logo
Child protection laws need awareness, proactive administration for better implementation: Experts

Child protection laws need awareness, proactive administration for better implementation: Experts

Hindustan Times14-05-2025

New Delhi, Widespread awareness, proactive administrative approaches and personal intervention by authorities were some of the suggestions made for the effective implementation of child protection laws during a virtual meeting convened by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights on Wednesday.
The National Consultation was aimed at strengthening the dissemination and awareness of two key child protection laws, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and the Child and Adolescent Labour Act, 1986.
Delivering the keynote address, NCPCR Chairperson Tripti Gurha stressed the importance of structured and widespread awareness to ensure the effective implementation of these legislations.
She highlighted various initiatives undertaken by the Commission and called for stronger collaboration among all stakeholders to uphold child rights in their truest sense.
Preeti Bharadwaj Dalal, Member , shared her on-ground experiences of promoting awareness of the POCSO Act.
She said challenges in implementation could be addressed through proactive administrative approaches, personal intervention by authorities and better dissemination of legal provisions.
Dalal also noted the success of NCPCR's special benches and camps held in Aspirational Districts, which have helped reach marginalised and vulnerable communities.
Dr. Divya Gupta, Member , said effective implementation of the Child Labour Act required a gender-neutral approach and robust awareness campaigns.
Echoing the need for sustained efforts, Dr. Sanjeev Sharma, Member Secretary, emphasised the centrality of child protection and education for all stakeholders.
The consultation highlighted several critical areas of concern, including the urgent need for coordinated inter-ministerial efforts, establishment of fast-track courts for child sexual abuse cases, and uniformity in medico-legal reporting formats across the country.
The event drew participation from around 300 stakeholders, including representatives from central and state Ministries, state police departments, State Commissions for Protection of Child Rights , and civil society organisations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ECI trying to implement NRC through backdoor: Mamata
ECI trying to implement NRC through backdoor: Mamata

The Hindu

time7 hours ago

  • The Hindu

ECI trying to implement NRC through backdoor: Mamata

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday (June 26, 2025) lashed out at the Election Commission of India (ECI) for isolating voters born between July 1987 and December 2004 and seeking documentary evidence of their citizenship in the name of 'special intensive revision of electoral rolls'. Also Read | Had invited Rahul Gandhi for talks on voter roll issue, says Election Commission Alleging that the ECI was 'acting like a stooge of the BJP', Ms. Banerjee asked whether the move was a backdoor attempt to implement the NRC. Addressing reporters in the coastal town of Digha in Purba Medinipur district, where the chief minister is currently stationed to oversee preparations and participate in Friday's Rath Yatra of Lord Jagannath from the newly inaugurated Jagannath temple, Banerjee said she called the press conference in a hurry to address the issue which was a 'matter of utmost concern'. 'I have received two letters from the ECI, each comprising 25-30 pages. I haven't been able to go through them in detail so far. But from what I have understood from a cursory glance, the Commission is now seeking a declaration form from voters born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, which is Annexure D in one of the letters, where they will have to submit birth certificates of both parents as proof of citizenship,' Ms. Banerjee said. 'I don't understand the reason behind the ECI move or the rationale behind selecting these dates. This is nothing short of a scam. I seek clarification from the Commission on whether they are trying to implement the NRC through backdoors. In fact, this looks to be more dangerous than the NRC which every political party in opposition must resist,' she said. Ms. Banerjee revealed that the letters were sent to the Bihar government, and a copy was forwarded to her as well. 'Nothing will happen in Bihar because the BJP rules that State and the State elections there are at the doorstep. Their real target is Bengal. They want to delete the names of valid young voters. Many parents will not be able to furnish their birth certificates. They are targeting the migrant worker community of Bengal, students, villagers and uneducated voters,' she alleged. The Assembly elections in Bihar are due later this year. Ms. Banerjee accused the ECI of acting according to the wishes of the BJP and challenged its authority in making such rules. 'How can the ECI do this unilaterally without consulting the recognised political parties at the central and state levels who play a key role in running the country's democratic structure? They are treating us like bonded labourers and doing this only to fulfil the wishes of a certain RSS pracharak who is now running the country for all practical purposes,' the CM said, pointing to, but without naming, Union Home Minister Amit Shah. Urging people to stay vigilant of such 'attempts to snatch away their right to vote', Ms. Banerjee warned that the move will 'backfire on the BJP'.

