logo
Group opposing Mayor Brandon Johnson and allies raises $10 million, progressives decry ‘sucker politics'

Group opposing Mayor Brandon Johnson and allies raises $10 million, progressives decry ‘sucker politics'

Yahoo02-05-2025
The first well-funded shots against Mayor Brandon Johnson and progressive allies of his are already being fired, two years before they face reelection.
A series of mailers sent earlier this year by the dark money Common Ground Collective argue 'Chicago is in chaos' in a bid to beat up the mayor and four City Council members. The group behind the mailers is tight-lipped on where its cash comes from and what it plans to do next, but has a staggering amount of money to keep throwing punches.
The Common Ground Collective has raised $10 million, according to its executive director, Chuck Swirsky. It's a sum that's sure to grow but that is already similar to the combined amount Johnson received in his 2023 campaign from his top funders, the Chicago Teachers Union, Service Employees International Union and related unions.
The group, a nonprofit, is not required to publicly disclose its donor list, and Swirsky declined to do so. But he said the money came from around 90 donors, none of whom have contributed more than 5% of its total.
And Swirsky said among the contributors is GCM Grosvenor CEO Michael Sacks, a Democratic donor and close friend of former Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Sacks declined to comment when contacted by the Tribune.
The collective's first targets said the unspoken message — that progressives aligned with the mayor will face stiff opposition — would not change their course. Instead, they bashed the spending as, in the words of Ald. William Hall, 'sucker politics.'
'Show your face and your money,' said Hall, a key Johnson supporter. 'And your stance, which they don't have the courage to do.'
But as the mayor faces political turbulence of his own and early indications that some members of his progressive coalition are distancing themselves from him while looking at their own 2027 re-election prospects, it remains to be seen whether the dark money group's efforts to tie aldermen to Johnson make it tougher for him to pass his agenda.
In addition to Hall, mailers sent by the nonprofit and reviewed by the Tribune targeted Alds. Daniel La Spata, 1st, Byron Sigcho-Lopez, 25th, and Rossana Rodriguez-Sanchez, 33rd, each a Democratic Socialist who played a key role in narrowly passing the controversial January 2024 ordinance calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, among other progressive policy pushes.
The mailers reviewed by the Tribune could signal how the group might continue to deploy its funds. The cards feature a smiling photo of each alderman with the mayor and a message that says they 'refused to stand up to Johnson, raising our taxes while crime remains too high.' The mailers also share each alderman's office phone number and encourage recipients to call and tell the City Council member 'to show some courage and stand up to Mayor Johnson.'
On the other side, the mailers depict Johnson facing a black-and-white City Hall, his arms outstretched. 'Mayor Brandon Johnson is in over his head. And Alderman Hall has his back,' one read.
In a statement to the Tribune, Swirsky said the group aims to 'educate and mobilize local elected officials, build grassroots coalitions, and proactively engage voters around effective policies.'
'CGC will work to defeat extremist policies from both the far right and far left that seek and serve to divide our city,' he wrote. 'Common Ground Collective is supported by a large number of committed donors who care about Chicago and the State of Illinois.'
Swirsky previously served as a chief adviser to outgoing Chicago Public Schools CEO Pedro Martinez, who spent much of the last year in a series of high-profile battles with Johnson before the mayor fired him.
