
Audi A6 Avant review: An estate that lacks one essential ingredient
More correctly, it was supposed to be the A7 after Audi decided that its new EVs would have even-numbered names, while its internal combustion-engined models would take odd numbers. It's why the latest A4 is badged as the A5.
However, very shortly after announcing this strategy (and with the wraps already off the electric A6) Audi realised the potential folly of introducing another complex naming system and ditching a well-established format, it announced that the petrol and diesel A6 replacement would no longer be called A7, but would remain the A6.
Which is why this car is completely different from the electric A6 e-tron, despite sharing a name and competing for the same set of customers. But can the A6 rise above this confused gestation and complement its electric cousin?
Pros
Smooth and quiet on motorways
Roomy for passengers
Entry-level models undercut rivals
Cons
Small boot
Jiggly ride at low speeds
Inexplicably vocal engine
Engine choice
The engine range is simple: there's a choice of three. First up, the Volkswagen group's hard-working 2.0-litre petrol turbo, here producing 201bhp and matched to an automatic gearbox and front-wheel drive.
The diesel option is tested here: a 2.0-litre mild hybrid, also with 201bhp. Oddly, the diesel is only offered with four-wheel drive, the extra traction from which – together with a greater torque, produced at lower revs – allows it to sprint to 62mph a full 1.3 seconds more quickly than the petrol unit.
In addition, there's a plug-in hybrid (PHEV), based on the 2.0-litre petrol but with an electric motor and a 25.9kWh battery, enabling four-wheel drive and an electric-only range of 63 miles (officially – expect 40-50 in the real world).
Usually, you would choose a PHEV as a company car because the low official emissions figures result in a favourable benefit-in-kind tax rating. However, the A6 e-hybrid's figures are nothing much to write home about – and combined with a P11D value higher than, say, the equivalent BMW 5-Series, you'll pay far more in company car tax.
There's another problem with the PHEV; the battery under the boot floor reduces the luggage space below the load cover to a mere 404 litres. That's less than a Honda Civic hatchback.
Yet this issue is not peculiar to the plug-in version. The diesel model's mild hybrid additions reduce the load space to only 466 litres. Even the petrol-engined version, which lacks electrification of any kind, has only 503 litres – 60 litres less than the previous A6 and almost 70 litres less than the equivalent BMW 5-Series Touring.
All this in spite of the fact that the new car is 60mm longer than the old. You have to wonder what Audi has done with all the space.
Passenger space found
There's plenty of it in the passenger compartment, however, with acres of leg room for rear seat occupants, although the low roofline does means the edge of the door frame is quite close – buckling children into the back seats requires a bit of a stoop.
In the front, the dashboard is dominated by a huge slab of black glass, behind which sit two huge screens as standard (the top-of-the-range Edition 1 has a third screen ahead of the passenger, enabling them to stream videos on the move).
There's little in the way of physical buttons; the vast majority of the controls are accessed through the touchscreen. As usual, this interior design philosophy is flashy but flawed, requiring you to look away from the road for longer than should be necessary.
On the plus side, Audi was the originator of the virtual instrument binnacle concept; as you'd expect, its execution is still one of the best, with clear displays of speed and power, along with ancillary information that's easy to read at a glance.
So the boot is relatively small and the interior is a bit on the touchy side. At least you can count on an A6 Avant to be smooth, quiet and comfortable, right?
As soon as you start the diesel-powered A6 you notice that the vibration of its engine is not particularly well damped. You can feel it through the steering column, while as you pull away there's a noticeable clatter from under the bonnet that doesn't feel particularly premium.
Bump and grind
Then there are the bumps. The test car had the optional 21-inch wheels and air suspension. While the latter allows a softer ride, it's too slow-witted to mitigate the jarring thumps transmitted to the body as a result of the slender sidewalls of the 21in tyres.
