Experts Explain Why European Food Is Better For You
But as insufferable as she may be, Rebecca might actually have a point — especially when it comes to the food.
At some point, a lot of us come back from Europe feeling…better. Healthier. Lighter. More alive. Maybe it's the slower pace, the extra steps on cobblestone streets, the two-day vacationship with a man named Matteo, or the fact that your nervous system finally got a break from interpreting every period in a Slack message as a personal attack. Or maybe it's because you inhaled bread, cheese, wine, and pasta daily, and somehow came back feeling leaner.
So what gives? Is the food actually better over there, or are we all just drunk on Aperol and vacation delusion?
Dr. Sandy Ziya, a functional medicine physician, says food quality in Europe really does make a difference. One of the biggest culprits behind that post-vacation glow? A break from ultra-processed foods. 'In my experience, when my patients visit Europe, they do feel healthier,' she says. 'There are many aspects of the processed food and the preparation of food that contribute to that.'
And here's the thing: ultra-processed foods aren't just heavily refined — they're also loaded with additives, preservatives, and lab-made ingredients you can't pronounce. That's where the real trouble starts. 'In Europe, food colorings like Red Dye 3 and additives such as glyphosate [yep, the same stuff in Roundup weed killer] are prohibited,' says Dr. Ziya. That's because the European Food Safety Authority requires additives to be proven safe before they're approved. In the U.S., the FDA is a little looser.
Instead, we've got the GRAS loophole — short for 'Generally Recognized As Safe.' It allows companies to add ingredients based on expert opinion or historical use, which sounds okay in theory, until you remember that food companies have literally paid scientists to claim cereal was a health food. So, yeah — 'safe' is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.
Hey, you! Wanna cook easy recipes in step-by-step mode? Download the free Tasty app right now.
Dr. Supriya Rao, a gastroenterologist, explains that all those additives and preservatives can do more than just make you feel sluggish — they can mess with your gut on a cellular level. 'Some common American additives (like carrageenan, polysorbate 80, and certain oils) may alter gut bacteria or increase permeability and increase cytokine production, contributing to inflammation and digestive issues over time,' she says.
Zooming out, Dr. Rao adds that the broader issue is how the Standard American Diet stacks all of this together. 'It's full of processed foods, sugary drinks, fast foods, red meat, alcohol, and additives. Eating like this consistently drives chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, gut dysbiosis, weight gain, and more — all of which are foundational triggers for diseases like type 2 diabetes, autoimmune disorders, and cardiovascular issues.'
So yes, our food might be slowly killing us. But, hey, at least it's convenient, right?
Here's the thing: It's not about guilt-tripping you into growing your own kale or never eating a gas station Snickers again. It's about awareness. Because once you know what you're up against, you can actually do something about it.
'Most people don't even know they're consuming ultra-processed food at every meal,' says Dr. Ziya. 'But the lack of satiety — that never-full feeling — is a major clue. Processed foods hijack your hunger cues.' If you've ever eaten a full bag of Doritos and still felt snacky, you know what she's talking about.
So what can we do? Short of moving to a seaside village in Sicily, eating tomatoes grown out of your own garden, and making your own pasta with locally milled flour (honestly, tempting), here are a few real-world tips:
— Read ingredient lists. If it has 32 ingredients and you can't pronounce half of them, maybe skip it.— Prioritize organic when possible. Yes, it's more expensive. But when you can, do it. Especially for produce and animal products.— Look for 'banned in Europe' ingredients. If it's banned over there and allowed here, consider it a red flag (not a sexy red flag either).— Cook more at home. Even just a couple of meals a week can help cut down on additives.— Follow the 80/20 rule. You don't have to eat clean all the time; just try to make it your default.And maybe, just maybe, we start holding food manufacturers and government regulators accountable: lobby for better labeling, ask questions, and vote with your fork. Because right now, Europe isn't winning the food game by accident. They're winning because they actually care about public health. Wild, right?
TL;DR: Yes, European food is generally healthier. Their food safety standards are stricter, and their ingredient lists are shorter. Your vacation glow isn't all in your head — your gut, your sleep, and your mood probably did improve because of what (and how) you ate.
But you don't have to hop on a plane every time you want to feel better. Start small. Stay curious. And hey, if you happen to meet a hot man while shopping for organic zucchini in Trader Joe's, that's just a bonus.