He has repeatedly criticized Johnson on social media — with much of it focused on the mayor's schools policy and stances on the war in Gaza — and has also criticized President Donald Trump. Swirsky declined the Tribune's interview requests.
The group is likely to continue painting Johnson in a harsh light in the coming months. But its deep pockets might also give the mayor an opportunity to present himself as a working-class-champion foil to the powerful and rich.
Amid the beginnings of the well-funded effort to discredit him and his allies, Johnson has in recent weeks fired off his own criticism of Emanuel and 'the neoliberal agenda' with little prompting.
Asked last month about Trump's expected cuts to federal education funding, Johnson said Trump 'is running the playbook Rahm Emanuel executed in the city,' a reference to Emanuel's sweeping school closures.
'We didn't get here because you just happen to have a tyrant in the White House,' he said. 'We got here because someone gave him the script.'
Emanuel declined to comment when contacted by the Tribune about the mayor's comments.
The group appears to have so far only targeted progressives, some of whom will soon face potentially close reelection campaigns.
In 2023, Hall, the only City Council rookie against whom Swirsky's group has so far sent out a mailer, earned a spot in a runoff with 23.82% of a primary vote and won election by just under 1,800 votes in the South Side ward that includes the Chatham neighborhood and surrounding areas.
La Spata avoided a runoff by just 15 votes, while Rodriguez-Sanchez and Sigcho-Lopez respectively dodged runoffs by 499 and 233 votes.
Hall and Sigcho-Lopez, both among the most outspoken City Council members, blasted the group that targeted them, even before hearing the eight-figure sum it says it has raised.
It's 'pretty early' for such attacks to be made so far from an election, Sigcho-Lopez said.
'The big money behind it reflects what I'm hearing in circles: that billionaires aren't happy that they don't have a mayor that does their bidding,' he said. 'These are people who do not believe in democracy, they believe they can buy their way into government.'
Hall called the group's work a 'millionaire tantrum' and said its backers are spending to sow 'seeds of division.' The mailers were sent to every voter in his South Side ward, he said. But he pledged the offensive would not move him.
'I was built for this. This is what I was born to do,' he said. 'They want what they don't have, and what they don't have is power. What they don't have is relevancy.'
La Spata said he was also targeted with similar digital ads linking to what he called the group's 'nothing burger of a website.' He believes the mailer targeting him was widely distributed across his Northwest Side ward.
Asked about the mailer, La Spata says he 'has not been shy' about disagreeing with Johnson on important issues, even if he sides with the mayor more often than he sided with former Mayor Lori Lightfoot.
'I do not do this work for Mayor Johnson,' he said. 'I'm not going to let those mailers determine how and why I govern. I'm going to continue to listen to my ward. I'm going to continue to act on the values and vision I ran on.'
La Spata, who has further distanced himself from Johnson in recent months than the other mailer targets, said he doubts the mailers would lead to a 'productive' conversation. He reached out to Swirsky for a meeting to discuss the issues the group raises, but did not hear back, he added.
He said he did know who funded the group, but added there is 'no one in the city that I think of as my enemy.'
'I have yet to meet anyone in the city that there isn't something that we agree on,' he said.
Tribune reporter Gregory Royal Pratt contributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Just say no to Big Dope — and its push for even more legal marijuana
Just say no to Big Dope — and its push for even more legal marijuana

