logo
India-Pak water wars: A Jawaharlal Nehru and Mohd Ali Jinnah story

India-Pak water wars: A Jawaharlal Nehru and Mohd Ali Jinnah story

Indian Express06-05-2025

Weeks before Cyril Radcliffe drew the eponymous Line in August 1947 partitioning India and Pakistan, he had an earful from Muhammad Ali Jinnah. The founder of Pakistan told the chairman of the Boundary Commission that he would rather have 'deserts than fertile fields watered by courtesy of Hindus'. A dressing-down from Jawaharlal Nehru would follow as part of the 'joint Hindu-Muslim rebuke'.
Radcliffe was not at fault. Fighting the oppressive heat fuelled by a delayed monsoon in the soon-to-be divided Punjab, his biggest challenge in carving up the land was to assign control of its irrigation system, which was 'built, with a good deal of British inspiration, largely by Sikh money, design and sweat' to channel river waters through a system of elaborate canals to the arid west, 'turning the province into the granary of India.'
While the five rivers that supplied the water were all in the east and would invariably come under India, the land they irrigated was mostly in the west, which would become Pakistan. Realising that Partition 'vitally threatened' the great watering network, Radcliffe took a proposal, through the Viceroy, to Jinnah and Nehru: Would the two leaders agree to run this river-canal system as an Indo-Pakistan joint venture?
'Both leaders were obviously furious with him (Radcliffe),' recounted British author Leonard Mosley in his 1962 book 'The Last Days of the British Raj'. 'He was rewarded for his suggestion by a joint Hindu-Muslim rebuke. Jinnah told him to get on with his job and inferred that he would rather have Pakistan deserts than fertile fields watered by courtesy of Hindus. Nehru curtly informed him that what India did with India's rivers was India's affair.'
That was, according to Mosley, Radcliffe's 'one and only attempt to try to make a constructive suggestion' as the chairman of the Boundary Commission. The issue of shared waters between the two neighbours has remained contentious ever since.
While India put 'in abeyance' last month the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, citing a lack of 'good faith' after a terror attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam, even the buildup to the landmark water pact was fraught with mistrust.
With joint control of canals out of the question, a temporary solution was found in a 'Standstill Agreement' reached in December 1947 to buy time until March 1948 to negotiate a lasting solution. But neither side took any initiative to extend the timeline, and India discontinued the supply of water from the Indian Punjab's Ferozepur headworks on the Sutlej to the Dipalpur Canal in Pakistan's Punjab province on April 1, 1948. This also marked the formal Indo-Pakistan dispute over sharing the waters of the Indus system.
A month later, on April 30, Nehru ordered the East Punjab government to resume water supply. In an agreement signed on May 4, India assured that water would not be withheld without prior notice and time to develop alternate sources, and Pakistan recognised India's legitimate need for developing resources in Indian Punjab, which was historically deficient in water infrastructure.
Two years on, however, Pakistan said it accepted the May 1948 Agreement under 'compulsion' and 'signed under duress.' In response, Nehru wrote: 'A more extraordinary statement I do not remember to have come across at any time… It took two years for your government to discover that the Agreement was signed under duress.'
An initiative by the World Bank broke the impasse in 1951, and it took nine long years to thrash out a deal before the Indus Waters Treaty was signed in 1960. But Pakistan remained wary of India upstream.
Half a century later, Pakistan moved the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague, Netherlands, in 2011 against the Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project, citing 'stark deficit in trust between the parties' and the 'historical experience of 1948 when the East Punjab government cut off all the canals supplying West Punjab.'
Pakistan argued that the Indus River system is 'fundamental to (its) existence and the health and livelihood of its people'. Terming India's dam construction programme 'an existential issue,' Pakistan underlined the importance of 'limitations on India's capacity to manipulate the timing of flows,' by 'limiting the amount of live storage' of every hydropower dam that India could construct.
Before the PCA, India denied the relevance of events that occurred in the immediate aftermath of Partition, before the Indus Waters Treaty, 'during a period of some confusion between two new States … that were sorting out their respective rights.' Holding that 'the assertion that the Baglihar Dam was filled in such a way as to harm Pakistan is factually incorrect', India argued that the evidence introduced by Pakistan should be disregarded as 'inaccurate, emotion-laden and inflammatory'.
An Indian counsel underlined that India believes in the 'sanctity of all our international legal commitments,' including the Indus Waters Treaty. 'India wants peace and friendship with its neighbours, and we have striven very hard to build friendship, build confidence and trust,' he told the PCA.
That trust was tested by 'sustained cross-border terrorism by Pakistan targeting the Indian Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir' that goes against the fundamental 'obligation to honour a treaty in good faith'. On April 24, India decided to hold 'in abeyance' the Indus Waters Treaty, citing 'fundamental changes in the circumstances'.
Jay Mazoomdaar is an investigative reporter focused on offshore finance, equitable growth, natural resources management and biodiversity conservation. Over two decades, his work has been recognised by the International Press Institute, the Ramnath Goenka Foundation, the Commonwealth Press Union, the Prem Bhatia Memorial Trust, the Asian College of Journalism etc.
Mazoomdaar's major investigations include the extirpation of tigers in Sariska, global offshore probes such as Panama Papers, Robert Vadra's land deals in Rajasthan, India's dubious forest cover data, Vyapam deaths in Madhya Pradesh, mega projects flouting clearance conditions, Nitin Gadkari's link to e-rickshaws, India shifting stand on ivory ban to fly in African cheetahs, the loss of indigenous cow breeds, the hydel rush in Arunachal Pradesh, land mafias inside Corbett, the JDY financial inclusion scheme, an iron ore heist in Odisha, highways expansion through the Kanha-Pench landscape etc. ... Read More

