Is SoundHound AI Stock Proving to Be the Real Deal?
SoundHound posted record quarterly revenue recently, with its top line surging by 217%.
The company has benefitted from having a diverse customer base, giving it many ways to grow its business.
It still, however, is nowhere near turning a profit, and its rate of cash burn has accelerated.
10 stocks we like better than SoundHound AI ›
For investors who don't want to simply load up on Nvidia and other already established artificial intelligence (AI) companies, it can be challenging to find the next big AI stock to buy. There are a lot of companies that claim they have AI-powered products and services -- and sprinkle the term AI into all of their press releases and reports -- but simply being involved with AI doesn't mean that a stock is destined to rise in value.
One company that has been a popular option for investors in the past couple of years has been SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN). It's involved in voice AI software, making it easy for people to converse with AI, including placing orders at a drive-through.
There have been question marks around SoundHound's business and whether it is indeed destined to be a top AI stock to own for the future, or if it's just one of many in an increasingly crowded space. With the company recently coming off a strong quarter that showed a lot of growth, has it proven that it is, in fact, the real deal, and that it's an AI stock worth investing in?
SoundHound posts 217% revenue growth
On Aug. 7, SoundHound released its second-quarter results. The company reported an all-time high for revenue, which totaled $42.7 million -- that's more than triple the $13.5 million that the business reported in the same period last year. The tech company has been expanding its business in many industries as its vast customer base has helped it expand across multiple sectors.
The company also has released Amelia 7, which is its agentic AI platform that it says can be used for complex queries and perform them "as part of natural, humanlike interactions." SoundHound says that it now has 15 large enterprise customers that are migrating to this new platform.
The company is still no closer to profitability
While SoundHound reported strong growth in its most recent quarter, its financial performance was far from flawless. Its net loss doubled, from $37 million a year ago to just under $75 million. What also didn't look great was a significant decline in gross margin -- from 63% to 39%. The company says that this was mainly the result of its acquisition of AI company Amelia back in 2024. And it's that acquisition that has been a key reason why SoundHound's customer base has become more diverse, and why its revenue is up so much; the prior-year results didn't include contributions from Amelia.
Another issue to consider is that SoundHound has been burning through more cash. Over the past six months, it used up $44 million during its day-to-day operating activities, compared with $40 million during the same period last year.
Unfortunately, while SoundHound has experienced significant growth, it comes with an asterisk. Not only were the results boosted by an acquisition, but they didn't move the needle in terms of improving cash flow and overall profitability. Without that, this remains a highly risky business to invest in.
SoundHound AI still has a lot to prove
Mergers and acquisitions can be a great way for companies to manufacture growth. By simply adding another company into the mix, you're adding sales without needing to grow organically. SoundHound highlighted its overall growth rate last quarter, but not its organic growth, which may tell a much different story.
While the headline of 217% growth sounds impressive, I'm not convinced that SoundHound is really on the right path. If its margins are deteriorating and losses are getting bigger, it may simply be incentivizing customers with lower prices and promotions in order to grow sales.
Shares of SoundHound jumped on the quarterly results, but the stock is still down around 18% this year. And as the excitement from the revenue growth cools and investors take a closer look at the numbers and see the risks that still linger with the stock, I wouldn't be surprised to see it give back some of its recent gains.
This is still a risky stock to own, and until SoundHound shows that it has a path to profitability, you may be better off steering clear of it.
Should you invest $1,000 in SoundHound AI right now?