New York Post

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Just say no to Big Dope — and its push for even more legal marijuana

Will more marijuana use make America a better place? Not many who've seen and smelled what legalizing the drug has done to cities like New York, Washington, DC, and San Francisco would say so. Yet President Donald Trump is contemplating a change to marijuana's federal classification that would make it easier to buy and more profitable to sell. The pot industry — Big Dope — is heavily invested in getting its product recategorized from a Schedule 1 to a Schedule 3 drug. Industry leaders ponied up for a $1-million-a-plate Trump fundraising dinner earlier this month to hear what the president had in mind, according to The Wall Street Journal. The president should ignore the well-funded cannabis lobby: What matters is what more and cheaper marijuana will mean for ordinary Americans. Twenty-four states have legalized recreational use of the drug, despite the ugly results experienced by the first state to do so. Taking advantage of high Democratic turnout the year of President Barack Obama's re-election, activists passed a Colorado ballot measure to make pot legal back in 2012. Legalization didn't take effect until 2014, but by 2022 marijuana use in Colorado and other states that had then legalized was 24% higher than in states where recreational use remained illegal. A study by the South Korean scholar Sunyoung Lee published in the International Review of Law and Economics this year examines what's happened to crime levels in US states that legalized pot. Lee reported his findings 'do not yield conclusive evidence supporting a reduction in crime rates after legalizing recreational marijuana. Rather, they underscore notable positive associations with property crimes and suggest potential correlations with violent crimes.' The marijuana lobby claims that drug prohibition, not the drug itself, drives violent crime. That would be a bad argument even without evidence like Lee's, which suggests legal weed makes crime worse. After all, any profit-driven criminal enterprise could be shut down by simply legalizing the crime in question. If bank robbery were legal, bank robbers wouldn't need to use guns. If auto theft were legal, carjackers wouldn't have to use force, and there wouldn't be any violence associated with black-market chop shops because the chop shops would all be as legal as the commercial marijuana industry is today. Legalize everything Tony Soprano does, and Tony won't have to get rough — but he'll only do more of what he was doing before. Libertarians who argue for legalizing drugs to stop drug violence are closer than they realize to the radical leftists who argue property crimes shouldn't be prosecuted. The psychology is the same: They sympathize with the people who make it harder to live in a civilized society and reject society's right to defend its rules. There are downsides to laws against marijuana, just as there are costs to protecting private property and citizens' bodily safety. But the costs are well worth paying when the alternative is passivity in the face of aggression, handing your belongings or your life over to any thug who makes a demand. For a time marijuana legalization was sold to voters as just a matter of leaving people alone to consume whatever they want in private, without bothering anybody else. Yet millions of Americans have now lived long enough with pot legalization, or the non-enforcement of laws still on the books, to know the pot lobby perpetrated a fraud. What the country has actually had to deal with is pot smoking so rife in public that the offensive smell — and the sight and sounds of intoxication — smacks you in your face. It's hardly different from dope-users blowing smoke right in your eyes on the street. That's not the worst crime in the world — but neither is shoplifting, and there's no reason to tolerate that, either. Tolerating such things only breeds more tolerance for worse abuses, which is what has led progressives to treat even violent criminals with the utmost leniency. Two scenes in the suburbs of DC convinced me pot tolerance has gone too far. First was seeing an African-American bus driver, on a blazing hot summer day, order two dope-smoking teens to put out their joints and be aware there were children around. To the extent our cities work at all it's because of working-class men like him — and the rest of us have to decide whether we're on his side or the punks'. A year or so later I watched a young mother one bright October afternoon hold her small daughter's hand as they walked through a neighborhood reeking of high-potency pot. The multibillion-dollar weed industry got to advertise its product to a little girl about 4 years old that day. It's an industry that notoriously even sells its drug in candy form, as 'gummies.' Our cities and towns shouldn't be open-air drug dens — and Trump shouldn't let a lobby get high off of making Americans' lives worse. Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review and editor-at-large of The American Conservative.

Mamdani's ‘war' against Trump spells bad news for NYC
Mamdani's ‘war' against Trump spells bad news for NYC

New York Post

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Mamdani's ‘war' against Trump spells bad news for NYC