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘State can't object if families agree': SC grants bail to man arrested after inter-faith marriage
‘State can't object if families agree': SC grants bail to man arrested after inter-faith marriage

Scroll.in

time25 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

‘State can't object if families agree': SC grants bail to man arrested after inter-faith marriage

The Supreme Court has granted bail to a Muslim man who was arrested by the Uttarakhand Police in December under the state's anti-conversion law after he married a Hindu woman. 'State cannot have any objection to the appellant and his wife residing together inasmuch as they have been married as per the wishes to their respective parents and families,' said a bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and SC Sharma in a judgement delivered on May 19. The bench was hearing a petition by a man named Aman Siddiqui, who was arrested under the 2018 Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act and sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly concealing his religious identity and marrying a Hindu woman under Hindu religious customs, the Hindustan Times reported. Siddiqui was in jail for nearly six months. Siddiqui was booked on December 12, two days after his wedding, on a complaint filed by his wife's cousin, who claimed the family discovered the groom's religious identity only after visiting his home in Delhi. In February, Siddiqui's bail application was rejected by the Uttarakhand High Court, which accepted the prosecution's claim that the man and his family had intentionally concealed their religious identity. It took note as evidence an affidavit submitted by Siddiqui the day after the marriage, wherein he pledged not to force his wife to convert and to respect her religious freedom. The High Court had also stated that the marriage was not conducted under the Special Marriage Act, which is typically followed in interfaith unions. Siddiqui then approached the Supreme Court.

J-K: LG Manoj Sinha pays obeisance to Baba Barfani, performs 'Pratham Puja' at holy Amarnath cave
J-K: LG Manoj Sinha pays obeisance to Baba Barfani, performs 'Pratham Puja' at holy Amarnath cave

India Gazette

time29 minutes ago

  • India Gazette

J-K: LG Manoj Sinha pays obeisance to Baba Barfani, performs 'Pratham Puja' at holy Amarnath cave