The entry-level Sport has 18-inch wheels and, consequently, comfier tyre profiles, along with conventional steel springs. Without testing it, I suspect that's preferable, but as tested the A6 is jiggly and unforgiving over churned-up stretches of urban Tarmac. Larger wheels, therefore, are to be avoided.
Thankfully, even an A6 so-equipped smooths out on motorways; meanwhile, the engine settles down to a fairly innocuous background hum (unless it's pressed hard during an uphill overtake), so this is still a lovely way to cover long distances.
Off the motorway, meanwhile, it's business as usual for a big Audi: four-wheel drive provides superb traction and huge amounts of grip, while the nose responds crisply to steering inputs, yet feel and involvement are in short supply.
The Telegraph verdict
Perhaps the problem is that this car was conceived as a far more design-led offering; style over substance, as you might expect from an A7. Maybe that explains the diminutive boot.
However, now it has arrived it is pitched as a rival to large, roomy and quietly luxurious rivals from BMW and Mercedes. Against them, it falls short.
It's a struggle to recommend even as a company car, due to the parlous BIK costs of the PHEV. The all-electric A6 e-tron would make more sense in that role.
By contrast, the combustion-engined A6 Avants feel strangely underbaked – not bad cars per se, just not ones that give you any particular reason to choose them.
The facts
On test: Audi A6 Avant 2.0 TDI Quattro Launch Edition Plus
Body style: five-door estate (also available as a five-door saloon)
On sale: now
How much? £68,555 on the road (range from £53,285)
How fast? 147mph, 0-62mph in 7.0sec
How economical? 50.7mpg (WLTP Combined)
Engine & gearbox: 1,968cc four-cylinder diesel, seven-speed dual-clutch automatic gearbox, four-wheel drive
Electric powertrain: 48V integrated starter generator with dedicated battery
Electric-only range: 0 miles
Maximum power/torque: 201bhp/295lb ft
CO2 emissions: 150g/km (WLTP Combined)
VED: £540 first year, £620 next five years, then £195
Warranty: 3 years / 60,000 miles
Spare wheel as standard: no (not available)
The rivals
Mercedes-Benz E220d AMG Line Premium Plus Estate
217bhp, 55.4mpg, £72,400 on the road
This top-flight Merc estate costs more than the A6 despite being only rear-wheel drive, but it provides notably better fuel economy as a result, not to mention far more boot space. Its interior is just as screen-heavy as the Audi's, although the integrated screens and swathes of open-grain wood trim provide a classier feel.
BMW 520i M Sport Pro Touring
205bhp, 45.6mpg, £58,435 on the road
BMW no longer makes a diesel 5-Series, nor does it make a fully loaded top-specification model – this is as fancy as it gets, which explains the price disparity. But it's worth noting how close this petrol mild hybrid engine is to the diesel Audi's fuel economy. The BMW has greater boot space, too.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
12 minutes ago
- Times
Sacked executive who slept in sauna wins disability claim over ADHD
A female executive who was sacked for allegedly becoming so drunk at a work event that she slept in a sauna was discriminated against due to her ADHD, an employment tribunal has ruled. Shannon Burns, who earned £220,000 a year as vice-president of engineering at German firm Gitpod, was dismissed for her behaviour at an off-site event in Lofer, Austria, in 2023. She was told her behaviour had 'eroded trust and confidence' and she should 'lead by example' as a senior employee of the software development company. Burns, who used to work at US technology giant Slack before she was headhunted for the role at Gitpod in the UK, said her male colleagues were 'far more intoxicated' and faced no punishment. She also claimed there was a 'tech bro' culture at the company. • 'Tech bros' sued by woman who slept in sauna after drunken night Burns, who was diagnosed with ADHD in 2015, claimed she was discriminated against by her former company for both her sex and disability. Employment judge Rachel Wedderspoon dismissed Burns's claim of sexual discrimination, noting her 'lack of professionalism' had nothing to do with her gender. However, the judge backed the former executive's disability claim, saying Burns's ADHD had contributed to a 'great deal of forgetfulness', including losing the keys to her hotel room on the night of the off-site function. Burns is now eligible for compensation. The tribunal was told that Burns, who was hired in late 2002, had requested an ADHD coach in February 2023 after feeling 'deeply overwhelmed' with her workload and experiencing a high level of anxiety. Concerns were raised in March 2023 about Burns's performance, with Johannes Landgraf, the Gitpod chief