‘I am disappointed in myself for believing we were more than just a number': AIB staff angered by cut to hybrid working
AIB
to cut
hybrid working
has been met by frustration and disappointment by some staff at the bank, internal company communications show.
The bank informed more than 10,000 employees on Tuesday that staff eligible for hybrid working will be required to work from the office 'a minimum of three days each week' on a phased basis, the tightest rule among Irish retail banks.
The company said it believes the new arrangements 'strike the right balance' between flexibility for staff and 'delivering invaluable opportunities and benefits of collaboration and deeper engagement' between colleagues.
More than 250 staff members have expressed disappointment and frustration with the decision on an internal company forum seen by The Irish Times.
[
AIB calls eligible staff into office three days a week
Opens in new window
]
'I am disappointed in myself for believing we were more just a number,' one AIB employee said in response to a company question and answer post on the forum, in which AIB notes that 'deliberate non-compliance with the new policy will not be accepted'.
Another staff member labelled the decision a 'really disappointing move'. It 'completely disregards the struggles working families already face with limited childcare and creche spaces available,' the person said.
AIB
'A solution to a problem that didn't exist,' another person responded, saying the policy was 'forcing staff to be less productive, less motivated, and more stressed. Bravo.'
Some responses criticised the company for the manner in which the decision was communicated.
One staff member called it 'an example of very poor communication', calling for 'something this serious that affects staff lives' to have been delivered in-person or over a video call.
[
Remote working is here to stay and has whole new language about 'hidden hybrid' and 'mouse jiggling'
Opens in new window
]
Another AIB employee said the company's Q&A posted to the forum, in addition to the staff email, 'reads like a lecturer to a student with a bamboo stick out... disgusting terminology.'
'There is ZERO thought for your employees here – we will be told where and when we are working and we will be 'MONITORED' for 'NON COMPLIANCE''.
'Who exactly do you think you are talking to after the loyalty shown and the HUGE hours far and beyond our working weeks with no overtime to keep the show on the road during Covid while the Bank raced to make bumper profits and coming back to private ownership?'
AIB
The new policy, according to the company Q&A post, will not allow in-person days be decided for individuals, with requirements being detailed on a team-by-team basis. A number of staff voiced concerns with this element of the policy.
[
Office attendance is becoming a performance metric
Opens in new window
]
'You state 'We'll be as flexible and understanding as we can',' an employee said, before pointing a number of restrictions on the flexibility of the policy, 'So what is this flexibility you speak of, can you give more detail please.'
AIB
Many employees questioned how the new limitations to hybrid working fit with the company's green ethos.
'As part of the Green Agenda, AIB wants to put more cars on the road commuting to their base location, locations already with limited on-site parking.'
The employee said the bank had seen five 'hugely successful' years of hybrid working, which was used as a selling point to new staff, and that the reward for that performance was 'making staff come into the office an extra day for no logical reason other than they might bump into someone they know.'
Some employees pointed to logistical and financial challenges that the new policy will pose for them. One employee, based in Cork, said the policy will require him to make a '520km round trip' to attend work and will make life harder for people to manage work and family responsibilities 'especially when remote work has already proven effective'.
Links to sign up to the
Financial Services Union (FSU)
were posted in the channel a number of times.
In a statement to The Irish Times, the FSU encouraged AIB to 'consider how they can promote sustainability while at the same time putting 10,000 staff back in cars.'
The FSU said it will be holding 'a number of members meetings over the next few days' and expects to meet management following that consultation to 'strongly advocate for a reversal of this decision'.
It said a survey of almost 3,000 AIB employees conducted in the past 48 hours showed 'real dissatisfaction' at the 'unilateral decision'.
Responding to questions from The Irish Times, a spokesman for AIB said 'all employees benefit from in person time with their own team and broader colleagues' and that AIB 'recognise[s] the benefits of structured, hybrid working and are committed to enabling it.'
