logo
9 changes in ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-3, ITR-4 you need to know for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26) income tax return filing

9 changes in ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-3, ITR-4 you need to know for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26) income tax return filing

Time of India13-05-2025

The Income Tax Department has notified the
income tax return
forms for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26), incorporating the changes in tax laws announced in the July 2024 budget. However, taxpayers will have to wait for the release of the
ITR filing
e-utilities on the income tax portal to file their ITR.
#Operation Sindoor
The damage done at Pak bases as India strikes to avenge Pahalgam
Why Pakistan pleaded to end hostilities
Kashmir's Pahalgam sparks Karachi's nightmare
ET Wealth Online explains the nine changes made in this year's
ITR forms
that will make your ITR filing process easier for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26).
Changes in ITR forms for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26)
1. Expansion of eligibility to file ITR 1 and ITR 4:
This year, the Income Tax Department has expanded the eligibility by relaxing the eligibility criteria, making more taxpayers eligible to file their tax return using ITR 1 and ITR 4. The new rules allow even taxpayers with long-term capital gains from equity and equity mutual funds to file a tax return using ITR1 and ITR 4 (as applicable), provided the capital gains do not exceed Rs 1.25 lakh.
Naveen Wadhwa, Vice-President of Research and Advisory at Taxmann, says, "The Budget 2024 increased the LTCG exemption limit on listed equity and equity mutual funds from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 1.25 lakh. In previous years' ITR forms, even if a taxpayer's LTCG under Section 112A was within the exemption limit and there was no tax payable, the presence of capital gains income made them ineligible to file the simpler
ITR-1
forms. Instead, they were required to file the return in ITR-2 or ITR-3 forms, which are more complex and time-consuming. This resulted in a genuine hardship for small taxpayers. To address this, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has notified that taxpayers are eligible for filing ITR-1 and ITR 4, even if they have LTCG under Section 112A, provided the total LTCG does not exceed Rs 1.25 lakh and there is no brought forward or carry forward capital loss. This move eases the compliance burden and simplifies return filing for small taxpayers with limited capital gains with no losses to be brought forward."
Live Events
ITR1 and ITR 4 notified by the tax department: Check the major changes here
2. Aadhaar enrolment ID not acceptable:
One of the quiet changes made in Budget 2024 was removal of the acceptance of the Aadhaar enrolment ID for the PAN application, and also at the time of filing the ITR. Post this amendment, PAN applications and ITRs can no longer be filed using Aadhaar enrolment ID instead of the actual Aadhaar number. This year's income tax return forms (ITR 1, ITR 2, ITR 3 and ITR 5) have been amended to remove the column to enter the Aadhaar enrolment ID.
Wadhwa says, "The ITR forms for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26) do not have the Aadhaar Enrolment ID column this year. If the taxpayers do not have an Aadhaar number, then they will not be able to file ITR this year."
3. Opting out of new tax regime by small business owners:
Taxpayers having business income cannot switch/choose tax regimes every financial year, unlike individuals who don't have business income. As per the income tax rules, taxpayers having business income have once in a lifetime option to switch from the old to the new tax regime. However, this switching requires submission of a form to the tax department.
Wadhwa says, "The previous year ITR-4 simply asked whether the taxpayer had opted out of the new tax regime. If yes, then the taxpayer was required to provide the date and acknowledgement number of Form 10-IEA if applicable. However, the ITR-4 for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26) has introduced a more detailed disclosure. It now seeks confirmation of past filings of Form 10-IEA and asks whether the taxpayer wants to continue opting out of the new Tax Regime in the current year."
4. Mention TDS section in ITR form:
This year's income tax return forms (ITR 1, ITR 2, ITR 3 and ITR 5) require taxpayers to mention the TDS section under which tax was deducted from the income earned in FY 2024-25.
Wadhwa says, "The requirement to mention the TDS section in the ITR form is applicable if tax is deducted on income other than salary. Earlier, there was no requirement to mention the TDS section in the ITR form while claiming the tax credit. However, from this year, a taxpayer must mention the section under which the benefit of TDS credit is being taken."
