logo
Starmer told he should be ‘stabbed and shot' in threatening emails

Starmer told he should be ‘stabbed and shot' in threatening emails

Yahoo29-05-2025
Sir Keir Starmer was told he should be 'stabbed and shot to death' in a series of threatening emails, a court heard.
Mark Tew, 63, is charged with sending the offensive material to the Prime Minister, a criminal barrister and former Conservative ministers, including Dame Priti Patel.
The emails, which were sent between January and November 2021, were not read by the MPs themselves but were intercepted by their staff who subsequently notified the police, Southwark Crown Court heard.
In one email allegedly sent to the then leader of the opposition, Mr Tew wrote 'You should be beaten up Starmer, stabbed to death, shot to dead. You gutless yellow bastard Starmer. Tell the truth you miserable uneducated tosser', the court heard.
In another sent on March 11, Mr Tew was said to have written: 'Starmer, I've heard a lot of journalists are out to get you.
'To beat you up. To kick your f---ing head in. You gutless dirty bastard. You pathetic wimp. You f---ing coward Starmer. I hope they get you and bash the living daylights out of you.'
Paul Jarvis, KC, prosecuting, said: 'The prosecution's case is that Mr Tew was a prolific emailer who would often send emails to politicians and, later, barristers to raise issues and complaints he had with them and others.
'The tone of those emails was frequently rude and discourteous but politicians in particular are expected to be thick-skinned and so while those emails were unpleasant, they were not we would suggest criminal.
'The eight emails that this case is concerned with were different. Their content was more than just rude and discourteous, but contained either a grossly offensive message or indeed threats or both.'
The first of Mr Tew's messages was sent in January 2021 to Ms Patel, who was then the home secretary.
He sent an email with an image of a man attached in which he wrote: 'Patel, you thick Ugandan b-----, was this man in the IRA? He says he was in the IRA. Was he?', the court heard.
Ms Patel's staff reported the email to the police, and Mr Tew was arrested for sending a malicious communication.
He told the police he was autistic and suffered from several medical conditions for which he was receiving medication, the court heard.
When the police seized his phone, they found the emails that had been sent to Sir Keir, as well as Rishi Sunak, the then chancellor, and Ben Wallace, the former defence secretary.
Mr Tew, of Camden, North London denies six counts of sending an electronic communication with intent to cause stress or anxiety, and two counts of sending an indecent or grossly offensive electronic communication with intent to cause stress or anxiety.
The trial continues.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump must not give anything away in Alaska
Trump must not give anything away in Alaska

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump must not give anything away in Alaska

Many commentators have likened President Trump's meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska to the 1938 Munich meeting between Adolf Hitler, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and French Premier Eduard Daladier over the fate of Czechoslovakia. There certainly are similarities. The Munich meeting took place without the presence of Czech President Edvard Benes, and the Alaska summit will not include Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. And there is widespread fear, especially in Europe, that Trump will yield to Putin's demands for Ukrainian territory — both that which his armed forces have already seized in Crimea and the oblasts of Luhansk and Donetsk, and those still held by Ukraine there and in the oblasts of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. As the Institute for the Study of War points out, should Putin successfully obtain control of all four oblasts — and especially all of Donetsk, which contains what the Institute terms Ukraine's 'fortress belt' — he would control several potential vectors of attack on the remainder of Ukraine. This would enable Russian forces to seize the country, just as Hitler ultimately took all of Czechoslovakia. Yet there are significant differences as well. Hitler was determined to seize the Sudetenland, and ultimately all of Czechoslovakia, without firing a shot. He had already effectively incorporated Austria that way in the 1936 Anschluss. And he succeeded in doing so. While Putin also wants to be handed over territories that his forces have not yet occupied without having to fight for them — in this regard following Hitler's precedent — he faces a very different set of circumstances. Russian forces have been fighting a determined Ukrainian military since February 2022. Moreover, despite ceaseless and heavy bombardment of Ukrainian formations and military infrastructure, coupled with terror attacks on cities and civilian institutions, Russia has gained remarkably little territory over the past three years of intense combat. Furthermore, just as Putin mistakenly thought that a Spetsnaz (special forces) attack on Kyiv at the start of the war would decapitate the Ukrainian leadership and install a pliant pro-Russian regimen, he also appears to have erroneously thought that Russian-speaking Ukrainians, many of them in the four provinces he seeks to annex, would also take Moscow's side. Yet Russia's attacks have actually united most of Ukraine's population, most notably those selfsame Russian speakers who once held positive attitudes toward Moscow. For its part, Ukraine not only has limited Russian advances in over three years of war, it has inflicted severe damage to Russia's military infrastructure, hit targets deep inside Russia including Moscow and has killed or wounded hundreds of thousands of Russian soldiers and North Korean personnel. Still another difference relates to Ukraine's neighbors and partners. Whereas the leading European powers in 1938 hastily acquiesced to Hitler's demands, France, Germany, Britain, the Nordic and Baltic states and the European Union have all made it clear that they stand by Kyiv's determination to preserve its territorial integrity and that Ukraine must have a seat at any table that would determine its future. In addition, NATO has not closed the door on the prospect, however remote, of Ukrainian accession; Putin wants that door shut tight and permanently. That Trump has spoken of concessions in the form of land swaps, while Putin has never indicated anything like an exchange of territory, has deepened European concerns that a deal would legitimate a Russian land grab. It also worries Europeans that Trump is so eager to achieve an agreement, regardless of how its terms affect Ukraine, because he covets the Nobel Peace Prize. The prize is awarded by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, whose members are appointed by the Norwegian parliament; since Norwegians generally view Trump unfavorably, it is highly unlikely that the Committee would ever award him the prize. Hitler interpreted Daladier and Chamberlain's willingness to fold at Munich as a signal that he would not encounter British opposition to either his seizure of all of Czechoslovakia or his planned attack on Poland. He viewed both men as 'poor worms,' and Nazi documents released subsequent to World War II reveal that Hitler viewed Chamberlain as so weak that he worried that British prime minister would preemptively give away Poland, thereby robbing Germany of the ability to seize the country by force. Trump needs to demonstrate to Putin when they meet in Alaska that he is no Neville Chamberlain. He must avoid any giveaway to the Russian dictator, which would only whet Putin's clearly insatiable appetite for more conquests, be they remainder of Ukraine, neutral Moldova or one of NATO's Baltic members. As Hitler sought 'lebensraum' — 'living space' for Germans — Putin seeks to restore the Czarist Empire. Whatever the term, the objective was and is the same: territorial expansion. It took a global war to stop Hitler. Hopefully, a strong-willed Trump will obviate the prospect of another devastating conflict. Dov S. Zakheim is a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and vice chairman of the board for the Foreign Policy Research Institute. He was undersecretary of Defense (comptroller) and chief financial officer for the Department of Defense from 2001 to 2004 and a deputy undersecretary of Defense from 1985 to 1987.

