Bernie Sanders Says Yes To Love, No To AI Girlfriends
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) believes in the radical power of love... as long as it's between humans.
While appearing on Tuesday's episode of the 'Joe Rogan Experience,' America's most prominent progressive veered into philosophical territory as he discussed the challenges and potential benefits of an AI-powered future.
When host Rogan wondered how people will find meaning in their lives in a world where automation replaces workers, Sanders pointed to the enduring value of human connection.
'You know, there's a thing called love, right? ... To be human, nobody wants to be alone,' he said.
Minutes later, the senator warned listeners not to try and find that love from artificial sources.
Bernie on the Joe Rogan Experience: "Others, Zuckerberg, you know, are talking about: if you're lonely, we got a machine for you... We got a friend for you on AI and her name is Mary and you can chat with her 20 hours a day, and she really loves you.""We are human beings and… pic.twitter.com/E1V1gb34KH
— More Perfect Union (@MorePerfectUS) June 24, 2025
Mentioning Meta's Mark Zuckerberg and Sam Altman of OpenAI, Sanders criticized tech bosses for pitching ideas like: 'If you're lonely, we got a machine for you... We got a friend for you on AI, and her name is Mary, and you can chat with her 20 hours a day, and she really loves you.'
'That's so dystopian,' Rogan replied as his guest nodded in agreement.
Offering an example of that warped reality, the podcaster pointed to recent headlines about a man who fell in love with and proposed to his AI 'girlfriend,' despite having a flesh-and-bones girlfriend in real life.
While Rogan saw the story as a disturbing sign of things to come, Sanders framed it as a call to action.
'Look, at the end of the day, all we've got is us,' he reasoned. 'We are human beings and we're gonna have to cling to each other to get through this thing.'
'All I would say at this moment, is the answer is not to fall in love with your AI creature out there.'
Sanders' message comes amid rising reports about people's disquieting relationships with AI.
A recent study from the Institute for Family Studies found that 1 in 4 young adults believe AI partners could replace real-life romance and that 1% of the 2,000 people surveyed already have digital companions of some sort.
Bernie Sanders Makes Rare Endorsement In New York City Mayoral Race
Gavin Newsom Savagely Corrects Sarah Huckabee Sanders
Bernie Sanders Revealed Why He Thinks Democrats Lost The Presidential Election, And HuffPost Readers Have THOUGHTS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
35 minutes ago
- CNBC
Meta wins AI copyright case, but judge says others could bring lawsuits
Meta on Wednesday prevailed against a group of 13 authors in a major copyright case involving the company's Llama artificial intelligence model, but the judge made clear his ruling was limited to this case. U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria sided with Meta's argument that the company's use of books to train its large language models, or LLMs, is protected under the fair use doctrine of U.S. copyright law. Lawyers representing the plaintiffs, including Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehisi Coates, alleged that Meta violated the nation's copyright law because the company did not seek permission from the authors to use their books for the company's AI model, among other claims. Notably, Chhabria said that it "is generally illegal to copy protected works without permission," but in this case, the plaintiffs failed to present a compelling argument that Meta's use of books to train Llama caused "market harm." Chhabria wrote that the plaintiffs had put forward two flawed arguments for their case. "On this record Meta has defeated the plaintiffs' half-hearted argument that its copying causes or threatens significant market harm," Chhabria said. "That conclusion may be in significant tension with reality." Meta's practice of "copying the work for a transformative purpose" is protected by the fair use doctrine, the judge wrote. "We appreciate today's decision from the Court," a Meta spokesperson said in a statement. "Open-source AI models are powering transformative innovations, productivity and creativity for individuals and companies, and fair use of copyright material is a vital legal framework for building this transformative technology." Though there could be valid arguments that Meta's data training practice negatively impacts the book market, the plaintiffs did not adequately make their case, the judge wrote. Attorneys representing the plaintiffs did not respond to a request for comment. Still, Chhabria noted several flaws in Meta's defense, including the notion that the "public interest" would be "badly disserved" if the company and other businesses were prohibited "from using copyrighted text as training data without paying to do so." "Meta seems to imply that such a ruling would stop the development of LLMs and other generative AI technologies in its tracks," Chhabria wrote. "This is nonsense." The judge left the door open for other authors to bring similar AI-related copyright lawsuits against Meta, saying that "in the grand scheme of things, the consequences of this ruling are limited." "This is not a class action, so the ruling only affects the rights of these thirteen authors — not the countless others whose works Meta used to train its models," he wrote. "And, as should now be clear, this ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta's use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful." Additionally, Chhabria noted that there is still a pending, separate claim made by the plaintiffs alleging that Meta "may have illegally distributed their works (via torrenting)." Earlier this week, a federal judge ruled that Anthropic's use of books to train its AI model Claude was also "transformative," thus satisfying the fair use doctrine. Still, that judge said that Anthropic must face a trial over allegations that it downloaded millions of pirated books to train its AI systems."