Jammu and Kashmir [India], June 11 (ANI): Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha on Wednesday paid obeisance to Baba Barfani and performed the 'Pratham Puja' at the holy cave, marking the ceremonial beginning of the annual Amarnath Yatra. 'Har Har Mahadev! Paid my obeisance to Baba Barfani and performed the 'Pratham Puja' at the Holy Cave, marking the ceremonial beginning of the annual Shri Amarnath Ji Yatra. May Baba Amarnathji keep showering his divine blessings on all of us,' posted LG Sinha on X. The Jammu and Kashmir LG urged devotees to turn out in large numbers and come to offer prayers at the holy shrine during the Amarnath Yatra. 'I would request all the devotees of Baba Barfani to visit in large numbers for the Holy Yatra and pray to Mahadev for the progress of J&K and the nation. SASB and Admin have improved the pilgrims' facilities. JKP, Army, CRPF, CAPFs have made foolproof security arrangements,' said LG Sinha after his visit. Earlier in the day, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) performed the first puja for the upcoming Amarnath Yatra at the Tawi riverfront. The puja was organised here on the occasion of Jyeshtha Purnima at the Tawi riverfront in Jammu, days ahead of the Amarnath Yatra. On Tuesday, a high-level security meeting chaired by Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Udhampur, Amod Ashok Nagpure, IPS, was held to review preparations and strategise for the smooth conduct of the Shri Amarnath Ji Yatra, 2025, officials said. The meeting was attended by Additional SP Udhampur, SDPOs, DySPs, and SHOs from Udhampur, Majalta, Rehambal, and Chenani, along with other officers involved in the Yatra arrangements. SSP Nagpure emphasised the importance of strong inter-agency coordination, robust security planning, and effective communication to tackle any challenges and ensure the safety of pilgrims. The discussions centred on key aspects such as security arrangements, intelligence sharing, traffic management, medical aid, emergency response, and logistical support. Special focus was laid on anti-narcotics operations. SSP Nagpure directed all officers to remain vigilant and conduct proactive drives to dismantle narco networks operating in the region. He also instructed officers to maintain a high level of alertness and operational readiness throughout the Yatra. Regular review meetings, briefing sessions, and mock drills were stressed to ensure the flawless implementation of all plans and protocols, officials said. The Amarnath Yatra is an annual Hindu pilgrimage to the sacred Amarnath Cave Shrine, dedicated to Lord Shiva, located at an altitude of about 3,888 meters in the Himalayas of Jammu and Kashmir (J-K). The cave houses a naturally formed ice Shivling, believed to represent Lord Shiva, and draws lakhs of devotees every year. The Yatra is typically held during the Shravan month (July to August) as per the Hindu calendar, under the supervision of the Shri Amarnathji Shrine Board (SASB) and with coordinated support from security and civil administration. (ANI)

India shocked at Pakistan's new UN counter-terrorism role
India shocked at Pakistan's new UN counter-terrorism role

India Gazette

time29 minutes ago

  • India Gazette

India shocked at Pakistan's new UN counter-terrorism role

Rajnath Singh has questioned the Security Council's decision to appoint Islamabad as vice-chair of its anti-terror panel Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh has expressed shock and disappointment over the United Nations Security Council's (UNSC) decision to appoint Pakistan as the vice-chair of its counter-terrorism committee. In a public address on Tuesday, Singh questioned the intentions and policies of international organizations in light of the move. Last week, the UNSC appointed Pakistan as vice-chair of the Counter-Terrorism Committee consisting of 15 nations. "Its land has been used as a refuge by global terrorist organizations. There, terrorists like Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar roam around openly, and senior officers of Pakistan Army attend the funerals of terrorists," Singh said. "Now, the same country is expected to lead the global community against terrorism. This raises serious questions on the intentions and policies of the international system." India and Pakistan have fought four wars since the countries gained independence from British rule in 1947. Their most recent military standoff began on May 7, when India launched strikes against suspected terror targets in Pakistan-controlled territory. New Delhi said the strikes were conducted in response to a terrorist attack in Pahalgam in India's union territory of Jammu and Kashmir in late April that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The Resistance Front, believed to be linked to the Pakistani-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, initially claimed responsibility for the attack, but later denied it. Islamabad also denied having any involvement in the Kashmir attack. Pakistan retaliated to India's May 7 strikes, and after intense fighting over the next few days, the two nuclear-armed nations announced a ceasefire on May 10. On Tuesday, India's defense minister also called on the international community to cease funding Pakistan, claiming that the money ultimately supported the infrastructure of terrorism. He advocated for the international community to exert strategic, diplomatic, and economic pressure on Pakistan to compel it to address terrorism. Singh suggested that if Pakistan was unable to take action against terrorism within its own territory, it should consider seeking assistance from India. He said the Indian armed forces possessed the capability to conduct counter-terror operations on both sides of the border.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store