Zelenskyy nominates Yulia Svyrydenko as new Ukraine PM
The announcement on Monday could herald a wider reshuffle in the government, three and a half years into the Russian invasion.
'I have proposed that Yuliia Svyrydenko lead the government of Ukraine and significantly renew its work,' Zelenskyy wrote on social media. 'I look forward to the presentation of the new government's action plan in the near future.'
The recommendation is part of what he called 'a transformation of the executive branch' of government in Ukraine.
The two discussed 'concrete measures to boost Ukraine's economic potential, expand support programs for Ukrainians and scale up our domestic weapons production', Zelenskyy said.
Svyrydenko, 39, gained prominence this year during fraught negotiations around a rare minerals deal with the United States that nearly derailed ties between Kyiv and its most important military ally.
If the change is approved, she would replace Denys Shmyhal, who became prime minister in 2020.
'The government needs a change because people are exhausted,' said Tymofiy Mylovanov, a former economy minister who worked with Svyrydenko.
Mylovanov, who now heads the Kyiv School of Economics, said the changes would likely bring 'a sort of freshness' after more than three years of war.
Zelenskyy is also considering naming Defence Minister Rustem Umerov as Ukraine's ambassador to Washington, he said at a news conference last week.
Zelenskyy met Umerov over the weekend, after which he said, 'Ukraine needs more positive dynamics in relations with the United States and at the same time new steps in managing the defence sector of our state.'
Svyrydenko, who is also a deputy prime minister, was appointed to manage Ukraine's struggling economy months before the Kremlin launched its full-scale assault in February 2022.
Her appointment will require approval by parliament, which has largely united around Zelenskyy since the invasion and is unlikely to vote against the president.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Russia says it needs time to ‘analyse' Trump's Ukraine announcements
The Kremlin has said that US President Donald Trump's recent statements, including a threat to impose sanctions on Russia's trading partners, are serious and require time to assess. Amid growing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump on Monday announced new deliveries of weapons, including Patriot missile systems, to Ukraine and said that buyers of Russian exports could face severe tariffs if Moscow fails to agree to a peace deal within 50 days, signalling a major policy shift in Washington. 'The US president's statements are very serious. Some of them are addressed personally to President Putin,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters in Moscow on Tuesday. 'We certainly need time to analyse what was said in Washington. And if and when President Putin deems it necessary, he will definitely comment.' Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev mocked Trump's announcement, calling it a 'theatrical ultimatum' and saying that 'Russia didn't care'. Medvedev, who now serves as deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, has frequently issued strident remarks throughout the war. Russian Senator Konstantin Kosachev was similarly dismissive. Writing on Telegram, he said Trump's announcement would have no impact on public sentiment in Russia and claimed the United States was setting a trap for Europe — forcing NATO states to pay for weapons that would primarily benefit the US arms industry. 'Only the American military-industrial complex will profit from this,' Kosachev said. Europeans promise to support weapons shipments Several European countries pledged to support Trump's proposal to send more weapons to Ukraine. Denmark's Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said Copenhagen would 'do its part' to finance Patriot systems for Ukraine, though he gave no specifics. 'It seems the US is finally on the right side,' Rasmussen told reporters in Brussels. The Netherlands and Sweden also said they were exploring ways to support the initiative. Sweden's Defence Minister Pal Jonson welcomed Trump's pressure on Russia and confirmed Stockholm would contribute to the delivery of weapons, though details remained unclear. Lithuania's Foreign Minister Kestutis Budrys said the announcements showed that 'leadership is once again coming from the US.' Sanctions package stalls But in a sign that European unity remains fragile, the European Union's planned 18th sanctions package stalled on Tuesday after Slovakia requested a delay in the vote. Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, who visited the Kremlin last year, said the move reflected domestic political concerns over gas supplies amid a looming ban on Russian imports from 2028. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas voiced frustration at the setback. 'I'm really sad the sanctions didn't get approved,' she said. 'But I hope they will be passed tomorrow.' Kallas added that the EU welcomes Trump's commitment to defending Ukraine but said Washington must also 'share the burden'. In a separate move, the European Council imposed asset freezes on five Russian judicial officials accused of persecuting opposition figure Alexei Gorinov, citing human rights violations.