executive, telling a colleague that Burns was 'not a superstar' and that he would not hire her again. Landgraf was not aware of her disability at the time, the tribunal was told. At the team-building event in Austria in April 2023, Burns and other staff, including Landgraf, had been drinking. It was noted Burns, who had been experiencing a 'very difficult period' in her life at the time, had cried and appeared drunk at the event, including 'slurring her words'. Later that evening Burns went back to her room but could not find her key and was unable to wake her roommate to be let in. The tech executive eventually gave up and went to sleep in the sauna. The tribunal was told Burns later received a message from a senior male executive who said she must 'lead the team by example' and 'stay in control'. He went on to say that he had heard comments that Burns had 'got too drunk and fallen asleep in the sauna room'. • 'Day-one' employment rights spark business backlash After the event Landgraf had concerns about Burns's 'lack of professional accountability' and behaviours which were 'incompatible with executive responsibility'. In June, Burns was invited to a meeting where she was dismissed. In her witness statement, Burns said: 'My male colleagues were drinking alcohol/drunk at the off-site but I was the one who was dismissed.' The judge said Burns had accepted her 'impairments were exacerbated by the consumption of alcohol'. Upholding her disability discrimination claims, Wedderspoon admitted Burns had consumed 'quite a lot' of alcohol on the night she was locked out of her room. 'However, being disorganised and forgetful may be features of ADHD,' she said. 'Insofar as [Burns] was criticised for being locked out in the evening the tribunal finds that this was likely in part to be as a result of the combination of her alcohol consumption and her forgetfulness which is something arising from her disability of ADHD.' The tribunal dismissed her claims of sex discrimination. 'She displayed a lack of professionalism, namely lack of executive presence as vice president. That had nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that [Burns] is woman,' Wedderspoon said. A hearing to decide Burns's compensation will take place at a later date.


Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
FIA announces tender for new WRC promoter
Aug 21 (Reuters) - Motorsport's governing body announced on Thursday a tender process to replace Red Bull and German investment company KW25 as commercial rights holders of the World Rally Championship (WRC). The International Automobile Federation (FIA) said JPMorgan would act as financial advisor to Red Bull and KW25, who jointly own Munich-based WRC Promoter GmbH -- the commercial arm responsible for media, sponsorship rights, and television production. The promoter, which also oversees the European Rally Championship, took over the WRC rights in 2013 and still had seven years remaining on the contract, according to sources. Reuters reported a year ago that the owners were preparing a potential sale with a target valuation of up to 500 million euros ($581 million). The WRC has been in existence since 1973 and this year features 14 rounds on different continents with the showcase Monte Carlo Rally opening the season in January. "The tender process for the commercial rights holder is a big opportunity for a new enterprise to take the championship into its next chapter with renewed energy and investment," said the FIA's deputy president for sport Malcolm Wilson. "We will work with Red Bull and KW25 to find the best fit for this important role." The FIA said the championship had surged in popularity with a cumulative television audience of 1.3 billion and more than four million on-site visitors in 2024, with huge further growth potential. Paraguay makes its debut hosting a round of the championship this weekend and the sport is looking into a future round in the United States. "I am confident that, together with the right partner, we can take the championship to the next level, preserve its proud heritage, and grow its global reach for generations of fans to come," said FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem. ($1 = 0.8606 euros)


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
EU pushes for reduced US autos tariff from August 1 as joint text limits exemptions
