
Al-Fayadh: Voting on the Popular Mobilization Law is an Expression of the People's Gratitude to its Fighters
The head of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), Falih al-Fayadh, confirmed on Sunday that the vote on the PMF Law is not merely a legislative measure, but rather an expression of the people's gratitude to their fighters.
In a statement addressed to members of the Iraqi Parliament, received by the Iraqi News Agency (INA), al-Fayadh said, "At a moment when the meanings of loyalty and history are embodied, we face a national responsibility and a matter related to the dignity of those who took up arms in defense of Iraq and its sovereignty."
He added, "The vote on the PMF Law is not merely a legislative measure, but rather an expression of the people's gratitude to their fighters and a confirmation of the rights of those who answered the call of the religious authority and wrote the glory of this nation with their blood."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Shafaq News
31 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
Khor Abdullah: A waterway entangled in sovereignty disputes and legacy of invasion
Shafaq News – Baghdad The maritime channel of Khor Abdullah, located at the southern edge of Iraq's Basra province and separating Iraq's al-Faw Peninsula from Kuwait's Bubiyan Island, has once again returned to the forefront of political and legal controversy. Despite decades of international resolutions and bilateral agreements, the waterway remains a sensitive flashpoint involving sovereignty, economic competition, and unresolved historical grievances. A Legacy of Invasion and Forced Demarcation The roots of the current dispute trace back to August 2, 1990, when Iraqi forces invaded Kuwait, triggering a regional upheaval and prompting a US-led coalition military response under Operation Desert Storm. In the aftermath, Iraq faced severe international sanctions and territorial repercussions. One of the key post-war measures was United Nations Security Council Resolution 833, adopted in 1993, which formally demarcated the land and sea borders between Iraq and Kuwait—cutting through the center of Khor Abdullah. Many Iraqi legal experts and politicians have long argued that this decision was imposed under duress, at a time when Iraq could not defend its national interests. It was enforced under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which allows for coercive measures, further fueling Iraqi perceptions of injustice. The 2012 Navigation Agreement and Its Fallout Nearly two decades later, Iraq and Kuwait signed a bilateral agreement in 2012 to regulate maritime navigation in Khor Abdullah. The deal, which outlined traffic routes, joint security mechanisms, and trade facilitation protocols, aimed to manage the shared waterway more effectively. However, the agreement quickly stirred backlash within Iraq. Critics described it as a de facto concession of sovereignty —especially concerning Iraq's maritime access and fishing rights. Although Article 6 of the agreement explicitly states that it does not modify the borders established by Resolution 833, many Iraqis argued that its practical implementation further curtailed Iraq's influence in the Gulf. The agreement was ratified by Iraq's Council of Ministers in 2012 and passed by Parliament the following year under Law No. 42 of 2013. It was subsequently published in the official Iraqi Gazette. But in September 2023, the Iraqi Parliament voted to annul the agreement altogether, reigniting tensions with Kuwait. The Kuwaiti government responded by submitting a formal protest to the UN Security Council, warning that Iraq's withdrawal "violates international agreements and undermines bilateral stability." Several Iraqi political figures defended the revocation, asserting that the agreement had been concluded under pressure during a period when Iraq's sovereignty was still compromised. International law expert Fawzi Hameed told Shafaq News, 'Resolution 833 was linked to the ceasefire, but Iraq was not in a position to advocate for its interests at the time. Agreements made under coercion can be revisited under international law.' Strategic and Economic Stakes Khor Abdullah serves as Iraq's only maritime gateway to the Gulf, making it essential for both commercial imports and oil exports. Several major Iraqi ports depend on this channel: -Umm Qasr Port – Iraq's main commercial seaport -Khor al-Zubair – A hub for oil and petrochemical exports -Grand al-Faw Port – A strategic infrastructure project under construction, intended to transform Iraq into a regional logistics center On the Kuwaiti side, heavy investment has gone into Mubarak al-Kabeer Port on Bubiyan Island. Positioned to become one of the largest ports in the region, it is widely viewed as a direct competitor to Iraqi and even Iranian maritime hubs. This overlapping infrastructure has fostered both opportunities and rivalries. While both nations seek to enhance their trade standing, their shared geography and competing ambitions have added another layer of complexity to an already politically charged environment. The channel's shared location necessitates coordinated maritime security between Iraq and Kuwait. Preventing smuggling, ensuring navigational safety, and managing traffic flows require bilateral cooperation—especially amid broader regional tensions. Any escalation involving neighboring powers, particularly Iran, could compromise shipping routes through Khor Abdullah, with direct economic implications for both Baghdad and Kuwait City. A Broader Sovereignty Debate For many in Iraq, the dispute is not just about navigation—it is a symbol of national sovereignty. Mohammad al-Basri, a researcher specializing in border affairs, argued that Khor Abdullah had historically been administered by Basra province. He warned that continuing the agreement would jeopardize Iraq's maritime and economic security. 'This is not a conflict with Kuwait,' he said. 'It is a struggle over Iraq's sovereign rights.' Former Iraqi military officer Brigadier Mahmoud al-Jubouri echoed that sentiment, stating, 'The post-1991 isolation allowed for the imposition of unbalanced agreements. Khor Abdullah is a strategic loss that should have been reviewed long ago.' Observers warn that the ongoing dispute risks stalling critical joint infrastructure projects, including the Grand al-Faw Port and broader regional connectivity plans that could transform Iraq's economic future.


