logo
India-Pak water wars: A Jawaharlal Nehru and Mohd Ali Jinnah story

India-Pak water wars: A Jawaharlal Nehru and Mohd Ali Jinnah story

Indian Express06-05-2025

Weeks before Cyril Radcliffe drew the eponymous Line in August 1947 partitioning India and Pakistan, he had an earful from Muhammad Ali Jinnah. The founder of Pakistan told the chairman of the Boundary Commission that he would rather have 'deserts than fertile fields watered by courtesy of Hindus'. A dressing-down from Jawaharlal Nehru would follow as part of the 'joint Hindu-Muslim rebuke'.
Radcliffe was not at fault. Fighting the oppressive heat fuelled by a delayed monsoon in the soon-to-be divided Punjab, his biggest challenge in carving up the land was to assign control of its irrigation system, which was 'built, with a good deal of British inspiration, largely by Sikh money, design and sweat' to channel river waters through a system of elaborate canals to the arid west, 'turning the province into the granary of India.'
While the five rivers that supplied the water were all in the east and would invariably come under India, the land they irrigated was mostly in the west, which would become Pakistan. Realising that Partition 'vitally threatened' the great watering network, Radcliffe took a proposal, through the Viceroy, to Jinnah and Nehru: Would the two leaders agree to run this river-canal system as an Indo-Pakistan joint venture?
'Both leaders were obviously furious with him (Radcliffe),' recounted British author Leonard Mosley in his 1962 book 'The Last Days of the British Raj'. 'He was rewarded for his suggestion by a joint Hindu-Muslim rebuke. Jinnah told him to get on with his job and inferred that he would rather have Pakistan deserts than fertile fields watered by courtesy of Hindus. Nehru curtly informed him that what India did with India's rivers was India's affair.'
That was, according to Mosley, Radcliffe's 'one and only attempt to try to make a constructive suggestion' as the chairman of the Boundary Commission. The issue of shared waters between the two neighbours has remained contentious ever since.
While India put 'in abeyance' last month the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, citing a lack of 'good faith' after a terror attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam, even the buildup to the landmark water pact was fraught with mistrust.
With joint control of canals out of the question, a temporary solution was found in a 'Standstill Agreement' reached in December 1947 to buy time until March 1948 to negotiate a lasting solution. But neither side took any initiative to extend the timeline, and India discontinued the supply of water from the Indian Punjab's Ferozepur headworks on the Sutlej to the Dipalpur Canal in Pakistan's Punjab province on April 1, 1948. This also marked the formal Indo-Pakistan dispute over sharing the waters of the Indus system.
A month later, on April 30, Nehru ordered the East Punjab government to resume water supply. In an agreement signed on May 4, India assured that water would not be withheld without prior notice and time to develop alternate sources, and Pakistan recognised India's legitimate need for developing resources in Indian Punjab, which was historically deficient in water infrastructure.
Two years on, however, Pakistan said it accepted the May 1948 Agreement under 'compulsion' and 'signed under duress.' In response, Nehru wrote: 'A more extraordinary statement I do not remember to have come across at any time… It took two years for your government to discover that the Agreement was signed under duress.'
An initiative by the World Bank broke the impasse in 1951, and it took nine long years to thrash out a deal before the Indus Waters Treaty was signed in 1960. But Pakistan remained wary of India upstream.
Half a century later, Pakistan moved the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague, Netherlands, in 2011 against the Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project, citing 'stark deficit in trust between the parties' and the 'historical experience of 1948 when the East Punjab government cut off all the canals supplying West Punjab.'
Pakistan argued that the Indus River system is 'fundamental to (its) existence and the health and livelihood of its people'. Terming India's dam construction programme 'an existential issue,' Pakistan underlined the importance of 'limitations on India's capacity to manipulate the timing of flows,' by 'limiting the amount of live storage' of every hydropower dam that India could construct.
Before the PCA, India denied the relevance of events that occurred in the immediate aftermath of Partition, before the Indus Waters Treaty, 'during a period of some confusion between two new States … that were sorting out their respective rights.' Holding that 'the assertion that the Baglihar Dam was filled in such a way as to harm Pakistan is factually incorrect', India argued that the evidence introduced by Pakistan should be disregarded as 'inaccurate, emotion-laden and inflammatory'.
An Indian counsel underlined that India believes in the 'sanctity of all our international legal commitments,' including the Indus Waters Treaty. 'India wants peace and friendship with its neighbours, and we have striven very hard to build friendship, build confidence and trust,' he told the PCA.
That trust was tested by 'sustained cross-border terrorism by Pakistan targeting the Indian Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir' that goes against the fundamental 'obligation to honour a treaty in good faith'. On April 24, India decided to hold 'in abeyance' the Indus Waters Treaty, citing 'fundamental changes in the circumstances'.
Jay Mazoomdaar is an investigative reporter focused on offshore finance, equitable growth, natural resources management and biodiversity conservation. Over two decades, his work has been recognised by the International Press Institute, the Ramnath Goenka Foundation, the Commonwealth Press Union, the Prem Bhatia Memorial Trust, the Asian College of Journalism etc.
Mazoomdaar's major investigations include the extirpation of tigers in Sariska, global offshore probes such as Panama Papers, Robert Vadra's land deals in Rajasthan, India's dubious forest cover data, Vyapam deaths in Madhya Pradesh, mega projects flouting clearance conditions, Nitin Gadkari's link to e-rickshaws, India shifting stand on ivory ban to fly in African cheetahs, the loss of indigenous cow breeds, the hydel rush in Arunachal Pradesh, land mafias inside Corbett, the JDY financial inclusion scheme, an iron ore heist in Odisha, highways expansion through the Kanha-Pench landscape etc. ... Read More