Trump's Chances of Winning Nobel Peace Prize Increase Ahead of Putin Summit
Trump's Chances of Winning Nobel Peace Prize Increase Ahead of Putin Summit

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Trump's Chances of Winning Nobel Peace Prize Increase Ahead of Putin Summit

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The odds on President Trump winning the Nobel Peace Prize this year have improved dramatically ahead of his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, according to a leading bookmaker. Oddspedia has Trump as the joint favorite along with Yulia Navalnaya, a Russian campaigner and the widow of former opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Each is given a 28.6 percent chance of winning the award. Why It Matters Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize multiple times since 2018 but has yet to win. In June the president complained on Truth Social: "No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me." President Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, just eight months into his presidency, in a move Donald Trump Jr. described as "affirmative action." What To Know Trump's latest Oddspedia prospects, from August 13, marks a dramatic improvement from July, when his odds hit a low of 10.6 percent as efforts to negotiate ends to the wars in Ukraine and Gaza were unsuccessful. Trump and Navalnaya are followed in the bookmaker's list by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (9.1 percent), humanitarian group Doctors Without Borders (7.7 percent) and the International Criminal Court, which has issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (7.7 percent). President Donald Trump speaking during an event at the Kennedy Center on August 13, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump speaking during an event at the Kennedy Center on August 13, 2025 in Washington, DC. Andrew Harnik/GETTY The frontrunners' list is completed by Environmental campaigner Greta Thunberg (5.9 percent), Julian Assange (4.8 percent), Elon Musk and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (2.9 percent). Friday's meeting will take place at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, with Trump describing it as "a feel-out" to gauge whether Putin is interested in peace. On Wednesday Trump said Putin would face "very severe consequences" if he refused to end the war, which began with a full scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, after Friday's summit. Zelensky has already rejected the suggestion he could withdraw Ukrainian troops from the country's eastern provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk in exchange for a ceasefire. Russian troops are currently attempting to seize the town of Pokrovsk which is located in Donetsk province. What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek, Oddspedia spokesperson Shing Mon Chung said: "Trump is treating the prize like an active campaign. "When you've got a U.S. president meeting Putin on American soil for the first time in a decade, traders pay attention. This geopolitical theatre moves odds because it feels like a make-or-break play. "Trump's Nobel odds have been like a political seismograph this year, spiking or sinking with every major headline. Each event has left a clear cause-and-effect fingerprint on the market." U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg Television on Wednesday: "I'm not going to get ahead of the president, but the president is the best at creating leverage for himself, and he will make it clear to President Putin that all options are on the table." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on Telegram: "Putin is definitely not preparing for a ceasefire or an end to the war. He is determined only to present a meeting with America as his personal victory and then continue acting exactly as before, applying the same pressure on Ukraine." What Happens Next? The meeting between Trump and Putin will take place on Friday in Anchorage. Trump told a press conference Wednesday that following the bilateral meeting, there was a chance of a second meeting with Putin that would include Zelensky. The Ukrainian leader has already ruled out removing his troops from his country's eastern Donbass region in exchange for a ceasefire.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store