WASHINGTON/BRUSSELS, Aug 21 (Reuters) - The European Union will work to ensure lower U.S. tariffs on its car exports are applied retroactively to August 1, the bloc's trade chief said on Thursday, as the transatlantic partners set out details of a framework trade deal struck in July. In a 3-1/2-page joint statement, the two sides spelled out that 15% U.S. tariffs would apply to most EU imports and listed the commitments made, including the EU's pledge to eliminate tariffs on U.S. industrial goods and to give preferential market access for a wide range of U.S. seafood and agricultural goods. Washington will take steps to reduce the current 27.5% U.S. tariffs on cars and car parts, a huge burden for European carmakers, once Brussels introduces the legislation needed to enact promised tariff cuts on U.S. goods, it said. The statement said U.S. tariff relief on autos and auto parts would kick in on the first day of the month in which the EU introduced the legislation. EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said it was the European Commission's "firm intention" to make proposals by the end of this month, meaning the U.S. car tariff reduction would apply from August 1. A senior Trump administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said European carmakers could see relief from the current U.S. tariffs within "hopefully weeks." "As soon as they're able to introduce that legislation - and I don't mean pass it and fully implement it, but really introduce it - then we will be in a position to provide that relief. And I will say that both sides are very interested in moving quickly," they said. U.S. President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the deal on July 27 at Trump's luxury golf course in Turnberry, Scotland after months of negotiations. The two leaders met again this week as part of negotiations aimed at ending Russia's war in Ukraine, with both lauding their trade framework deal as an historic accomplishment. The joint statement said the deal could be expanded over time to cover additional areas and further improve market access. The joint statement was "a play to hold each other accountable" and ensure that both sides carried out the pledges announced last month, the U.S. official said. Ryan Majerus, a former U.S. Commerce Department official now with the King and Spalding law firm, said the statement "could serve as a conceptual model for what we will eventually see with Japan and South Korea." The two major U.S. trading partners negotiated similar reductions in Trump's automotive tariffs but are also waiting for them to be implemented. The EU and U.S. said they intended to accept and provide mutual recognition to each others' automotive safety and other standards, but industry officials said this language was more vague than initially announced. The joint statement noted that the U.S. agreed to apply only pre-existing Most Favored Nation tariffs of below 15% from September 1 on EU aircraft and parts, generic pharmaceuticals and ingredients, chemical precursors and unavailable natural resources, including cork. This exemption did not apply to wine or spirits, a key EU demand, but the two sides agreed to consider other sectors and products for inclusions. "So these doors are not closed forever," Sefcovic said, while acknowledging that securing an exemption for alcoholic drinks would not be easy. SpiritsEUROPE trade group Director General Herve Dumesny urged "both sides to remain at the negotiating table and deliver a swift, full return to zero-for-zero" tariffs on spirits. The U.S.-EU statement reiterated the EU's intention to procure $750 billion in American liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear energy products, plus an additional $40 billion worth of U.S.-made artificial intelligence chips. It also repeated the intention for EU companies to invest an additional $600 billion across U.S. strategic sectors through 2028. Both sides committed to address "unjustified digital trade barriers," the statement said, and the EU agreed not to adopt network usage fees. They also agreed to negotiate rules of origin to ensure that the agreement's benefits accrued to both trading partners. The statement also left unchanged the 50% U.S. national security tariff on EU-produced steel, aluminum and goods made with the metals, which were expanded this week to hundreds of additional products. "There will be no exemptions, no exclusions for steel and aluminum tariffs," Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro told reporters at the White House, due to what he said were past exclusion abuses. But the joint statement left the door open to a future tariff rate quota for the EU as the two sides discuss "ring-fencing" their domestic markets from overcapacity, a reference to Chinese production. Navarro called the Trump administration's agreement with the EU a "magnificent achievement" for both sides of the Atlantic that U.S. courts should not criticize. A federal appeals court is expected to rule any day on a legal challenge that could strike down a significant portion of Trump's tariffs, those invoked under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.