logo
Chicago Democrats issue warnings about their mayor amid Zohran Mamdani's rise

Chicago Democrats issue warnings about their mayor amid Zohran Mamdani's rise

NBC News5 days ago
Before New York City mayoral primary winner Zohran Mamdani made a splash, another big-city Democratic mayoral candidate with progressive bona fides unexpectedly burst onto the national political scene.
Two years later, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's tenure has captured so much negative attention (dubbed 'America's Worst Mayor' by The Wall Street Journal's editorial board) that Mamdani's campaign has taken note. Mamdani's camp is tracking Johnson's challenges and trying to avoid repeating Second City missteps, according to a person close to both Mamdani's and Johnson's teams.
Johnson isn't the only progressive major-city mayor in the country, and his troubles wouldn't automatically translate to ideological allies. Mamdani himself has 'repeatedly cited' another progressive mayor as a role model, as The Boston Globe noted: Boston Mayor Michelle Wu.
But Johnson's tenure in Chicago does serve as a useful early warning system for some of the issues Mamdani could confront in New York, whether in a multiway general election or as mayor, if he wins in November. Chicago Alderwoman Jeanette Taylor, a strong campaign ally who has also criticized some of the mayor's early decisions, noted how critics often trot out the word 'socialism' to cast blame on Johnson for long-standing issues facing the city. It's a phenomenon, she added, that Mamdani could similarly face.
'People make this a bad word. People make this into something that it is not. Let's just call all of this what it is: This is the way the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor, because they get us fighting on s--- that just does not even matter,' she said.
Johnson was a county commissioner, schoolteacher and union organizer when he leapfrogged far more battle-tested candidates to clinch the city's mayoralty. While Mamdani knocked out former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary in New York City, before Cuomo began a third-party run, Johnson with his rise.
Johnson, who does not call himself a democratic socialist but believes in many of the same principles as Mamdani, was swept into office by a coalition underpinned by the powerful Chicago Teachers Union and the city's Black and brown voters. He vowed to unite fractured coalitions and lift up the most vulnerable. He represented change, and his strong roots in the community as an activist, a parent and a resident of a neighborhood that struggles with crime gave hope around new efforts toward equality across a city long deeply segregated by race and income.
The young, energetic activist with a passion for fighting wealth inequality and lifting up the city's left-behind neighborhoods entered office with much promise. But it hasn't gone well since then.
'They lost the plot,' the person close to both Mamdani's and Johnson's teams said of Johnson's tenure. The person noted that while both Johnson and Mamdani have specific visions, they said Mamdani is 'pragmatic and he wants to succeed' but described Johnson as unbending at times.
One of the most significant missteps, the person said, was whom Johnson brought into his administration, adding: 'Staffing is very important. You need professionals who can execute your vision. Those may not be the same people who ran your campaign.'
One of Mamdani's recent communications hires comes with deep experience. Dora Pekec, who once served as a campaign manager for Chicago Alderman Bill Conway, also worked with House Majority PAC before heading communications for Brad Lander in his New York mayoral run. Former Mayor Bill de Blasio also recently suggested staffers under his administration would be ripe for picking.
It was a point that Rep. Jesus 'Chuy' Garcia, D-Ill., also underscored. Garcia was among those who lost in the first round of Chicago's 2023 mayoral election.
'When progressives run for high office it's critical to be ready to govern,' Garcia wrote in a text message. 'Governing entails striking a balance between promises made (ideals) and making the wheels of government turn. Need to assemble a team that understands your priorities and deliver services, keep relationships with stakeholders especially a base while expanding through engagement. Intergovernmental relationships need to be really keen.'
'Experience in developing and executing plans is most important. This applies to Johnson and when Mamdani is elected,' he continued.
Agendas and obstacles
While attempting to make headway on his agenda, Johnson was confronted with a rash of challenges facing Chicago, and his popularity began to slide. With some exceptions, observers say it was less about Johnson pushing far-left policies and more about the mayor's confrontational style, his struggles to communicate and his inability to forge alliances with state and federal officials.
