
India-Pak water wars: A Jawaharlal Nehru and Mohd Ali Jinnah story
Weeks before Cyril Radcliffe drew the eponymous Line in August 1947 partitioning India and Pakistan, he had an earful from Muhammad Ali Jinnah. The founder of Pakistan told the chairman of the Boundary Commission that he would rather have 'deserts than fertile fields watered by courtesy of Hindus'. A dressing-down from Jawaharlal Nehru would follow as part of the 'joint Hindu-Muslim rebuke'.
Radcliffe was not at fault. Fighting the oppressive heat fuelled by a delayed monsoon in the soon-to-be divided Punjab, his biggest challenge in carving up the land was to assign control of its irrigation system, which was 'built, with a good deal of British inspiration, largely by Sikh money, design and sweat' to channel river waters through a system of elaborate canals to the arid west, 'turning the province into the granary of India.'
While the five rivers that supplied the water were all in the east and would invariably come under India, the land they irrigated was mostly in the west, which would become Pakistan. Realising that Partition 'vitally threatened' the great watering network, Radcliffe took a proposal, through the Viceroy, to Jinnah and Nehru: Would the two leaders agree to run this river-canal system as an Indo-Pakistan joint venture?
'Both leaders were obviously furious with him (Radcliffe),' recounted British author Leonard Mosley in his 1962 book 'The Last Days of the British Raj'. 'He was rewarded for his suggestion by a joint Hindu-Muslim rebuke. Jinnah told him to get on with his job and inferred that he would rather have Pakistan deserts than fertile fields watered by courtesy of Hindus. Nehru curtly informed him that what India did with India's rivers was India's affair.'
That was, according to Mosley, Radcliffe's 'one and only attempt to try to make a constructive suggestion' as the chairman of the Boundary Commission. The issue of shared waters between the two neighbours has remained contentious ever since.
While India put 'in abeyance' last month the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, citing a lack of 'good faith' after a terror attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam, even the buildup to the landmark water pact was fraught with mistrust.
With joint control of canals out of the question, a temporary solution was found in a 'Standstill Agreement' reached in December 1947 to buy time until March 1948 to negotiate a lasting solution. But neither side took any initiative to extend the timeline, and India discontinued the supply of water from the Indian Punjab's Ferozepur headworks on the Sutlej to the Dipalpur Canal in Pakistan's Punjab province on April 1, 1948. This also marked the formal Indo-Pakistan dispute over sharing the waters of the Indus system.
A month later, on April 30, Nehru ordered the East Punjab government to resume water supply. In an agreement signed on May 4, India assured that water would not be withheld without prior notice and time to develop alternate sources, and Pakistan recognised India's legitimate need for developing resources in Indian Punjab, which was historically deficient in water infrastructure.
Two years on, however, Pakistan said it accepted the May 1948 Agreement under 'compulsion' and 'signed under duress.' In response, Nehru wrote: 'A more extraordinary statement I do not remember to have come across at any time… It took two years for your government to discover that the Agreement was signed under duress.'
An initiative by the World Bank broke the impasse in 1951, and it took nine long years to thrash out a deal before the Indus Waters Treaty was signed in 1960. But Pakistan remained wary of India upstream.
Half a century later, Pakistan moved the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague, Netherlands, in 2011 against the Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project, citing 'stark deficit in trust between the parties' and the 'historical experience of 1948 when the East Punjab government cut off all the canals supplying West Punjab.'
Pakistan argued that the Indus River system is 'fundamental to (its) existence and the health and livelihood of its people'. Terming India's dam construction programme 'an existential issue,' Pakistan underlined the importance of 'limitations on India's capacity to manipulate the timing of flows,' by 'limiting the amount of live storage' of every hydropower dam that India could construct.
Before the PCA, India denied the relevance of events that occurred in the immediate aftermath of Partition, before the Indus Waters Treaty, 'during a period of some confusion between two new States … that were sorting out their respective rights.' Holding that 'the assertion that the Baglihar Dam was filled in such a way as to harm Pakistan is factually incorrect', India argued that the evidence introduced by Pakistan should be disregarded as 'inaccurate, emotion-laden and inflammatory'.
An Indian counsel underlined that India believes in the 'sanctity of all our international legal commitments,' including the Indus Waters Treaty. 'India wants peace and friendship with its neighbours, and we have striven very hard to build friendship, build confidence and trust,' he told the PCA.
That trust was tested by 'sustained cross-border terrorism by Pakistan targeting the Indian Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir' that goes against the fundamental 'obligation to honour a treaty in good faith'. On April 24, India decided to hold 'in abeyance' the Indus Waters Treaty, citing 'fundamental changes in the circumstances'.
Jay Mazoomdaar is an investigative reporter focused on offshore finance, equitable growth, natural resources management and biodiversity conservation. Over two decades, his work has been recognised by the International Press Institute, the Ramnath Goenka Foundation, the Commonwealth Press Union, the Prem Bhatia Memorial Trust, the Asian College of Journalism etc.
Mazoomdaar's major investigations include the extirpation of tigers in Sariska, global offshore probes such as Panama Papers, Robert Vadra's land deals in Rajasthan, India's dubious forest cover data, Vyapam deaths in Madhya Pradesh, mega projects flouting clearance conditions, Nitin Gadkari's link to e-rickshaws, India shifting stand on ivory ban to fly in African cheetahs, the loss of indigenous cow breeds, the hydel rush in Arunachal Pradesh, land mafias inside Corbett, the JDY financial inclusion scheme, an iron ore heist in Odisha, highways expansion through the Kanha-Pench landscape etc. ... Read More

