The 10 best cities for first-time homebuyers — and 10 that are the worst
Cities were scored on 22 factors, from housing costs and weather to crime rates and school quality.
Most top cities for first-time buyers are in Florida, while most of the worst are in California.
Data from the National Association of Realtors (NAR) shows there are fewer first-time homebuyers than ever in the market. The market share of first-time homebuyers decreased from 32% in 2023 to 24% in 2024 — the lowest share since NAR began tracking in 1981.
It's also taking longer for Americans to secure their first home. The median age of a first-time homebuyer increased from 35 in 2023 to 38 in 2024.
Still, it's not impossible to buy for the first time, and some cities have better conditions than others.
The personal-finance website WalletHub analyzed 300 US cities of all sizes across 22 metrics, grouped into three key categories: affordability, the local real estate market, and quality of life. Factoring in elements like housing costs, weather, crime rates, and school quality, the cities were ranked based on how well they support first-time homebuyers.
"Buying a home for the first time is a very stressful and difficult process, especially when housing prices are through the roof and interest rates have risen sharply in the past few years," WalletHub Analyst Chip Lupo said. "The best cities for first-time home buyers not only are affordable both in terms of buying a house and living there afterward, but they also have a lot of housing choices as well as low crime rates and good schools."
According to WalletHub, six of the best 10 cities for first-time homebuyers are in Florida, while all but one are in the South. California garnered the most cities at the bottom of the list.
Here are the 10 best cities for first-time homebuyers and the 10 worst, according to WalletHub.
9. Lakeland, Florida Population: 124,990Median household income: $60,947Median home-sale price: $315,000Real estate market rank: 9Affordability rank: 139Quality of life rank: 15
8. Orlando Population: 334,854Median household income: $69,268Median home-sale price: $403,500Real estate market rank: 7Affordability rank: 159Quality of life rank: 17
6. Gilbert, Arizona Population: 288,790Median household income: $121,351Median home-sale price: 593,500Real estate market rank: 17Affordability rank: 34Quality of life rank: 85
5. Huntsville, Alabama Population: 230,402Median household income: $70,778Median home-sale price: $343,000Real estate market rank: 35Affordability rank: 36Quality of life rank: 43
4. Surprise, Arizona Population: 167,564Median household income: $93,371Median home-sale price: $435,000Real estate market rank:Affordability rank: 1Quality of life rank: 207
10. San Mateo, California Population: 103,006Median household income: $152,669Median home-sale price: $1,725,000Real estate market rank: 261Affordability rank: 287Quality of life rank: 245
9. New Orleans Population: 362,701Median household income: $55,339Median home-sale price: $385,000Real estate market rank: 195Affordability rank: 213Quality of life rank: 295
Population: 289,600Median household income: $98,152Median home-sale price: $425,000Real estate market rank: 259Affordability rank: 152Quality of life rank: 298
7. Costa Mesa, California Population: 109,131Median household income: $110,073Median home-sale price: $1,640,000Real estate market rank: 230Affordability rank: 297Quality of life rank: 188
6. Los Angeles Population: 3,878,704Median household income: $80,366Median home-sale price: $1,124,000Real estate market rank: 255Affordability rank: 294Quality of life rank: 246
3. Oakland, California Population: 443,554Median household income: $97,369Median home-sale price: $868,000Real estate market rank: 275Affordability rank: 231Quality of life rank: 300
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
These families are most at risk of losing HUD housing due to Trump's proposed time limits
More than one million low-income households — most of them working families with children — who depend on the nation's public housing and Section 8 voucher programs could be at risk of losing their government-subsidized homes under the Trump administration's proposal to impose a two-year time limit on rental assistance. That's according to new research from New York University, obtained exclusively by The Associated Press, which suggests the time restriction could affect as many as 1.4 million households helped by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The NYU report, which was published Thursday, also raises concerns about the largely untested policy, as most of the limited number of local housing authorities that have voluntarily tried the idea eventually abandoned the pilots. Advertisement 7 The time restriction could affect as many as 1.4 million households helped by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. AP 'If currently assisted households are subject to a two-year limit, that would lead to enormous disruption and large administrative costs,' for public housing authorities, the report said, adding that once the limit was up, housing authorities 'would have to evict all of these households and identify new households to replace them.' Defining temporary assistance 7 Map of U.S. public housing agencies with time-limited programs. Local Housing Solutions Advertisement Amid a worsening national affordable housing and homelessness crisis, President Donald Trump's administration is determined to reshape HUD's expansive role providing stable housing for low-income people, which has been at the heart of its mission for generations. At a June congressional budget hearing, HUD Secretary Scott Turner argued reforms like time limits will fix waste and fraud in public housing and Section 8 voucher programs while motivating low-income families to work toward self-sufficiency. 