5. New capital gains rules incorporated in ITR forms:
Budget 2024 announced new capital gains rules, effective July 23, 2024. Hence, if you have made capital gains by selling listed or unlisted shares, equity mutual funds, houses, land, or any other capital asset, then the date of sale is important to calculate the correct capital gains amount and the appropriate tax on it.
Wadhwa says, "Taxpayers should check the date of sale and transfer of the capital asset to know whether the tax will be calculated based on the old rules or new rules. If the transfer date is before July 23, 2024, the old tax provisions will continue to apply, including the 15% tax rate on STCG covered under Section 111A, the 20% tax rate on LTCG covered under Section 112 with indexation benefit, and the 10% tax rate on LTCG under Section 112A. However, if the transfer occurs on or after 23rd July 2024, new tax provisions will apply. The ITR form requires a disclosure of the date of transfer, separate reporting for transfers made before and on or after 23rd July 2024, and the proper application of revised tax rates and indexation rules."
If you have capital gains, then income from them will be reported in ITR 2, ITR 3 and ITR 5, as applicable.
6. Separate reporting for capital gains from unlisted bonds and debentures:
Budget 2024 changed the taxation rules for unlisted bonds and debentures. The new rules are effective July 23, 2024.
Wadhwa says, "According to the new rules, if unlisted debentures or bonds were issued on or before July 22, 2024, but redeemed, matured, or transferred on or after 23rd July 2024, the entire gain will be taxed as short-term capital gains, regardless of the holding period. As per the new rules, the gains will be taxed at the income tax slab rates applicable to your income. However, if the maturity, redemption or transfer occurs before July 23, 2024, the resulting gain will be classified as long-term and taxable according to the old provision. Under the old rules, the capital gains will be taxed at 20% with indexation benefit."
The reporting of capital gains from unlisted bonds and debentures has to be done in ITR-2, ITR-3 or ITR-5, as applicable.
7. Reporting of buy-back proceeds as deemed dividends:
From October 1, 2024, the amount received on the buy-back of shares by domestic listed companies will be considered as deemed dividends in the hands of shareholders. The new rule was announced in Budget 2024.
Wadhwa says, "ITR-2, 3 and 5 have been amended so that shareholders can report the buy-back proceeds as dividend income under the section 'Income from other sources'. Under the capital gains schedule, the taxpayers will be required to report zero as sale proceeds so that the cost of acquiring shares results in a capital loss. This capital loss can be brought forward and set off against other long-term capital gains for the next eight assessment years."
8. Providing disability certificates for deduction under Section 80DD and 80U:
Under the old tax regime, a taxpayer could claim a deduction under Section 80DD or Section 80U for expenditure made for disabled individuals. This year, a taxpayer claiming any of the deduction is required to provide acknowledgement number of the disability certificate as well.
Wadhwa says, "Till previous years, a taxpayer could claim a deduction under Section 80DD or Section 80U by quoting the Form 10-IA as per income tax rules. However, from this year, taxpayer is also required to provide acknowledgement number of disability certificates along with Form 10-IA to claim deduction."
Section 80DD can be claimed by a resident individual or HUF who incurs medical expenditure or pays an insurance premium for the care of a dependent family member with a disability or severe disability.
The deduction under Section 80U is available to a resident individual who is himself suffering from a disability or severe disability.
Wadhwa says, "This reporting requirement is applicable only if ITR-2 and ITR-3 is filed. There is no reporting requirement if the taxpayer files ITR-1."
9. Asset reporting applicable if total income exceeds Rs 1 crore:
There is good news for taxpayers having income above Rs 50 lakh. From this year, a taxpayer is required to report their assets and liabilities only if the gross total income exceeds Rs 1 crore.
Wadhwa says, "Earlier, a taxpayer was required to report their assets and liabilities if their gross total income exceeded Rs 50 lakh in a financial year. However, from this year, the reporting in Schedule AL will be mandatory only if gross total income exceeds Rs 1 crore."
The reporting in Schedule AL can be done in the ITR 2 and ITR 3.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RBI Cuts Repo Rate: Major Banks Slash Lending Rates; Know Objective Behind It
RBI Cuts Repo Rate: Major Banks Slash Lending Rates; Know Objective Behind It