Rudaw Net
2 hours ago
- Rudaw Net
Flights to resume at Mosul airport in 2 months after 11-year hiatus
Also in Iraq Iraq says 'committed' to receiving 230,000 barrels of oil daily from KRG KRG delegation in Baghdad for salary talks after oil export deal KRG to resume oil exports after new agreement with Iraq Iraq issues salaries to over 2,200 Yazidi ISIS survivors, launches Shingal projects: Official A+ A- ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - Mosul International Airport is expected to resume flights within the next two months, the airport director announced on Thursday, just weeks after its official reopening following an 11-year closure due to its capture by the Islamic State (ISIS). Ammar Khader told Rudaw that final preparations are underway to obtain an operational license from the Iraqi Civil Aviation Authority (ICAA). 'We have an integrated program for the preparation, landing, and takeoff of aircraft, and for receiving passengers,' Khader said, adding that the airport's communication and fire-fighting systems must first be inspected by a 'reputable international company' before flights can commence. He noted that the remaining legal and administrative procedures are being fast-tracked to meet Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' al-Sudani's mid-July directive to open the airport within two months. Sudani officially inaugurated Mosul International Airport on July 16, coinciding with the anniversary of the city's liberation from the Islamic State (ISIS). Earlier in June, an aircraft successfully completed the first test landing at the airport in over a decade. Mosul, the capital of Nineveh province in northern Iraq, was seized by ISIS in June 2014 during the group's rapid expansion across Iraq and Syria. It was declared the capital of ISIS's so-called caliphate. The battle to retake the city began in October 2016, led by Iraqi forces with support from the US-led Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS. Kurdish Peshmerga forces played a key role in securing the city's eastern and northern flanks, cutting off supply routes, and clearing surrounding areas. Mosul International Airport was retaken in February 2017, and the city was officially declared liberated on July 10 of the same year. However, the airport sustained extensive damage during the conflict. Reconstruction began in August 2022 with a budget of around 200 billion Iraqi dinars (around $142.8 million). According to Khader, several international firms - including British, Emirati, Omani, and Turkish companies - have submitted proposals to operate the airport. A special committee, formed under the prime minister's directive, will review the bids and assess their operational plans. The newly rebuilt airport features a main terminal hall, VIP lounge, modern radar systems, and a 3,000-meter runway. It is expected to handle up to 630,000 passengers and 30,000 tons of cargo annually, making it a key driver of Nineveh's post-war economic recovery.


Iraqi News
4 hours ago
- Iraqi News
Al-Sudani challenges Iran-backed militias as Iraq reasserts control
Baghdad ( – Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani's recent efforts to assert state authority have drawn strong criticism from Kataib Hezbollah, one of the country's most influential Iran-aligned militias. The group accused Al-Sudani of provoking a confrontation with their security forces, underscoring growing friction between the central government and armed factions operating outside official oversight. Tensions surged following a deadly incident in Baghdad's Dora district, where Kataib Hezbollah Secretary-General Abu Hussein al-Hamidawi called on the Shia Coordination Framework to suspend Al-Sudani's executive powers, citing what he described as a breakdown in trust. The violence began when gunmen stormed the Agriculture Directorate during a conference in southern Baghdad, leading to clashes with security forces. One federal police officer was killed, and at least 15 others were wounded. Iraq's Joint Operations Command later confirmed that the attackers had been arrested and handed over to the judiciary. The suspects were identified as members of the PMF's 45th and 46th brigades, units tied to Iran-backed groups. While the backlash highlights the enduring power of such factions, some analysts view it as a signal that Al-Sudani is taking firm steps to curb their influence. His push to strengthen formal state institutions has resonated with segments of the public calling for a more sovereign and independent Iraq. International pressure has also intensified. In late July, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned Al-Sudani that a proposed law formalizing the Popular Mobilization Forces could entrench Iranian influence and legitimize groups Washington sees as destabilizing. Domestically, Iraq's highest Shiite religious authority has echoed calls for stronger state control. On July 17, Grand Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani's representative, Abdul Mahdi Al-Karbalai, delivered a rare sermon urging an end to militia activity and the reinforcement of national institutions. This is widely seen as a clear signal in favor of state sovereignty. With national elections on the horizon, Al-Sudani faces a critical test. Whether he continues to challenge armed factions or opts for political compromise may define both his leadership and Iraq's path toward independent governance.