'It's broken and deviated from its original purpose, which is to temporarily help Americans in need,' Turner said. 'HUD assistance is not supposed to be permanent.' Elderly and disabled people would be exempted, but there's little guidance from the agency on how time-limited housing assistance would be implemented — how it would be enforced, when the clock starts and how the exemptions would be defined. Advertisement 7 'It's broken and deviated from its original purpose, which is to temporarily help Americans in need,' Turner said. 'HUD assistance is not supposed to be permanent.' AP The NYU researchers dove deep into HUD's nationwide data over a 10-year period, analyzing nearly 4.9 million households that have been public housing and Section 8 voucher tenants. Of that, about 2.1 million could be affected by the time limits because they include at least one adult who is not elderly or disabled and about 70% of those households had already been living on those subsidies for two or more years. HUD spokesperson Kasey Lovett pushed back on the NYU study. 'There is plenty of data that strongly supports time limits and shows that long-term government assistance without any incentive disincentivizes able-bodied Americans to work,' Lovett said in a statement. Working families most at risk Advertisement 7 About 2.1 million could be affected by the time limits because they include at least one adult who is not elderly or disabled. AP The time limits could displace more than a million children, as it would largely punish families who are working but still earning far below their area's median income. 'Housing assistance is especially impactful for children,' said Claudia Aiken, the director of new research partnerships for the Housing Solutions Lab at NYU's Furman Center who co-authored the study with Ellie Lochhead. Their health, education, employment and earnings potential can 'change in really meaningful ways if they have stable housing,' Aiken said. 7 The time limits could displace more than a million children, as it would largely punish families who are working but still earning far below their area's median income. AP Havalah Hopkins, a 33-year-old single mom, has been living in a public housing unit outside of Seattle since 2022, but now fears a two-year time limit would leave her and her teenage son homeless. The 14-year-old boy has autism but is considered high-functioning, so how HUD defines disabled and 'able-bodied' for the time limit could determine if their family will be affected by the restriction. Hopkins, who does catering work for a local chain restaurant, pays $450 a month in rent — 30% of her household income — for their two-bedroom apartment in Woodinville, Washington. Asked what she likes most about her home, Hopkins said: 'I like that I can afford it.' Few successful examples 7 'Housing assistance is especially impactful for children,' said Claudia Aiken, the director of new research partnerships for the Housing Solutions Lab. AP Advertisement Of the 17 housing authorities that tried time limits, 11 discontinued the trial. None tried two-year limits — the most common policy was a five-year limit with the option for an extra two and the limits usually applied to specific programs or referrals. Although there are over 3,000 housing authorities in the country, only 139 of them have ever been granted flexibility to consider testing a time limit while using federal funds for programs such as job training and financial counseling. 'Any conversation about time limits ends up being this really nuanced, hyper-local focus on what works for specific communities rather than this broad national-level implementation,' said Jim Crawford, director of the Moving to Work Collaborative which oversees that group of housing authorities. 7 Of the 17 housing authorities that tried time limits, 11 discontinued the trial. AP Advertisement Even with those supports, several housing authorities said rent was still too high and well-paying jobs were scarce, according to the study. Others said they didn't have enough capacity to provide enough supportive services to help households afford rent. Shawnté Spears of the Housing Authority of the County of San Mateo in California said the agency's five-year time limits have 'given folks motivation' to meet their goals in tandem with self-sufficiency programs funded by dollars Trump wants to cut. Time limits also give more households the chance to use vouchers, she said. But with the Bay Area's high rents, some tenants still have to spend more than half of their income on rent once their time is up or end up back on waitlists. 'I believe the program is very helpful in getting folks prepared but there lies this really, really significant rent burden here in our county,' said Spears. 'When folks do leave our time-limited program, they are facing an uphill battle.'