Thinking of cooking at home tonight? Download the free Tasty app, where you can follow step-by-step instructions for over 7,500 recipes — no subscription required.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New study raises concerns about impact of common toxin on the brain: 'Significant neurotoxicity and metabolic disruptions'
New study raises concerns about impact of common toxin on the brain: 'Significant neurotoxicity and metabolic disruptions' A new study is sounding alarms about the potential damage "forever chemicals" can do to our brains, including disrupting memory, emotional regulation, and behavior. What's happening? Scientists from China exposed mice to low levels of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) mixtures, similar to the levels commonly found in drinking water near contamination sites, over a seven-week period. The findings, published in the Journal of Hazardous Materials, revealed that four types of PFAS, including PFOS and PFHpA, built up in the brain and interfered with cognitive functions. The exposed mice experienced anxiety-like behavior, impaired memory, and reduced attention. Brain scans showed that key brainwaves associated with learning and focus had shifted, and researchers discovered neuron damage in the hippocampus, the region responsible for memory. Chemical analysis confirmed changes in neurotransmitter systems and inflammation in brain tissue. "This study demonstrated that long-term exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of a PFAS mixture resulted in significant neurotoxicity and metabolic disruptions in mice," the study's authors wrote. Why are PFAS concerning? PFAS are widely used in water-resistant clothing, nonstick cookware, cosmetics, and food packaging. Because they don't break down, they can accumulate in water, soil, and the human body over time. Most Americans already have detectable levels of PFAS in their blood, and many are unknowingly exposed through tap water, dust, or everyday products. While this study was conducted on mice, the findings reflect similar human studies that have linked prenatal PFAS exposure to developmental delays in children. The ability of PFAS to breach the blood-brain barrier and alter neurotransmitters raises serious concerns about long-term effects on memory, mood, and learning. In terms of long-term health, PFAS can lead to increased risks of cancers, immune system disruptions, and negative impacts on reproductive systems. What's being done about PFAS exposure? While broader policy action is essential, individuals can take small steps to protect themselves, such as using water filters certified to remove PFAS, avoiding nonstick or stain-resistant products, and steering clear of industrial items labeled with "fluoro" or "PTFE" to help reduce exposure. On a larger scale, several states are banning PFAS in consumer goods, and advocacy groups are pushing for stronger federal protections. By supporting clean-water efforts and safer product standards, we can move toward a healthier, more sustainable future, one where dangerous chemicals no longer accumulate in our homes, our water, or our bodies. Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home? Majorly Sometimes Not really I don't know enough about them Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
Buzz Feed
5 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Breaking My Silence: A 56-Year Secret That Saves Lives
'If your period is late, here's what you do: Boil up half a bottle of red wine and drink it while it's hot. Then stand on a chair and jump off several times. That should take care of it.' It was March 1957, and I'd just finished packing my trunk. I would be leaving the next day to sail from England to the United States, where I would marry Ezra, my soldier-fiancé. Those were my mother's final words of advice. Not 'never go to bed angry,' or 'pick your battles,' but how to abort a fetus. Her recommendation was unusual. Knitting needles were the instrument of choice for many British women trying to abort. Fewer Americans are knitters, so before Roe v. Wade made abortion legal in 1973, many women in the United States — or individuals from whom they sought assistance to end their pregnancies — used wire coat hangers. My mother believed her alternative method was a safe one. I smiled to myself, for I was pretty sure her instructions were useless. Only married women had access to contraception in the United Kingdom, so I planned to be fitted with a diaphragm as soon as I arrived in America. I was confident I would be able to avoid any unplanned pregnancies. The day after I landed, I looked up 'obstetricians and gynecologists' in the yellow pages and found a doctor nearby. I was disappointed when she refused to fit me, telling me I should come back after I was married. Just like in Britain, the United States only provided contraception to married women at that time. My wedding was two weeks away. What did this doctor think was going to happen on my honeymoon? Our first child, Ruth, was born after we'd been married for two years — just as Ezra and I planned. Dan was born 21 months later. Although I was often exhausted, I found taking care of two little children exhilarating. Watching their development was an unfolding miracle. Then, three and a half years later, when we were living in Palo Alto, California, I discovered I was pregnant again. While I was still in the throes of morning sickness, Ruth and Dan both came down with German measles, aka rubella. Everyone knew if you caught it when you were pregnant, especially in the first trimester, the baby was at high risk for serious birth defects like deafness, cataracts, heart malfunctions, developmental disabilities, and liver and spleen damage. The baby might also be stillborn. I asked my obstetrician what he would do if I contracted rubella. 