logo
iPhone 17 Air vs iPhone 16 Plus: Why Apple might replace the Plus

iPhone 17 Air vs iPhone 16 Plus: Why Apple might replace the Plus

India Today3 days ago
iPhone 17 Air vs iPhone 16 Plus: Why Apple might replace the Plus
By Divya Bhati
There is a high chance that this year Apple might replace the Plus model with the slimmer and more refined iPhone 17 Air in its iPhone 17 series.
Photo: AppleHub/X
According to rumours, Apple has been facing numerous challenges with the sales of the iPhone Plus models, and is therefore finally planning to remove the model altogether.
While the 16 Plus focused on a larger screen and battery, the new 17 Air is said to prioritise sleekness, portability, and cutting-edge design.
The iPhone 17 Air is rumoured to feature a 5.5 mm thin design, and could become Apple's thinnest iPhone ever.
Photo: iDeviceHelp/YouTube
It is also said to weigh around 145 grams, targeting users who prefer portability over screen size.
On the front, the iPhone 17 Air could feature a 6.6-inch screen and a 120Hz ProMotion display.
Apple is also expected to introduce a new chip for the upcoming iPhones, and the iPhone 17 Air is likely to receive the A19 chip along with 8GB of RAM.
However, to achieve the slimmer profile, there could be some compromises; the iPhone 17 Air is rumoured to use a single rear camera with Fusion technology, offering optical-quality zoom.
The phone could also come with a smaller battery reportedly featuring a smaller 2,800mAh cell.
As for the price, the iPhone 17 Air is rumored to arrive at the price point of iPhone 16 Plus somewhere around Rs 89,900 - Rs 99,900 in India.
Photo: Majin Bu
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple's Next iPad Pro May Get M5 Chipset and Dual Front Cameras This Year
Apple's Next iPad Pro May Get M5 Chipset and Dual Front Cameras This Year

Hans India

time11 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Apple's Next iPad Pro May Get M5 Chipset and Dual Front Cameras This Year

Apple is gearing up to launch its next-generation iPad Pro later this year, and if reports are accurate, it could bring some significant upgrades. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, the upcoming iPad Pro may be powered by Apple's advanced M5 chipset, promising a big jump in performance and energy efficiency over its predecessor. One of the most talked-about changes is the addition of dual front-facing cameras. The new design would feature two selfie cameras — one for landscape orientation and another for portrait mode. This tweak addresses a long-standing complaint from iPad users who found the current camera placement awkward for video calls and selfies when holding the tablet vertically. With the new arrangement, FaceTime calls, selfies, and Face ID unlocking should work seamlessly, no matter how the device is positioned. Rumours suggest the iPad Pro will also flaunt a sleeker design with an AMOLED display surrounded by ultra-thin bezels, giving it a more modern look and sharper visuals. If the leaked timeline holds true, the upgraded iPad Pro could debut in September or October 2025, staying in line with Apple's typical 18-month refresh cycle. Reports indicate that mass production is already underway, hinting that Apple is confident about sticking to its release schedule. The combination of the powerful M5 chip, an improved camera system, and a fresh design underlines Apple's aim to position the iPad Pro as a serious laptop alternative. These anticipated enhancements could make the new iPad Pro even more appealing to creative professionals, students, and anyone looking for a high-performance tablet. As always, Apple has yet to officially confirm these details, but if the rumours are accurate, the next iPad Pro might be one of the company's most exciting tablet upgrades yet.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 5G price drop alert: Get 512 GB storage at up to Rs. 50,000 discount
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 5G price drop alert: Get 512 GB storage at up to Rs. 50,000 discount

Time of India

time11 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 5G price drop alert: Get 512 GB storage at up to Rs. 50,000 discount

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 5G price drop: Samsung has just made its Galaxy Z Flip 6 5G more attractive to Indian buyers, offering a significant discount of over ₹37,000 on Flipkart. This premium Samsung foldable smartphone, known for its sleek design and flagship features, is now available at a reduced price for a limited time. The offer is part of Flipkart's ongoing deal promotions and applies to select variants of the device. With its compact build, powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor, and high-end camera system, the Galaxy Z Flip 6 5G remains one of the most stylish foldables in the market. This price drop brings a rare chance for consumers to experience Samsung's foldable technology at a more accessible cost. In this article, we break down the new pricing, specs, and why this deal is worth your attention. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 5G specifications The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 comes with a 3.4-inch AMOLED cover panel and a 6.7-inch AMOLED panel with a refresh rate of 120 Hz. Along with 12GB of RAM and up to 512GB of storage, the tablet has a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 CPU. It has a 25W charger and a 4,000 mAh battery. The smartphone has a 12MP ultrawide sensor and a 50MP main camera. It has a 10MP camera on the front. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 5G price, discount, and offer You may purchase the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 for Rs 75,990. But hold on. You can receive a bank discount of up to Rs 4,000 if you can set up a Flipkart Axis Bank credit card, which will reduce the price to about Rs 71,990. Other advantages include getting the greatest deal when you trade in your old smartphone. In reality, though, it is dependent upon the model and operating conditions. You can also select EMI choices with free EMI if you're on a tight budget. For an additional fee, consumers can choose Warranty Extended or Complete Mobile Protection add-ons.

