Air India crash report expected soon: Govt's new demolition rules to target buildings & trees near airports; details here
The Aircraft (Demolition of Obstructions Caused by Buildings and Trees, etc.) Rules, 2025, were published on June 18, 2025, under the Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam, 2024, and are open to public comment for 21 days.
What's new in the proposed rules?
These new Draft Rules are set to replace the 1994 Rules, which allowed the Deputy or Joint Director General of Civil Aviation to order the removal of height violations. Under the older framework, aggrieved individuals could appeal the order, and non-compliance meant the District Collector could step in.
The 2025 Draft Rules propose faster and more enforceable actions. Officials will be authorised to issue notices, carry out daytime inspections, and order demolition of non-compliant structures. Property owners will have 60 days to submit structural documents, and action can be taken if safety norms are breached. Importantly, only those who comply will be eligible for compensation under Section 22 of the 2024 Act. Unauthorized structures built after the notification date won't qualify.
The Investigation report yet to be made public on Friday about the cause of Air India crash is focusing on the movement of the engine fuel control switches. The co-pilot mistakenly cut off fuel supply to one of the engines and the Captain activated Auto pilot mode at a wrong altd pic.twitter.com/GqNqhlY2ie
Concerns over due process and consultation time
While the rules aim to strengthen aviation safety, they have been criticised for not including procedural safeguards mandated by the Supreme Court in demolition-related matters. The short 21-day window for public feedback has also raised concerns about the reactive nature of the policy process.
Why proactive regulation is critical
The crash of the Air India flight in Ahmedabad has once again highlighted how aviation regulations are often reactive. A historical example—the US President's Commission on Aviation Security and Terrorism in 1990 criticised American aviation regulators for waiting for tragedies before acting. The same risk exists here.
Aviation rules must be grounded in research, account for technological developments, and include transparency through public consultation. As the upcoming crash report may reveal more gaps, this framework must be built with resilience and adaptability in mind.The draft rules are a step forward, but lasting change will need foresight, public trust, and evidence-based regulation beyond crisis response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Maharashtra to amend child labour rules, allow hiring child artistes with riders
MUMBAI: The state government has decided to amend the Maharashtra Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Rules, 1997, and set up a taskforce in 36 districts to draw up a comprehensive action plan to rescue children employed illegally. The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) (Amended) Act, 2016 prohibits the employment of children below 14 years in all occupations. The draft of the revised rules was issued on August 7, and suggestions and objections have been sought from citizens within the next 30 days, which will be presented to the labour department. The new rules are being framed after a gap of nearly 30 years. The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) (Amended) Act, 2016 prohibits the employment of children below 14 years in all occupations. It also regulates the work of adolescents between 14-18 years in hazardous occupations and processes. The labour department also issued amended rules for children hired or employed illegally. 'A child may be allowed to work as an artiste subject to the certain conditions,' states the draft rules. While there are stipulated hours of work mandated in the draft, it underscores that production houses must obtain permission from the district collector before hiring the child. While screening films and programmes on television, a disclaimer must be added saying all measures were taken to protect the child during shooting. 'There is also a mandate to make proper arrangements to ensure there is no discontinuity in the child's academic lessons in school. Additionally, no child will be allowed to work consecutively for over 27 days,' said a senior officer from the state labour department. It is also the responsibility of the parents to set aside at least 20% of the child's earnings in a fixed deposit account in a nationalised bank in his/ her name, which will be credited to the child on attaining majority. 'This provision will ensure that the entire income of the child as an artiste will not be spent by their parents and guardians, and a portion of it will be saved for his future,' the official explained. The rule book also underscores that no child will be made to participate 'in any audio visual and sports activity including informal entertainment against his or her will and consent'. In a separate clause, the government has permitted only those children to work who need to support their families. However, to avoid their exploitation, they will be allowed to work only in family enterprises. In such cases, if a child remains absent from school consecutively for 30 days, the school's principal must report the matter to the nodal officer appointed by the district collector'. The government has also decided to set up a Child and Adolescent Rehabilitation Fund, where the amount from fines and penalties in cases of offences will be transferred to the victim once he/ she turns 18. 'Against each case the state government will also deposit ₹15,000, the interest on the total amount will be transferred to the victim's bank account after six months,' informed another official. The accused will be charged between ₹20,000 to ₹50,000 apart from imprisonment between six months to two years. Child rights activist Santosh Shinde termed the amended rules as 'insufficient'. 'The state government missed the opportunity to streamline the process of hiring children, especially those related to child artistes. The rules formulated are patchy, considering the need of the children employed in the film and TV industry. For instance, the government should have looked into the kind of language being used by children in the content shown on web series,' Shinde said. He added that the government 'has tried to emulate the model rules and didn't try to formulate rules according to our need as most of the content is made in Mumbai'.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