Even as he made headway in the areas of public safety and mental health, Johnson grew entrenched in battles big and small, cultivating an air of drama over his City Hall.
While Johnson eschewed criticism during his campaign that he would be owned by the teachers union, those concerns persisted. He did hammer out a teachers contract without a disruption to the school year — no small feat — but it proved to be a bad-tempered and messy ordeal that could bring lasting political reprisal. He went to war with and fired a popular schools CEO, and also saw the resignations of the entire board of education, which Johnson had appointed.
Johnson almost immediately saw his coalition splinter over an influx of migrants whom Texas Gov. Greg Abbott bused into Chicago without warning. Like other major cities at the time, Chicago grappled with how to adequately house families vying for legal status. The city clashed with its own residents, including in neighborhoods of color, with much of the political backlash affecting Johnson.
He and Gov. JB Pritzker, a fellow Democrat, share a frosty relationship at best. He locked horns with his city council over major policy decisions. He broke a campaign promise by seeking a $300 million property tax increase then suffered the humiliation of a 50-0 council defeat.
William Daley, the son of longtime Mayor Richard J. Daley and brother of longtime Mayor Richard M. Daley, said Johnson's troubles at least partially stem from lacking experience in managing an expansive budget and overseeing tens of thousands of employees. He predicted that, if elected, the 33-year-old Mamdani could face similar political troubles as Johnson.
'It's a very tough job if you've never been in politics or in a job that manages something big,' Daley said, noting his brother's prior experience before his mayorship. 'Rich had eight years as state's attorney. … He had that experience for eight years — running something. It's not an easy task for these people who have never run anything.'
Johnson's predecessors had their own shortcomings, from public corruption to massive civil rights failures, relentless crime and poor fiscal management that still haunts the city today. In 2008, then-Mayor Richard M. Daley sold the city's parking meters to private investors for a staggering 75 years, trading billions of dollars in future revenue to plug a budget hole for a one-time payment.
Taylor, the Chicago City Council member, said that while Johnson 'made some rookie mistakes' he is unfairly getting the brunt of the blame for mistakes shared by predecessors.
'You think in 22 months we have dug a $1.5 billion hole?' she said of those blaming Johnson. 'The math ain't mathing.'
New beginnings
Politically, things have potential to look up for Johnson. Trump has sicced his Department of Justice on the mayor to investigate his hiring practices after Johnson had discussed hiring Black individuals for key positions. Johnson fired back that his hiring reflected the country and the city, while Trump's hiring reflected a 'country club.'
It caught on in conservative circles, with cable news hosts bashing Johnson just as they had done with Lightfoot. In an interview, she said Mamdani could expect the same.
Lightfoot often hit back, and that brought its own repercussions.
'It's hard to fight against the guy who's got the biggest megaphone in the world,' Lightfoot said. 'Many of us who were Black women, like me in Chicago, like Muriel Bowser in D.C., like Keisha Lance Bottoms in Atlanta, when he mentioned us by name in a disparaging way, candidly, the death threats went through the roof.'
Moving into the second half of his term, Johnson can point to public safety as one of his biggest achievements. Observers largely applaud his choice of Superintendent Larry Snelling to lead the police department, as well as policies the mayor has put into place, like boosting mental health services, restructuring the detectives bureau and backing violence intervention methods.
The number of murders in the city has fallen for two consecutive years, and Chicago could be on pace to reach the mayor's goal of having fewer than 500 homicides this year for the first time in a decade.
'Mayor Johnson's primary focus over his first two years in office has been on driving down violent crime in Chicago. Since taking office, Chicago has seen historic reductions in crime and violence under the Johnson administration's holistic approach,' a spokesperson from Johnson's office said in a statement, citing a 33% drop in homicides in the first six months of 2025 and a 38% drop in shootings in that same period. It also boasted of having the highest homicide clearance rate in more than a decade.
As far as Johnson's poll numbers, 'the narrative that Mayor Johnson is unpopular has been constructed by a small number of well-funded political organizations opposed to the Mayor's progressive agenda,' the statement said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Haiti ushers in last phase of transitional government amid color, class tensions
Haiti ushers in last phase of transitional government amid color, class tensions

