US agriculture supply chain protected from Chinese Communist Party in new Hinson, Ricketts bipartisan bill
FIRST ON FOX: Rep. Ashley Hinson and Sen. Pete Ricketts are rolling out a bicameral bill with bipartisan support that would secure agriculture supply chains in the United States from vulnerabilities and potential Chinese Communist Party exploitation, Fox News Digital has learned.
Hinson, R-Iowa, will introduce the Securing American Agriculture Act in the House of Representatives, while Ricketts, R-Neb., will introduce the measure in the Senate.
The Securing American Agriculture Act would require the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to conduct an annual assessment to identify supply chain vulnerabilities, domestic production gaps and potential CCP exploitation.
It also would direct the secretary of Agriculture to recommend ways to strengthen U.S. reliance and reduce China's influence in the industry to mitigate potential threats.
The bill would ensure that the USDA accurately accounts for U.S. dependence on China for critical agricultural inputs and guarantee access for American producers.
"China has intentionally captured a significant market share of America's agricultural inputs — which is vital to our food supply chain — ceding leverage to our top adversary," Hinson told Fox News Digital Tuesday. "Iowa farmers have told me firsthand that if China decides to shut off U.S. access to these critical inputs, our food production would be in jeopardy. I'm proud to reintroduce this bipartisan bill that exposes and counters China's grip on agricultural inputs to strengthen domestic manufacturing and food security."
Hinson added: "Plain and simple: We should bring our agriculture supply chain home."
And Ricketts told Fox News Digital Tuesday that "Communist China's strategic control over crucial sectors of our food and agricultural supply chains poses a serious national security threat."
"Losing access to key inputs could reduce productivity, increase food prices and undermine food security," Ricketts told Fox News Digital. "My bill will bolster and protect these supply chains and reduce our reliance on foreign adversaries."
The bill is also supported by House China Committee Ranking Member Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., who said the bipartisan bill is "a critical step forward in protecting our nation's food supply and farmers from foreign adversaries, including the Chinese Communist Party, who threaten our agricultural security."
"America's farmers are the backbone of our economy, and we must ensure they have the resources and safeguards needed to compete on a level playing field while securing our nation's agricultural supply chains," Krishnamoorthi told Fox News Digital.
The bill is also supported by House China Committee Chairman John Moolenaar, R-Mich.; Rep, Jill Tokuda, D-Hawaii; Rep. Sharice Davids, D-Kansas; and Rep. Scott Franklin, R-Fla, among others.
In the Senate, Democrat Sen. Elissa Slotkin; Republican Sens. James Risch, R-Idaho; Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.V.; Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.; Mike Crapo, R-Idaho; Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb.; and Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., also support the bill.
Slotkin told Fox News Digital that "food security is national security."
"We need to treat threats to our food supply chain just like any other security risk," Slotkin said. "This legislation requires us to assess those risks so we can protect our food supply. Bottom line: We need to make sure America's agriculture supply chain is secure and stays right here at home."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump Org launches mobile service for $47.45 a month
The Trump Organization announced Trump Mobile as its next venture on Monday, on the 10th anniversary of President Trump announcing his first bid for the White House. Why it matters: The announcement marks yet another expansion for the organization — run by the president's sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. — which made millions in real estate and luxury golf courses, but has pivoted to other avenues, including crypto and digital media. "One of the places where we felt there was lackluster performance was in the mobile industry," Donald Trump Jr. said from Trump Tower in New York City on Monday. State of play: Phones will be both built and remanufactured in the U.S., and the phone plan — which will cost $47.45 a month, a nod to Trump serving as the 45th and 47th U.S. president — will include unlimited data, texting and calls with over 100 countries. Trump Mobile will maintain a flat carrier fee and include a telemedicine partnership at no additional cost, with prescribing doctors available around the clock. It will also offer roadside assistance via Drive America. Customers can elect to use Trump Mobile SIM cards in their existing phones, though a new smartphone called the T1 is set for release in September and will cost $499. An image from the Trump Mobile website shows a gold-plated phone engraved with an American flag on the back. The website says the phones are made in the U.S. The call center will be based in St. Louis, Missouri, Eric Trump said. "It's about time we disrupt this space," he said. The intrigue: Trump Mobile "products and services are not designed, developed, manufactured, distributed or sold by The Trump Organization," the website said. Our thought bubble, from Axios' Ben Berkowitz: Trump Mobile is entering a crowded space that just so happens to be regulated by the president's appointees. The T1 brand on its phone is owned by the Trump Organization, effectively putting the Trump family in a manner of competition with the likes of Apple and Samsung, both of which the president has threatened to tariff heavily. Zoom out: During his 2024 campaign, the now-president promoted the sales of Trump-branded Bibles, sneakers and cologne.
Hamilton Spectator
25 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
The Latest: Trump attends G7 summit amid his trade war with US allies
President Donald Trump has arrived for the G7, or Group of Seven, summit in Canada, a country he's suggested should be annexed, as he wages a trade war with America's longstanding allies. If there's a shared mission at this year's G7 summit, which begins Monday in the Rocky Mountains, it's a desire to minimize any fireworks at a moment of combustible tensions. Here's the latest: Sen. Kaine says he'll force a vote to give Congress more of a say over military force against Iran Sen. Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat and a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is filing a resolution that would require that Congress authorize a declaration of war or any specific use of military force against Iran. Congress passed a similar resolution in 2020 during Trump's first term. 'It is not in our national security interest to get into a war with Iran unless that war is absolutely necessary to defend the United States. I am deeply concerned that the recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into another endless conflict,' Kaine said. The resolution requires that any hostilities with Iran must be explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force, but would not prevent the United States from defending itself from imminent attack. Who's attending the G7 summit? The Group of Seven comprises Canada, the United States, France, Italy, Japan, Germany and Britain. Leaders of each nation will be in attendance. The European Union also attends, as well as other heads of state who are not part of the G7 but have been invited by Carney. These include Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, who is expected to have her first in-person meeting with Trump, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the kingdom's de facto ruler, was invited but will not attend. ▶ Read more about the G7 summit ICE is using no-bid contracts, boosting big firms, to get more detention beds Leavenworth, Kansas , occupies a mythic space in American crime, its name alone evoking a short hand for serving hard time. The federal penitentiary housed gangsters Al Capone and Machine Gun Kelly — in a building so storied that it inspired the term 'the big house.' Now Kansas' oldest city could soon be detaining far less famous people, migrants swept up in President Trump's promise of mass deportations of those living in the U.S. illegally. The federal government has signed a deal with the private prison firm CoreCivic Corp. to reopen a 1,033-bed prison in Leavenworth as part of a surge of contracts U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has issued without seeking competitive bids. ICE has cited a 'compelling urgency' for thousands more detention beds, and its efforts have sent profit estimates soaring for politically connected private companies, including CoreCivic, based in the Nashville, Tennessee, area and another giant firm, The Geo Group Inc., headquartered in southern Florida. ▶ Read more about new immigration detention centers Trump's schedule Monday, according to the White House Trump is expected to have a busy schedule on the first day of the G7 conference. 9 a.m. — Trump participates in a bilateral meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney 10 a.m. — Trump will attend the event's official welcome 10:30 a.m. — Session one 12:30 p.m. — Session two 2:45 p.m. — Session three 5:45 p.m. — Time for a group photo 6:15 p.m. — Session four 9 p.m. — Trump will attend a 'cultural event' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Boston Globe
26 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Bill to increase access to public records in R.I. will die in committee — again
DiPalma, a Middletown Democrat, said that while the governor's office and an array of state agencies opposed the bill, the administration offered few, if any, recommendations on how to improve the state's public records law. Advertisement 'Categorically, it is going to take someone at the top saying, 'Here is how we can get it done,' ' DiPalma said. 'It's OK to say 'no.' But you need to come to the table with suggestions on how to make it better — unless you believe it's perfect.' Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up DiPalma, seen as a potential lieutenant governor candidate in 2026, said he will seek to have the bill heard earlier in next year's legislative session. 'I am not stopping,' he said. 'This is just cueing me to work harder.' DiPalma said he feels sorry for 'all the people who are impacted by this — those seeking information — and also for the cities and towns and others that asked us to address 'vexatious' records requests. That is falling on deaf ears.' Advertisement McKee spokesperson Laura Hart said, 'Transparency is in the public's interest — that's not in dispute — but the state must balance transparency with privacy rights and costs to the taxpayer. State and municipal experts who do this work every day have brought up numerous privacy concerns.' Among other issues, she said, 'Disclosing the names of preferred license plate owners violates the Driver's Privacy Protection Act. Disclosing subpoenas prematurely could negatively impact investigations,' and 'Narrowing the exceptions for doctor/patient communications could put health care privacy at risk.' Hart said the public records law was designed with the ability to charge fees to cover the costs of document collection, review, and redactions 'and to discourage overly broad requests that take staff time and taxpayer dollars to complete.' 'Requiring public records officer, instead of the courts, to determine fee waivers based on 'public interest' or when there is a 'denial' will add significant risk and expense, both in staff time and in unnecessary litigation, all financed by taxpayer dollars," Hart said. Steven Brown, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island, said the McKee administration 'bombarded' legislators with objections to the bill. 'We just have to keep at it,' Brown said. 'At some point, I am hopeful the legislature will recognize that reform is absolutely essential, notwithstanding bogus objections from the executive branch.' John M. Marion, executive director of Common Cause Rhode Island, said, 'It's sad that the legislature just doesn't find it a priority to advance transparency in government. That's the single bill that would do the most, of the thousands of bills before them, to advance open government in Rhode Island at a time when people don't have a lot of trust in government.' Advertisement Advocates need to continue to link the legislation to people's everyday lives, Marion said. 'We also need to convince every legislator that this is really a bread-and-butter issue for them,' he said. 'This is about how government runs and how people can find out how government runs.' Justin Silverman, executive director of the New England First Amendment Coalition, said, 'Government decisions affect the life of every Rhode Islander. From the Washington Bridge to local law enforcement, these are issues that matter to everyone. This APRA bill would allow us to better understand the decisions government makes and how our tax dollars are being spent. The bill will get passed one way or another, this year or next. Transparency and accountability are far too important to give up on.' This story first appeared in Rhode Map, our free newsletter about Rhode Island that also contains information about local events, links to interesting stories, and more. If you'd like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday, Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at