India's TRP ecosystem needs a reset. Time to end BARC monopoly
India's TRP ecosystem needs a reset. Time to end BARC monopoly

The Print

time11 minutes ago

  • The Print

India's TRP ecosystem needs a reset. Time to end BARC monopoly

Before BARC, TAM (Television Audience Measurement)—a joint media research venture by Kantar and Nielsen—tracked what India watched. But India is a large country, and TAM could only place meters to measure audience preferences in a limited number of households, that too mostly in urban areas. As a solution, broadcasters, advertisers, and media agencies came together in 2010 to form BARC, which was empanelled by the MIB and started operations in 2015. BARC roped in TAM for back-end technological expertise and rejigged sampling methods. When BARC was rolled out, it measured 12,000 out of the 145 million TV households in India. This was still only 0.008 per cent. At the heart of this mismatch is a measurement gap that the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) is now trying to resolve through reforms to TV ratings guidelines. The MIB is in the process of amending the 2014 television ratings guidelines that led to the accreditation of the Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) to measure the relative popularity of TV channels. This much-needed proposal aims to end BARC's monopoly and allow additional entities to conduct TV ratings, which can revitalise TV advertising. Television advertising revenues have been in freefall , declining from Rs 334 billion to Rs 294 billion in just two years. Twelve per cent of the brands that used TV to reach the masses in 2023 adopted a different distribution medium in 2024. Despite this, the TV industry continues to expand its offerings. DD Free Dish, a state-run distribution platform that requires only a one-time installation fee and no subscription charges, added both consumers and channels last year. The number of Free-to-Air channels on TV that recover costs from advertising is also increasing. Clearly, there is a disconnect between broadcasters' and advertisers' assessment of the true value of India's 160 million-household-strong TV market. Panel sizes have grown over the years to 55,000, but BARC continues to use the same data-collection methods. Watch time is measured in clock minutes through audio-watermarking technology that detects the channel being viewed. Before watching, each family member in a metered household must press a button to indicate whether they are an adult or a child, and to record their gender. They must press the same button again when they stop viewing. This approach rests on the optimistic assumption that viewers comply every time they switch channels. Meanwhile, the global media landscape has been moving ahead with qualitative, platform-agnostic measurement tools enabled by big data, advanced meter technologies, and more demographically inclusive panels. Also read: Internet can't be regulated like TV. Look at how UK, Australia are doing it Need for competition in TV ratings Advertisers rely on BARC's single measurement currency, Television Rating Point (TRP), which estimates the duration and frequency of viewership. These ratings help them determine which channels attract the most viewers and where to spend their ad budgets. There are no alternative estimates to go by. In contrast, financial institutions can access data from seven credit rating agencies to determine the creditworthiness of a borrower. There are a dozen or more agencies that news channels can commission for exit poll surveys of elections. A one-agency, one-currency system also leaves TV audience measurement vulnerable to manipulation. The first complaints of TRP manipulation emerged in 2018, when Hansa Research – the entity that installs meters for audience measurement – filed a police complaint alleging that households were being paid to watch a particular channel. Later, in 2020, the TRP scam implicated broadcasters and former officials at BARC, with allegations of manipulation dating back to 2016, according to an audit report that Mumbai Police received from BARC. The council suspended ratings for three months, but the damage had already been done: advertisers had lost trust in the TRP system, and some broadcasters exited BARC. Other mature media markets have gone through challenges involved in relying on a single entity to track consumer attention across platforms, devices, and demographics, and have therefore transitioned to 'multi-currency models' that allow multiple measurement providers to coexist. Ad-industry bodies in the US, such as the Video Advertising Bureau and the Television Bureau of Advertising, encourage alternative measurement providers. Even in Singapore, where the TV market is smaller than those in India and the US, multiple agencies operate. Also read: OTT isn't stopping viewers from turning to TV for sports. Now, remove legacy regulations Much-needed shot in the arm A ratings monopoly in India has led to a lack of technological variation, resulting in sluggish systems detached from market dynamics. The rationale for MIB's latest move is therefore strong, and if advertisers can choose between multiple measurement providers, they will gain access to sharper audience data and become more confident in their fiscal planning. This policy rejig also makes room for multi-stakeholder collaborations between distributors with last-mile reach and specialist measurement companies. The resulting competition will drive improvements in advertisers' access to quality data. The ministry should allow the players to freely collaborate, and the best measurement models to emerge in the market. Even as advertising revenue dwindles, TV in India is far from its swan song. This year, 169 million people tuned in to the Indian Premier League final on TV. With mass appeal intact, opening up the ratings ecosystem could engender much-needed trust in TV advertising and give broadcasting a shot in the arm. It could also prove to be a testbed to stress-test India's growing data analytics capacities, bolstered by the R&D and skills spillovers of global firms setting up global capability centres here. If done right, this much-needed reform can catalyse the kinds of multiplier impacts free markets tend to regularly deliver in high-technology ecosystems. Varun Ramdas and Srishti Joshi are media policy specialists at Koan Advisory, New Delhi. These are their personal views. This article is part of ThePrint-Koan Advisory series that analyses emerging policies, laws and regulations in India's technology sector. Read all the articles here. (Edited by Zoya Bhatti)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store