Opposition alliance urges CJP to act on Rs300bn sugar scandal
In a letter addressed to the CJP, Vice Chairman Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar called for the formation of a commission under Article 184(3) of the Constitution to investigate suspected policy manipulation and regulatory failures.
Khokhar requested that the issue be urgently referred to a three-member committee or that the letter be treated as a formal petition to initiate judicial proceedings.
"The future of the country's economic stability and citizens' trust in governance hinges on prompt and decisive action," the letter added.
It further highlighted that the Public Accounts Committee was informed on Tuesday, July 29, that sugar mills had earned Rs300 billion through recent rate hikes.
CCP reschedules hearing
The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has postponed the hearing of the sugar cartel case after over 70 sugar mills requested a delay, citing the unavailability of legal counsel due to the Supreme Court's summer recess.
In a statement issued on Monday, the CCP announced that the hearing will now take place from September 22 to 25. The decision follows multiple adjournment pleas submitted by sugar mills.
More than 50 mills have also filed appeals in the Supreme Court challenging the tribunal's decision directing the CCP to rehear the case.
The commission clarified that the hearing has been deferred once to fulfil the requirements of a fair trial. However, it emphasised that no further delay or adjournment would be granted.
The CCP stated that the case proceedings will be conducted daily.
Read: CCP to hear sugar pricing case today
Earlier in May, the Competition Appellate Tribunal had returned the case to the CCP for rehearing after announcing its verdict on the appeals filed by the sugar mills and the association against a Rs44b fine.
The tribunal instructed that the case be reheard under the supervision of the CCP chairperson or any other member who was not previously involved in the hearings.
The tribunal also ordered the commission to complete the rehearing and issue a verdict within 90 days.
In 2021, the CCP imposed a Rs44 billion fine on the PSMA and its member mills for forming a cartel to fix sugar prices and engaging in other anti-competitive practices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Internet firewall: Govt defends controversial rollout in NA
ISLAMABAD: Amid fierce criticism over the multi-billion-rupee internet firewall installation, the federal government on Wednesday staunchly defended the controversial rollout, insisting it is essential to protect the country's digital infrastructure from escalating cybersecurity threats. In a written response to a question raised in National Assembly by MNA Muhammad Jawed Hanif Khan, the Minister for Information Technology and Telecommunication, Shaza Fatima Khawaja, emphasised the firewall's role in protecting citizens' data and complying with legal mandates under Article 19 of the Constitution. 'The internet is central to economic activity in the era of the fourth industrial revolution,' Khawaja said. 'Safeguarding the data of citizens, institutions, and entities is of paramount importance.' The firewall, quietly installed last year, blocks access to websites deemed objectionable under Pakistani law, including content violating morality, national security, or public order. Civil society groups and digital rights advocates have criticised the lack of transparency surrounding the firewall's deployment, warning it represents unprecedented surveillance rather than mere content filtering. Industry insiders say the firewall operates at upstream internet gateways, using deep packet inspection and traffic rerouting to monitor and restrict online content in real time. Users and service providers have noted disruptions, particularly on WhatsApp and Facebook, while IT businesses cite degraded connectivity. Officials describe the firewall as a 'web management upgrade,' but digital rights organisations like Bytes for All view it as a full-scale surveillance apparatus. The country's Internet infrastructure remains underdeveloped compared to regional peers, hampered by weak fibre networks and low broadband penetration. Critics argue the firewall prioritises governmental control over genuine cybersecurity improvements. Khawaja reiterated that the firewall is based on constitutional provisions allowing restrictions on freedom of expression for national security and public order, highlighting the government's commitment to protecting the country's digital space while navigating complex legal and ethical challenges. Separately, the House approved two amendments to criminal law removing the death penalty for tearing a woman's clothes and for contacting hijackers. The amendments, presented by Law Minister Azam Tarar in the National Assembly, are part of the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Bill 2025. The first reduces punishment for tearing a woman's clothes, previously punishable by death under Section 354A – a provision introduced during late military dictator Gen Zia-ul-Haq's regime and criticised for misuse. 'The death penalty for this offence is being removed, and a lesser sentence imposed,' Tarar said. The second amendment abolishes the death penalty under Section 402C for anyone meeting or contacting hijacking suspects. This section was introduced under former president late Pervez Musharraf. The amendments faced opposition from Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) MNA Aliya Kamran during the debate; however, the amendments were passed by a majority vote. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Properties' auction: Bahria Town moves SC against IHC order
