CM Yogi warns against defaming Kanwariyas, Kanwar Yatra
Speaking at an event near Dulhera Chowki in Meerut on Sunday, the UP CM also urged the devotees to practise restraint and desist from taking the law into their hands. However, the CM showered flowers on kanwariyas during his Meerut visit while returning from Delhi.
Meanwhile, the CM's assertion came a day after seven kanwariyas were booked for assaulting a CRPF personnel in Mirzapur. On Sunday, three of the Kanwariyas were held by the district police.
However, smelling a rat in the entire controversy, the CM said: 'If anyone creates ruckus to defame the Kanwar Yatra, then we have CCTV footage of all of them. After the Kanwar Yatra is over, their posters would be displayed in public.'
'Where there is enthusiasm, excitement, faith and devotion, some elements will constantly try to disturb that bonhomie and defame the devotion and faith…Unmask them, keep them away from you at all costs. Do not allow them to enter your circle. … approach the administration instead of taking the law into your hands,' added CM Yogi.
'Sayiyam banana chahiye.. Hum Kanwar Yatra jo leja rahe hain..Hum dusaron ki bhi pareshaniyon ko samjhen (Show restraint… We need to understand the problem of others),' he said while asking the Kanwariyas to be within the limit of law and order.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
4 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
SC refuses to examine order mandating eateries along Kanwar Yatra route to display owner's identity
The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to examine the legality of the directives issued by the Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring eateries along the Kanwar Yatra pilgrimage route to display quick response codes with their owners' identities, Live Law reported. A bench of Justices MM Sundresh and NK Singh disposed of the interlocutory applications filed against the directives. But it said that the eateries must display their licences and registration certificates as required by law. 'We are told that today is the last day of the yatra,' Live Law quoted the bench as saying on Tuesday. 'In any case it is likely to come to an end in the near future. Therefore, at this stage, we would only pass an order that all the respective hotel owners shall comply with the mandate of displaying the licence and the registration certificate as per the statutory requirements.' During the Kanwar Yatra, devotees, called Kanwariyas, walk hundreds of kilometres to collect water from the Ganga near Haridwar and carry it back to their home states to offer at temples. The devotees mainly come from Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Delhi and Madhya Pradesh. This year's Kanwar Yatra started on July 11. The applications in the court were moved in the writ petitions filed in 2024 against directions to display the names of owners and staff, Live Law reported. The applications were filed by Delhi University Professor Apoorvanand and activist Aakar Patel. Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra and the Association of Protection of Civil Rights were the other petitioners, Live Law reported. The applications argued that the mandate violated the 2024 interim order of court that prohibited forcing vendors to disclose their identities. The QR codes, now being made mandatory for food stalls and eateries along the pilgrimage route, would enable pilgrims and others to access personal details of business owners, said the applications. It contended that this not only undermines the spirit of the court's stay but also risks discriminatory profiling, particularly of vendors from minority communities, under the guise of public safety and licencing requirements. The applications claimed that the governments' orders violate the fundamental right to privacy and dignity. It pointed out that while vendors are legally required to display licences, those are meant to be posted inside their premises, not put up prominently outside or through public QR codes. During the proceedings on Tuesday, advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing the petitioners, said that the authorities should have sought the modification of the 2024 order before issuing the directives on the QR code, Live Law reported. Singhvi also asked how the surname of an owner of an eatery was supposed to ensure good service, adding that the only intent was 'to cause religious profiling'. He asked how the identity of a person could be deemed offensive. The advocate also referred to reports about shops being allegedly attacked, adding: 'When you sow the seeds of divisiveness, the rest is taken care of by the populace.' The governments' directives were unconstitutional as they created divisiveness based on identity and violated the fundamental right to trade, he argued, adding that it was also a 'direct assault' on the principle of secularism, Live Law reported. Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the Uttar Pradesh government, said that the directions were issued as per the requirements of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. Rohatgi also claimed that a few dhabas that used to sell meat were misrepresenting themselves by saying that they were selling only vegetarian food. This had offended the sentiments of devotees, he claimed. However, advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, representing the petitioners, noted that the eateries could only sell vegetarian items as per the local regulations during this period. But the court said that a customer should know if a place was exclusively selling vegetarian items throughout. 'If a hotel is running as a vegetarian hotel all through, then the question of indicating names and other things will not arise,' Live Law quoted Sundresh as saying. 'But if only for the purpose of yatra, somebody stops serving non-veg and starts selling veg, the consumer should know.' Ahmadi also asked what was the necessity of revealing the identities of the owners and the staff, adding that the mandate for the disclosure of the names was to understand the religious identity. 'What happens on the ground this sort of a message religion is to be considered as a factor, this is promoting untouchability through the backdoor,' Live Law quoted Ahmadi as saying. Deputy Advocate General Jatinder Kumar Sethi, representing the Uttarakhand government defending the directions issued by the state. Another counsel for the state government claimed that that the real problem was dhabas named 'Shiva Dhaba' or 'Parvati Dhaba' being run by Muslim. 'Please, don't embarrass us like this,' the bench said without entertaining the submission.
