Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi addresses HIV testing decline following funding cuts
Image: Bongani Shilubane / Independent Newspapers
Minister of Health Aaron Motsoaledi stated that while there may be a decline in HIV testing following the funding cuts by the United States' President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (Pepfar), the country's HIV/Aids programme is not collapsing.
This comes after Reuters reported this week that data from an unpublished document by the National Health Laboratory Service, a government entity, seen by the agency, showed that viral load testing declined by up to 21% among key groups in the last two months.
For individuals with HIV undergoing anti-retroviral therapy, viral load testing quantifies the amount of virus present in their bloodstream.
Viral load testing for individuals aged 15-24 declined by 17.2% in April compared to last April, after dropping 7.8% year-on-year in March. Overall population testing decreased 11.4% in April, according to Reuters.
Maternal viral load testing was down 21.3% in April, after declining by 9.1% in March. Early infant diagnostic testing was also down 19.9% in April after declining by 12.4% in March.
Additionally, nationwide, viral suppression rates among tested individuals decreased by 3.4% in March and 0.2% in April. Young adults experienced even greater declines, suggesting potential disruptions in patient treatment, the data showed.
During a briefing on the status of the HIV/Aids and TB Campaign in South Africa, the Minister said that he has never stated that everything is fine in the country following the funding withdrawal.
'I never said everything is fine. All I said is that it's wrong to say the campaign of the HIV/Aids programme in South Africa is collapsing because it's not… If viral load testing has dropped, does it mean the collapse of the campaign by any stretch of imagination? No, we expected that some of these problems will occur, but we are sitting with them every day,' he said.
According to reports, the Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (Caprisa) community programmes head and Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) deputy general secretary, Patrick Mdletshe, stated that the decline in viral load testing in South Africa can be attributed to funding cuts, particularly from Pepfar.
'These cuts have significantly impacted HIV testing and treatment programmes, especially among vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, infants, and young adults,' he said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Mdletshe said that some of the key factors contributing to the decline are reduced funding and closure of NGO-run clinics primarily funded by Pepfar, which will consequently increase the risk of HIV transmission and lead to the disruption of treatment.
Professor Wolfgang Preiser, who heads the Medical Virology Department of Pathology at Stellenbosch University and the NHLS at Tygerberg Hospital, said that while they have seen a decline of test volumes for those markers recently, this decline cannot be attributed to the Pepfar cuts as there are other, parallel issues that also affect how many samples are received for testing.
He said some of these parallel factors are based on internal rearrangements within the NHLS between its different laboratories.
'When looking at NHLS test figures from year to year, you should factor in the network downtime last year following the cyberattack. That is long resolved but it is reflected in test volumes still,' added Preiser.
Kate Rees, public health specialist from the Anova Health Institute, said the organisation's programmes have been terminated. 'We cannot say to what extent there is a decline in the indicators. I have seen NHLS and Department of Health data that shows a decline in viral load testing nationally and HIV testing in Johannesburg. But it is not my data.'
Networking HIV and AIDS Community of Southern Africa (Nacosa) spokesperson, Sophie Hobbs, said their Pepfar-funded programme that monitored viral loads of children and adolescents in the city of Cape Town has also been terminated.
Hobbs said Nacosa has, as a result, not been able to collect this data.
She stated that according to the latest Thembisa Model estimates, there are significant gaps for children and youth in the Western Cape, with only a 67% antiretroviral therapy coverage rate and a 73% viral suppression rate in children under 15.
'Before it was terminated, our programme in Cape Town had very good treatment adherence (100%) and viral suppression rates,' said Hobbs.
The Minister further explained that of the R46.8 billion South Africa spends on the HIV/Aids programme, only R7.9bn was from Pepfar.
'It is inconceivable that out of R46.8bn spent by the country on the HIV programme, the withdrawal of R7.9bn by President Donald Trump will collapse the entire programme,' he said.
The Minister said since the Pepfar funding was pulled, in the 27 high-HIV burden Pepfar-supported districts, out of 57 across the country, there are 2,772 public health facilities.
He said in these 27 districts, there were only 12 specialised clinics independent from the government, managed by the NGOs providing services mainly for key populations funded by Pepfar. Key populations include transgender individuals, men who have sex with men, sex workers, and people who inject drugs.
'In these 27 districts, the total number of these key population clients served by these 12 specialised clinics was 63,322, of which 41,996 are found in the City of Johannesburg,' he said.
Motsoaledi said when the Pepfar-funded clinics were closed, the Department removed their files from those clinics to the nearest public facilities.
'We can confirm that all 63,322 have been moved. Then the work to contact their owners to transfer them to public health facilities where their files are started in earnest and still continues,' he said.
