logo
'Everest' true story: Here's what happened to the real Mount Everest disaster climbers (plus a side-by-side look at the film's cast)

'Everest' true story: Here's what happened to the real Mount Everest disaster climbers (plus a side-by-side look at the film's cast)

Yahoo16-03-2025

Though Jason Clarke and Jake Gyllenhaal lead an A-list cast in Everest, the real star of the 2015 movie is the mountain itself. Located in the Himalayas near the China-Nepal border, Mount Everest is said to be the planet's highest mountain above sea level.
As such, it's become a destination for mountaineers and thrill-seekers all over the world. The danger and grandeur promised by Everest also brought out audiences, with Icelandic director Baltasar Kormákur's film pulling in a worldwide gross of over $203 million on a $55 million budget.
Now that the film is streaming on Netflix, new viewers may be curious about the events depicted in the film. So, is Everest based on a true story? Are the characters played by Gyllenhaal and Clarke inspired by real people? Read on as we answer those questions and more.
Set in 1996, Everest follows two expedition groups, Adventure Consultants and Mountain Madness, on a climb to the summit of Mount Everest. The former is led by Kiwi mountaineer Rob Hall (Clarke), an experienced climber who has previously ascended Everest four times. Joining him is an American journalist, Jon Krakauer (Michael Kelly). The latter is led by Scott Fischer (Gyllenhaal), a macho American mountain guide who climbed Everest's peak two years prior to the events of the film.
The two groups combine, but the arrival of a full-scale blizzard impacts their path and vision. The dream to climb Everest is strong, but the climbers nevertheless struggle with altitude sickness, hypoxia, and high-altitude pulmonary edema as they try to return to their base camp.
Yes, Everest is based on a real-life tragedy in which eight people died while trying to climb Mount Everest in 1996.
Several climbers who survived the storm wrote memoirs about their experience on the mountain. The most famous is Krakauer's Into Thin Air, a book EW called "a horrible triumph" that "offers readers the emotional immediacy of a survivor's testament as well as the precision, detail, and quest for accuracy of a great piece of journalism." (Survivor Anatoli Boukreev, played in Everest by Ingvar Eggert Sigurðsson, penned his own book refuting some of Krakauer's claims, though Krakauer stands by his account.)
But Everest isn't a direct adaptation of either book. Though it draws much inspiration and information from climber Beck Weathers' Left For Dead, the screenplay by William Nicholson (Les Miserables) and Simon Beaufoy (Slumdog Millionaire) is considered an original, cumulative account of their own research. As director Kormákur explained to Entertainment Weekly, it was also informed by previously-unheard audio tapes between the climbers and base camp.
'None of the books that have been written had access to these tapes,' Kormákur told EW. 'They put them away and wanted to try to move onward with their life. But they listened to it with us which was incredibly moving and, of course, very traumatic for them to go through again. But it was also very informative because we got all the small details. There were very different stories out there in many of those books and we wanted to try to understand what was misunderstood. And a lot of this came through those tapes.'
Several lines in the film, Kormákur said, are taken directly from the tapes. He told EW that this was part of an effort to "humanize" the climbers. "I didn't want to ridicule or create a villain that doesn't exit… or a hero that didn't exist," he said. "I wanted to be true and show the mistakes and failures that happened on the mountain. This isn't about a group of people who go up a mountain and get blown off by a storm. They were in real bad shape before the storm came in. The storm was just the final thing that finished them off.'
When EW's writer asked him about Krakauer's bestseller, Kormákur was dismissive. 'To be honest I wasn't that interested in telling a story about a writer on a mountain," he said. "I've seen a lot of movies about writers. His book is a first-person account and there are a lot of things that he assumes or thought that happened that didn't really happen. This is the story of a group of people who are going up this mountain and I wanted to be true to that.'
For his part, Krakauer, who also penned the popular nonfiction books Into the Wild and Under the Banner of Heaven, is not a fan of Everest. 'It's total bull," he told the L.A. Times following the film's release. "Anyone who goes to that movie and wants a fact-based account should read Into Thin Air.'
He also took issue with a scene in the film in which his character neglects to help with a rescue attempt due to being snow blind, saying, "I never had that conversation."
By and large, the Everest cast plays real people who were on Mount Everest in May 1996. Below, take a look at who plays who.
Australian actor Jason Clarke has appeared in a variety of critically acclaimed and award-winning films, including Zero Dark Thirty (2012), The Great Gatsby (2013), and Mudbound (2017). Most recently, he played Lakers coach Jerry West on HBO's Winning Time: The Rise of the Lakers Dynasty (2022–2023) and the supremely hateable Roger Robb in the Oscar-winning Oppenheimer (2023).
Clarke plays Rob Hall, an experienced mountaineer who famously summited the seven highest peaks in the world in seven months alongside climber Gary Ball. As depicted in the film, his wife, Jan Arnold, was pregnant at the time of his death. They met during an Everest summit attempt in the early '90s.
"Rob had a very dry, laconic sense of humor," Guy Cotter, a friend of Hall's, told PBS. "You first meet him and you think, 'This guy's all business.' And Rob would have everything organized; he'd be sort of making sure everything was going well. He wasn't the sort of character who would stand up and just order everybody around; he always gave a lot back. There was always a lot of fun, a lot of smiles, a lot of subtle, wry jokes that you had to know him for a little while before you'd get the hang of it."
Jake Gyllenhaal, one of the 21st century's most recognizable actors, has deftly pivoted between blockbuster fare (Spider-Man: Far From Home, The Day After Tomorrow) and more challenging, cerebral fare (Donnie Darko, Zodiac, Enemy). His work in Ang Lee's Brokeback Mountain (2005) scored him an Academy Award nomination. Most recently, he appeared in Doug Liman's Road House reboot (2024) and Apple TV+'s Presumed Innocent series (2024).