EU leaders meet to decide on whether to back quick US trade deal or seek better terms
EU leaders meet to decide on whether to back quick US trade deal or seek better terms

Hindustan Times

time11 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

EU leaders meet to decide on whether to back quick US trade deal or seek better terms

By Philip Blenkinsop and Jan Strupczewski EU leaders meet to decide on whether to back quick US trade deal or seek better terms BRUSSELS -European Union leaders are to tell the European Commission on Thursday whether they want to reach a quick trade agreement with the United States on terms that favour Washington or keep fighting for a better deal. A quick deal seems to be the preferred option for most, officials and diplomats said, as the EU can then seek to address the unfavourable bias with some rebalancing measures of its own. "I support the Commission, I support the President of the European Commission in her endeavours to make progress on competitiveness. I also support the European Commission in all its endeavours to reach a trade agreement with the USA quickly," German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said. "I want us to get Mercosur off the ground and conclude further trade agreements. Europe is facing decisive weeks and months," he said. The Commission, which negotiates trade agreements on behalf of the EU, will ask leaders of the EU's 27 members meeting in Brussels how they want to respond to President Donald Trump's July 9 deadline for a deal, now less than two weeks away. The bloc has said it is striving for a mutually beneficial agreement, but as Washington looks set to stick to its 10% across-the board tariffs on most EU goods and threatening higher rates with prolonged talks, EU diplomats said a growing number of EU countries were now favouring a quick resolution. "A trade war makes both sides of the Atlantic poorer and is just stupid. So I support the approach of the Commission president, who always kept calm and has negotiated for a result," said Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever. "If that were to end in one-sided and unfair tariffs then we have to take proportionate and very targeted countermeasures." The bloc is already facing U.S. import tariffs of 50% on its steel and aluminium, 25% for cars and car parts, along with a 10% tariff on most other EU goods, which Trump has threatened could rise to 50% without an agreement. The United States' only completed trade deal to date is with Britain, with the broad 10% tariff still in place. U.S. officials say it will not go lower for any trading partner. Some 23 of the leaders will come to Brussels straight from the NATO summit in the Hague. Few will want to follow accord there with an economic war. "There is a group of EU countries that want to protect companies by seemingly accepting something they have gotten used to – a 10% baseline," one EU diplomat said. REBALANCING MEASURES One question EU leaders face is whether it should respond with its own measures to such a baseline tariff. The European Union has agreed, but not imposed, tariffs on 21 billion euros of U.S. goods and is debating a further package of tariffs on up to 95 billion euros of U.S. imports. Some EU countries favour watering it down. Among the EU rebalancing options is a tax on digital advertising, which would hit U.S. giants like Alphabet Inc's Google, Meta, Apple, X or Microsoft and eat into the trade surplus in services the U.S. has with the EU. The bloc has a trade surplus with the U.S. in goods. The Commission has proposed an EU-U.S. deal to cut respective tariffs on industrial goods to zero, along with potential further EU purchases of liquefied natural gas and soybeans. Washington has shown little obvious interest, preferring to highlight items it considers as barriers, such as EU value-added tax, environmental standards and rules on online platforms, on which the EU does not want to move. On the sidelines of the summit, EU leaders will also seek to allay the concerns of Slovakia and Hungary over ending their access to Russian gas as foreseen by the EU's plan to phase out all Russian gas imports by the end of 2027. EU diplomats said EU leaders' assurances over gas should allow the two countries to back the EU's 18th package of sanctions against Russia, which they are now blocking. Before the start of the summit however, Slovakia's Prime Minister Robert Fico said he would demand a delay in voting for the sanctions until Slovak concerns were addressed. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

NHRC notice to Odisha government over 'social boycott' of woman's family after inter-caste marriage
NHRC notice to Odisha government over 'social boycott' of woman's family after inter-caste marriage

New Indian Express

timea day ago

  • New Indian Express

NHRC notice to Odisha government over 'social boycott' of woman's family after inter-caste marriage

NEW DELHI: The NHRC on Wednesday said it has issued notice to the Odisha government over reports that the family of a woman was allegedly subjected to a social boycott by villagers after her marriage to a man from a different caste in Rayagada district. The villagers reportedly demanded a "purification ritual" if the family of the woman wanted to be accepted back into the community. They were threatened with an "indefinite boycott" in case they refused to comply with the ritual, the National Human Rights Commission said in a statement. The NHRC has taken "suo motu cognisance of a media report that the family of a woman from a Scheduled Tribe community was subjected to a social boycott by the villagers after her marriage to a man belonging to a Scheduled Caste in Rayagada district of Odisha," it said. The Commission has observed that the content of the news report, if true, raises serious issues of violation of the human rights of the victims. Therefore, it has issued a notice to the chief secretary of the government of Odisha, seeking a detailed report in two weeks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store