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
EU council sanctions individuals, entities, for destabilising Moldova
The European Union has imposed sanctions on seven individuals and three entities it said are responsible for efforts to destabilise Moldova's democracy, including through vote-buying and political bribery linked to the country's 2024 presidential election and referendum on EU accession. In a statement on Tuesday, the European Council said those sanctioned were engaged in 'actions aimed at destabilising, undermining or threatening the sovereignty and independence as well as democracy, the rule of law and stability of the Republic of Moldova.' Among those targeted are figures closely associated with Ilan Shor, the exiled pro-Russian Moldovan businessman and political figure already under EU sanctions. Shor is accused of funding political operations from abroad and leading efforts to spread disinformation. The council named Shor's Victory political bloc as one of the three entities sanctioned. It accused the bloc of running orchestrated campaigns to buy votes and spreading misinformation during the EU referendum. In October 2024, Moldovans voted 'yes' to constitutionally codifying their goal to join the EU by a razor-thin margin amid accusations of Russian meddling. Another group, the Cultural Educational Centre of Moldova, was listed for facilitating interference in the elections. The third entity, A7, was cited for its links to Russian political influence operations. Those listed will face asset freezes and travel bans across the EU, the council said. This is the second time the EU has used its special sanctions system for Moldova, which was set up in 2023 at the request of the Moldovan government. It comes as the country faces growing threats linked to Russia's war in Ukraine. 'The EU remains unwavering in its support for the Republic of Moldova and its peace, resilience, security, stability, and economic growth in the face of destabilising activities by external actors,' the council said, adding that destabilisation attempts would be met with firm measures. With Tuesday's announcement, a total of 23 individuals and five entities have been sanctioned under the Moldovan government. EU officials said the listings send a clear signal to actors attempting to undermine the country's pro-European trajectory. The move comes as Moldova, a former Soviet republic, continues to strengthen its ties with the EU. The country was granted candidate status in 2022 and began accession talks last year.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump threatens tariffs in 50 days: What harm will it do to Russia?
United States President Donald Trump has threatened to impose steep trading restrictions on Russia unless a peace deal with Ukraine is reached within 50 days, as he announced an agreement with NATO allies to send more weapons to Kyiv. The announcements on Monday marked a shift in US foreign policy as Trump's endorsement of Ukraine comes just weeks after Washington announced it would pause weapons sales to Kyiv. But Trump has expressed increasing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin and hopes that tariffs and sanctions, as well as new deals for Patriot air defence missiles, will help bring an end to Russia's more than three-year invasion of Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Telegram that he had spoken to Trump and 'thanked him for his readiness to support Ukraine and to continue working together to stop the killings and establish a lasting and just peace'. On Tuesday, Russia's top security official, Dmitry Medvedev, said the Kremlin did not care about the 'theatrical ultimatum' issued by Trump, adding that Putin will comment on the US proposals if he deems it necessary to do so. What did Trump say? Sitting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte at the White House, Trump told reporters he was disappointed in Putin and that billions of dollars of US weapons would go to Ukraine. In recent days, Russia has launched hundreds of drones to attack Ukrainian cities, angering Trump, who had accused Putin on July 8 of throwing a lot of 'b*******' at the US. Trump has said that his shift was motivated by frustration with the Russian president. 'My conversations with him [Putin] are always very pleasant… and then the missiles go off at night,' he followed up on Monday. 