logo
Rajasthan finalises action plan for M-sand plot auctions to curb illegal mining

Rajasthan finalises action plan for M-sand plot auctions to curb illegal mining

The Hindu17-05-2025

In a significant policy move aimed at streamlining construction material supply and curbing illegal mining, the Rajasthan government has finalised an action plan for delineating and auctioning plots designated for manufactured sand (M-sand) units. The decision follows the State's recognition of M-sand units as an industry, extending them official status to encourage investment and development.
Principal Secretary (Mines) T. Ravikanth announced on Saturday (May 17, 2025) that 109 plots have been identified under the plan. Of these, 77 plots spanning a total of 158 hectares are earmarked for M-sand units, while 32 overburden dumping plots covering 131 hectares will also be prepared for e-auction. Notably, 26 plots have already been successfully auctioned, aimed at increasing the supply of M-sand for the construction sector.
The initiative marks a strategic shift in response to a 2017 Supreme Court directive that imposed a ban on riverbed sand (commonly known as bajri) mining in Rajasthan. The top court had ordered a scientific replenishment study and subsequent clearance from the Ministry of Environment and Forests before any resumption of mining activities. A Central Empowered Committee (CEC) was subsequently constituted to examine the issue of illegal sand extraction.
The court's intervention had led to a sharp decline in the availability of legally mined riverbed sand, resulting in a spike in prices and the emergence of a sand mining mafia operating in defiance of environmental norms. Though environmental clearance was eventually granted to 60 mining zones in 2022, the lag in supply had already hampered several infrastructure projects across the State.
The new policy on M-sand, which seeks to reduce reliance on riverbed resources, is expected to ease supply bottlenecks and bolster environmental safeguards. It enables investors to establish M-sand units while availing themselves of State-backed incentives and infrastructural support. Officials say the move is also expected to instil public confidence in the quality and utility of M-sand for construction.
Addressing officials at a departmental review meeting held at Khanij Bhawan, Mr. Ravikanth emphasised that promotion of legal mining is key to checking illegal extraction activities. He directed the Mines Department to expedite the delineation and auction of mineral plots, including both major and minor categories.
In addition, Mr. Ravikanth said that efforts are under way to identify new revenue sources for the department and plug existing leakages. He noted that the auction process for 22 major mineral blocks had already commenced at the beginning of the current financial year.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump travel ban shows ‘deep hostility' towards Iranians, Muslims, says Iran
Trump travel ban shows ‘deep hostility' towards Iranians, Muslims, says Iran

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump travel ban shows ‘deep hostility' towards Iranians, Muslims, says Iran

Iran on Saturday lambasted US President Donald Trump's travel ban on countries, including Iran, and said that it showed "deep hostility" towards Iranians and Muslims. Iran's foreign ministry posted a statement on X quoting a senior official and said, "The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals - merely due to their religion and nationality - not only indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates... international law." Separately, Iran on Saturday slammed the new sanctions imposed by the United States targeting over 30 individuals and entities that Washington said are part of a "shadow banking" network linked to Tehran. It said that the network has laundered billions of dollars through the global financial system. "The new U.S. sanctions ..., are illegal and violate international law, and are further evidence of the deep and continuing hostility of the U.S. ruling regime towards the Iranian people," foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said in a statement, Reuters reported. Earlier on Wednesday, Trump issued a full-entry travel ban on nationals from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Burma (Myanmar), Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Meanwhile, partial restrictions will also be enforced on Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela, limiting immigrant and non-immigrant visas due to high overstay rates or insufficient collaboration between law enforcement. The travel ban was justified by the White House, which cited Taliban control in Afghanistan, Iran and Cuba's state-sponsored terrorism, and Haiti's influx of illegal migrants during the Biden regime. Additionally, countries like Chad (49.54% B1/B2 visa overstay rate) and Eritrea (55.43% F/M/J overstay rate) were flagged for disregarding US immigration laws. 'We will restore the travel ban, some people call it the Trump travel ban, and keep the radical Islamic terrorists out of our country that was upheld by the Supreme Court," Trump had said. The travel ban was also upheld by the Supreme Court which ruled that 'it is squarely within the scope of Presidential authority' and noted that it is 'expressly premised on legitimate purposes'.