Before you buy stock in SoundHound AI, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and SoundHound AI wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025
David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Is SoundHound AI Stock Proving to Be the Real Deal? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada labor minister presses Air Canada, union to intensify talks to resolve dispute
(Reuters) -Canadian Labor Minister Patty Hajdu said on Friday that she met jointly with Air Canada and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), urging both sides to work harder and remain at the negotiating table to reach a deal and avert a potential strike. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Putin made a 'business pitch' to Trump in his statement: Edward Lawrence
FOX Business White House correspondent Edward Lawrence analyzes Russian President Vladimir Putin's 'business pitch' to President Donald Trump in Alaska.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income
Key Points Statistical evidence supports the idea that these two ETFs can simultaneously grow capital and generate income. Maximum monthly drawdowns are less than the benchmark's performance, and so is the risk as defined by standard deviation. These ETFs do relatively best when benchmark indexes are highly volatile but still make money in bull markets. 10 stocks we like better than JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF › The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEMKT: JEPI) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NASDAQ: JEPQ) have garnered significant investor attention, in part due to their trailing-12-month dividend yields of 8.2% and 11.2%, respectively. Moreover, they offer monthly income, making them a favorite among passive income investors. As such, it would be interesting to share some modeling of their performance to see if they do offer investors a way to a relatively low-volatility strategy that practically guarantees a monthly income. (Keep in mind dividends can always be cut.) Introducing two JPMorgan ETFs The first thing to understand about these two exchange-traded funds is that they are not tailored to invest in dividend stocks. Instead, they both follow the same strategy of investing up to 80% of net assets in equities (stocks), with the only difference being that the Equity Premium ETF focuses on S&P 500 stocks while the Nasdaq Equity Premium ETF focuses on stocks in the Nasdaq-100. As noted above, the stocks are not explicitly selected for their dividend yield, an essential point because high-yield equity-focused ETFs often involve concentrating holdings in sectors with high yields. The remaining net assets, up to 20%, are invested in equity-linked notes (ELNs) that follow a strategy of selling call options on the indexes that the two ETFs benchmark -- S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100, respectively. A call option is the right to buy shares of the index at a specified price (the strike price) and is bought by bullish investors. The seller of the call options (in this case the ETF) receives a premium from the buyer. However, if the index increases significantly, the option is exercised, and the ELN typically incurs a loss. Conversely, when the index experiences a small gain, stays flat, or loses value, the option isn't exercised. The idea is that an anticipated net profit in premiums collected from the ELNs, combined with some dividend income from stock holdings, will generate sufficient income for distributions to be paid to shareholders under any condition, particularly in the event of a substantial increase in the index. And note that the upside is limited (gains less than the market), but the downside is also restricted. This table lays out how the portions of the ETFs will perform based on how the underlying index performs in a month. Monthly Index Performance Strong Gain Moderate Gain Moderate Loss Strong Loss Equities (At least 80% of the ETF assets) Strong Gain Gain Loss Strong Loss ELNs (Up to 20% of the ETF's assets) Loss Profit Profit Profit Overall Gain, but less than the market Gain, but less than the market Slight profit/slight loss Loss, but less than the market Author's analysis. What the ETFs need to do to demonstrate they work Before I throw charts at you, it's worth noting that the proof of the strategy working includes: The ETF should have a lower volatility than the index (measured here by the standard deviation of monthly returns). The ETFs should have relatively low maximum monthly drawdowns because passive investors usually do not want to lose a significant amount in any one month. The strategy should demonstrate a high coefficient of determination, or R^2, indicating that the independent variable (in this case, the benchmark index) is primarily responsible for determining the outcome. Performance consistent with the outcomes outlined in the table above. That said, here are the charts comparing the monthly index performance to the ETF's performance. Both sets of data include reinvestment of dividends. First, here's the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF. And now the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF. A few conclusions can be drawn from the data, along with some additional calculations. The monthly standard deviation of the S&P 500 over the period is 4.7%, compared to 3.1% for JEPI, indicating lower volatility returns. The monthly standard deviation of the Nasdaq-100 over the period is 5.7%, compared to 4.2% for JEPQ, indicating lower volatility returns. Both ETFs exhibit high R^2 values, indicating a consistency of outcome from the strategy. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPI are -6.4%, -4.2%, and -4.1%. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPQ are -8.7%, -6.8%, and -6.6%. In general, the strategy is effective, generating a collection of positive returns when the indices report moderate gains and losses. The downside is limited compared to the index when the market declines significantly, and the upside is limited when the indexes perform well. What it means to passive investors Both indices have performed very well over the periods, with an average monthly gain of 1.5% on the S&P 500 and 1.8% on the Nasdaq; therefore, the ETFs have understandably underperformed. However, there's no guarantee that these conditions will continue, and these ETFs have demonstrated lower volatility returns while maintaining substantial dividends for those seeking monthly income. As such, they are excellent options for those seeking to generate passive income across a range of market conditions. Should you invest $1,000 in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF right now? Before you buy stock in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
