Big update on Rare Earth magnets as China makes big move, not good news for US and India due to....
Big update on Rare Earth magnets: In a significant development impacting manufacturing activity across the globe, China is reportedly using export controls on rare-earth minerals as a strategic tool. Causing global supply chain disruptions and economic uncertainty through its unofficial export bans and tactical resumptions, Xi Jinping's China is trying to assert its economic power. Experts have noted that China had earlier stopped the exports of rare-earth magnet which are important for several industries like electronics, electric vehicles, wind turbines and defense, which led to its massive shortage in countries like USA and India. How is China using rare-earth minerals as strategic tool?
However, after some months in June, China relaxed some of these unofficial export restrictions, resulting in an increase in supply of the critical minerals across the world. Data showed that a huge rise of 158% month-on-month in the shipments was seen after China started the exports.
Informal trade restrictions imposed by China on capital equipment, critical minerals, and skilled technical personnel, can adversely impact India's electronics manufacturing ecosystem and constrain India's deeper integration into global value chains (GVCs), leading industry body India Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA) has said.
India's electronics and mobile manufacturing sector has seen a remarkable growth over the past decade, driven by forward-looking policy interventions and private sector investments and the shift of GVCs to India. How China dominates global source of high-precision tools?
China remains the dominant global source of high-precision tools and specialised machinery – an outcome of three decades of industrial clustering and deep GVC integration. 'For the electronics sector, including smartphones, this has created a high dependency on China for capital equipment,' the ICEA said in its letter.
Recent curbs by China on rare earth materials are also risking input shortages for smartphone manufacturers operating in India.
(With inputs from agencies)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Diplomatic moves that opened the door to possible Trump-Putin meeting on Ukraine
Feb. 28, 2022: Ukrainian and Russian delegations meet in neighboring Belarus for the first time since the invasion. Talks continue for the next two weeks, but no agreements emerge other than a decision to set up humanitarian corridors for civilians. March 21, 2022: Zelenskyy calls for direct talks with Putin but is rebuffed by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. A day later, Zelenskyy says he is prepared to discuss a commitment for Ukraine to not to seek NATO membership in exchange for a ceasefire, the withdrawal of Russian troops and a guarantee of Ukraine's security. March 29, 2022: Talks begin in Istanbul, with Moscow saying it's willing to 'fundamentally cut back' military activity near Kyiv and the northern city of Chernihiv. Kyiv said it was open to discussing neutral status for Ukraine if its security is backed by other nations. April 7, 2022: Lavrov rejects a Ukrainian peace proposal as 'unacceptable." He says Kyiv has walked back on an agreement to exempt the Crimean Peninsula from wider Ukrainian security guarantees. Russia illegally annexed Crimea in 2014. July 22, 2022: Russia and Ukraine, with mediation by Turkey and the UN, agree on a deal to unblock supplies of grain stuck in Ukraine's Black Sea ports, ending a standoff that threatened global food security. The deal expires a year later. Sept. 30, 2022: Russia illegally annexes the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, even though it doesn't fully control any of them. Ukraine responds by applying to join NATO and by enacting a decree that declares negotiations with Putin 'impossible.' Dec. 7, 2024: US President-elect Donald Trump meets Zelenskyy and other European leaders in Paris. Feb 12. 2025: Trump and Putin agree to begin negotiations on ending the Ukraine war in a phone call that ends a three-year US-led effort to isolate Russia over Ukraine. Feb. 18, 2025: Russian and US officials, including Lavrov and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, meet in Saudi Arabia and agree to work toward ending the war, as well as restoring bilateral ties. Ukrainian officials are not invited. Feb. 28, 2025: Zelenskyy meets with Trump, Rubio and Vice President JD Vance in a contentious session in the Oval Office. A proposed minerals deal between the countries is left unsigned. March 11, 2025: US and Ukrainian officials meet in Saudi Arabia, with American officials putting forward a plan for a 30-day ceasefire. Kyiv agrees to the proposed truce. March 13, 2025: Putin effectively rejects the ceasefire plan, stating certain issues must be resolved. He also meets with US special envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow. Witkoff would travel to Russia twice more in April to meet Putin. March 18, 2025: A proposal is put forward for a temporary halt on strikes on energy infrastructure. Both sides agree to the plan, but soon accuse each other of violations, and the measure later expires. April 19, 2025: Putin announces a 30-hour ceasefire to mark the Easter holiday, although attacks continue across Ukraine. April 28, 2025: The Kremlin declares a unilateral 72-hour ceasefire starting May 8 to mark Russia's Victory Day celebrating the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II. Kyiv does not agree, preferring a 30-day truce proposed by US officials. Both sides accuse each other of violating it. May 11, 2025: Putin proposes restarting direct talks with Ukraine in Istanbul 'without preconditions' but does not agree to the 30-day ceasefire. Zelenskyy challenges Putin to meet in Turkey. May 15, 2025: Russian and Ukrainian delegations meet for direct talks in Istanbul for the first time since early 2022. Subsequent meetings are held on June 2 and July 23, but aside from ongoing exchanges of prisoners of war and the bodies of fallen soldiers, no substantive progress is made on key issues. July 14, 2025: Trump says he will implement 'severe tariffs' on Russia and countries that continue to buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a peace deal with Ukraine within 50 days. Two weeks later, on July 28, he says that he will shorten that deadline to 10-12 days. Aug. 6, 2025: Witkoff visits Moscow and meets with Putin two days before Trump's deadline. Later that day, a White House official speaking on condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal plans says Trump and Putin could soon meet in person. A day later, the Kremlin confirms the planned meeting but does not set a date.