'We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to NATO,' Trump said, adding that NATO would pay for them. For his part, Rutte said that Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and Norway want to be part of the weapons deal. Trump also said that 'we're going to be doing very severe tariffs [on Russia] if we don't have a deal in 50 days'. Putin has yet to accept a proposal from Trump for an unconditional ceasefire, which was quickly endorsed by Kyiv. Trump also said US tariffs on Russian exports would be priced 'at about 100 percent' and then threatened 'secondary tariffs [otherwise known as secondary sanctions]'. Secondary sanctions, which would be far more punishing than US tariffs, would be levied on any country that trades with Moscow, targeting its commodities business in particular. What is Trump's tariff threat to Russia? Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Western countries – including the US, the United Kingdom, and European Union nations – have imposed 21,692 sanctions on Russia, most against individuals. Key sanctions on Moscow include import bans on Russian oil, a price cap on Russian fuel, and the freezing of Russian central bank assets held in European financial institutions. But the threat to impose so-called secondary sanctions, if carried out, would mark a notable shift. So far, Group of Seven (G7) member states have held back from taking steps that would restrict Russia from selling its fossil fuels elsewhere, to key buyers like China and India. Lawmakers from both US political parties are pushing for a bill – the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 – that would target other countries that buy Russian oil and gas. The bill would give Trump the authority to impose 500 percent tariffs on any country that helps Russia. US senators are reportedly waiting on Trump's OK to move the bill forward. Trump could also impose secondary tariffs through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which lets the president restrict trade in the event of a national emergency. Elsewhere, EU countries are close to reaching an agreement on a new package of sanctions against Russia, the bloc's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Tuesday. 'We hope to reach a political agreement on the 18th sanctions package,' Kallas said before a meeting with foreign affairs ministers from the 27 EU countries in Brussels. How dependent is Russia's economy on fossil fuels? Fossil fuel sales still generate substantial revenue for the Kremlin. Seaborne oil revenues, for instance, dropped modestly in 2024 but stayed at near pre-war levels. This is due to Russia's 'shadow fleet' – ships with opaque ownership structures and no Western ties in terms of finance or insurance, allowing them to bypass Western sanctions. So, while G7 sanctions have reduced Moscow's margins and increased export costs, they haven't cut volumes to importing nations. From 2022 to 2025, China has purchased almost half of Russia's total crude oil exports (roughly 5 million barrels per day), with India following closely behind at nearly 40 percent. Both countries also import a large amount of Russian coal. Other importing nations include Brazil, Turkiye and Egypt. The EU, meanwhile, continues to consume large amounts of Russian natural gas, though Brussels has stated it wants to terminate all its contracts by 2027. As for the US itself, higher tariffs on Russian goods would have little impact – exports to the US totalled just $3bn in 2024, or 0.7 percent of Russia's total exports. While fossil fuels now contribute less to Russia's gross domestic product (GDP) than pre-invasion, Moscow's dependence on energy products remains high. Estimates vary, but fossil fuels still make up 55 percent of Russian export revenues and 16 percent of its GDP (roughly $280bn) That compares with 60 percent and 18 percent, respectively, before Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022 – a small drop. How much could Trump's sanctions threat hurt Moscow? A sharp decline in Russian energy flows from secondary sanctions would almost certainly lead to higher global prices, particularly for natural gas. 'The impact would probably be greater on natural gas prices than oil,' said Kieran Tompkins, senior climate and commodities economist at Capital Economics, in a note. He pointed out that 'the oil market appears to have sufficient spare capacity to more or less offset a loss of Russian exports', owing to untapped OPEC supplies. However, he pointed out that 'knocking out half of Russia's crude and petroleum exports [on the back of Trump's threat] could reduce export revenues by $75bn or so.' In turn, Tompkins said that could induce a 'fiscal crisis' in Russia, leading to 'debt issuance ramping up, bond yields spiking and pressure for widespread fiscal tightening.' Looking ahead, Trump's 50-day proposal will give Moscow some time to come up with counterproposals and delay the implementation of sanctions. But Trump will be hoping that the threat of sanctions will influence Putin to put an end to hostilities.