Related: The 15 best Jake Gyllenhaal performances
Gyllenhaal plays Scott Fischer, who, prior to his death, had climbed both Everest and K2, the two highest peaks on the planet. Friends described him as "larger-than-life" with an "incredibly magnetic personality."
Though Josh Brolin found early success in The Goonies (1985), his career really took off with his disquieting turn in the Coen Brothers' No Country For Old Men (2007). Since then, he's worked with some of the best living filmmakers, including Paul Thomas Anderson (Inherent Vice), Denis Villeneuve (Dune, Dune 2), Oliver Stone (W.), and Spike Lee (Oldboy). He received an Academy Award nomination for his performance in Gus Van Sant's Milk (2008). And, of course, he played Thanos in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
Brolin plays Beck Weathers, a climber who was part of Hall's expedition. During the storm, he fell into a hypothermic coma but survived. In 2000, he wrote a memoir about the tragedy, Left For Dead: My Journey Home From Everest.
John Hawkes was nominated for an Oscar for his turn in 2010's Winter's Bone, though you may also recognize him from series like Deadwood (2004–2006), Eastbound & Down (2009–2013), and True Detective: Night Country (2024). His film credits include American Gangster (2007), Lincoln (2012), and Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri (2017), as well as The Perfect Storm (2000), another story of a real-life tragedy.
Hawkes' Doug Hansen was a passionate climber from Washington who worked as a postal worker. Lou Kasischke, a survivor of the climb, described Hansen as "very determined," while Weathers said he was "in his element" on the mountain. He was one of the eight who died on the expedition.
Emily Watson's debut film role in Lars Von Trier's Breaking the Waves (1996) scored the actress her first Academy Award nomination, with her second coming two years later for Hilary and Jackie (1998). Since then, Watson has appeared in films like Paul Thomas Anderson's Punch-Drunk Love (2002), Charlie Kaufman's Synecdoche, New York (2008), and Matthew Vaughn's Kingsman: The Golden Circle (2017). She also had an Emmy-nominated turn in HBO's Chernobyl (2019) and recently starred in Dune: Prophecy (2024).
Watson plays expedition associate Helen Wilton, who survived the storm and would later join Everest director Kormákur in listening to the audio tapes from the tragedy.
Michael Kelly is best known for playing Doug Stamper on Netflix's House of Cards and CIA agent Mike November on Amazon Prime's Jack Ryan. Most recently, he had leading roles on Taylor Sheridan's Special Ops: Lioness (2023–present) and HBO's Batman spinoff The Penguin (2024).
Kelly plays Jon Krakauer, the acclaimed author who chronicled his experience on Everest in the bestselling book Into Thin Air (1997). In an interview with the L.A. Times following the release of Everest, the Times wrote that Krakauer found his portrayal in the film to be a "personal affront." He also noted that Kelly never reached out to him prior to filming.
Sam Worthington has appeared in several blockbuster films, including Terminator Salvation (2009) and Clash of the Titans (2010), though most audiences know him as Jake Sully from Avatar (2009) and Avatar: The Way of the Water (2022). He also starred in Under the Banner of Heaven (2022), FX's adaptation of another Krakauer book.
Worthington plays Guy Cotter, the now-CEO of Adventure Consultants and a survivor of the blizzard. He served as a consultant on Everest, telling HuffPost that he worked to ensure the cast and crew's safety during filming and would let Kormákur know if anything looked "bogus or just plain wrong."
Speaking to Worthington's performance, he cracked, "He obviously doesn't have my charisma or sense of humor but he did ok! Seriously though, it's pretty hard to connect with someone portraying you, and I think there wasn't a lot of scope from the director for him to portray more emotion in the scenes, so I thought the performance was reasonable."
According to Kent Harvey, Everest's second unit director of photography, many of the climbing sequences were shot in the Dolomite Mountains in Italy. Additional filming was done in Nepal, with the actors making part of the trek to the Everest base camp, though the actors did not actually film at the real base camp.
Instead, the base camp was constructed at Italy's Cinecitta Studios. As for the Hillary Step, a 40-foot vertical rock face that serves as one of the most challenging parts of the Everest climb, the site was built at Pinewood Studios in England.
"They had [Everest climber] David Breashears and a bunch of Sherpas there as consultants," Harvey told Outside. "It was incredible. It all looked very real. But it was still surrounded in green screen."
The crew did, however, need to get real Everest footage to incorporate into the film. According to Havey, that was a challenge. "You can't just take your average Hollywood crew person to the top of Everest," he said. "I had to assemble a team of people that had a lot of experience climbing, had spent time on Everest, but also had some familiarity with the movie-making process. I also wanted some guide friends that could do stunt double work."
Upon release, EW's critic called Everest "a relentless 3-D workout" that "stages all of the high-altitude chaos effectively, if a bit too chaotically."
He continues, "It may sound cold to say that while all of the performances are solid, it's the danger of Everest that's the film's primary lure. But no one pays IMAX ticket prices for nuanced human drama, and the film's ­dizzying climbing scenes and vertiginous don't-look-down moments are what give it its heart-quickening power. Shot in Nepal and Italy, Everest makes you feel how mismatched and exposed even the strongest climber must have felt when a blizzard kicked up during this group's descent, ­leaving them stranded and doomed."
But all that chaos ultimately serves to confuse, turning these real-life figures into "a sea of parkas." His review reads, "Maybe that's the point — that Mother Nature doesn't discriminate. But I doubt it. Plus, it shouldn't be. When the lights come up, you don't want to feel like you've watched a better Cliffhanger. You want to understand the tragedy you've just watched. Yes, you want to be entertained, but you also want the icy, whipping wind of reality to sting."
Read EW's full B- review here.
Everest is currently streaming on Netflix. You can also rent or buy it via Amazon Prime.Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Writers Roundtable: Seth Rogen, Jen Statsky, Craig Mazin, Lauren LeFranc & More
Writers Roundtable: Seth Rogen, Jen Statsky, Craig Mazin, Lauren LeFranc & More