Zohran Mamdani's 'Five Boroughs Against Trump' tour makes oodles of sense for him — but only at the expense of the rest of the city. Not just because the last thing New Yorkers need is a mayor seeking a war with the White House, since they'd inevitably be the cannon fodder. More: Centering the mayoral debate on countering President Donald Trump encourages everyone to ignore all the issues Mamdani doesn't want voters thinking about, like how to make the streets and subways safe, the public schools functional and the local economy growing. It also prevents any focus on his privilege and inexperience, his cop-hatred, his obsessive loathing of Israel and the unworkability of pretty much his entire 'positive' agenda. Truth is, it mainly appeals to the vanity of his Democratic Socialists and their cheerleaders: Already imagining that their guy's surprise victory (in a Democratic primary) puts America on the brink of a new socialist era, they now get to also dream of Mamdani somehow turning the tide against Bad Orange Man. Except that he can't 'stand up' to Trump (beyond boring bits like the legal efforts to claw back improperly canceled grants that Mayor Eric Adams already has under way). Indeed, no mere mayor of any city can. Check the US Constitution: You'll find no mention of a mayoral power to check the president, Congress or for that matter the Supreme Court. And in the real world, a Mayor Mamdani declaring war on Trump would entail setting City Hall on fire and expecting the White House to burn down. New York City has zero leverage over the federal government, except perhaps 1) Wall Street's money — which socialists can't direct except via their trust funds — and 2) whatever power the national media has left — when the media's already done its damnedest to stop Trump. The feds, meanwhile, can screw New York eight ways to Sunday, starting with cutting back on the hundreds of billions it sends our way. Nor can local government 'withhold' New Yorkers' taxes, as some whiz kids in the Legislature suggest. State Attorney General Tish James, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg and a few complacent judges have already waged their worst lawfare against Trump, while then-Mayor Bill de Blasio did what he could against the Trump businesses that remain here. 'Trump-proofing' the city — the new tough talk from progressives around the country — is an empty threat, too: Federal law almost always trumps state and local ordinances. Playing tough guy and talking big is sure to give Mamdani lots of outraged outtakes for his social media. But he is writing checks that the people of NYC will have to pay.

White House scrapped Biden ship tour after learning ‘how many steps were involved,' emails show
White House scrapped Biden ship tour after learning ‘how many steps were involved,' emails show

New York Post

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Post

White House scrapped Biden ship tour after learning ‘how many steps were involved,' emails show

The White House opted against having former President Joe Biden board a vessel during a July 2023 visit to a Philadelphia shipyard after learning 'lots of steps' were required to get on board, newly released emails show. The records, obtained by watchdog group Protect the Public's Trust via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and first reported by Fox News, show Department of Transportation staffers attempting to gather information about Biden's July 20, 2023, trip to the Philly Shipyard and what the president would be doing during his visit. The DOT's Maritime Administration (MARAD) had awarded the Philly Shipyard a contract to build a massive National Security Multi-Mission Vessel (NSMV) years earlier – but the agency learned days before Biden's trip that the White House would not allow the then-80-year-old president to inspect the boat. Advertisement 3 White House officials would not allow Biden, who was 80-years-old at the time, to board a vessel at a Philadelphia shipyard in 2023. AFP via Getty Images 'No visit to the NSMV vessel is planned after the WH realized how many steps were involved to get on the ship,' a MARAD official notified members of Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST), quoting a contact the agency had at that shipyard. 'True – lots of steps on grating,' the message continued in a parenthetical note. Advertisement Biden's visit to the Philly Shipyard (PSI), where he met with apprentices and attended a steel-cutting ceremony for an offshore wind farm construction vessel, came just weeks after he took a hard fall at an Air Force Academy graduation ceremony in Colorado. Since the fall, the president had been observed boarding Air Force One using the aircraft's shorter set of stairs. Seven days before the Philadelphia shipyard visit, Biden stumbled on Air Force One's short staircase as prepared to depart Helsinki-Vantaan International Airport in Finland. 3 Biden took a hard fall less than two months before the Philly trip. AP Advertisement 3 The National Security Multi-Mission Vessel being built at the shipyard had too many steps for Biden, according to an email sent to DOT staffers from a MARAD official. Bloomberg via Getty Images The White House's refusal to let Biden board the National Security Multi-Mission Vessel in Philadelphia may not have been the only time the president wasn't allowed to get on a boat over concerns about the number of steps involved. Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson claimed in his autobiography, 'Unleashed,' that the White House would not allow Biden to board the British Navy's flagship aircraft carrier – the HMS Prince of Wales – ahead of the 2021 G7 summit in Cornwall. Advertisement The decision left Johnson questioning Biden's 'physical fitness.' 'His staff told us that he would not in fact be boarding our vast aircraft carrier — which we had proudly stationed in the bay — because it had so many steps; and we wondered what that meant about his physical fitness,' Johnson said, according to an excerpt from the former prime minister's book obtained by The Telegraph.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store