Salwa Judum case: Legislative workaround and limits of contempt power
Salwa Judum case: Legislative workaround and limits of contempt power

New Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Salwa Judum case: Legislative workaround and limits of contempt power

The doctrine of separation of powers must always be acknowledged in a constitutional democracy, the Supreme Court said in its May 15 order ruling that any law made by Parliament or state legislatures cannot be held to be in contempt of court. The decision by a bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma came while dismissing a 2012 contempt petition filed by sociologist Nandini Sundar and others against the Chhattisgarh government for enacting the Auxiliary Armed Police Force Act, 2011, alleging the law violated an earlier SC order. The bench held that the law did not amount to contempt of the SC's 2011 landmark judgment that disbanded the state government-backed Salwa Judum, terming it unconstitutional. Salwa Judum was a government-backed militia formed in Chhattisgarh in 2005, which used armed tribal civilians to combat Maoist violence. The contempt plea claimed that the Chhattisgarh government failed to comply with the 2011 order to stop open backing of vigilante groups like the Salwa Judum, and instead went ahead and armed tribal youths in the fight against Maoists. It said there had been a clear contempt of the SC order when the state government passed the Chhattisgarh Auxiliary Armed Police Force Act, 2011, which legalised arming tribals in the form of Special Police Officers (SPOs) in the war against Maoists. The petitioners further submitted that instead of disarming SPOs, which was a key constituent of the SC's 2011 order, the Chhattisgarh government legalised the practice of arming them. They also argued that the victims of the Salwa Judum movement had not been adequately compensated. In the latest ruling of May 15, the Supreme Court said the Chhattisgarh Auxiliary Armed Police Force Act, 2011 does not constitute a contempt of court per se, and that the balance between sovereign functionaries must always be delicately maintained. 'Every State Legislature has plenary powers to pass an enactment and so long as the said enactment has not been declared to be ultra vires the Constitution or, in any way, null and void by a Constitutional Court, the said enactment would have the force of law," the bench said. If any party wants that the legislation be struck down for being unconstitutional, the legal remedies would have to be presented before an appropriate constitutional court, the bench noted.

Amid Donald Trump-Elon Musk public feud, a ‘truth' from the crash of Truth Social
Amid Donald Trump-Elon Musk public feud, a ‘truth' from the crash of Truth Social

Hindustan Times

time3 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Amid Donald Trump-Elon Musk public feud, a ‘truth' from the crash of Truth Social

The past few days have been nothing but a roller coaster ride as the public and politicians alike witnessed the growing feud between President Donald Trump and his one-time billionaire ally, Elon Musk. The buzz was so much so that Trump's Truth Social network crashed amid the online war of words on June 6 and spilt the biggest "truth" instead. The error screen that appeared on Trump's Truth Social relayed the message that there were "no truths" to be found on the platform. The fallout began on Tuesday when Musk, who left the Department of Government Efficiency to focus on his EV-making company Tesla, denounced Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act over concerns that it could add approximately $3 trillion to the federal deficit over the next 10 years. He had described the GOP-backed tax cuts and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination". Later, Trump said that he was "very disappointed" after his former ally and top donor expressed criticism over his "big, beautiful" spending bill before Congress. "I'm very disappointed in Elon. I have helped Elon a lot," the President said. Musk responded to Trump's remarks, and the two traded insults over social media back and forth. While Trump hinted at potential cuts against Musk's companies, the Tesla CEO claimed that the President was in the controversial Epstein files. An allegation post that he later deleted. Trump on Saturday again warned Musk of "serious consequences" if the tech billionaire went on to fund democratic candidates to run against Republicans who vote in favour of his tax cuts and spending bill. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," he added. Trump also dismissed any ideas of mending the relations with Musk after their recent public feud. Elon Musk was one of the biggest Trump supporters during the 2024 presidential campaign. He was also the biggest donor to the Trump campaign, with a whopping $300 million. The Tesla CEO claimed that the Republican leader would not have won the 2024 election without his backing. The public feud brought unprecedented traffic to Trump's Truth Social platform, resulting in its crash and leaving followers to scramble to track the developing tiff. As per DownDetector, which was cited by Comic Sands, traffic on the Truth Social platform witnessed a crazy spike. Once the massive traffic led to the crash of Trump's page, users could see this message: "No Truths. When this user composes a Truth, or ReTruths, you will see it here." Several users took to X to point at the revealed "truth" about Trump. One user said, "Truth Social crashed, leaving this actual truth behind." "Truth Social has crashed from the traffic surge and in so doing accidentally created a hauntingly poignant image," another quipped. "Finally, something honest about Trump," wrote another user on X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store