India.com

time13 minutes ago

  • India.com

RBI Cuts Repo Rate: Major Banks Slash Lending Rates; Know Objective Behind It

RBI Repo Rate Cut: In a bid to boost economic momentum, several major banks have followed the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) lead after it cut the repo rate by 50 basis points. Among them, Punjab National Bank (PNB), Bank of India, and UCO Bank have announced reductions in their lending rates. The RBI's move is aimed at making borrowing easier and more affordable for both individuals and businesses. Wasting no time, Punjab National Bank was quick to respond, bringing down its repo-linked lending rate from 8.85% to 8.35%, setting the tone for others to follow. Bank of India Repo Rate: Bank of India responded to the RBI's repo rate cut by lowering its repo-linked lending rate from 8.85% to 8.35%, as disclosed in a stock exchange filing. However, the bank chose to keep its base rate and marginal cost of funds-based lending rate (MCLR) unchanged. UCO Bank Reduces MCLR Across All Loan Tenures Taking a slightly different path, UCO Bank opted to reduce its MCLR by 10 basis points across all loan tenures. This move, effective from June 10, aims to ease borrowing costs for various types of loans, including home and personal loans. Specifically, UCO Bank trimmed its overnight MCLR from 8.25% to 8.15%, the one-month rate from 8.45% to 8.35%, and the three-month rate from 8.6% to 8.5%. The six-month and one-year MCLRs were also adjusted to 8.8% and 9%, respectively. Bank of Baroda Repo Rate: Adding to the trend, Bank of Baroda announced a 50 basis point cut in its repo-linked lending rates for select loan tenures. These rate revisions follow the RBI's latest decision—announced by the Monetary Policy Committee led by Governor Sanjay Malhotra—to lower the repo rate, the key policy rate at which the central bank lends to commercial banks. The broader goal: to ease borrowing costs and stimulate economic activity. Objective Behind Cut In Repo Rate The objective behind the rate cut is to energise the economy by encouraging spending and investment through cheaper loans. In addition to the repo rate cut, the RBI also reduced the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) by 100 basis points, from 4 per cent to 3 per cent. Repo Rate Reduction In Four Phases This reduction will be rolled out in four phases and is expected to inject Rs 2.5 lakh crore of liquidity into the banking system. The CRR is the portion of bank deposits that must be maintained with the RBI, and lowering it allows banks to lend more. (With Inputs From IANS)

Chhattisgarh high court declines to intervene in tata projects and CHiPS bank guarantee dispute
Chhattisgarh high court declines to intervene in tata projects and CHiPS bank guarantee dispute

Time of India

time14 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Chhattisgarh high court declines to intervene in tata projects and CHiPS bank guarantee dispute

RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh high court disposed of a writ petition filed by Tata Projects Limited, directing the company to seek remedy before the Commercial Court. The petition concerned the encashment of a performance bank guarantee of Rs 167.46 crore by the Chhattisgarh Infotech Promotion Society (CHiPS), the nodal agency for driving IT growth and implementing IT and e-Governance initiatives in the state. A division bench of Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas and Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad heard the petition filed by Tata Projects. The company sought restoration of the status quo ante, asking for the return of the Rs 167.46 crore to State Bank of India and the issuance of an identical bank guarantee. Alternatively, Tata Projects requested CHiPS to deposit the amount in an interest-bearing account until the dispute's resolution. According to court records, CHiPS issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the selection of a Master System Integrator (MSI) for the BharatNet Phase-II Project in Chhattisgarh. A dispute arose between Tata Projects and CHiPS during the commercial contract. Previously, Tata Projects filed a writ petition, in which a single bench of the high court on 2 July 2024, granted interim protection, restraining respondents from encashing the performance bank guarantee. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo This writ petition was later disposed of on 30 April 2025, with the court re-delegating the parties to approach the Commercial Court. Subsequently, Tata Projects filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Commercial Court, on 3 May 2025, ordered an interim status quo regarding the invocation of the bank guarantee. However, after the respondents filed their reply, the Commercial Court disposed of the application on 6 May 2025, vacating the status quo order. The initiation of the bank guarantee encashment process led Tata Projects to approach the highcourt. Senior Counsel Kishore Bhaduri, appearing for Tata Projects, argued that CHiPS's conduct was fraudulent and high-handed, misleading the court and misusing its power by attempting to invoke the bank guarantee. Counsel for the respondents and the state argued that the writ petition was not maintainable, as Tata Projects had remedies available under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, or under the Chhattisgarh Madhyashtham Adhikaran Act, 1983. The high court observed that an arbitration clause existed in the agreement and that Tata Projects already approached the Commercial Court. The court ruled that the writ petition was not maintainable at this juncture. However, it granted Tata Projects the liberty to pursue statutory remedies before the Commercial Court. The court also clarified that the respondents were free to raise objections regarding the maintainability of any application. The high court directed the Commercial Court to consider and decide any interim application or application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the petitioner expeditiously and in accordance with the law. The high court also made it clear that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the case, leaving it to the Commercial Court to decide independently.

Mohandas Pai flags lack of domestic capital for Indian startups; urges policy overhaul; calls for stronger R&D support
Mohandas Pai flags lack of domestic capital for Indian startups; urges policy overhaul; calls for stronger R&D support

Time of India

time18 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Mohandas Pai flags lack of domestic capital for Indian startups; urges policy overhaul; calls for stronger R&D support

NEW DELHI: Indian startups are struggling to grow due to limited domestic investment and restrictive government regulations, warned industry veteran and Aarin Capital Chairman Mohandas Pai, calling for urgent policy reforms and increased R&D funding to boost the ecosystem. He cautioned that despite India's position as the world's third-largest startup ecosystem, the nation could lose ground in global innovation if existing issues remain unresolved. "We have 1,65,000 registered startups, 22,000 are funded. They created USD 600 billion in value. We got 121 unicorns, maybe 250-300 soonicorns," Pai said in an interview to PTI. "The biggest issue for startups is the lack of adequate capital. For example, China invested USD 835 billion in startups and ventures between 2014 and 2024, US invested USD 2.32 trillion. We just put in USD 160 billion, out of which possibly 80 per cent came from overseas. So local capital is not coming in," he added. He further highlighted that while American insurance firms and university endowments significantly fund startups, Indian regulations prevent endowments from such investments, and insurance companies remain uninvolved due to incomplete regulatory framework. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bu bankalar başvuran herkese kredi kartı veriyor mu? Kredi Kart Şimdi Keşfet Undo He recommended regulatory adjustments to enable insurance companies' participation in fund-of-funds and suggested increasing the government's fund-of-funds programme from Rs 10,000 crore to Rs 50,000 crore. Additionally, he noted that India's pension funds, holding Rs 40-45 lakh crore, cannot invest in startups due to conservative policies and regulatory restrictions. Pai emphasised the need to increase research funding in Indian universities substantially and urged organisations like DRDO to share their technologies with the private sector. He indicated that current research expenditure in public universities falls considerably short of global standards. "We need to remove barriers for startups to sell business to the government and public sector though the government has reformed it, it doesn't work in actual practice. It must be opened up, and I think that has to be a mind shift," the industry veteran continued. Pai further criticised the prevailing business culture in India, stating that, "The problem in India is that all the big companies try to beat down the small startups and give them less money, and force them to sell the technologies and use them, and often don't pay them on time.' "This culture of hurting the small people should change," Pai added. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store