Los Angeles Times

time40 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Writers Roundtable: Seth Rogen, Jen Statsky, Craig Mazin, Lauren LeFranc & More

When you gather the creative minds behind six of the most entertaining and acclaimed shows of 2025, the conversation is destined for narrative intrigue. The writers who took part in this year's Envelope Roundtable touched on social media blackouts, release strategies, runaway production, even the wonder of Bravo's 'The Valley.' How's that for a twist? This panelists are Debora Cahn of 'The Diplomat,' about an American foreign service officer thrust into a thorny web of geopolitics; R. Scott Gemmill of 'The Pitt,' which focuses on front-line healthcare workers inside a Pittsburgh hospital during a single 15-hour shift; Lauren LeFranc of 'The Penguin,' a reimagining of the Batman villain Oswald Cobblepot as a rising Gotham City kingpin, Oz Cobb; Craig Mazin of 'The Last Of Us,' an adaptation of the popular video game series about survivors of an apocalyptic pandemic; Seth Rogen of 'The Studio,' a chronicle of the film industry's mercenary challenges as seen through the eyes of a newly appointed studio chief; and Jen Statsky of 'Hacks,' about an aging comic's complicated relationship with her outspoken mentee.

Is it too late to reverse Hollywood's runaway production? Writers on the ‘stark' reality
Is it too late to reverse Hollywood's runaway production? Writers on the ‘stark' reality

Los Angeles Times

time40 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Is it too late to reverse Hollywood's runaway production? Writers on the ‘stark' reality