The spokesman said AIB has a 'balanced and comprehensive hybrid working structure in place' and would continue to review the policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Economist calls for budget ‘prudence', as Central Bank governor suggests rethink is needed
'A lot of prudence' is needed in Budget 2026 , while there is a case for postponing recurrent spending and tax cuts until there is 'greater clarity' on the negative implications of the EU-US trade deal , a prominent economist has said. Dan O'Brien, the chief economist of the Institute of International and European Affairs , made the remarks while responding to comments from the Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf suggesting the Government should rethink its approach to the October budget. In its summer economic statement last month the Government said a €9.4 billion tax and spending package will form the foundation of the upcoming budget. However, the Coalition warned at the time it may have to 'recalibrate' its strategy and reduce the size of the overall package if there is a 'deterioration in the tariff landscape' over the coming months. READ MORE The European Union has since struck a trade deal with the United States which sees EU goods, including those from Ireland, hit with 15 per cent tariffs by the US. The Business Post reported on Sunday that Mr Makhlouf said Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe now has 'more certainly' for planning the budget with the level of tariffs on EU goods known. 'Hopefully the summer economic statement is not the budget, and hopefully, by the time he (Mr Donohoe) gets there, he will have reflected again on what the trade situation is telling us,' Mr Makhlouf said. He added: 'For an economy operating at full employment, we're adding more stimulus to the economy than it needs – and I would look again at what we're planning to do.' Mr Makhlouf also told the paper: 'I think at the moment there's a risk that we're in the wrong place.' [ What did the summer economic statement really tell us about Budget 2026? Opens in new window ] A spokeswoman for Mr Donohoe declined to comment on Mr Makhlouf's remarks. During an interview on Newstalk radio on Sunday, Mr O'Brien was asked if he agrees Mr Donohoe needs to rethink the budget. He said this suggestion is 'largely' correct, as 'we're facing a lot of uncertainty'. Mr O'Brien added: 'I think the Government needs to manage expectations around this. There's been a lot of giveaways [in recent budgets]. Clearly we had a general election last year.' He said there has been a 'big uptick in inflation' but this has 'come right back down again' and 'there isn't the justification for Government to be intervening to deal with every problem'. Mr O'Brien said the implications of the trade situation for the pharmaceutical sector are uncertain, relying on the 'whims of the US president who may just decide he doesn't like the pharmaceutical sector in Europe selling stuff to the US and he may do something more radical'. He added: 'So there's a lot of uncertainty here, and I think we need a lot of prudence in this budget.' Asked about potential tax choices in the budget, Mr O'Brien argued there is 'no economic justification' for the Government's intention to reduce the VAT rate for the hospitality sector. 'One might strongly make the case that both recurrent spending and tax cuts maybe need to be postponed until we get greater clarity as to the negative implications of the trade deal and the extent to which it effects particularly the pharmaceutical sector and how that feeds into corporation tax revenues,' Mr O'Brien added. 'We just don't know how big a hit that could impose on the public finances if we get a change in pharmaceuticals sales to the US and that results in a reduction in corporation tax profits.' Did the EU have its hands tied before striking a trade deal with the US? Listen | 23:32
The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
'A right, not a request': Australian state seeks to enshrine work from home in law
THE PREMIER OF the Australian state of Victoria has announced plans to enshrine working from home in law, saying it should be 'a right, not a request'. Under Jacinta Allan's plan, workers would be entitled to work from home at least two days per week, if the job allows. 'We're doing that because we know what the evidence tells us – workers are more productive, it saves time for families, it saves money for families,' Allan said, launching the proposed policy at the Australian Labor Party's state conference. 'This change will mean that any worker who can reasonably do their job from home has the right to do so for at least two days a week.' Advertisement Premier of Victoria, Jacinta Allan Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Allan said the policy would now go out for consultation with workers, employers and unions. She said it was important to 'get the details of this important change right'. Allan said the move could save the average worker $110 a week, cut congestion on roads, and keep more women in the workforce. During national elections in May, the opposition Liberal-National coalition's plan to eliminate remote work was partly blamed for its poor performance. Victoria's opposition leader, Brad Battin, said work from home arrangements had been valuable, and that he supported measures that promote better work-life balance. The measure is likely to come before the state parliament next year. In Ireland, some large employers have shown resistance to the continuation of working from home years after the pandemic has subsided. Related Reads Unions push back on AIB's plan to roll back hybrid working freedoms for staff Ireland's 'right to request' remote work law is useless - it should be overhauled Remote working: Denis O'Brien reminded us of the outdated work practices we've left behind Last month, AIB staffwere told to return to their office for three days per week as the bank seeks to phase out its full-hybrid working practice. The Financial Services' Union has labelled the change 'regressive and without justification'. AIB told The Journal that it believes employees benefit from spending time with their team and colleagues, as in-person workdays leads to 'greater collaboration, connection and innovation'. It is the second bank to change its hybrid working models in recent weeks , after Bank of Ireland has requested its employees to return to the office for eight days each month.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Inheritance, relatives and blended families: what does it mean for tax-free thresholds?