The Minister highlighted that there are other prominent funders like the Global Fund that have been supporting the country with health services for key populations. '34 designated facilities are funded by the Global Fund for this purpose across Gauteng, Free State, North West, Limpopo, Eastern Cape, KZN, Mpumalanga, and Western Cape.'
karen.singh@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
University jumps in to fight SA's GBV
The president has declared GBV as a pandemic in South Africa. Activists fighting against gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF) and crime experts are welcoming North-West University's (NWU) launch of a GBVF Empowerment Centre. It was recently launched at the NWU Vanderbijlpark campus to serve as a one-stop hub offering psychosocial support, legal case navigation and proactive advocacy. Key partners include the Gauteng department of Community Safety, Sonke Gender Justice, Higher Health, Ikhaya le Themba Empowerment Centre and international collaborators such as University College Dublin and Dublin Rape Crisis Centre. Dr Vedhna Dayanand-Lalla from NWU said, 'The president has noted that South Africa is facing a GBVF pandemic. ' Like other institutions of higher learning, we have encountered cases of GBVF. Through the centre, we aim to address all GBVF matters effectively and efficiently. 'The centre will adhere to a strict professional and confidential process. Social workers from Ikhaya le Themba will be at the centre twice a week to provide professional services. 'Vereeniging SA Police Service members will work closely with us to ensure a smooth and qualified process for all cases. 'We plan to train student leaders to respond to trauma in a supportive manner, especially as first responders within the residences. 'We hope to include social work students and honours psychology students as interns at the centre in the near future. 'We envision a focus on research alongside community service. We hope the centre will generate quality research that will serve as the foundation for our interventions while contributing to preventative processes and programmes.' The centre will be open to the surrounding community. To kick-start community education, they partnered with Ubuntu Evolution Hub, which will train 52 school principals on GBVF, handling and reporting statutory rape, HIV/Aids and pupil pregnancy. GBV activist Prince Ntsikelelo Soga, executive director of the organisation I Am That Man, said the centre would bridge critical gaps in offering psychosocial care, legal guidance and proactive advocacy under one roof. Willem Els of the Institute for Security Studies said it was part of the bigger strategy needed, as government and law enforcement agencies do not have enough impact. – [email protected]
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Inside SA's multi-million rand plan to fill US funding void
The current tranche of money comes from Treasury's contingency reserve. Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi recently announced that National Treasury had released roughly R753 million to help plug the gap left by US funding cuts to South Africa's health system. Another R268 million is also being released in the following two years for researchers that lost their US grants. But this may only constitute the first round of emergency funds from government, according to sources we spoke to. ALSO READ: Treasury allocates R750m to offset Pepfar funding withdrawal as Motsoaledi tables health budget The health department is planning to submit a bid for an additional allocation later on, which will be considered by Treasury. But this will likely only be approved if the first tranche of funding is appropriately used. So how is the money supposed to be used? To find out, we spoke with officials from the National Treasury, the National Department of Health and the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC). Money for provinces is for saving jobs at government clinics The current tranche of money comes from Treasury's contingency reserve, which exists partially to deal with unforeseen funding shortfalls. It was released in terms of Section 16 of the Public Finance Management Act. Of the R753 million that's been announced for this year, Motsoaledi stated that R590 million would be going to provincial health departments via the District Health Programme Grant – a conditional grant for funding the country's public health efforts, particularly HIV, TB, and other communicable diseases. Such conditional grants typically give the National Health Department more say over how provincial departments spend money than is the case with most other health funding in provinces.. To explain how government officials arrived at this figure, it's worth recapping what services the US previously supported within provinces. Prior to Donald Trump becoming US president on 20 January, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) had financed health programmes in specific districts with high rates of HIV. These districts were scattered across all South Africa's provinces, save for the Northern Cape. The funds were typically channelled by USAID to non-governmental organisations (NGOs), which used the money to assist the districts in two ways. The first is that NGOs would hire and deploy health workers at government clinics. The second is that the NGOs would run independent mobile clinics and drop-in centres, which assisted so-called key populations, such as men who have sex with men, sex workers, transgender people, and people who inject drugs. Following the US funding cuts, thousands of NGO-funded health workers lost their jobs at government clinics, while many of the health centres catering to key populations were forced to close. In response, the health department began negotiations with Treasury to get emergency funding to restore some of these services. As part of its application, the health department submitted proposals for each province, which specified how much money was needed and how it would be used. (Though this only took place after significant delay and confusion). Since Treasury couldn't afford to plug the entire gap left by the US funding cuts, the provincial-level proposals only requested money for some of the services that had been terminated. For instance, funding was not requested for the key populations health centres. Instead, the