NDTV
21 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Consumer Is King": Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With QR Code Order On Kanwar Route
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to interfere with the decision of the Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand government directing the eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route to display QR codes which would enable the pilgrims to know the details of the owners and well as the staff employed. The top court disposed the application against the QR code directives noting that this was the last day of the Kanwar Yatra. However, the court left the main issue of whether government can force vendors to disclose names and identity pending. A bench of Justice MM Sundresh and Justice NK Singh disposed of the interlocutory applications filed challenging the mandate issued by the authorities. Saying that consumer is king, the top court advocated for customers' right to know about the ingredients and preparation methods used in the food being served at restaurants, including whether the place was serving non-vegetarian food earlier. Only for the purpose of the Yatra, if someone changes from non-veg to veg, then the customers should know, the Supreme Court said. Essentially considering that Kanwar Yatra is ending today, the Supreme Court refused to go into the legality of the directives issued by the Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand authorities. The bench also clarified that the sellers must display their licenses and registration certificates as required by the law. Senior advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi, and Huzefa Ahmadi appeared for different petitioners, including academic Apoorvanand Jha. The petitioner termed this move by the state governments "the worst kind of religious profiling" and an attempt to promote "untouchability" from backdoor. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appeared for Uttar Pradesh. He defended the move saying that Kanwariyas are sentimental people and we are living in a country where a person won't eat his own brother's house if he knows that they cook meat in their kitchen. Mr Singhvi, appearing for petitioners, argued that forcing vendors to publicly display names of owners and employees amounted to unconstitutional identity-based discrimination. "There is anonymity of the marketplace. You are trying to ostracise establishments owned by minorities," Mr Singhvi argued, calling the move a "direct assault" on Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21 and the basic structure doctrine. Mr Ahmadi further argued restrictions on serving non-vegetarian food during the Kanwar Yatra could be considered reasonable, but identity disclosure was a separate and constitutionally suspect matter. When an intervening counsel remarked that a dhaba with a Hindu name was being run by a Muslim and that this was the root cause of problem, Justice Sundresh bluntly responded: "Please don't embarrass us with such submissions." Justice MM Sundresh further remarked, "I'm agnostic. I have no problem. But my friend wouldn't eat at a place that even touches garlic or onion. Consumer interest matters." Justice Sundresh highlighted the importance of transparency for consumers while still balancing the rights of business owners. "Consumer is the king," he remarked, indicating that they have a right to know whether a hotel serves vegetarian food only during Shravan or throughout the year; and that such information could be drawn from licenses already required under law.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Kanwar Yatra: Supreme Court refuses to stop QR code order for eateries
In a case concerning the Kanwar Yatra, the Supreme Court has addressed the Yogi government's mandate for eateries. The court declined to stop the mandatory ID directive but issued an interim order for shop owners to display their licence and registration certificate. This came after a petition challenged a QR code requirement, calling it a "direct assault on the basic ethic of secularism" and a form of "identity politics" that could ostracise minorities. The Supreme Court's order aims to balance the sentiments of the Kanwar Yatris with the business interests of shopkeepers, ensuring yatris know if a hotel is vegetarian or non-vegetarian. The court did not rule on the legality of the QR code mandate itself, noting that the yatra was on its final day.