Could you clarify a passing comment that you made in your article last week. You used the phrase 'by blood'. Are you drawing a distinction with uncle or aunt by marriage versus an uncle or aunt 'by blood'? In other words, are you saying that a child can inherit under Class B from their parent's sibling, but not the spouse of that sibling? Are you sure that is correct as I do not see any such distinction in Revenue guidance ? It also raises the question of who is 'the parent' in the case of a divorce and remarriage. Does the birth parent for Class A purposes cease to be a parent on remarriage or can the step-parent become one? Mr DL READ MORE I always wonder when I write 'by blood' whether it is clearly understood. As with many recurring items, I have set out clearly what that means at one point or another but often revert to the shorthand. And yes, it can be counterintuitive if, like me, you grew up in a family where aunts were regarded as aunts regardless of whether they were my parents' siblings or had married into the family – and similarly for uncles. But Revenue does make a distinction when it comes to inheritance. The three inheritance tax thresholds are very specifically delineated according to blood relationship between the person making the gift or leaving the inheritance in their will and the person receiving it. Category A, which offers the highest tax-free threshold – currently €400,000 – is generally referred to as covering gifts and inheritances from a parent to a child, but it is slightly wider than that. [ Inheritance tax: How to avoid leaving your loved ones with a hefty bill Opens in new window ] For instance, if it is the child that dies – as an adult or otherwise – and the parent who inherits from them, the parent will also benefit from the Category A threshold as long as they are inheriting outright – rather than, say, getting a life interest in a property. The threshold will also apply to a child – anyone under the age of 18 – where they are inheriting from their grandparent when their parent is dead. We'll come back to that Category A in a minute in relation to the second part of your query. Category B covers close blood relatives other than parents – or other scenarios covered by Category A. It is sometimes described as lineal relations – i.e. those in a direct line of descent or ancestry. Most commonly, that is seen as covering gifts and inheritance from a brother or sister, a grandparent and an uncle or aunt. And yes, it is only aunts or uncles related by blood – i.e. siblings of one or other parent. You're certainly right to query it. I used to think it covered everyone with that title but I did check with the Revenue commissioners and they did confirm that there had to be a blood relationship with the aunt or uncle for them to be covered under Category B. Category B will also cover life interest inheritance from a child to a parent or any inheritance from a child to an aunt, uncle or grandparent in the unfortunate circumstance of the child predeceasing the older relative. [ Will inheritance tax be cut again in the budget? Opens in new window ] Many people worry about what other people will pay in tax on an unexpected windfall (inheritance) after they are gone. Photograph: Getty Images There is a growing clamour – particularly from people who do not have children – for reform of this Category B. As it stands, the tax-free threshold under Category B is €40,000, just 10 per cent of the Category A threshold. An awful lot of people worry about what other people will pay in tax on an unexpected windfall (inheritance) after they are gone. Personally, I always find that odd but that's not to say it is not a thing. There is pressure either to raise this significantly or to find some other device to allow people without children nominate one or two beneficiaries who can avail of a higher threshold. It is something that has been examined in the Tax Strategy Papers published recently by the Department of Finance . These papers examine issues that might be addressed in the budget later this year or a budget further down the line. As is their wont, this review merely sets out options and, to the degree possible, their likely cost or benefit to the exchequer. Whether one approach should be favoured over another or whether any policy change should be pursued remains a political matter for decision by the Government . Finally, we have Category C which covers all other people benefiting from a gift or inheritance – sometimes called 'strangers in blood' where the current tax-free threshold is €20,000. [ I am due to inherit €30,000, is it worth my while to gift my husband half to avoid tax? Opens in new window ] The three inheritance tax thresholds are delineated according to blood relationship between the person leaving the inheritance in their will and the person receiving it. Photograph: Getty Images And you can see here why Revenue specifies that aunts and uncles in Category B must be blood relations, not relations by marriage. Apart from friends, neighbours, carers, gardeners etc, Category C also includes cousins who are, by definition, blood relatives of some sort and also in-laws, whom in many cases can be closer to the disponer (the person making the gift or inheritance) than even a niece or nephew by blood. But so it is. As regular readers will know, the other key thing to note is that these are lifetime limits on all gifts and inheritances dating back under each category to December 5th, 1991. So, under Category B, you need to tot up all large gifts and inheritances you have received from any grandparent, sibling, aunt or uncle to see if your latest windfall is tax-free or otherwise. And when we say gifts, we mean gifts valued at more than €3,000, as anything below that in any year is covered by the small gift exemption and is also tax free. Finally, once to hit 80 per cent of the relevant threshold – benefits of €320,000, €32,000 and €16,000 for each category respectively, you need to file an inheritance tax return to Revenue even though no tax is owing until you exceed the full threshold. Getting back to your second query – the position with blended families after divorce, remarriage and separation – you're quite correct to say that this is increasingly relevant in our modern society. We need to return to the question of the Category A threshold. When it states that a child can receive up to €400,000 tax-free from parents, the definition of child also refers to stepchildren and to adopted children. In fact, it even applies to foster children as long as those foster children spent at least five years with the family before the age of 18 at the family's expense. So does that mean that a child who is adopted or whose parents have divorced and remarried can receive category A benefits from more than two parents? Yes, it does. A stepchild qualifies for Category A on inheritance or gift from their birth parents and from any step-parent. The same is true for a child formally adopted. But birth parents are not removed from the Category A equation. A child can still avail of Category A in relation to a birth parent, even after divorce and remarriage, or where the child has been adopted elsewhere, as can a child who has been fostered under the criteria mentioned above. The one difference between the three categories of child is that if an adopted child's birth parent dies without making a will, they are not entitled to anything under intestacy where a stepchild and a fostered child would be. Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street, Dublin 2, or by email to , with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice
