment would be granted. The CCP stated that the case proceedings will be conducted daily. Read: CCP to hear sugar pricing case today Earlier in May, the Competition Appellate Tribunal had returned the case to the CCP for rehearing after announcing its verdict on the appeals filed by the sugar mills and the association against a Rs44b fine. The tribunal instructed that the case be reheard under the supervision of the CCP chairperson or any other member who was not previously involved in the hearings. The tribunal also ordered the commission to complete the rehearing and issue a verdict within 90 days. In 2021, the CCP imposed a Rs44 billion fine on the PSMA and its member mills for forming a cartel to fix sugar prices and engaging in other anti-competitive practices.
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Enhancing legal aid access
EDITORIAL: In a significant move, the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan (LJCP), under the leadership of Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, has announced its decision to expand the free legal aid facility across all levels of the judiciary – a service previously available only within the lower judiciary. An essential element of this initiative is a fundamental right it offers to underprivileged individuals, particularly those who have been languishing in jails for extended periods due to their inability to afford legal representation. In many instances, individuals are either wrongfully accused of crimes they cannot afford to defend themselves against or are trapped in prolonged legal battles. As a result, a large number of people in such circumstances are denied meaningful access to justice. While this initiative is a step in the right direction, a key concern remains the quality of legal representation. Although legal aid guarantees the opportunity for representation to members of the disadvantaged sections of society, it does not necessarily ensure access to experienced and competent lawyers. In many cases, individuals who receive free legal assistance may be represented by lawyers with limited experience. These lawyers, although appointed to District Legal Empowerment Committees supported by the IJCP through the 'Access to Justice Development Fund' (which covers lawyers' fees, court charges, copying costs, process fees, and other expenses), may lack the expertise required for a given field of law. This situation becomes particularly problematic in cases that demand specialized knowledge of the law. The result of inadequate legal representation could be wrongful convictions, disproportionate sentences, or even the irreversible consequence of a death sentence in the case of criminal trials. Therefore, it is critical not only to ensure that indigent litigants have access to the legal process, but also the quality of legal representation they receive. The system must ensure that those, who can least afford it, do not have their chances of a fair trial compromised by subpar representation. To effectively address this issue, it is important that legal aid lawyers are well-trained and adequately resourced. This could include offering specialised training programmes for public defenders to build their capacity and expertise, particularly in areas where the need for skilled legal support is the greatest. In addition, while the financial assistance for each litigant has been modestly increased from Rs. 40,000 to Rs. 50,000, it is insufficient to attract good lawyers. It would be beneficial to improve the quality of pro bono work by fostering partnerships between the government, law schools, and non-profit organizations. Legal aid can best serve its purpose if it ensures that individuals, especially those from marginalized backgrounds, are not just represented in court, but represented well. In this regard, improving both access and quality will be essential for the success of LJCP's initiative. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Justice delivery: CJP for targeted interventions to bridge disparities
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi expressed concern over the lack of basic infrastructure in underdeveloped districts, and emphasised the need for targeted interventions to bridge regional disparities in justice delivery. The chief justice was meeting with a delegation of lawyers from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa at the Supreme Court Branch Registry, Peshawar. The press release regarding the meeting, issued by the SC PRO on Friday, stated that CJP Yahya encouraged the bar members to benefit from Continuing Legal Education (CLE) programmes at the Federal Judicial Academy (FJA). Delivery of timely, effective justice a moral imperative: CJP He announced a new legal aid initiative to bring inclusivity to ensure that no litigant remains unrepresented. 'Financially distressed litigants will now be provided legal representation at all levels – from Magistrate Courts to the Supreme Court – at State expense, therefore asked the bars to nominate competent lawyers to the relevant judges,' he said. The statement said, that while presiding over a high-level meeting to review and enhance institutional linkages between the Bar Associations and the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan in Peshawar, the chief justice urged bar representatives to engage their members proactively and stay involved in these reform efforts. The CJP shared insights from his recent visits to some of the most remote districts in all provinces. He informed the participants that the Commission has decided to post senior-level representatives in every province. These officers will be based in the high courts and serve as liaisons with district bar associations. Their duties include raising awareness of justice sector initiatives, identifying local priorities, and supervising grassroots reforms. The CJP stated that Bar Associations will also be invited to submit development proposals for consideration by the relevant District Development Committees headed by the D&SJ. Representatives from federal and provincial departments are now part of the process to accelerate execution and prevent resource duplication. The chief justice urged bar representatives to engage their members proactively and stay involved in these reform efforts. He directed that all government-provided support to Bar Associations be streamlined and properly structured to maximise impact and cost-effectiveness. He also called on provincial line departments to remain actively engaged with designated officers to ensure timely implementation of projects proposed by the District Committees. Noting challenges such as poor infrastructure, unreliable power supply, and limited digital access in underdeveloped districts, he stressed the need for targeted interventions. The chief justice observed that despite the availability of development funds inadequate coordination among institutions has hindered effective implementation. He emphasised the need to include Bar Associations in judicial development efforts, especially those linked to judicial complexes. CJP Yahya also encouraged Bar Associations to benefit from the CLE programmes offered by the FJA. He instructed that the training calendar be widely disseminated, and focal persons be appointed within each bar to coordinate with the academy. The meeting was attended by Chief Justice Peshawar High Court SM Attique Shah; Vice Chairman Pakistan Bar Council Tahir Warraich; Vice Chairman Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Bar Council Ahmed Farooq Khattak; Vice President Supreme Court Bar Association Fida Bahadur, Chairman Executive Committee, KP Bar Council Akbar Khan Kohistani; the registrars, Supreme Court and Peshawar High Court; Secretary Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan; Secretaries of Finance, Law and Parliamentary Affairs, and Planning and Development of the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; Director General, KP Judicial Academy; Director Planning, Peshawar High Court; and a representative from the Ministry of Law and Justice, Federal Government. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