priority was to secure the jobs that had been lost at government health facilities. READ MORE: Over 8 000 SA healthcare jobs lost – and more could follow – after US Pepfar aid cuts As such, the total amount that was requested from Treasury for each province was largely calculated by taking the total number of health workers that NGOs had hired at clinics and working out how much it would cost to rehire them for 12 months. Rather than paying the NGOs a grant to deploy these workers as was done by USAID, the health department proposed hiring them directly. This meant that they calculated their wages according to standard government pay scales which is less than what these workers would have earned from the NGOs. The total came to just under R1.2 billion for all the provinces combined. Treasury awarded roughly half of this on the basis that the money would be used to finance these wages for six months, rather than 12. This amounts to the R590 million for provinces that was announced by Motsoaledi. If all goes smoothly and this money is used effectively to hire these staff over the next six months, then a new tranche of Section 16 funding could be released in order to continue hiring them. Funds might also be released to fund the key populations health sites. A concern, however, is that the money may just be used by provinces to augment their ordinary budgets. If the funds aren't actually earmarked to respond to the US cuts, then it is much less likely that more emergency funding will be released. At this stage, it is too early to tell how provinces will use the money, particularly given that it appears that at least some of them haven't gotten it yet. Spotlight and GroundUp sent questions to several provincial health departments. Only the Western Cape responded. The province's MEC for Health and Wellness, Mireille Wenger, said that the funds have not yet been received by her department, but that once they were, they would be directed to several key priority areas, including digitisation of health records, and the strengthening of the primary healthcare system. It's thus not clear whether the province will be earmarking any of the funds to employ health staff axed by US-funded NGOs. In response to a question about this, Wenger stated that 'further clarity is still required from the National Department of Health and National Treasury regarding the precise provincial allocations and conditions tied to the additional funding'. What about research? Of the R753 million that's been released for this year, R132 million has been allocated to mitigate the funding cuts for research by US federal institutions, primarily the National Institutes for Health (NIH). Unlike USAID, the NIH is not an aid body. It provides grants to researchers who are testing new treatments and medical interventions that ultimately benefit everyone. These grants can be awarded to researchers in the US or abroad as part of a highly competitive application process. Researchers in South Africa are awarded a few billion rands worth of grants from the NIH each year, largely due to their expertise in HIV and TB. But over the last few months, much of this funding has been terminated or left in limbo. (See a detailed explanation of the situation here). The R132 million issued by Treasury is supposed to assist some of these researchers. It will be followed by another R268 million over the following two years. The Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust are chipping in an additional R100 million each – though in their case, the funds are being provided upfront. All of this money – R600 million in total – is being channelled to the SAMRC, which will release it to researchers via a competitive grant allocation system. According to SAMRC spokesperson Tendani Tsedu, they have already received the R132 million from Treasury, though they are still 'finalising the processes with the Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust for receipt of [their donations]'. The SAMRC is also in negotiation with a French research body about securing more funds, though these talks are ongoing. In the meantime, the SAMRC has sent out a request for grant applications from researchers who have lost their US money. The memo states: 'Applicants may apply for funding support for up to 12 months to continue, wind down or complete critical research activities and sustain the projects until U.S. funding is resumed or alternative funds are sourced.' 'The plan,' Tsedu said, 'is to award these grants as soon as possible this year.' READ MORE: Health experts warn of 'huge disaster' as USAID terminates Pepfar HIV funding in SA Professor Linda-Gail Bekker, CEO of the Desmond Tutu Health Foundation, told us that the hope is that the grants could fill some of the gaps. 'This is a bridge and it is certainly going to save some people's jobs, and some research,' she said, but 'it isn't going to completely fill the gap'. Indeed, the SAMRC has made clear that its grants aren't intended to replace the US funding awards entirely. This is unsurprising given that the money that's being made available is a tiny fraction of the total grant funding awarded by the NIH. It's unlikely that research projects will continue to operate as before, and will instead be pared down, said Bekker. 'It's going to be about getting the absolute minimum done so you either save the outcome, or get an outcome rather than no outcome,' she said. In other cases, the funds may simply 'allow you to more ethically close [the research project] down,' Bekker added. For some, this funding may also have come too late. Many researchers have already had to lay off staff. Additionally, patients who had been on experimental treatments may have already been transitioned back into routine care. It's unclear how such projects could be resumed months later. In response, Tsedu stated: 'For projects that have already closed as a result of the funding cuts, the principal investigator will need to motivate whether the study can be appropriately resurrected if new funds are secured.' The SAMRC has established a steering committee which will adjudicate bids. They will be considering a range of criteria, Tsedu said, including how beneficial the research might be for the South African health system, and how heavily the project was impacted by the US funding cuts. They will also consider how an SAMRC grant