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump's approval rating on immigration and government spending has slipped, new AP-NORC poll finds
Most don't see positive impact from Trump's policies Roughly half of US adults report that Trump's policies have 'done more to hurt' them since his second term began six months ago, the survey found. About 2 in 10 say his policies have 'not made a difference' in their lives, with about one-quarter saying his policies have 'done more to help' them. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The vast majority of Democrats and about half of independents say Trump's policies have had a negative impact, while even many Republicans say they haven't seen positive effects. Advertisement 'As it sits today, I don't know his policies have made much of a difference in my day-to-day life,' said Landon Lindemer, a 29-year-old logistics manager from suburban Atlanta who voted for Trump three times. Lindemer said he generally approves of Trump's job performance, even if he has concerns about the massive spending in the big bill the president signed into law on July 4. Advertisement 'I'm not sold it's really going to help,' he said. Low but steady presidential approval ratings The mixed reviews on Trump's policies come as he struggles to follow through on key campaign promises, including lowering costs for working-class Americans, preserving popular social welfare programs like Medicaid, ending foreign wars and lowering government spending. Inflation rose last month to its highest level since February as Trump's sweeping tariffs push up the cost of everything from groceries and clothes to furniture and appliances. Separately, Trump's budget bill included Medicaid cuts that will lead to 11.8 million more Americans becoming uninsured and add $3.3 trillion to the national debt, the Congressional Budget Office estimated. At the same time, violent conflicts still rage in Israel and Ukraine. Overall, the new poll finds that about 4 in 10 US adults approve of Trump's job performance, a figure that's in line with his June approval but historically weak compared with recent presidents. Closer to half of US adults approved of President Joe Biden and President Barack Obama at roughly the same point in their Democratic presidencies, according to polls from AP-NORC and Gallup, although Biden's approval rating declined in the second half of his first year and remained low for the rest of his time in office. Poll respondent Bailey Neill, a 42-year-old attorney from San Antonio, said he was 'terrified' of Trump. Neill, a Democrat who describes himself as a 'student of history,' cast Trump as an authoritarian who has followed the controversial playbook outlined in Project 2025, a conservative blueprint for transformative changes across the federal government that Trump tried to distance himself from before the November election. Advertisement 'In terms of my day-to-day life, I really haven't seen a change, except for the general fear and anxiety I feel at a core level,' Neill said. Most disapprove of Trump's handling of immigration, economy and more Trump earned less than 50 percent approval on every issue included in the new AP-NORC poll, including the economy, government spending, trade, taxes, immigration, health care and his handling of the conflict in the Middle East. Only 43 percent of US adults said they approved of his handling of immigration, down slightly from the 49 percent who supported his work on the issue back in March. Trump also appears to have lost some support for his spending decisions. About 4 in 10 Americans approve of Trump's handling of government spending, down from 46 percent in March. On the economy overall, roughly 4 in 10 adults approve of Trump's performance, which hasn't changed measurably in the last few months. Timothy Dwyer, of Dyersburg, Tennessee, a 26-year-old self-described independent who works in retail sales and leans Republican, said Trump's work on the economy, especially his tariffs, has 'really sucked.' 'He's turned us into a toilet and has absolutely made us the laughing stock of the world,' Dwyer said of Trump's trade policies, while also lamenting the president's work on reducing grocery prices and health care. Most view Trump as effective, but fewer think he understands their needs Despite such criticism, most US adults think Trump is at least somewhat effective. About 6 in 10 say 'capable of getting things done' describes Trump at least 'somewhat' well. And about half of US adults say the same about the phrases 'good negotiator' or 'capable of handling a crisis.' That doesn't mean they believe Trump can see things from their perspective. Most Americans, 56 percent, say 'understands the problems facing people like you' is a phrase that describes Trump 'not very well' or 'not well at all.' His numbers on the question are relatively weak even among those in his party: Just about half of Republicans say he understands the problems facing people like them 'extremely' or 'very' well. Advertisement 'I think he's doing quite well. He could be doing a hell of a lot worse,' said poll respondent Levi Fischer, of Marshalltown, Iowa, who voted for Trump three times. Still, Fischer acknowledged that he hasn't seen the economy improve as quickly as he hoped. Trump's policies, he said, 'don't make much difference in my life.' ___ Peoples reported from New York.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Retail sales up a surprising 0.6% in June after a May pullback by consumers