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US senator slams Trump's 50% tariffs on India: 'Risks years of work into building ties'
US President Donald Trump hiking up tariffs on Indian imports to 50 per cent has not gone down well with senator Gregory Meeks, who said the move puts the relationship that New Delhi and Washington have fostered over the years at risk. FILE PHOTO: President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi shake hands(REUTERS) Reacting to the tariff move, the Democrat said on Friday, "Trump's latest tariff tantrum risks years of careful work to build a stronger US-India partnership." He also described the India-US relationship as "strategic, economic, and people-to-people", urging that any concerns be addressed in "a mutually respectful way consistent with our democratic values." Donald Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs for India last week, calling New Delhi's tariffs "far too high", and also criticised India buying military equipment and energy from Russia. Days later, Trump intensified the tariff attack with additional 25 per cent tariffs, hiking to total duties to 50 per cent. The secondary sanctions were owed to India's business with Russia. In response, New Delhi called the move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable", and pointed that only India was being targeted for actions several other countries were also taking. When asked why he hadn't slapped similar sanctions on China, another key buyer of Russian oil, Trump did not give a definite answer, only saying that more secondary sanctions were incoming. In a separate remark Trump had said it "could happen" when asked about the possibility of India-like additional tariffs for China. Half of Trump's announced tariffs have come into force, and the remaining 25 per cent will take effect on August 27. With all eyes on the future of the India-US trade partnership, Trump has ruled out the possibility of any negotiations with India to that effect until the tariff issue is resolved. 'No, not until we get it resolved,' Trump said in the Oval Office in response to a question on whether he expects increased trade negotiations with India.
Economic Times
41 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trade stalemate: It's all about Indian kisan vs American farmers
ET Online As Trump ramps up tariff pressure, Modi is holding firm on stance to protect farmers Trade talks between India and the United States have ended in a stalemate after five rounds of negotiations. After imposing a 50% tariff on India, US President Donald Trump has indicated that no further trade negotiations between the two countries would take place unless the tariff matter is resolved. Asked about more trade negotiations between India and the US, Trump said, "No, not until we get it resolved."In his first comments after Trump imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Thursday he will not compromise the interests of the country's farmers even if he has to pay a heavy price. "For us, our farmers' welfare is supreme," Modi said at an event in New Delhi. "India will never compromise on the wellbeing of its farmers, dairy (sector) and fishermen. And I know personally I will have to pay a heavy price for it," he said."For the farmers of my country, for the fishermen of my country, for the livestock rearers of my country, Bharat stands ready today," he insistence on access to agriculture, dairy and fishery sectors was the biggest point of discord in trade talks. PM Modi has effectively ruled out concessions to American business in these sectors. The US has not only been demanding low tariffs on certain farm products such as corn, soybeans, apples, cotton, almonds and ethanol, but also pitching for allowing entry of its genetically modified produce like maize, soy, canola and cotton into the Indian market. India was also unwilling to allow American dairy imports due to concerns over the feed practices in the US, specifically the use of animal-based products to feed cows. The stalemate in India-US trade talks is ultimately about 'our farmers versus your farmers'. The US has been pushing its agriculture and dairy products to promote its farmers, a politically powerful section in the US, while India has been resisting offering tariff concessions on these goods to protect its own farmers from low-priced American agriculture and dairy products flooding the Indian market which can drastically bring down prices, thus harming Indian farmers. Trade negotiations are rarely just about economics. They are deeply entangled with domestic political imperatives. In the US-India trade talks under the Trump administration, one of the key undercurrents was the political weight of American farmers. Trump, elected in part due to strong support from rural America, has prioritised the interests of the US agricultural and dairy sectors in trade policy. His administration's push for greater market access to India for American agricultural and dairy products is not merely an economic strategy. It's a calculated political move shaped by the influence of the powerful farm farmers, particularly those in the Midwest, represent a formidable political force. They are a critical part of Trump's base, having overwhelmingly supported