Miami Herald

time22 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Haiti ushers in last phase of transitional government amid color, class tensions

The latest transition of power in Haiti is highlighting long-standing fault lines between the country's Black majority and the mostly mixed-race business class and threatens to inflame unresolved social dynamics, spilling into the country's already volatile politics. Adding to the tensions: The U.S. State Department is weighing into the fray, accusing unnamed 'malign actors' of trying to destabilize the crisis-wracked nation by offering bribes to block the hand-over of power. On Thursday, Laurent Saint-Cyr assumed the leadership of Haiti's ruling nine-member Transitional Presidential Council from Fritz Alphonse Jean, a U.S.-educated economist, as part of a rotating presidency. Saint-Cyr represents the private sector on the council, which has some presidential powers and is tasked with restoring law and order to the Caribbean nation. Ahead of the change over, concerns over a possible coup led to increased security precautions. There was no coup, but on the morning of the swearing-in, armed gangs launched attacks on the road leading to the seat of government after Jimmy 'Barbecue' Cherizier, a leader in the Viv Ansanm gang coalition, announced his intent on social media to attack the prime minister's office and the Villa d'Accueli, where both the prime minister and Transitional Presidential Council work. Saint-Cyr is slated to remain in power until Feb. 7, 2026, which is supposed to be the end of the transition and a run-up to national elections. His ascension consolidates power in the hands of members of the country's small, lighter-skinned economic elite for the first time in recent memory, and has been for months the subject of political infighting and intense debates about colorism and class that harken back to Haiti's colonial history. Tensions peaked last week when bribery allegations surfaced amid reports of an attempt to remove Prime Minister Alix Didier Fils-Aimé ahead of the changeover to shift the balance of power. Jean and other council members, along with the head of the Pitit Desalin political party, Jean-Charles Moïse, reportedly held secret talks about replacing Fils-Aimé as prime minister after efforts to dissuade Saint-Cyr from taking the helm failed. Fils-Aimé was unanimously appointed to the prime minister job in November after the council abruptly fired his predecessor, Garry Conille, after barely six months. Like Saint-Cyr, Fils-Aimé is from the business community and is considered part of Haiti's self-described 'mulatto' class, which, along with the private sector, has historically been a lighting rod for the country's ills. On Friday, the State Department took to X and, in a highly unusual post, the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs made it known Washington will 'hold accountable anyone who seeks to disrupt' the transition. 'The United States is aware of reported bribery attempts to undermine Haiti's stability,' the post said. 'We commend those [council] members for rejecting corruption and reaffirm our support for their collaborative work with the Prime Minister to work together to stabilize Haiti, in our shared national interests.' State Department officials, responding to an inquiry from the Herald, did not provide details or say what fueled the post on Haiti. They would only say that they are 'aware of credible reports that malign actors are actively seeking to destabilize the transition government.' Jean, who took over the council's presidency in March, and Moïse denied the bribery allegations, and argued they were justified in their concerns about the transition, which would place two lighter-skinned men in the two top positions of power in Haiti, because of the country's long, tortuous history in which a small, lighter-skinned minority class has long controlled the majority of the wealth. 'Analyses are pouring in on social media and on radio stations on social rifts that may occur with Saint-Cyr and Fils Aimé occupying the top of the executive branches,' he said. He also dismissed the allegations of any bribery taking place behind the scenes. 'This question of bribery is a pure narrative manipulation of political entrepreneurs fighting to keep the status quo,' Jean said ahead of Thursday's swearing-in ceremony. 'It is a desperate and trivial effort to attract the sympathy of American congressmen and women, and the U.S. administration.' The optics are not lost on Haitians, who worry about political fallout from the country's small economic elite taking such a visible role when armed gangs have targeted their properties, and foreign governments have openly accused some of them of financing the gang warfare. But critics and political observers also say that Jean and others who are part of the transition are weaponizing the class and color issue to hide their own failure to put Haiti on the path to stability. 'We have to recognize that nothing is working here,' said Pierre Esperance, a human rights advice who recently issued a scathing report on the council's failings. The presidential council, he added, 'isn't any good, the governance isn't good, and the country is not being governed. You have a group of individuals who are fighting among themselves while at the same time collecting on all the privileges the state gives them each month, and they are not doing anything for the country.' Espérance warned that if the council and the prime minister fail to take action soon to initiate a political dialogue on governance, Haiti will face even greater instability. In the 16 months that the transitional council has been in power, Haiti is no closer to holding elections or getting the armed gangs under control. Instead, the country has ceded ground to gangs, which now control up to 90% of Port-au-Prince and are spreading to other regions to the north. 'Every time there is a change on the council, there is this kind of conflict,' said Jacques Ted St. Dic, who calls the infighting a diversion to hide the failings and corruption in the system. St. Dic acknowledges that given Haiti's history, the country finds itself at a difficult juncture, where the racial conflict between Blacks and lighter-skinned Haitians could resurface at any moment. 'All of those conflicts can emerge into a battle of politicians, a real political fight,' St. Dic said. 'And that's where the danger lies.' The issue had already broken into the publicly this week, when Moïse, the head of the Pitit Dealin party, pushed back on radio on the State Department's post, and evoked the race and class question in his defense. Moïse acknowledge he had meetings about two weeks ago with Fils-Aimé about his concerns, as well as with three council members who have been indicted in a bribery scheme in which they are accused of demanding credit cards and cash from the head of a state-owned bank. Jean, the outgoing head of the presidential council, said he has spoken out about the 'danger' of Saint-Cyr and Fils-Aimé holding power at the same time. More than two centuries after enslaved Africans defeated their French colonizers, there remain deep and divisions and distrust between Haiti's mostly poor, Black population and the small, mixed-race elite in Haiti. For example, on Wednesday, Jean took to social media to distance himself from the council's support of a contract that gives elements of the private sector 24 years of control of 70% of all the cargo-container traffic coming into Port-au-Prince, after questioning its legitimacy in Haiti's economy, which relies heavily on imports and exports. Meanwhile, with armed gangs now seizing on the tensions to advance their attacks, Haitians find themselves divided about whether the new political landscape will bring more violence or help to finally pave the way for a return to stability.

