Australia Hits Back At Trump's ‘Betrayal', Refuses To Commit Troops In Potential US-China-Taiwan War – Is QUAD-AUKUS Falling Apart?
From Melbourne to Beijing, the shift in tone is palpable. As Prime Minister Anthony Albanese walks the diplomatic tightrope in China, his government is making it known that Australia will not send troops if tensions between the United States and China explode into war over Taiwan. No pre-commitments. No blind faith.
Defence Minister Pat Conroy echoed the same. Calm, deliberate and without drama. He refused to make advance promises. Decisions, he said, would be made by Australia's elected government, not dictated by demands from Washington.
Behind the scenes, frustration brews. The AUKUS pact, trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States intended to promote a free and open Indo-Pacific that is secure and stable, once hailed as a defence revolution, now stumbles. The nuclear submarines promised by the United States have not arrived. Deadlines have shifted. Commitments have blurred. Trust has thinned.
This, many in Canberra believe, is not only about Taiwan but being treated as an equal partner and not a subordinate. It is about remembering history as well.
Australia and the United States are both part of the Quad, a security alliance meant to counter China's rise. But now, Australia's faith in the alliance is being tested.
In Beijing, PM Albanese stays cautious. He talks of peace. He speaks of stability in the region. He avoids the war talk that Washington seems eager to entertain. And he will not offer reassurances on troop deployment.
Reports say the US Department of Defense has asked Australia and Japan for written guarantees. They want allies to commit to sending forces if a conflict erupts in the Indo-Pacific. One name keeps coming up is Elbridge Colby. A senior voice in Washington, overseeing the AUKUS plan, now seen as pushing too hard and too fast.
But this is not the Australia of 20 years ago.
Canberra today is caught in a different storm. On one side is Trump's America that is unpredictable, transactional and slapping tariffs even on allies. On the other is China, Australia's largest trading partner, economically vital and militarily dominant.
Financial Times revealed that Japan too is under similar pressure. Washington is asking for promises. But leaders in Asia are hesitating. No one wants to sign up for someone else's war.
Back home, Australian officials say Albanese's six-day China visit is about protecting national interest, both security and trade. It is a recalibration and a moment of realism.
With Quad's future hanging in the balance, analysts whisper what officials will not say aloud – the alliance is wobbling. And if the pressure continues, it may not survive.
Australia's response is less about defiance and more about dignity and less about choosing sides and more about choosing sovereignty.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a minute ago
- Business Standard
India-Australia FTA likely in 'very near future', says Australian Trade Min
Australia and India are likely to expand their free trade agreement (FTA) very soon, Bloomberg quoted Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell as saying. Speaking at the Lowy Institute in Sydney on Friday, Farrell said that the two countries were close to finalising the updated trade deal earlier this year. However, Australia's general election in May caused a delay in the negotiations. 'If the election had been a week or so later, we might have finalised the agreement,' Farrell said. He also hinted that India's trade minister is currently busy negotiating tariff exemptions with the Trump administration in the US. 'I think we will get another agreement with India in the very near future,' he added, as quoted by Bloomberg. The initial FTA between Australia and India was signed in April 2022. It removed tariffs on many goods and services traded between the two nations. In 2023, total trade between the two countries was valued at nearly A$50 billion (around $32.9 billion), according to the Australian government. Agriculture products still pending Despite the earlier agreement, several key Australian agricultural products such as chickpeas, dairy, and wheat were excluded. Farrell explained that political challenges required the trade pact with India to be finalised in phases. 'Bits and pieces' of the full agreement would be signed gradually, he said. Farrell also addressed recent comments linking Australia's decision to lift restrictions on US beef imports with US President Donald Trump. The Australian government announced this move a day before Farrell's speech, and Trump had welcomed the decision on his social media platform TruthSocial. However, Farrell clarified that the decision was based on science, not politics. 'We haven't done this in order to entice the Americans into a trade agreement, we think they should do that anyway,' he said, as quoted by Bloomberg. When asked whether this move would make it easier to strike a trade deal with the US under Trump, Farrell responded that it was still uncertain. India, UK seal landmark free trade agreement On Thursday, India and the United Kingdom officially signed a major free trade agreement. The deal was signed during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the UK and is expected to boost trade between the two nations by $34 billion annually. Under the agreement, India will reduce tariffs on several British goods. For example, whisky tariffs will drop from 150 per cent to 40 per cent over ten years. Import duties on British cars will fall to 10 per cent from more than 100 per cent, under a quota system. India will also lower duties on gin, cosmetics, and medical devices. In return, the UK will allow zero-duty access for 99 per cent of Indian goods such as textiles, leather, marine products, gems, jewellery, toys, and sports equipment. Additionally, Indian companies will be able to bid for public contracts in UK sectors like healthcare, energy, and transport.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why India-UK deal on critical minerals points to New Delhi's anxiety over Chinese grip