When you gather the creative minds behind six of the most entertaining and acclaimed shows of 2025, the conversation is destined for narrative intrigue. The writers who took part in this year's Envelope Roundtable touched on social media blackouts, release strategies, runaway production, even the wonder of Bravo's 'The Valley.' How's that for a twist? This panelists are Debora Cahn of 'The Diplomat,' about an American foreign service officer thrust into a thorny web of geopolitics; R. Scott Gemmill of 'The Pitt,' which focuses on front-line healthcare workers inside a Pittsburgh hospital during a single 15-hour shift; Lauren LeFranc of 'The Penguin,' a reimagining of the Batman villain Oswald Cobblepot as a rising Gotham City kingpin, Oz Cobb; Craig Mazin of 'The Last Of Us,' an adaptation of the popular video game series about survivors of an apocalyptic pandemic; Seth Rogen of 'The Studio,' a chronicle of the film industry's mercenary challenges as seen through the eyes of a newly appointed studio chief; and Jen Statsky of 'Hacks,' about an aging comic's complicated relationship with her outspoken mentee. Read on for excerpts from our discussion. Lauren, you're making a series that is tethered to source material that's really beloved by fans. I'm curious what the conversations are like with DC, or 'The Batman' director Matt Reeves, when your series has to fit into a larger canon. LeFranc: I knew where Oz ended in 'The Batman.' I knew my job was to arc him to rise to power and achieve a certain level of power by the end. Outside of that, I was given carte blanche and I could just play. And that's the most exciting thing to me. We both were in agreement that this should be a character study of this man. I love digging into the psychology of characters. So many people were like, 'Do you feel pressure? What's this like for you?' And I was like, 'Am I numb as a human?' I don't feel that kind of pressure. I feel pressure to tell a great story and to write interesting, engaging characters that are surprising and to kind of surprise myself. I'm not the first type of person you would think who would get an opportunity to write a guy like Oz, necessarily, and to write into this type of world. I think there's been a lot of crime dramas and a lot of genre shows or features that don't have the lens that I have on a man like that. So I took that seriously. And I also really wanted to pepper the world with really interesting, complicated women as well. I felt like, in some of these genres, sometimes those characters weren't as fully formed. Craig, you know what it's like working with source material, and we knew the fate of fan-favorite character Joel, who dies in Part 2 of the video game. Tell me about your experience of the death of Joel in the video game — playing it — and how that informed what you wanted to see out of Season 2 and where exactly it would fall. Mazin: I was upset when it happened, but I wasn't upset at the game. It was, narratively, the right thing to do. If you make a story that is about moral outcomes and the consequences of our behavior, and somebody goes through a hospital and murders a whole lot of people, and kind of dooms the world to be stuck in this terrible place, and takes away the one hope they have of getting out of it, yeah, there should be a consequence. If there's no consequence or even a mild consequence, then it's a bit neutered, isn't it? It made sense to me and it made sense that if we were going to tell the story, that was the story we were going to tell. Sometimes people do ask me, 'Was there any part of you that was like, 'Hey, let's not have Joel die?'' No. That would be the craziest thing of all time. How quick were you watching the real-time reaction from fans? Mazin: I don't do that. Rogen: But how do you get validation? How do you know to feel good? Statsky: Can you teach me not to look? Mazin: I think I'm looking for validation. Really what I'm looking for is to repeat abusive behavior toward me — that's what my therapist says. For all of our shows, millions and millions and millions of people are watching these around the world. And if 10,000 people on Twitter come at you for something, that is a negligible number relative to the size of the audience, but it sure doesn't feel [like it]. So I made a choice. The downside is I do miss the applause. Who among us doesn't love applause? I've just had to give that feeling up to not feel the bad feelings. With a show like 'The Studio' or 'Hacks,' does it feel cathartic to lampoon the industry or show the ridiculous nature of the business and the decision-makers sometimes? Rogen: What's funny is, as we were writing the show, we never used the word 'satire.' To us, the goal was not to make fun of any element of the industry — honestly, it's mostly based on myself and my own fears, as someone who's in charge of things, that I'm making the wrong choices, and that I'm prioritizing the wrong things, and that I'm convincing my idols to work with me and then I'm letting them down, and I'm championing the wrong ideas. That I'm making things worse and that I'm giving notes to people that are detrimental rather than exciting, and that I'm mitigating my own risks rather than trying to bolster creative swings. That was the startling moment where I realized I personally relate in my darkest moments to a studio executive more than I do a creative person in the industry in many ways. And that was kind of the moment where I was like, 'Oh, that's a funny thing to explore.' Statsky: But it's interesting when you put it like that, because of the part of showrunning where you become management and you're much more on that business side [of] running a show. We're executives in many ways too. Mazin: I have a question for you. How do you deal with the fact that — as we kind of move through things as