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Piyush Goyal to meet Swiss, Swedish business leaders; to discuss trade, investments
Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal will meet Swiss and Swedish business leaders this week and discuss ways to boost trade and investments, an official statement said on Sunday. Goyal is visiting Switzerland and Sweden from June 9 to 13. The visit is commencing from Bern in Switzerland, where the minister will engage with global CEOs and industry figures to explore avenues for enhanced bilateral trade and investment, the commerce and industry ministry said. He will hold discussions with companies from sectors, including pharma and life sciences, precision engineering, amid high-tech manufacturing. Goyal will also discuss potential opportunities arising from the India-EFTA Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement. In Sweden, he will co-chair the Indo-Swedish Joint Commission for Economic, Industrial and Scientific Cooperation (JCEISC) with Benjamin Dousa, Minister for Foreign Trade of Sweden. Companies like Ericsson, Volvo Group, IKEA, Sandvik, Alfa Laval , and SAAB are among those with a significant presence or interest in enhancing ties with India, it said.


The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Assam govt to intensify drive to identify illegal foreigners: Himanta
Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Monday (June 9, 2025) said the State Government would enforce a 1950 law to identify and evict illegal foreigners. He claimed that the law empowers the district commissioners to declare individuals as illegal immigrants and initiate eviction proceedings. Speaking during a special day-long Assembly session, he alleged that Congress does not value 'citizenship', as out of four family members of one of its leaders, three are foreigners. It was an apparent jibe at the opposition party's State President Gaurav Gogoi, who was seated at the visitors' gallery of the Assembly in front of the treasury bench, whom the chief minister had been targeting for his alleged Pakistan links through his British wife. Mr. Sarma, replying to issues of detection and deportation of foreigners, said the state government will implement the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950, for the purpose. It allows the district commissioner to declare illegal foreigners and evict them. Mr. Sarma said a constitutional bench of the Supreme Court had recently ruled that the Act is in force and the government can proceed under its provisions. He said more than 300 illegal Bangladeshis have been deported in recent months. Responding to AIUDF MLA Rafikul Islam's caution that foreigner detection should be handled carefully because 'citizenship is a most valued asset for any individual,' Mr. Sarma doubled down on his criticism of the Congress. 'Rafikul Islam has said citizenship is the most valuable asset, but it may not be so for Congress as they have people in whose family out of four members, three are foreigners,' he said. Mr. Sarma had been claiming that not only has Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi's wife retained her British citizenship, but their two minor children are also not Indian nationals.


New Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Espionage case: Punjab YouTuber Jasbir Singh sent to 14-days judicial custody
CHANDIGARH: A Mohali court on Monday sent Punjab YouTuber Jasbir Singh, arrested on espionage charges to fourteen days' judicial custody. Singh alias Jaan Mahal, a resident of Mahlan village in Rupnagar district, was arrested on June 4 and was sent to Ropar Jail from Mohali. He was running a YouTube channel "JaanMahal Video" with over 11 lakh subscribers, ostensibly posting travel and cooking vlogs. Singh was produced before the court after the completion of the two-day police remand. Speaking to the presspersons, the counsel appearing for Mr Singh said that they will file his bail application. Meanwhile, his female friend, hailing from Jalandhar, was questioned for hours at the State Special Operation Cell (SSOC) of the Punjab Police. According to the police, She has told them that Singh took her to Delhi several times and once accompanied her to an invitation-only Pakistan Day event hosted by the Pakistan High Commission, despite her not having an official invite. Singh allegedly used his close ties with Pakistan operative Ehsan-ur-Rahim alias Danish to secure her entry, according to police sources. The woman also claimed that Singh had been providing her with financial assistance for some time. Her phone and social media accounts are currently being examined as part of the broader investigation into a suspected Pakistan-backed espionage network. According to investigators, Danish had been attempting to lure more young women into the network. Singh is also suspected to have been in contact with another Pakistani Intelligence Operative (PIO), Shakir alias Jutt Randhawa.