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Beef being ‘weaponised' against Hindus; Assamese people must take ‘non-compromising stance': CM
Beef being ‘weaponised' against Hindus; Assamese people must take ‘non-compromising stance': CM

The Print

time26 minutes ago

  • The Print

Beef being ‘weaponised' against Hindus; Assamese people must take ‘non-compromising stance': CM

Addressing a press conference at the BJP state office here, Sarma said, 'Earlier, if a couple of Muslim families lived in a Hindu neighbourhood, they would be careful not to create any problems for the Hindus. If they wanted to have beef, they would go to their people living in Muslim-majority areas.' 'But now, it has become such that they will throw away the leftovers and waste around so that the Hindus in the neighbourhood have to eventually leave that place,' he added. Stressing that Assamese people have to take a 'non-compromising' stance to push back illegal foreigners, he maintained that Assam was waging a struggle against forces which had 'sympathisers' across the globe. Guwahati, Jun 10 (PTI) Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Tuesday alleged that beef is being 'weaponised' against Hindus in the state, citing instances of pieces of the meat being purportedly thrown in public places after the Eid celebration last week. He cited the instances of beef being purportedly left in various places after Eid last week, including in front of Cotton University here. 'Someone can have it at Eid, but it cannot be weaponised against other people,' Sarma asserted. He rued that no protests were held against the act and maintained that the number of voices opposing such incidents are coming down. 'Good Muslims oppose such acts. They do not post photos on Facebook holding beef,' he said, adding that he received just three phone calls from Muslim persons after these incidents to say that they do not approve of it. The chief minister expressed apprehension that if things move as it is now, 'in 20 years, beef will be thrown in front of Kamakhya temple'. While police have a role in curtailing such incidents, support of the people behind the force is necessary for it to take decisive steps, Sarma added. He asserted that the Assamese people have to take a 'non-compromising stance to protect ourselves' and the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government was willing to lend all its help. 'Modi ji is saying push back (illegal foreigners), but Assamese people are questioning why push back is happening. Most criticism of the push back is coming from Assamese people… Modi ji alone cannot protect us,' he said. He claimed that all foreigners were sent away from Gujarat by Modi and not a single one went to the court, whereas in Assam, cases are filed daily against action on illegal migrants by Assamese petitioners and lawyers. Sarma said that Congress and its legislative party head Debabrata Saikia had opposed the push back of foreigners in the assembly on Monday, but no organisation has protested their stand or media criticised the party for it. He also cited Saikia quoting in the assembly that then PM Jawaharlal Nehru had opposed the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950, which empowers district commissioners to identify foreigners and remove them. 'This goes on to show that Nehru's pro-foreigner stance was from 1950 itself,' he said. 'Our struggle is against forces which have sympathisers everywhere in the world,' Sarma maintained. He said 2,895 Facebook accounts, originating from places like Islamabad, Dhaka and Riyadh are active which write or comment only on Palestine and Assam. 'We are a state surrounded by enemies… we have to do our research and hand over these details to Modi ji, so that he can take it further and enlist the help of agencies like Interpol,' Sarma said. He said that the 'interest' of Pakistan and Bangladesh in Assam was since the time of Independence as it was proposed to be included in erstwhile East Pakistan. 'It is nothing new. When there was friendly government in Bangladesh, anti-India sentiments had decreased, and when Younis came, these sentiments increased. In Pakistan, the anti-India sentiments were always there,' he maintained. 'If we take the initiative (to work against these forces), central government will help us,' he added. Mentioning of the National Register of Citizens (NRC), Sarma said that the state government, AASU and others are 'not satisfied' with it. He said the state government has approached the Supreme Court for re-verification of 20-10 per cent of the names in various categories, and though the apex court has not agreed to it yet, 'we believe the court will accept it'. He also cited an SC judgement which states that NRC and deportation of foreigners are not linked. Sarma said that the state government will use the 1950 Act for 'removing' foreigners from the state, with 35 identified illegal immigrants ready to be pushed back as soon as the flood situation improves. Admitting that sending them back will not completely solve the problem, he said that it will ensure that new immigrants will not try to enter. 'Arunachal Pradesh regularly sends back these people and hence, there have fear to go there. We also have to instill that fear,' he added. Sarma claimed that there was a section of lawyers trained by the Congress who helped ineligible people to get their names included in the NRC, though he did not take any names. He emphasised the need for lawyers to represent the 'people of the state' in the Supreme Court in cases on foreigners issue, maintaining that only the government advocates were not enough. 'Courts are for the people… if there are lawyers representing the interest of the people, the judiciary will have a better understanding of the people's problems,' he added. PTI SSG SSG ACD This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