him in the 2016 and 2020 elections. These regions hold significant sway in shaping the national conversation on trade and rural most farming-dependent counties overwhelmingly backed Trump in last year's election by an average of 77.7%, as per independent news outlet, Investigate Midwest. Not only did Trump increase his support among farming-dependent counties, but more than 100 of those counties supported him with at least 80% of their vote. In a speech before Congress in march, Trump said that his new trade policies would "be great for the American farmer" even as he acknowledged that there "may be a little bit of an adjustment period." "Our farmers are going to have a field day right now," Trump said. He also claimed that farmers could compensate for any losses by selling more domestically. "Nobody is going to be able to compete with you," he said the years, American farmers have grown increasingly dependent on exports due to domestic overproduction and changing consumption patterns. Major agricultural states like Iowa, Wisconsin and Nebraska rely heavily on foreign markets for commodities such as soybeans, corn, dairy and meat. Therefore, securing new or expanded trade deals that boost agricultural exports directly serves both the economic interests of these states and Trump's political Trump's previous term, government payments to farmers rose to historic levels as the Trump administration handed out cash to farmers to compensate for the financial losses from his tariff own political and economic considerations -- protecting its domestic farmers, adhering to food safety norms and maintaining strategic autonomy -- clash with American demands for duty concessions on agricultural and dairy products. Agriculture and its allied areas contribute just 16% to India's $3.9 trillion economy, but sustain nearly half of the country's 1.4 billion population. As farmers remain one of the most powerful voting blocs, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government was forced into a rare retreat four years ago when it tried to push through controversial farm prospect of cheaper imports from the US threatens to drive down local prices, handing the opposition a fresh opportunity to attack the government. New Delhi has traditionally kept agriculture out of Free Trade Agreements with other nations. Granting market access to the US could force India to extend similar concessions to other trading partners. The average Indian farm comprises just 1.08 hectares, compared to 187 hectares in the US. In dairy, the average herd size in India is two to three animals per farmer, compared to hundreds in the US. This difference makes it difficult for small Indian farmers to compete with their US US is pressing India to open its markets to a wide range of American products, including dairy, poultry, corn, soybeans, rice, wheat, ethanol, citrus fruits, almonds, pecans, apples, grapes, canned peaches, chocolates, cookies, and frozen French fries. While India is willing to grant greater access to US dry fruits and apples, it is holding back on allowing imports of corn, soybeans, wheat, and dairy products. India does not allow genetically modified (GM) food crops, while most US corn and soybean production is GM-based. Dairy remains a sensitive issue in India, where cultural and dietary preferences strongly influence food choices. Indian consumers are particularly concerned that cattle in the US are often fed with animal byproducts, a practice that conflicts with Indian food Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) has cautioned that permanent reduction of agricultural tariffs in the India-US free trade agreement could result in subsidised US grains overwhelming Indian markets during global price downturns. Historical evidence shows that global grain prices plummeted between 2014 and 2016, with wheat prices falling under $160 per tonne, devastating African farmers. "India must retain policy space to manage food stocks, support rural incomes, and respond to global shocks. In today's geopolitically unstable world, food security must remain sovereign," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava was quoted as saying by present, the government doesn't allow cultivation of GM food crops, even though varieties can aid yields. The commercial release of GM mustard has been stalled due to a legal challenge in the country's top court, and in 2010, the government rejected a GM variety of brinjal. Still, India already meets about 60% of vegetable-oil demand through imports, including soy and canola oils from GM crops. The country is also the second-largest cotton grower, with more than 90% of that crop genetically India remained firm on not giving concessions in market access in the sensitive dairy and agricultural sectors, the country was looking to allow imports of certain GM-based farm products used in animal feed, ET had reported based on information from sources. India might agree to inbound shipments of some products used in animal feeds, such as soybean meal and distillers dried grains with solubles, a byproduct of corn-based ethanol production, people familiar with the matter, who asked not be identified as the information isn't public, had told Bloomberg last month. (With inputs from agencies)