Digital Trends
35 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
WhatsApp's new AI feature lets you skip the scroll
If you've ever opened a group chat on WhatsApp and felt a knot in your stomach at the sight of endless unread messages, help is at hand. Meta-owned WhatsApp has just announced Private Message Summaries, which does what it says on the tin by offering an overview of your unread messages, saving you from endless scrolling as you try to get your head around the content of a conversation. Recommended Videos In the company's own words, WhatsApp's new Private Message Summaries feature uses Meta AI 'to privately and quickly summarize unread messages in a chat, so you can get an idea of what is happening, before reading the details in your unread messages.' Message Summaries uses Meta's Private Processing technology. This allows Meta's AI smarts to create a response without Meta or WhatsApp ever seeing your messages or the private summaries. Additionally, others in the chat won't know that you chose to summarize your unread messages. How to use Private Message Summaries Private Message Summaries won't automatically appear. Instead, you'll see a 'summarize privately' message appear intermittently on the same button that displays how many unread messages you have. Simply tap on the button to bring up a summary of your undead messages. Message Summaries is rolling out in English to U.S.-based users, with WhatsApp aiming to bring it to other languages and countries later this year. Of course, the proof of the pudding is in the you-know-what, so try it out for yourself to gauge the accuracy of WhatsApp's new Private Message Summaries feature. We certainly hope it'll be free of the mishaps that plagued Apple's much-mocked AI-powered notification summaries, which made headlines for all the wrong reasons toward the end of last year. In other WhatsApp news, Meta recently announced that ads are coming to the messaging app for the first time in its 16-year history … though you may never see them.
The Verge
41 minutes ago
- The Verge
Meta's AI copyright win comes with a warning about fair use
Meta won a major legal ruling in an AI copyright lawsuit brought by 13 authors alleging that the company illegally trained its AI systems on their work without permission. On Wednesday, Judge Vince Chhabria ruled in Meta's favor, saying it is 'entitled to summary judgment on its fair use defense to the claim that copying these plaintiffs' books for use as LLM training data was infringement.' However, the judge also pointed out some weak points in the ecosystem of Big Tech's AI efforts and Meta's arguments defending its actions as fair use. 'This ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta's use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful,' Judge Chhabria said. 'It stands only for the proposition that these plaintiffs made the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record in support of the right one.' The ruling follows Anthropic's major fair use victory it won from a separate federal judge yesterday, who ruled that training its models on legally purchased copies of books is fair use. Judge Chhabria says that two of the authors' arguments about fair use were 'clear losers:' the ability for Meta's Llama AI to reproduce snippets of text from their books and that Meta using their works to train its AI models without permission diluted their ability to license their works for training. 'Llama is not capable of generating enough text from the plaintiffs' books to matter, and the plaintiffs are not entitled to the market for licensing their works as AI training data,' the judge wrote. The plaintiffs didn't do enough for a 'potentially winning argument' that Meta's copying would create 'a product that will likely flood the market with similar works, causing market dilution,' according to Judge Chhabria. He also discussed the Anthropic ruling, saying that Judge William Alsup brushed aside concerns about the harm generative AI could 'inflict on the market for the works it gets trained on.'