'Nothing,' he replied with a shrug. A pregnant friend got rubella from one of her children and received the same answer from her doctor. She attempted suicide because of it and spent the rest of her life in a vegetative state. After our third child, Jonathan, was born, we moved to Berkeley, where I was fitted with an IUD. Ezra's architectural practice was thriving, and he was teaching at UC Berkeley. His work involved frequent travel to the East Coast, and he was away for weeks at a time. I was being pulled in many different directions by three children with very different needs. I began to feel inadequate as a parent — out of my comfort zone and overwhelmed. I struggled to hold things together for five years. When Jonathan entered kindergarten in 1969, I was thrilled to be able to return to my studies at the University of California. Kindergarten was half a day, and I was able to coordinate my classes with his. Life finally took on a comfortable rhythm. One morning in October that year, I woke up feeling the familiar signs of early pregnancy. At first, I denied the possibility. Abortion was illegal, so I continued to rely on my IUD, considered the safest form of birth control available at the time. I had been told they were 99% effective, which meant I was now part of the unlucky 1%. The thought of a baby growing together with the IUD was terrifying. What damage could that cause? But, more than that, I knew I couldn't handle taking care of another baby. Life was just beginning to feel normal. The prospect of dealing with a fourth child filled me with dread. I made an appointment with my obstetrician, who confirmed I was pregnant. 'I suppose I'll have to resign myself to having another baby,' I said, my eyes stinging with tears. 'We thought our family was complete. I don't know how I'm going to manage. I'm afraid it'll push me over the edge.' 'It sounds as if you might not want another baby,' my doctor said. 'No. I really don't. I'm stretched so thin already.' 'Go home and talk to your husband. If the two of you decide you definitely don't want to continue the pregnancy, here's what you'll do,' he told me. 'Call my office and tell them you are having a lot of bleeding. They will tell you to go to the emergency room, and I'll meet you there.' I had been looking down into my purse, groping for a tissue. I felt my jaw drop as I raised my eyes to meet his. He was smiling and nodding slowly as he spoke. In his subtle, gentle way, he was offering me a choice — one I'd never anticipated would be possible for me. A sense of relief washed over my entire body. I had thought I was trapped, and I had been offered a way out. When Ezra and I talked after dinner, there were no doubts — neither of us wanted more children. The next day was Saturday. I called my doctor's office and lied to the receptionist about bleeding heavily. Ezra drove me to the hospital, where we met the doctor. The two men shook hands, and the doctor told my husband, 'Not to worry — I'll take good care of her.' As I was wheeled into the operating room, the nurse walking beside the gurney squeezed my hand. 'You'll be fine,' she said. That's the last thing I remember about the procedure. When I awoke from the anesthesia, I got dressed and waited for Ezra and the children to pick me up in the hospital lobby. They arrived in the late afternoon. They'd gone to a football game, and the children were still excited about it. That evening, Ezra and I hugged and shared our thoughts about how relieved we were. He was particularly attentive and brought a stool so I could put my feet up. After he washed the dishes, he slipped out and came back with a tub of butter pecan ice cream — my favorite — our special way of marking important occasions. I didn't mention the experience to any of my friends. I had broken the law, and if word got out about my doctor's willingness to perform this procedure, his life could be ruined. The threat of legal action scared me into silence. I've maintained that silence until now. What would I have done if my doctor hadn't opened up this window of opportunity? Friends were going to Mexico for abortions, but the status of medical care in that country was a mystery to me. I could have ended up with a botched procedure, as often happened with the illegal abortions that were performed in so-called back alleys in the United States. Or what if I didn't have access to health care in the first place or the money to pay for the procedure, as many other women and families did — and do — not have. I also believed only a properly trained obstetrician could be trusted to remove the IUD nestling in my uterus beside my growing baby. Its removal was another opportunity for mistakes to be made. I am risk-averse and would have probably turned down these choices and carried the fetus to term. I would have been an angry, depleted mother to all my children. Today, at the age of 92, my reproductive years are far in the past, but old age doesn't temper the anger I feel towards the legislators who exercise their power to order a woman to carry her pregnancy to term whether she wants to or