The fine print of the India-UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) has a signal towards India's growing anxiety over the Chinese chokehold on the critical minerals' supply chain, and how New Delhi is aiming to counter Beijing's dominance in the sector. This follows a similar initiative by the Quad (comprising India, Australia, Japan, and the United States) earlier this month, where they launched an initiative to secure supply chains of critical minerals, as worries grow around China's stranglehold over the resources, which are vital to new technologies. The India-UK Vision 2035, a document outlining the broader collaborative goals of the free trade agreement between the two said that they will work together to develop cutting-edge technology and research, building on the Technology Security Initiative, focused on future telecoms, artificial intelligence and critical minerals, laying the ground for future collaboration on semiconductors, quantum, bio-technology and advanced materials. To further cooperation in critical minerals, the two countries will also establish a UK-India Critical Minerals Guild to 'transform financing standards and innovation', according to a joint statement by the two. 'Together, the two sides will prioritise processing (of critical minerals), R&D, recycling, managing risk to supply chains, market development etc. and will champion circular economy principles and advance traceability,' it said. As part of the deal with the UK, the second phase of the UK-India Critical Minerals Supply Chain Observatory (SCO) will receive £1.8 million in new funding to set up a satellite campus at the Indian School of Mines in Dhanbad. The funding will also support developing the world's largest digital data infrastructure on the critical minerals value chain, according to an official joint statement. The SCO is housed within the Industrial Resilience Research Group at the University of Cambridge's Institute for Manufacturing. The first phase, which involved sharing, monitoring, and analysing supply chain data on critical minerals like lithium, copper, nickel, and cobalt, was launched in collaboration with IIT Bombay in October last year. Critical minerals, which include rare earth elements (REEs), are an important component of various cutting-edge hardware, ranging from semiconductors and electric vehicles to jet fighters. Rare earth magnets, especially neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets, are crucial for EV manufacturing, particularly in electric motors. They provide the strong magnetic fields needed for efficient and powerful electric motors, including traction motors that drive EVs. These magnets also play a major role in other EV components such as power steering systems, wiper motors, and braking systems. China has a near monopoly over the production of these rare earth magnets. Following US President Donal Trump's tariff onslaught on other countries in April, China implemented specifically designed bureaucratic hurdles for foreign companies looking to source critical minerals from the country. While the availability of rare earth metals is not limited to China, it is in the efficient processing of these critical elements where Beijing has a substantial lead, which was once enjoyed by the US and Japan. In recent years, Japan has been able to restart some of its minerals processing industry owing to government policies, but countries like the US and India are heavily dependent on Chinese exports of these metals. In response to the US administration's reciprocal tariff heat, China restricted exports of seven heavy rare earth metals including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium, as well as rare earth magnets. Earlier, it had also banned exports to the US of gallium, germanium, antimony, and other key high-tech materials with potential military applications. India's nascent but slowly growing EV industry has faced a direct impact of Chinese restrictions on export of rare earth magnets. None of the applications made by Indian carmakers to source the critical minerals have yet been accepted by Beijing, with automakers staring at shortages and potential setbacks to production plans. China requires companies to secure an end-user licence, along with an endorsement from the local government that the minerals will not be used for military applications. However, the fact that China has not yet cleared any application from Indian entities is a cause of concern. Worrying still is a fresh insistence from Beijing that instead of sourcing magnets separately, carmakers buy entire electric motor assemblies from Chinese companies, or simply wait for the Chinese authorities to issue export permits to local rare earth magnet producers, as has been done, according to Reuters, for at least four magnet producers that include suppliers to Volkswagen — the first granted since Beijing restricted shipments earlier this year. The German carmaker is said to have lobbied hard with Beijing to get this done. Aggam Walia is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, reporting on power, renewables, and mining. His work unpacks intricate ties between corporations, government, and policy, often relying on documents sourced via the RTI Act. Off the beat, he enjoys running through Delhi's parks and forests, walking to places, and cooking pasta. ... Read More Soumyarendra Barik is Special Correspondent with The Indian Express and reports on the intersection of technology, policy and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he has reported on issues of gig workers' rights, privacy, India's prevalent digital divide and a range of other policy interventions that impact big tech companies. He once also tailed a food delivery worker for over 12 hours to quantify the amount of money they make, and the pain they go through while doing so. In his free time, he likes to nerd about watches, Formula 1 and football. ... Read More
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Starmer to press Trump over deal to cut tariffs on UK steel imports, reports
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer will lobby U.S. President Donald Trump to accelerate a final deal to cut tariffs on British steel , the Financial Times reported on Friday. Starmer is expected to meet Trump on Monday and will also use the meeting to press the case for building closer ties and cutting tariffs on Scotch whisky , the report said, citing British officials. Reuters could not immediately confirm the report. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo
