
EXCLUSIVE 'We're worried...we've been kept in the dark': Inside leafy Cheshire town convulsed by fear after 300 male migrants arrived at hotel in dead of night
But six months on from that covert operation to take over a hotel in Altrincham to house migrants MailOnline has discovered that many of those original arrivals have been evicted - only to start living in tents nearby.
It marks the latest twist in the ongoing saga surrounding the well-to-do market town that overnight became home to around 300 single male asylum seekers.
Residents living in the so-called 'Golden Triangle' town, home to a number of footballers, soap stars and wealthy professionals, were left in the dark about the original decision to take over the popular Cresta Court Hotel.
But they can't miss what's happening now as many successful asylum seekers have fallen foul of what's called the '56 day rule' - and end up living rough on their streets.
This is the Home Office regulation which states that asylum seekers who are successful in being granted refugee status are from that moment only given 56 days more accommodation in asylum seeker hotels.
After that period, refugees are supposed to find their own accommodation.
But in practice many find it impossible to find accommodation within this time limit so having no alternative accommodation - while new migrants have taken their places inside hotels - they are effectively rendered homeless.
Many successful asylum seekers have fallen foul of what's called the '56 day rule' - and end up living rough on their streets
Home Office regulation states that asylum seekers who are granted refugee status are from that moment only given 56 days more accommodation in asylum seeker hotels
So because of those stuck with nowhere to go, many tents have popped up around the area, most prominently outside the town hall in the neighbouring town of Sale.
When MailOnline visited the council offices this week there were five tents propped up, housing seven men, who had previously been housed at the hotel, and one woman.
The three migrants who spoke with us had travelled to the UK from war-torn Sudan, while the others camping nearby are said to have been from the East African countries of Eritrea and Ethiopia.
One of the migrants, who spoke to us in broken English, said that he had been living in the hotel for a few months but after being granted a temporary e-visa was waiting to be housed.
The young man, no older than his mid twenties, said he had been camping on the streets for 30 days - while the other two young men accompanying him had been there between one and three weeks.
'I don't know where we shall live,' another one of the asylum seekers told MailOnline. 'We can't shower and it is difficult to find a toilet.
'We can't wash our clothes and I've been here 30 days but haven't been able to wash our clothes.'
Leader of the Trafford Conservatives Nathan Evans said: 'It seems a number of the migrants get kicked out of the hotel and they have to find their own accommodation.
'But there isn't any accommodation so they end up on the streets - camped outside the town hall in Sale or in Manchester city centre or wherever.'
Mr Evans said that even if they can find accommodation the pressure on limited housing stock is forcing rents up for all.
The hotel, on a road where the average house costs £708,000, only found out about their new neighbours when coachloads arrived late one night last October.
The decision has caused division in the community - with almost weekly protests being held outside of the hotel by frustrated residents as well as anti-migration and anti-racism demonstrators.
Those perhaps most affected by the decision are the people living on or near Burlington Road, where houses sell for an average of £708,000, which directly faces the hotel.
Kenneth Lee, who also lives nearby, said: ''It was a big surprise because we only heard about it when the newspaper said something.
'I believe the council are not worried about us residents and our council taxes are paying for it whether we like it or not.
'If the house wants to change to an office or another use, we have to apply for permission from the council. But something like that, the council supposedly did this overnight.
'When they go to election they send us loads of leaflets but nothing when it is something that really affects the local area. But there's not much we can do. We can't even help our own homeless.'
Karen, who did not disclose her surname, said: ' Some of them [who were spirited into the hotel last autumn] are now homeless and living in tents near the town hall.
'It is a sad situation. It is not easy for anyone - you wouldn't want to be them but it is a politically hot potato.'
Maria and Ray Williams said the decision to suddenly close the hotel was 'soul destroying' for locals for whom it had long been a community hub.
Mr Williams said: 'We got married there and our daughter did as well. What they are doing is such a disgrace.'
Mrs Williams added: 'It's just awful for people who had their weddings, baptisms and things like that planned. They did events for everything. We'd go in for a nice meal, disco nights, all of those things, it was very very sad and even now it was a lovely place to go.'
Pensioner Peter Hutchinson added: 'It's pointless trying to complain to anybody, what are they going to do?'
The Cresta Court is owned by Vine Hotels – whose chairman is former BBC Director General Greg Dyke. The company owns a number of Best Western hotels around the country.
The hotel was reportedly given a contract worth £10million for the year to October, meaning the owners would earn £2 million more in profit than they would from normal paying customers.
Those perhaps most affected by the decision are the people living on or near Burlington Road, where houses sell for an average of £708,000, which directly faces the hotel
Earlier in the year, local Conservative councillors held a meeting in a church hall so locals could air their concerns.
But tempers flared when it was wrongly suggested that asylum seekers would receive medical treatment from a private doctors' service at a time when it was announced that Altrincham Hospital's minor injuries unit would be closing permanently.
The unfounded claim had been circulating on social media with a Facebook post Altrincham residents were told 'migrants staying at the Cresta Court will be receiving private health coverage FOR FREE!!' being shared more than 1,700 times.
In reality, Gtd Healthcare, a not-for-profit organisation, rather than local services that had been given a 12-week contract to provide publicly funded NHS healthcare to the migrants.
The false claims have led to a number of so-called anti-migrant influencers turning up with film cameras to the hotel's reception almost daily.
Local anti-racism campaigner Mark Krantz told the Independent previously: 'It's a persistent thing. The lead security staff member told me it was almost every day that they have hostile individuals coming down.'
Far-right groups Britain First and Patriotic Alternative have also been amongst those staging protests across the road from the hotel.
A spokesperson for Trafford Council said: 'A number of tents appeared outside Sale Waterside in early April. Our housing options team have spoken to people in the tents and our understanding is that they are predominately former asylum seekers who have been granted leave to remain.
'They are non-priority need homeless, which means the Council doesn't have a duty to accommodate, though our team are trying to source private rented accommodation which we would do for any other applicant who wasn't in priority need. As a result, we have managed to source accommodation for some people who were previously there in tents.
'We are aware they have been using a public toilet in Sale and we have encouraged them to behave appropriately and use publicly available facilities. We have had no reports of anti-social behaviour and we are also aware they could be victims of crime.
'Our housing options team will continue to engage with the people as we are firmly of the view that the current situation is not in anyone's best interests, nor is it a suitable place for anyone to stay.'
Support for newly recognised refugees in the UK is available through Migrant Help.which can help individuals appl;y for universal creedit and find housing options.
Since July 2024, the Government returned 6,781 hoping to find asylum in the UK to their home country.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Epping council goes to High Court to remove migrants from hotel
Epping Forest district council has applied to the High Court to stop asylum seekers being housed at a hotel that has been at the centre of protests. The local authority has asked for an interim injunction to prohibit the use of the Bell Hotel as asylum seeker accommodation for a fortnight. The leader of the council said it had taken the action because ' the current situation cannot go on', adding that the Home Office 'continues not to listen'. Protests have been taking place outside the hotel since last month, after an Ethiopian asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a schoolgirl days after arriving in Britain. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denied the charge when he appeared at Chelmsford magistrates' court, and has been remanded in custody. In a statement on Tuesday, Cllr Chris Whitbread said: 'The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub, we could have closed it down long ago. 'So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals who might only have been in the country a matter of days before being housed at the hotel. 'There are five schools and a residential care home within the vicinity of the hotel. 'The use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community. We are frustrated that the Home Office continues not to listen.' The Conservative-led council is claiming that placing asylum seekers in the Bell Hotel is a 'clear breach of planning permission' because it is not being used as a hotel. Cllr Whitbread said he hoped that, should an interim injunction be granted, it would be a 'catalyst to the prohibition of the use of the Bell Hotel' to house migrants. At the end of last month, Essex Police said 14 people had been charged in connection with protests outside the hotel, and there had been 23 arrests. Protesters opposing the use of the hotel to house migrants have also been faced by counter-protests, at times leading to hundreds of demonstrators in the area. Since the demonstrations began in Epping, there have been other migrant protests cropping up in other parts of the country, including at Heathrow and the financial area of Canary Wharf. Cllr Holly Whitbread, responsible for Epping Forest district council's finances, told PA: 'In terms of the community impact and the pressure on local infrastructure, it's just completely unsustainable, particularly also in light of the amount of police resource which has been required around some of the protests which I know have been largely peaceful.' 'In theory, the Home Office are supposed to foot the bill for those within the hotel, but I think the reality is often different'. Meanwhile, Ricard Tice, the Reform UK deputy leader, claimed migrants were 'leering and jeering' at mothers taking their children to school. He told Times Radio: 'We are seeing an increase in numbers of sexual assaults, leering and jeering, coincidentally around asylum seeker hotels. When I campaign up and down the country, I hear this from concerned residents close to these hotels time and time again. Around primary schools, as mums take their youngsters to school.' Other local authorities have previously sought injunctions against the use of hotels as asylum accommodation. Councils including Ipswich borough council, East Riding of Yorkshire council, Fenland district council and Stoke-on-Trent city council had interim injunctions granted but not continued. In January 2023, the High Court decided to continue an injunction from the previous in Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, where a seafront hotel had been lined up to house asylum seekers. The court noted that the area's local plan had a policy to protect the seafront, and that hostels were not permitted there. Matt Vickers, the shadow policing minister, said Epping Forest district council 'is absolutely right to take a stand'. He added: 'Communities like Epping should not be forced to carry the burden of Labour's broken asylum policy. Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object to this accommodation in their community. 'This is the direct result of Labour's decision to throw open Britain's borders and tear up the deterrents the Conservatives put in place. The Conservatives will remove all illegal arrivals immediately and put a proper deterrent in place so that towns like Epping are never put in this position again.' A Home Office spokesman said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment while legal proceedings are ongoing.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Government expands police use of live facial recognition vans
More live facial recognition (LFR) vans will be rolled out across seven police forces in England to locate suspects for crimes including sexual offences, violent assaults and homicides, the Home Office has announced. The forces will get access to 10 new vans equipped with cameras which scan the faces of people walking past and check them against a list of wanted people. The government says the technology has been used in London to make 580 arrests in 12 months, including 52 registered sex offenders who breached their conditions. However, campaign group Big Brother Watch said the "significant expansion of the surveillance state" was "alarming". Live facial recognition was first used in England and Wales in 2017 during the Uefa Champions League final football match in Cardiff. Since then its use has largely been confined to South Wales, London and Essex including at a Beyoncé concert to scan for paedophiles and terrorists. The government is now funding ten vans equipped with LFR to be shared between seven forces, approximately doubling the number of vehicles. The seven forces are Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire. The technology identifies people by taking measurements of facial features including the distance between the eyes and the length of the jawline and then comparing the data to to an existing watchlist. Each van will be staffed with a trained officer who checks the matches identified by the technology. Simultaneously, the government is holding a consultation on what safeguards are needed to "ensure transparency and public confidence", ahead of drawing up a new legal framework. Big Brother Watch is bringing a legal challenge against the Met Police's use of the technology, alongside Shaun Thompson, who was wrongly identified by an LFR camera. Rebecca Vincent, interim director of Big Brother Watch, said: "Police have interpreted the absence of any legislative basis authorising the use of this intrusive technology as carte blanche to continue to roll it out unfettered, despite the fact that a crucial judicial review on the matter is pending."The Home Office must scrap its plans to roll out further live facial recognition capacity until robust legislative safeguards are established."Charlie Whelton, policy and campaigns officer at Liberty, said: "It's welcome news that the government will finally develop a statutory framework on the use of facial recognition, but this should be in place before more facial recognition technology is rolled out."There's no reasonable excuse to be putting even more cameras on our streets before the public have had their say and legislation is brought in to protect all of us."The government says officers using the LFR vans will need to follow the College of Policing's guidance on the technology and the Surveillance Camera Code of Practice. It also says independent testing of the facial recognition algorithm by the National Physical Laboratory found that "the algorithm is accurate and there is no bias for ethnicity, age or gender at the settings used by the police".Chief Superintendent of South Wales Police Tim Morgan said: "We understand the concerns which are raised about the use of live facial recognition technology and we use any new technology ethically and spend time and effort making sure it's deployed in line with all legislation and guidance."The Police Federation of England and Wales, which represents police officers, said: "The government must also invest in comprehensive training programmes for officers to accompany this technology rollout, particularly as police forces face an unprecedented officer retention crisis."Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the government would "provide police with the tools they need to do their jobs". "Facial recognition will be used in a targeted way to identify sex offenders or people wanted for the most serious crimes who the police have not been able to find." The Home Office has also announced that it has fulfilled a manifesto pledge to ensure there is a named, contactable officer in every neighbourhood in England and Wales. It said people can search for an officer on the website of local police forces, who have signed up to a commitment to respond to queries within 72 hours. The type of contact method provided will be up to individual forces.


South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Live facial recognition to be widened in neighbourhood policing drive
The technology will be deployed to catch 'high-harm' offenders, with new rules drawn up to support its use and ensure 'safeguards and oversight', the Home Office said. Some 10 vans equipped with cameras will be rolled out across seven police forces – Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire – over the coming weeks. Existing rules require checks only to be done against police watchlists of wanted criminals, suspects and those subject to bail or court order conditions like sex offenders. But a Government consultation will launch in the autumn to help 'shape a new legal framework' on its use, taking views on when and how the technology should be deployed. Privacy campaigners have previously voiced concerns about a potential lack of regulation and transparency over the expansion of the technology. The vans will be manned by trained officers and it will be for individual forces to decide how and when they are deployed in their areas, operating within the College of Policing guidance. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said they would be focused on identifying sex offenders or 'people wanted for the most serious crimes who the police have not been able to find'. 'The algorithm being used in the vans has been independently tested and will only be operated in specific circumstances and with robust oversight,' the Home Office said. Chief Superintendent Tim Morgan of South Wales Police, which is co-ordinating the rollout alongside the National Police Chiefs' Council, sought to reassure the public that the technology would be used 'ethically'. 'We understand the concerns which are raised about the use of live facial recognition technology and we use any new technology ethically and spend time and effort making sure it's deployed in line with all legislation and guidance,' he said. 'It is important to remember that use of this has never resulted in a wrongful arrest in South Wales and there have been no false alerts for several years as the technology and our understanding has evolved.' Lindsey Chiswick, NPCC lead for facial recognition, said live facial recognition had already been used 'to great success, locating thousands of wanted offenders, or others breaching their bail conditions.' 'I am confident that the increased use of this technology will continue to support the safety of communities across the country moving forward,' she said. Forces already deploying live facial recognition have used it to arrest rape, domestic abuse, knife crime and robbery suspects as well as sex offenders breaching their conditions. Meanwhile, the Home Office said every community across England and Wales has now been assigned a 'named, contactable' officer to handle reports of crimes like anti-social behaviour. Their details will be made available for residents on their local force's website, it is understood. The pledge was made as part of the Government's previously announced Neighbourhood Policing Guarantee, under which forces have signed up to a commitment to respond to neighbourhood queries within 72 hours. The Government said the move would help ensure 'the public will have consistent direct links to their local force, with dedicated anti-social behaviour leads and new visible patrols in town centres'. Ms Cooper said: 'Neighbourhood policing has been decimated over the last 15 years, but through our Plan for Change we are turning the corner, starting with town and city centres. 'Within the next year, we will have 3,000 new neighbourhood officers and PCSOs in place, which is a big shift. 'We also want them to have more powers to tackle off-road bikes, shop theft, street theft and other crimes that have blighted some of our town and city centres, so everyone can feel safe in their own town.'