WASHINGTON (AP) — After an earlier pullback, consumers picked up their spending in June despite anxiety over tariffs and the state of the U.S. economy. Retail sales rose a better-than-expected 0.6% in June after declining 0.9% in May, the Commerce Department said Thursday. Sales in April fell 0.1%, pulled down by a steep drop in auto sales, after Americans ramped up their car-buying in March to get ahead of President Donald Trump's 25% duty on imported cars and car parts. Excluding autos and automotive parts, sales rose 0.5%, according to the Commerce Department. There was broad-based strength across the board. Clothing and accessories sales rose 0.9%, while health and personal care sales saw a 0.5% bump. Restaurants sales rose 0.6% , while online retailers recorded a 0.4% gain. Autos and automotive parts dealers rebounded with a 1.2% increase. There were a few weak spots like electronics and appliance retailers and department stores, both of which had sales declines. Heather Long, the chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that layoffs remain low and consumers are still confident enough that the economy is chugging along. 'Don't count the American consumer out yet," said Long in a statement. "There's still a lot of trepidation about tariffs and likely price hikes, but consumers are willing to buy if they feel they can get a good deal. The word of the summer for the economy is resilient.' The retail sales report arrives amid a whipsaw frenzy of on and off again tariffs have that jolted businesses and households. For businesses, that has made it harder to manage supply and inventories. Americans are focusing more on necessities, when they do shop. The latest government report showed that inflation rose last month to its highest level since February as Trump's sweeping tariffs push up the costs of everything from groceries and clothes to furniture and appliances. Consumer prices rose 2.7% in June from a year earlier, the Labor Department said Tuesday, up from an annual increase of 2.4% in May. On a monthly basis, prices climbed 0.3% from May to June, after rising just 0.1% the previous month. Trump insists that the U.S. effectively has no inflation as he has attempted to pressure Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell into reducing short-term interest rates. Yet the new inflation numbers make it more likely that the central bank will leave rates where they are. Powell has said that he wants to measure the economic impact of Trump's tariffs before reducing borrowing costs. Americans have continued to spend, which is what the Fed had hoped to curtail a little bit with rate hikes. One big litmus test was Amazon's four-day Prime event along with competing retail sales from the likes of Walmart and Target that kicked off last week. Adobe Digital Insights, which tracks online sales, reported that the sales events drove $24.1 billion in online spending, a 30.3% increase compared with the same period last year. Still, those that were buying prioritized essentials like dish soap and paper products over big-ticket purchases, according to consumer data provider Numerator, based on its analysis of Amazon Prime orders. Deborah Weinswig, founder and CEO of Coresight Research, said she's becoming more optimistic about the financial health of the consumer after the Amazon Prime events. She said inventories are at a healthy level, and she didn't see big fire sales. 'People aren't buying things that they don't need,' she said. 'I think it's a healthier retail environment.' Retailers are now turning their attention to the back-to-school shopping season, which is the second largest consumer rush after the winter holidays. Coresight Research estimates that total U.S. back-to-school spending will increase by 3.3% year compared with the year-ago period, to $33.3 billion. And it predicts that shoppers will do a big chunk of their shopping before August to get ahead of tariffs. Levi Strauss & Co. said last week that it was cutting back on making styles that aren't selling and making targeted price increases as it moves production away from China due to tariffs.