No clarity yet on BC quota as Cong postpones PAC meet
Hyderabad: The crucial political affairs committee (PAC) meeting of the Telangana Congress , originally scheduled for Aug 17, has been postponed and is now likely to be held between Aug 22 and Aug 24. The PAC, which comprises the chief minister, deputy chief minister, TPCC chief, AICC leader Meenakshi Natarajan, ministers, govt advisors, and senior leaders of the party, was expected to decide on the schedule for panchayat elections and the way forward for extending the 42% quota to the BCs in local bodies. According to party sources, the postponement of the PAC meeting was due to the absence of Telangana AICC in charge Meenakshi Natarajan from the city, among other factors. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad Chief minister A Revanth Reddy has also sought legal opinion on the proposed extension of enhanced BC quota in local bodies, an issue that was to be taken up in the PAC meeting. "It was proposed that the chief minister, along with Meenakshi and Telangana Congress president B Mahesh Kumar Goud, will take a final call on panchayat polls and the BC quota based on the majority opinion in the PAC meeting," said a senior Congress leader. With the high court setting Sept 30 deadline to complete the panchayat election process, and limited time available to legally extend the 42% quota to the BCs, there is speculation that the chief minister may decide on the matter without waiting for the PAC meeting. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The possibility of the chief minister consulting key party leaders over the phone or in person with those available in the city is also not being ruled out. A senior leader of the Telangana Congress said, "Revanth Reddy has to convene a cabinet meeting to seek approval for whatever course of action the govt adopts to extend the 42% BC quota, as well as to decide the dates and number of phases for the local body polls." "The chief minister, in a day or two, will take a call on whether to hold the cabinet meeting before the PAC, keeping in view the paucity of time to complete local bodies election process," the leader further said. The options before the state govt include issuing a GO or an ordinance to implement the 42% BC quota in local bodies after assessing whether such a move will survive legal scrutiny, given that the 50% cap has not been removed from the Panchayat Raj Act of 2018; approaching the Supreme Court with a writ of mandamus, or extending the enhanced BC quota on behalf of the party. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump targets racial preferences in college admissions but leaves legacy and donor advantages untouched
President Donald Trump has launched an assertive campaign to reform college admissions, presenting it as a win for meritocracy. His policies focus on standardized test scores, academic achievement, and the elimination of racial considerations, portraying a vision of higher education driven solely by measurable performance. Yet, while race is under intense scrutiny, legacy admissions and donor-based advantages remain untouched, preserving a system that favors wealth and inherited privilege. Legacy admissions: The hidden advantage Legacy preferences, sometimes described as 'affirmative action for the wealthy,' grant children of alumni or major donors a significant edge in admissions. Despite efforts to remove racial factors from evaluations, hereditary advantages continue to disproportionately benefit affluent and predominantly white students, leaving meritocracy incomplete. Political and legislative momentum Lawmakers argue that focusing solely on race does not fully address inequities in higher education. Several states, including Virginia, Colorado, and California, have banned legacy admissions at public institutions. Yet elite private universities, including all Ivy League schools, continue to uphold the practice. Stanford University recently announced it would maintain legacy preferences, even withdrawing from California's state financial aid program rather than abandoning the policy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Merit over race, wealth intact Trump's executive actions and Justice Department guidance aim to enforce compliance with the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling against affirmative action, requiring universities to provide detailed admissions data. While the policies prohibit racial consideration, they make no mention of legacy or donor advantages. Critics argue this selective focus undermines the notion of merit, allowing inherited privilege to continue shaping opportunity. Public opinion and university practices Most Americans oppose legacy and donor preferences, according to a 2023 AP-NORC poll. Universities defend the practice as a means of building community and securing donations. Transparency, however, remains limited. While institutions report whether they consider legacy status, few disclose its impact on admissions. Among the nation's most selective universities, very few reveal how many students are admitted under legacy or donor preference policies. Meritocracy under scrutiny Trump positions his actions as essential to maintaining meritocracy and ensuring colleges recruit capable future professionals. However, experts caution that targeting race alone may have unintended consequences, potentially prompting institutions to limit minority enrollment to avoid government scrutiny. The reform campaign raises fundamental questions about fairness in admissions when wealth and ancestry continue to hold sway. The road ahead Trump's admissions initiative exposes the tension between merit, diversity, and tradition in higher education. By addressing racial considerations while leaving legacy privileges untouched, the policies challenge universities to reconcile fairness with entrenched advantages. Whether true meritocracy can flourish amid enduring wealth-based benefits remains uncertain, highlighting the complexity of reforming an institution long shaped by privilege. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