could 'be leveraged for future sustainability of the project, personnel or unit,' he said. An endless back and forth The job of the SAMRC steering committee will likely be made a lot more complicated by the erratic policy changes within the NIH. On 25 March, the body sent a memo to staff, – leaked to Nature and Bhekisisa – instructing them to hold all funding awards to researchers in South Africa. After this, numerous researchers in the country said they couldn't renew their grants. However, last month, Science reported that a new memo had been sent to NIH staff which said that while South African researchers still couldn't get new grants, active awards could be resumed. Since then, some funds appear to be trickling back into the country, but certainly not all. For instance, Spotlight and GroundUp spoke to one researcher who had two active NIH awards before the cuts. He stated that one of these was resumed last month, while the other is still paused. READ MORE: SA funds 90% of its HIV/Aids ARV programme, Motsoaledi reveals amid Pepfar uncertainty Bekker also told us that she had heard of one or two research grants being resumed in the last week, though she said the bulk of active awards to South Africa are still pending. 'Where people are the prime recipients [of an NIH grant] without a subawardee, there seems to be a queue and backlog but some [of those awards] are coming through,' said Bekker. 'But how long this is going to take and when it might come through we're waiting to hear.' She said a strategy might be to apply for the SAMRC bridging funding and 'if by some miracle the [NIH funding is resumed]' then researchers could then presumably retract their SAMRC application. In the meantime, health researchers will have to continue spending their time working out how to respond to the abrupt and increasingly confusing changes to funding guidelines that have dogged them since Trump assumed office. 'It's such a dreadful waste of energy,' said Bekker. 'If we were just getting on with the research, it would be so much better.' This article was republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.
The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
Health Department doesn't track foreign nationals using public facilities
Treatment is still provided to those who cannot produce documents to verify their identity. Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi says his department does not track the number of foreign nationals using public healthcare facilities. Motsoaledi revealed this in a recent written parliamentary reply to ActionSA MP Tebogo Letlape, who had asked for the total number of documented and undocumented foreign nationals recorded as accessing public healthcare in the past five years. Letlape also wanted to know how many illegal immigrants had been reported to the Department of Home Affairs by healthcare facilities, as required by law. Motsoaledi on foreign nationals using public healthcare facilities In his response, Motsoaledi explained that provincial health departments keep no such records – and that the same applies to undocumented South Africans. 'In accordance with Section 27 of the constitution of the Republic of South Africa, everyone has the right to access healthcare services, including reproductive healthcare, and no one may be refused emergency medical treatment. 'Health care is provided based on clinical need, not on nationality or documentation status,' he said. Addressing the question about reporting to Home Affairs, the minister said while patients are requested to provide identification to verify their identity, treatment is still provided to those who cannot produce such documents. 'The patient administration and records systems utilised in public health facilities across the country do not classify or record individuals as South African or foreign and are therefore unable to provide a total number of undocumented people who accessed healthcare services over the past five years.' ALSO READ: 'We've not broken any laws': Operation Dudula to press on with ID checks after members freed on warning Motsoaledi also highlighted that many South African citizens also access healthcare without identification, often because they have no ID issued by Home Affairs or any other official authority. 'This makes it impossible to determine whether such undocumented patients are foreign nationals or not.' He added that civil registration systems across Africa remain underdeveloped and are 'lagging behind'. Egypt leads the continent with a civil registration rate of 98%, followed by South Africa at 89%, according to the minister. 'This means that 11% of South Africans are also undocumented, but cannot said to be illegal in their own country. Some countries on this continent are still between 1% and 5% registered.' Practitioners employed in public health sector A separate parliamentary reply highlighted significant shifts in the number of health practitioners employed in South Africa's public health sector over the past five years, with certain provinces recording growth while others seeing declines. Motsoaledi provided a breakdown from the Persal system detailing the total number of active health professionals by province and category – namely nursing professionals, medical practitioners, and other health professionals – between April 2020 and March 2025. The figures for the 2024/2025 financial year showed KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) employed the highest number of nursing professionals at 32 151, followed closely by Gauteng with 30 456. Gauteng also leads in medical practitioners (7 268) and 'other health professionals' (5 748). READ MORE: Motsoaledi announces 1 650 new healthcare jobs and R1.3bn to be spent on hospital equipment Moreover, KZN saw sustained growth in nursing staff since 2020, though numbers for medical practitioners dropped slightly from a peak of 5 938 in 2021/2022 to 4 868 in the most recent year. Free State experienced a steady decline in nursing staff from 8 264 in 2021/2022 to 7 283 in 2024/2025, while Limpopo saw a drop from 16 625 in 2021/2022 to 14 807 in 2024/2025. Mpumalanga's nursing workforce also decreased slightly after peaking in 2021/2022. The Northern Cape consistently has the smallest personnel, with only 2 544 nursing professionals, 521 medical practitioners, and 667 other health professionals in 2024/2025.