ISLAMABAD: M/s Bahria Town (Private) Limited challenged the Islamabad High Court's order, allowing the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to proceed with the auction for its properties, in the Supreme Court. A division bench of IHC, comprising Chief Justice Sardar Mohammad Sarfraz Dogar and Justice Muhammad Asif on August 05, 25 dismissed Bahria Town's petition, through a short-impugned order; 'The injunctive order issued on 15.04.2025 passed in writ petition No. 1368 of 2025 and order dated 04.06.2025 passed in W.P No. 2248 of 2025 are hereby recalled.' M/s Bahria Town (Private) Limited, on Wednesday, through Farooq H Naek, filed an appeal against the IHC order under Article 185(3) of the Constitution. It asked the apex court that a regular bench hear the appeal, as no vires of any law have been challenged or interpretation of any constitutional provision is involved in the case. The petition raised questions whether, in view of the amended proviso to Section 25(b) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the plea bargain agreement automatically becomes inoperative and unenforceable upon the accused's failure to fulfill the terms and conditions stipulated therein? Whether the NAB authorities can lawfully determine or attribute any liability arising out of a plea bargain agreement in the absence of the accused and without associating the accused in such proceedings? Whether NAB can impose any financial or legal liability upon a person without first preparing and concluding an investigation report in accordance with law? According to the petition, Zain Malik, son-in-law, was accused in three references and investigations of NAB. He later entered into plea bargain agreement with the NAB under Section 25(b) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. The said plea bargain agreement was duly approved by the Accountability Court, Islamabad, vide orders dated 11.08.2020 and 24.08.2020. Upon the request of Zain Malik, the petitioner/Bahria Town (Private) Limited, mortgaged its eight commercial properties (Media House, Rawalpindi; Agricultural Land, Islamabad; Bahria Town Corporate Office-I and II, Rawalpindi; Rubaish Marquee, Islamabad; Arena Cinema, Rawalpindi; Bahria Town International Academy, Rawalpindi; and Safari Club, Rawalpindi) through Memorandum of Title Deeds in favour of NAB as security for the liability of Zain Malik. Out of the eight properties, NAB released two properties (Media House and Agricultural Land) upon payment of two installments by Zain Malik, while six properties still remained mortgaged in favour of the NAB. Zain Malik failed to make further payments in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain agreement which were duly approved by the Accountability Court, Islamabad. As a consequence of this non-compliance, the plea bargain agreement automatically became inoperative with respect to the rights and obligations of the parties. It said that despite amended Section 25(i) of National Accountability (Second Amendment) Act, 2022, the NAB vide letter dated 6-2-2024 called upon Zain Malik to appear in person and justify the reason of delay of payment of outstanding installments in compliance of plea bargain agreement and orders of Accountability Court I, Islamabad. The petitioner being aggrieved by the actions of the NAB, approached the Accountability Court (AC), Islamabad, seeking cancellation and withdrawal of the impugned notices and letter. However, the AC the application on 19-03-25. The petitioner then challenged the Accountability Court's order before the IHC, which on 15-04-25 passed restraining order. However, the IHC on August 5, 25 dismissed the petition through short impugned order. Farooq H Naek contended that the IHC order infringing upon the petitioner's proprietary rights and violating the applicable statutory and constitutional provisions. It shows that it has been passed in a mechanical manner and the Honourable High Court, Islamabad has ignored all the material attached with the writ petition and the relevant law regarding the subject matter, he added. It said that the courts below ignored the fact that the NAB is unlawfully attempting to impose its illegal demand upon the petitioner without any legal justification, while acting beyond its legal authority and disregarding the law and constitutional guarantees under the constitution. It prayed that leave to appeal against the impugned order dated 05.08.2025, passed by IHC may very kindly be granted. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
‘Economy to suffer if PTB dissolved'
LAHORE: Pakistan's economy could face a substantial loss of estimated Rs700 billion from the tobacco sector if the government proceeds with dissolving the Pakistan Tobacco Board (PTB) and transfers its regulatory authority to the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The tobacco industry is already reeling from the impact of illicit trade, which has cost the economy over Rs415 billion. The sector could also suffer an additional loss of over Rs300 billion in duties from the legal companies if regulatory control shifts from the federal government to the provincial level, sources said. It may be added that Khyber Pakhtunkhwa remains the epicentre of Pakistan's illicit cigarette production, much of it operating under political protection. Transferring regulatory autonomy to provinces would weaken national policy consistency and open the door to manipulation by local interest groups. Moreover, tobacco remains a critical contributor to rural employment, national revenue, and export income. Timely and uniform policy action is essential to safeguard the interests of growers and maintain investor confidence in the sector. 'Devolving PTB would be a regulatory disaster,' said Osama Siddiqui, a macroeconomic analyst. 'Without a centralized authority, the already thriving illicit trade will spiral further out of control, crushing legitimate businesses and slashing government revenue,' he added. Siddiqui said that dismantling the PTB's federal structure would serve only the interests of illegal manufacturers and risk destabilizing a sector that plays a vital role in Pakistan's economy. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
