U.S. Education Department launches civil rights investigation into Green Bay School District
The U.S. Education Department's Office of Civil Rights has launched an investigation into the Green Bay School District after a January complaint alleged an elementary school discriminated against a White student based on his race.
'In America, we do not 'prioritize' students for educational access, nor do we judge their worth, on the basis of skin color. Schools must provide special needs students access to supportive educational resources on an equal footing and on the basis of need, not on the basis of race,' acting assistant secretary for civil rights Craig Trainor said in a May 28 news release.
In the complaint, the law firm Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty alleged the district discriminated against Green Bay King Elementary parent Colby Decker's son by not providing him access to literacy resources because he was not a 'focus student,' which was defined as a First Nations, Black or Hispanic student in King's student success plan. The focus student language has since been changed.
Decker's son has dyslexia, and she told WILL she requested he receive a one-on-one intervention. She said her son was put on a waiting list for reading interventions in April 2024 and was finally placed in a small group intervention last fall, which she said caused her son to fall behind.
Decker and WILL allege the district violated Title VI, which prohibits racial and ethnic discrimination. The civil rights complaint also raised concerns about the way the district handled WILL's original complaint, saying the district's investigation was biased. The complaint also claimed the district didn't meet special education law needs relating to Decker's son's dyslexia, which they said would account for discrimination on the basis of disability.
On May 28, OCR said it had opened a formal investigation into Green Bay based on the complaint. It will investigate whether the district violated Title VI, which prohibits racial and ethnic discrimination, and whether it failed to evaluate Decker's son as a student with disabilities, which it says is discrimination under federal law.
"The district had many opportunities to change course and make clear it would be treating its students in a colorblind way, and they didn't do that," WILL legal counsel Cory Brewer said. "We really hope this investigation is eye-opening for the district, particularly for district leaders."
Green Bay communications director Lori Blakeslee said the district hadn't yet received anything from OCR.
Contact Green Bay education reporter Nadia Scharf at nscharf@gannett.com or on X at @nadiaascharf.
This article originally appeared on Green Bay Press-Gazette: Federal civil rights investigation launched into Green Bay Schools
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Trump's new DEI: Drama, exaggeration and incoherence
President Trump's war against diversity, equity and inclusion is reverberating throughout nearly every sector, igniting a civil rights pushback. But his executive orders ending DEI cannot halt the historic pace of national racial diversity. According to the Census Bureau, the 'white only' share of the population is now 58.4 percent. Non-Hispanic whites are projected to fall below 50 percent by 2045. So the 'D' in DEI represents America's destiny. Although contentious race-based policy debates will continue, diversity is the new America and must be embraced. The DEI acronym, along with tariffs, ranks among Trump's most frequent utterances. But due to overuse and clouded meaning, change is afoot to rename DEI, starting with the 'Office of Belonging' at the renowned Mayo Clinic. Therefore, I propose changing DEI to mean 'drama, exaggeration and incoherence,' reflecting Trump's unique communication and governing style. 'Drama' captures the daily, head-splitting, inescapable second Trump term. Every day is Trump Day, as Americans are surrounded by media and compelled to tune in. The president's insatiable desire to consolidate power, combined with his unconventional need to create drama, leads to constant breaking news that affects every citizen's life to some degree. Such intentional 'drama by design' could be perceived as a subtle form of domination. Through daily headlines — regardless of whether the news is good or bad, since bad news is spun, justified or rationalized as good — Trump keeps himself prominently on your screen. He 'wins the day' by overshadowing or blotting out others. His need to be on your screen evokes George Orwell's classic dystopian novel '1984,' written long before screen viewing became a daily ritual. In '1984,' a totalitarian state dominates and controls its people through pervasive surveillance via their 'telescreen.' Maintaining a constant screen presence is 'Big Brother,' the all-powerful leader who is always watching and enforcing ideological purity throughout the land. Remarkably, Trump maintains a communication advantage over the fictional Big Brother. He holds a 65 percent stake in Trump Media and Technology Group, which operates Truth Social, his primary communication platform, with a market capitalization of $5 billion. Thus, a drama-loving president who owns and controls his main media dissemination vehicle is rationalized as 'Trump being Trump.' Through Truth Social — an Orwellian sounding name — Trump crafts his version of 'truth.' He generates non-stop drama, attacks America's premier institutions, denigrates his enemies, spews factually incorrect statements, picks fights with celebrities and, most egregiously, conducts official presidential business with no filters or guardrails. How long will Americans tolerate the pace of Trump's move-fast-and-break-things presidency? What most affects presidential job approval ratings are the prices for food, gas, cars, homes and consumer