writers, we are always comrades, we are colleagues of people. When you become a showrunner, you don't notice it at first, but there is this barrier between you and everybody, and one day you wake up and realize, 'Oh, it's because they look at me and see someone who can fire them, who can elevate them, who can change their lives for better or worse.' And you start to feel very, very lonely all of a sudden. Statsky: Oh, there's a group text you're not on. Mazin: And it's about you. Statsky: It's about you. It's such a hard part of this job that I struggle with very much because as writers, we are empathetic to others, and we are observing the world, and we are trying to commune with people as best as possible. But then you do this thing and you're like, 'I like writing, I like writing, I like writing.' And they're like, 'Great. Now here's a 350-person company to manage and you become a boss.' I struggle with it a lot, the thinking of people's feelings, thinking of people's emotions, wanting to be in touch with them, but then also, at the end of the day, having to sometimes make really difficult management-type decisions that affect people's livelihood. I find it very challenging. I need your therapist for that as well. Debora, you have a character, a female vice president, who's been doing the bidding of an older president whose capabilities have been called into question, and spoiler alert, she becomes president. The season launched a week or so before the 2024 presidential election. What was that like? And how is it writing a political drama now versus when you were working on 'The West Wing'? Cahn: Back in 'The West Wing' days, we would have people come in, people who worked in the field, and we would say, 'What are you worried about that we don't know to worry about yet?' And that was a pretty good barometer for getting an interesting story that was likely to still be topical in a year. That's all you want, really, is to not be completely lapped by the news when you're trying to tell a story that's not going to go to air for a year. Now, we're released from any boundaries of any kind. There's nothing that we can do that's more absurd than what's happening. Suddenly, we're doing a documentary, or we're doing a balm for what you wish government was like or what you vaguely remember it was like. But we're trying to stay in the headspace of, 'What is the foreign policy community going to be thinking about in the next two years?' and trying to find something that will continue to feel relevant. But more and more it's like, 'What are the conflicts that sane people have with each other in this field? What happens when you can look at two people and you feel like they both have good values and they are kind to children? What do they fight about?' Let's talk about release strategies. There's the traditional, week-to-week model and the more modern, all-at-once model. There's a mix of both in the marketplace. Scott, with 'The Pitt,' you could just see the way people rallied around every week to see what happened next. What do you like about the weekly release? Gemmill: I've only ever done that. This is my first streaming show, and we are doing it in a traditional drop a week. So I've never had a show that was bingeable. I don't know any other way. At one point, they were going to release three episodes at once, but they only released two [at the start]. I don't have a dog in that fight. I think my show, just because of the nature of it, would be very hard to binge. Rogen: As someone who's been bingeing it, I can attest to that. [To Cahn] Yours comes out all at once. Cahn: It does. I don't love that. It's not what I would choose. I think Netflix offers a lot of other pluses. [It's] got a big audience all over the world and that's really nice. But I came up in broadcast television, and the idea that you've created this thing and it's a story that you've experienced over time, and then people are like two days and done, it just — Mazin: It's weird. Cahn: And it changes the way that you write. Mazin: Over the last few years, what's happening is, for shows that are coming out week by week, people will now save up three at a time. So they don't want to watch week after week. There's this weird accordion thing going on, and I don't know where this is going. I don't think any of us do. I'm a little nervous about the week by week. I am just hoping that it remains. I thought for sure one day Netflix would go, 'Why are we doing this?' Because I really didn't understand. I still don't understand. Cahn: I have this question every three months. Rogen: They don't have an answer. Cahn: It works for them. Gemmill: Wonder why they complain about grind. Because it's not there. Well, it's because you put it all out at once. Mazin: But then what I'm worried about is that they're right. I'm just wondering if people are starting to lose their patience. Statsky: Attention span. I think they are. I've even noticed, because we used to drop two a week. In this season for 'Hacks,' we've done one a week. I saw a couple tweets where people were like, 'Why are the episodes shorter this year?' I was like, 'Well, they're not. You used to watch two.' But I do think the one-a-week model, because now people are so trained [to binge] — like you're saying, the attention span, it's scary. I don't think people want to watch like that anymore. Rogen: I produced 'The Boys,' and we actually went from them all coming out at once to weekly. And it did not affect the viewership in any way, shape or form was what we were told. What it did affect, that we could just see, was it sustained cultural impact. People talked about it for three months instead of three weeks of incredibly intense chatter. It just occupied more space in people's heads, which I think was beneficial to the show. Cahn: When they're coming out