‘Terror chose Dharma, India chose Karma': Rajnath Singh on Pahalgam terror attack, Op Sindoor
‘Terror chose Dharma, India chose Karma': Rajnath Singh on Pahalgam terror attack, Op Sindoor

Hindustan Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘Terror chose Dharma, India chose Karma': Rajnath Singh on Pahalgam terror attack, Op Sindoor

In a powerful message, defence minister Rajnath Singh on Tuesday said that while the terrorists in Pahalgam targeted civilians on April 22 based on their religion, India hit back at the terrorists on the basis of their 'karm' (deeds). "Terrorists killed people in Pahalgam asking their religion; we didn't ask their 'dharm' but hit back seeing their karma," Rajnath Singh said at an event in Dehradun. Talking about India's defence strategy, Singh said under PM Modi's "bold and visionary" leadership, India's defence sector has transformed remarkably from a largely import-driven model to becoming a "trusted global exporter". "The world saw this change during the recent Operation Sindoor," Singh said. On April 22, terrorists found to have links with Pakistan opened fire at tourists in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which resulted in the death of 26 people, mostly tourists. According to the victims, terrorists asked tourists about their religion and targeted only Hindu men. They reportedly asked women to go and narrate the ordeal to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In response, on May 7, India launched precision strikes under Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. In retaliation, Pakistan attempted attacks on Indian military bases on May 8, 9, and 10. India responded firmly to these actions. The hostilities on the ground ceased following talks between the directors general of military operations from both sides on May 10, resulting in an agreement to halt military actions. Earlier, Rajnath Singh said Pakistan should hand over UN-designated terrorists Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar to India if it is serious about talks between the two countries. In an interaction with naval warriors onboard aircraft carrier INS Vikrant off Goa, Singh said if Pakistan resorts to anything "evil or unethical" against India, it will face the firepower and ire of the Indian Navy this time. Singh said "Operation Sindoor is not over yet and this is just a pause, a warning. If Pakistan makes the same mistake again, India's response will be even harsher, and this time, it will not get a chance to recover."

News18 Evening Digest: Meghalaya Honeymoon Murder, Jaishankar On Ceasefire & Other Top Stories
News18 Evening Digest: Meghalaya Honeymoon Murder, Jaishankar On Ceasefire & Other Top Stories

News18

time34 minutes ago

  • News18

News18 Evening Digest: Meghalaya Honeymoon Murder, Jaishankar On Ceasefire & Other Top Stories

Last Updated: We are also covering: Rajnath Singh Objects To Pakistan's Role At UNSC Anti-Terror Panel, Mamata's Message On Op Sindoor In Bengal Assembly, and more stories In today's News18 afternoon digest, we bring you the latest update on Raja Raghuvanshi's murder in Meghalaya, Jaishankar's real reason for the India-Pakistan ceasefire, and other top stories. The disappearance of a couple on honeymoon, husband's body in a ditch and wife's surrender – the mystery over the 'disappearance" of Indore's Sonam and Raja Raghuvanshi ended on June 9. But then emerged the new angle – the suspected lover, Raj Kushwaha, who materialised his wife's alleged plan to eliminate the husband. READ MORE Meghalaya Honeymoon Murder: The pregnancy test of Sonam Raghuvanshi, the main accused in the Raja Raghuvanshi murder case, was 'inconclusive", and doctors have recommended an ultrasound after a week. The test was part of a detailed medical examination conducted on Monday by a team of three female doctors who assessed her physical and mental condition. READ MORE West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Tuesday questioned why none of the terrorists responsible for the Pahalgam terror attack had been captured. She suggested that the military standoff with Pakistan had been an 'opportunity to take control of PoK (Pakistan-occupied Kashmir)". READ MORE External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has provided a candid revelation about the real reason behind the India-Pakistan ceasefire on May 10, saying, 'Fighting stopped on the 10th for one reason and one reason only, which was that on the 10th morning we hit these eight Pakistani, the main eight Pakistani airfields and disabled them". READ MORE Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Tuesday said that the United Nations Security Council's (UNSC) decision to appoint Pakistan as the vice-chair of its anti-terror panel was like 'asking the cat to protect the milk." READ MORE Kunal Kapoor Shooting For Ramayana? His New PICS Spark Buzz: 'He Does Look Like Indra Dev' There's massive excitement for Nitesh Tiwari's 'Ramayana', which will be released in two parts in 2026 and 2027, respectively. The film stars Ranbir Kapoor, Sai Pallavi, Yash, Sunny Deol and others. Kunal Kapoor plays Lord Indra in the highly-anticipated film, and his recent pictures have left fans speculating whether he is currently shooting for the film. Fans couldn't stop gushing over his sharp jawline, with many sharing the opinion that he's absolutely perfect to play Indra Dev. READ MORE First Published: June 10, 2025, 18:03 IST

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store