goods. Rising costs and shortages driven by uncertainty due to Trump's tariffs, further complicated by this week's anti-tariff court ruling, and then blocked on appeal, suggest he could 'pay' in the midterms. More damaging is that Trump had promised to combat inflation, the key reason he won in 2024. The president, well aware of this problem, has instituted an ongoing operational plan to prevent Republicans from losing the House of Representatives. Trump also believes (with good reason) that a Democratic victory could trigger his third impeachment. Therefore, cue the 2026 election drama along with nonstop judicial drama. Exaggeration is Trump's default mode of communication. Since facts are often inconvenient, it's easier to use exaggerated words or phrases to enhance a narrative. Nearly every day, on any issue, Trump straddles the line between embellishment and outright lies, known in Trump-speak as 'alternative facts.' His flair for stretching the truth is baked into his always great, best-ever, big, beautiful persona. Although Trump continuously exaggerates his past, present and future achievements — most notably falsely claiming victory in the 2020 election — he occasionally faces the consequences of his exaggerations. After repeatedly saying, 'I will end the Ukraine-Russia war in 24 hours,' he now claims he was only speaking 'in jest.' Continuously fact-checking Trump's exaggerations is a thankless task, and why much of what he says goes unchecked and repeated as fact in Trump-friendly media, on X and Truth Social. Incoherence is Trump's enemy. His 79th birthday, coming in June, will bring more comparisons to former President Joe Biden's diminished mental state. And Trump is exhibiting increasingly bewildering behavior. At all hours, he is always on the attack, often posting bizarre Truth Social videos and tweets unbefitting of a president. Trump's Memorial Day 'scum' remarks and meandering West Point 'trophy wife' address, along with his usual 'weave' of rambling speech patterns bordering on gibberish, explains why the White House is purging its website of official transcripts. This action evokes another detail from '1984,' in which embarrassing documents are disappeared 'down the memory hole.' This new version of DEI represents our president governing through drama, exaggeration and incoherence, brazenly consolidating power with a 'dare you to stop me' attitude. That invites the question of what the presidency will look like after Trump. Do Americans prefer an all-powerful chief executive who enriches himself and tries to rule with fear and an iron fist? If so, Donald Trump Jr. could be our next president. Myra Adams is an opinion writer who served on the creative team of two Republican presidential campaigns in 2004 and 2008. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Black America Web
28 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Tyler Perry, Terri Vaughn Sued Over ‘She The People' Netflix Series
Source: Taylor Hill / Getty A lawsuit alleges that Tyler Perry's new Netflix series 'She The People' infringes on the brand identity and goodwill of a nonprofit organization and political space of the same name. Aimee Allison, president and founder of the nonprofit She the People, filed suit shortly before the release. Allison filed against Netflix, Perry, his company, Tyler Vision, LLC, and actress Terri Vaughn. According to her complaint, Allison previously contracted with Vaughn to develop a docuseries based on the 'She the People' concept. She further alleged that Vaughn and Perry's Netflix series pulls in many of the themes and frames from her work. 'The Series echoes many of the same themes regarding Black women's experiences in politics that Ms. Allison addresses through her activism under the SHE THE PEOPLE mark, albeit in a slightly different format,' reads the complaint. 'With a lighthearted and comedic touch, the Series trailer (the 'Trailer') shows the newly-elected lieutenant governor confronting a number of issues likely to resonate with women of color[.]' While the scenarios themselves are not unique, coupled with the She the People brand, it could suggest the unfair usage of Allison's intellectual property. A quick trademark search shows that Perry applied for the She the People trademark through legal representation. The application was initially denied in part due to the likelihood of confusion with Allison's existing trademark. Allison has not provided any public comment on the show, but she posted a video last week talking about the importance of defending your brand and creative ideas. A seasoned political strategist, Allison was also a significant supporter of former Vice President Kamala Harris during both her 2020 and 2024 presidential campaigns. Ahead of the 2024 election cycle, Allison launched a podcast under the She the People brand in partnership with Design Observer. In her personal capacity, Allison supported several fierce state and federal candidates for office, including Stacey Abrams. Through She the People and related work, Allison has established a network of relationships and engagements designed to uplift Black and other women of color. Much of her work has involved breaking through stereotypes of who is considered electable and challenging barriers to entry to Black and other women of color into politics. Founded in 2018, She the People has existed as a space of convening and conversation for Black and other women of color. Allison organized two convenings for Black and other women of color political leaders in 2018 and 2019. The 2019 event centered on a presidential forum that elevated the leadership and voices of Black and other women of color leaders and organizers, as well as several major presidential candidates. Several media outlets covered the event and notable moments from several 2020 candidates, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and Vice President Kamala Harris. I attended both convenings first as a staffer with former Democracy for America in 2018 and then as a freelance journalist in 2019. Across every moment, curated under the She the People brand, has been focused on shifting the cultural perception of who can be a leader. Allison has been in conversation with Congressional leaders like Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman and newly elected Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee. Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms said she was glad to sign on as an executive producer despite people in her inner circle warning her to stay away from the project. Despite her involvement in similar social circles, it's unclear whether Bottoms knew about the 'She the People' connection to Allison's work. 'The world is full of people who wish they had good ideas,' Allison said in an Instagram Reel. 'And too many who'll try to take yours when they see it catching fire. So, put your paperwork in place. And prepare to protect the soul of what you've built.' SEE ALSO: St. Louis Community Fills Relief Gaps Left by Federal Delay Coalition Pushes New Media Code Of Ethics In Crime Reporting SEE ALSO Tyler Perry, Terri Vaughn Sued Over 'She The People' Netflix Series was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Black America Web
28 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Target, Walmart Warn Investors About Consumer Boycotts
Source: Gary Hershorn / Getty Several companies have learned the hard way that the Trump administration isn't as 'pro-business' as it claimed. The administration's pronounced crackdown on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives has resulted in several companies rolling back, if not outright ending their DEI programs, which in turn has inspired consumer boycotts that have directly impacted sales at several companies. In fact, consumer boycotts have proven so successful that companies are now warning investors about the potential risks they pose to their future bottom line. CNN reports that companies such as Target, Walmart, and Home Depot listed consumer boycotts around DEI initiatives as a potential risk in their annual regulatory filings with investors. In recent years, consumer boycotts have become a common trend across political lines. In 2023, Bud Light faced backlash from the MAGA set for *checks notes* doing a brand deal with a trans woman. Wait, I thought we were supposed to be snowflakes? 'Companies face a Catch-22 situation,' Kristen Jaconi, director of the Peter Arkley Institute for Risk Management at USC, told CNN. 'Consumers may be dissatisfied if a company takes a particular position on a social issue or if a company takes no position at all.' I'd push back against the assertion that it's a Catch-22, as evidenced by the fact that we've seen both Costco and Apple maintain their DEI initiatives with little to no pushback, and we've yet to see any legal action taken against these companies by the government. In the case of Costo, its support of DEI initiatives has resulted in increased brand loyalty. The company is predicted to post strong quarterly sales in an earnings report set to be released on May 29. A company choosing to withdraw its DEI initiatives is an active choice to bend the knee to the current administration and only goes to show that their initial efforts weren't sincere, but simply political theater. If they truly believed in it, they'd have no problem standing on business (quite literally in this case). Source: NurPhoto / Getty Companies having to acknowledge consumer boycotts as a financial risk in their filings is proof that boycotts work. The first quarter sales for Tesla and Target show us that boycotts work. Tesla has faced consumer boycotts worldwide as a result of CEO Elon Musk's active role in the Trump administration. The company's first-quarter revenue fell by 20%, and in Europe, sales of Tesla vehicles have dropped 49% compared to last year. Considering that electric cars are predominantly favored by left-leaning individuals and have repeatedly been demonized by President Trump, no less, Musk's heel turn into being a right-wing troll isn't just weird, but also reveals a startling lack of business acumen. Target has been the focus of several consumer boycotts since it announced it'd be sunsetting it's DEI initiatives and ending a program designed to help Black employees advance their careers. Foot traffic has consistently been down in the company's stores, and it recently revealed a drop in its first-quarter sales. No one was surprised Walmart ended their DEI initiatives, given their clientele largely consists of brokies who think 'Buck Fiden' hats are the epitome of style and humor. Target's move was a shock considering how much they courted Black dollars in years past, only to turn around and play in our faces. Listen. I'm a staunch leftist who thinks Ronald Reagan was the worst thing to happen to Black people since Jim Crow, but I'm aware I don't live in a vacuum. America is filled with folks from all different ideological leanings. As a business, if your core clientele largely consists of a particular group, wouldn't it make more sense to double down on moves that engender that base to your business? It's as if these companies still haven't learned the inherent truth of running a business in the digital age: it's impossible to be everything to everyone. Consumer boycotts are inevitable in this day and age, so pick a lane and stay true to the base that's loyal to you. Otherwise, you'll be out here looking like Target, and who would want that? SEE ALSO: Affinity Graduations Canceled Amid Trump's DEI Crackdown California Teen Spurs Outrage With Racist Promposal – They Scared: Target, Walmart Warn Their Investors About Consumer Boycotts was originally published on