one a week, you can repeat things that you can't when they're coming out all together. You have to look at them in terms of, did they each have the same rhythm? Are they each really featuring the same characters and storylines? You have to think about it in terms of, 'If people do three at a time, what's their experience going to be?' It's terrible. The talk of the town is runaway production and how to stop it. Scott, 'The Pitt' is set in Pittsburgh and you did film exteriors there, but principal production happened on the Warner Bros. lot. Talk about why that was important for you. Gemmill: The show could have been shot in Moose Jaw. But it was important to bring the work here, so we fought really hard to get the California tax credit. The most important part of my job besides writing producible scripts that are on time is to keep my show on the air as long as possible, to keep everyone employed as long as possible. And that's the thing I like the best about it. This is the first show that Noah [Wyle]'s done since he left 'ER' that's shot in Los Angeles. It's a shame. There's more production now, but when we first were at Warner Bros. for this, it was a ghost town. It's so sad because I've been in the business for 40 years and still get excited when I go on a lot. And to see them become unused just because it's cheaper to shoot somewhere else ... and there's so many talented people here, and it's hard on their families if you have to go to Albuquerque for six months. I don't ever want to leave the stage again. Mazin: We did our postproduction on the Warner Bros. lot, but we shoot in Canada. And I love Canada. But yeah, of course, I'd love to be home. I like doing postproduction here. I'll take what I get. The financial realities are pretty stark, that's the problem. If you are making a smaller show, the gap is not massive. If you're making a larger show, every percentage becomes a bigger amount of money and also represents a larger amount of people to employ. But what's good is it seems like they're starting to get their act together in Sacramento. I do worry sometimes it's a little bit too late, because the rest of the world seems to be in an arms race to see how many incentives they can give to get production to go there. I'm hoping that at least we can start to move the needle a bit because, listen, that Warner Bros. lot, when I was a kid starting out, I would go on that lot, I would see the little 'ER' backlot with the diner and all of it. And I was like, 'That's on TV. It's here.' And now I walk around the Warner Bros. lot and it's just a single tram full of tourists and no one else. And it's so, so sad. LeFranc: It's really heartbreaking. You used to be able to write what you're doing, produce, do post all on the same lot. You had a family that you were able to form, and you could mentor writers. I would not be able to be a showrunner if not for all the people who came before me who mentored me, and I could walk to set, produce my own episode, and then I can walk to post. It's so hard now where you're asking writers, especially if networks aren't paying for writers to go to set, 'Can you pay for yourself to fly to New York?' It just makes it so hard to be able to educate people in the way that I feel like I was privileged enough to be educated. What are we going to do about that? Gemmill: Mistakes get made. The best part about the whole business is it's collaborative. But when you're separated by thousands of miles, sometimes there's a disconnect. Before we wrap, please tell me what you're watching. Jen, we were talking about 'The Valley' earlier. Rogen: Oh, I watch 'The Valley' too. It's amazing. Do you watch 'The Valley' aftershow? It's almost as good as 'The Valley.' Statsky: I'm really worried about Jax. Rogen: We watch reality television. I see the blank looks on everybody's face. Statsky: We're in comedy. Mazin: I can't believe how scared I was when you were talking, and then how good I felt when you're like, 'It's a reality show.' Statsky: So, you know 'Vanderpump Rules'? Mazin: Ish. Statsky: It's an offshoot. Rogen: Which is an offshoot of — Statsky: 'Real Housewives.' Mazin: This is an echo of an echo. Go on. Statsky: Yes, it's an echo of an echo of garbage. Rogen: But it's so good. Statsky: But it is the worst indictment of heterosexual marriage I've ever seen. Rogen: Yes, it really is. Mazin: Oh, so incidentally, the San Fernando Valley is what it's [about]? It's about Valley Village. Statsky: Valley Village. It's the couples that have moved to the Valley and are having children and — Rogen: And they are all in very bad places in their lives. It's amazing. Statsky: You think [in] reality shows most people are in bad places. That's sadly what people want to watch. These people are in particularly bad places. Rogen: And the show seems to be compounding it, I think. Statsky: Yeah, weirdly, being on a reality show is not helping their problem. Rogen: I find that I watch reality TV because when I watch all of your shows, I find them intellectually challenging. They make me self-conscious, or they make me inspired or something, which is not how I want to feel necessarily after a long day at work just watching something. And so reality TV makes me feel none of those things. It in no way reminds me of what I've done all day. Mazin: If you make me dissociate, I'm watching. Statsky: You're going to love it. But once you start watching, Jax owns a bar in Studio City. We can all go. We can reunite. Mazin: I've gone to that bar. Rogen: You been to Jax's? Mazin: Yes, I've been to that bar. Statsky: Wait, hold on. But everyone else in that bar was there because they watched the reality show. Why were you there? LeFranc: Out of context, I'm so invested in all this. Rogen: You've got to watch it. ... Nothing I will ever make is as good as 'The Valley.'

This Gritty Psychological Thriller Is the New #1 Film on Netflix (And It's Based on a True Story)
This Gritty Psychological Thriller Is the New #1 Film on Netflix (And It's Based on a True Story)

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

This Gritty Psychological Thriller Is the New #1 Film on Netflix (And It's Based on a True Story)

Gritty and intense are just a few of the words being used to describe A Widow's Game, a riveting thriller that has quickly shot its way to the top spot on Netflix. Based on a true story, the film centers around the mysterious events and investigations surrounding a man found dead under suspicious circumstances. The first person on the potential perpetrator list is his widow, which catches everybody off guard because nobody believes that she would be capable of the act of killing her husband in such a cruel manner. Things are never as they appear, however, and as it turns out, the story involves a number of secrets that leave everybody stunned. Directed by Carlos Sedes and starring Carmin Machi and Ivana Bacquero, the Spanish thriller is based on the factual events of a 36-year-old man named Antonio Navarro Cerdán, an industrial engineer who was ambushed and stabbed to death. And according to Rotten Tomatoes reviewers, the film is packed with twists and turns that don't disappoint. "The acting is excellent and the pacing is good, except for a short time in the middle where it focuses on the killer's POV. Looking at the story, the detective's method worked well," writes one Rotten Tomatoes reviewer, who gave the movie a 4-star rating. "I especially liked the actress who played the lieutenant," writes another. I've been looking for a new thriller to add to my watchlist this week, and A Widow's Game seems right up my alley…especially since it's the new number one film on Netflix. A Widow's Game is available to stream via Netflix. This Riveting Crime Show Just Hit #2 on Netflix—and the Trailer Alone Has Me ShookPureWow's editors and writers have spent more than a decade shopping online, digging through sales and putting our home goods, beauty finds, wellness picks and more through the wringer—all to help you determine which are actually worth your hard-earned cash. From our PureWow100 series (where we rank items on a 100-point scale) to our painstakingly curated lists of fashion, beauty, cooking, home and family picks, you can trust that our recommendations have been thoroughly vetted for function, aesthetics and innovation. Whether you're looking for travel-size hair dryers you can take on-the-go or women's walking shoes that won't hurt your feet, we've got you covered.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store