not. Women seeking abortions are often portrayed as foolish teenagers, but thousands of mature women with families are being put in this position just like I was. Our current legislators believe a few fertilized cells are more important than a woman's quality of life — a quality of life that ripples through her existing family. Right-to-lifers scream about 'partial birth abortions' while women who have suffered and wept through such rare procedures because of serious health issues are viewed as murderers. I'm telling my story now because maybe it will help wake us up to the nightmare we've created. Had I been forced to have a fourth child, the impact would have been devastating — not only for me, but for my family. We have failed the many women who find themselves in the same position I was. I was afraid to speak up back then. I am speaking up now. We are back in the days before Roe v. Wade, a time when women are being denied control of their own bodies. Doctors are understandably afraid to follow my obstetrician's example. Miscarriages are looked on with suspicion and without sympathy for a woman's grief when she experiences one. Women with dangerous pregnancy complications are told to wait for 'nature to take its course,' which puts their lives at risk. Many have died. Stories about women who spend their lives regretting their abortions and dreaming about the child-who-might-have-been spread throughout antiabortion communities. My post-abortion experience was the opposite. It enabled us to have the family we wanted. I've had no regrets. I will always be grateful to my obstetrician who was willing to risk imprisonment and the loss of his career to perform my illegal abortion. Now that we've gone back in time, women who don't want to bear a child will still find ways to abort a fetus just as they did before abortions became legal. They'll just be forced to do it in unsafe and potentially deadly ways. We are going back to the days of coat hangers and knitting needles. Cynthia Ehrenkrantz is a writer and storyteller. She was born in Britain and immigrated to the United States in 1957. Her memoir, 'Seeking Shelter: Memoir of a Jewish Girlhood in Wartime Britain,' is available wherever books are sold. She lives in Westchester County, New York.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
The 7 dietitian-backed foods to eat for a balanced breakfast
Your mornings are busy enough without having to spend the time to decide what to make – and then having to actually make – a healthy, well-balanced breakfast. That's further complicated by the fact "healthy" can mean different things to different people. Some may be trying to lose weight. Some may be trying to gain weight. Some may be trying to increase the amount of nutritious food they eat in a day. Some may just need to grab anything they can get their hands on to make sure there's something in their stomach before running out the door. Marisa Moore, MBA, RDN, LD, a registered dietitian nutritionist and author of "The Plant Love Kitchen," breaks down everything you need to know about best breakfast nutrition practices. Looking for a healthy breakfast? Here's what to eat in the morning for a nutritious meal. How many calories should I eat for breakfast? The amount of calories someone should eat in a given meal can depend on several factors, including age, sex, height, weight, physical activity, pregnancy or lactation status and individual goals. For example, the current Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends that a moderately active (defined as the equivalent to walking between 1.5 and 3 miles per day at 3 to 4 miles per hour) 35-year-old man should be consuming about 2,600 calories a day, while a moderately active 35-year old woman needs about 2,000. Women generally need fewer calories than men, and older adults generally need fewer calories than younger ones. These recommendations can also vary depending on whether a person is trying to lose, maintain or gain weight, too. Rather than focusing on how many calories someone should be eating at breakfast, nutrition experts suggest paying more attention to the variety of macronutrients you're serving yourself. "Start the day with a protein- and carbohydrate-rich meal for sustained energy until lunch time," Moore suggests. Adding healthy fats, such as chia seeds, walnuts, olive oil, avocado or full-fat yogurt to the equation is helpful. What is meal sequencing? Health experts explain whether the rising diet trend works. What should I eat for breakfast? Your morning menu doesn't have to be boring. These balanced breakfast options will give you the energy you need to get through the day. Vegetable-packed omelet with a side of fruit (pick your favorites!) Protein-rich Greek yogurt with walnuts and berries (a quick, no-cook option that Moore says will keep you full "for hours"). Oatmeal with a creamy nut or seed butter with a handful of berries (this one's vegan, if that's something you're looking for in a recipe). Leftover beans and rice or roasted broccoli with scrambled eggs or tofu ("Remember that breakfast can be anything you want it to be," Moore says). The U.S. Department of Agriculture's MyPlate (which in 2011 replaced the food pyramid you might be more familiar with) also offers dozens of healthy breakfast recipes, including apple oatmeal muffins, black bean burritos and Spanish omelets. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What to eat for breakfast, according to a dietitian