Socialist Zohran Mamdani has blistering response to Andrew Cuomo's alleged phone call with Trump: ‘Disqualifying'
Socialist Zohran Mamdani has blistering response to Andrew Cuomo's alleged phone call with Trump: ‘Disqualifying'

New York Post

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Socialist Zohran Mamdani has blistering response to Andrew Cuomo's alleged phone call with Trump: ‘Disqualifying'

Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani quickly seized Thursday on a report that Andrew Cuomo and President Trump had a call in recent weeks — blasting such alleged coordination as 'disqualifying' for a prospective Big Apple mayor. Mamdani contended that New Yorkers won't elect a mayoral candidate who's cozy with the president after the New York Times report that Trump, a Queens native, was eyeing getting involved in the race. The Democratic candidate, during an WNYC interview, claimed Cuomo was 'coordinating with' Trump, calling it 'disqualifying' given the president's supposed attacks on the city. He carried on the critique during a hastily organized rally outside 26 Federal Plaza, where ICE agents have controversially been rounding up immigrants appearing for routine court appearances. Advertisement 'The job of mayor is not to audition to be the jester for a want-to-be king,' Mamdani railed, as he was flanked by union leaders. 'New Yorkers do not want a mayor who is working in tandem with the president to subvert the will of the people of New York City.' 4 Zohran Mamdani on Thursday blasted Andrew Cuomo for allegedly coordinating with President Trump. James Keivom Advertisement Mamdani also argued he was the only candidate worthy of being elected in deep blue New York City, given incumbent Mayor Eric Adams allegedly being compromised by the president's Justice Department scuttling his federal criminal case, and Curtis Sliwa being the GOP nominee. 'The fact is, the president has three candidates in this race,' he said. 'One that he's directly been in touch with, another that he bailed out of legal trouble and now functionally controls and the final one literally being a member of the same Republican Party.' Insiders said White House officials have been actively calling New York lawmakers and politicos this week to figure out if Trump should weigh in on the race as polls show Mamdani is the clear frontrunner. Advertisement The president himself is unsure he should, one source told The Post. Trump thinks Adams is a politically tainted likely 'loser' who cannot win re-election, the source said. He also dislikes Cuomo, despite a relationship going back decades — and ditto for Sliwa, who marches to the beat of a political drum unaligned with MAGA. Trump and Sliwa have a beef going back years that can't be reconciled, sources said. Cuomo's spokesman Rich Azzopardi, in response to the Times report, said the former governor and Trump 'have not spoken in some time.' Advertisement 4 Andrew Cuomo has a long history with Trump. REUTERS 4 President Trump is weighing whether to get involved in the Big Apple's mayoral race. Bonnie Cash – Pool via CNP / MEGA 'As far as I know, they have not discussed the race,' he claimed. Azzopardi argued that Trump would actually prefer Mamdani, whom he has labeled a 'commie,' because his far-left positions would be a boon for Republicans nationwide in the midterm elections. He also attacked Adams — who has cozied up to Trump politically, with mixed success — as a 'wholly owned subsidiary of the President.' Sliwa is also in the race, bearing the standard of Trump's GOP, Azzopardi noted. 'There is only one candidate in this race who can effectively defend New York values and take on Donald Trump – the one official who already has: Andrew Cuomo,' he said. 'We'll leave the palace intrigue to the gossip mill.' 4 Mayor Eric Adams, who has been trying to cozy up to Trump, is viewed by the president as a 'loser' who can't win re-election, a source said. James Keivom Advertisement Trump, despite making gains in New York City during the 2024 election, remains deeply unpopular in his home city. A recent poll found that Trump's unfavorability stands at 62% in the city, while Mamdani is the only mayoral candidate whose favorability wasn't deep underwater.

Judge Denies Trump Request as Newsom National Guard Case Is Set To Start
Judge Denies Trump Request as Newsom National Guard Case Is Set To Start

Newsweek

time23 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Judge Denies Trump Request as Newsom National Guard Case Is Set To Start

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal judge has denied President Donald Trump's attempt to halt a lawsuit brought by Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom, effectively allowing the case to proceed as scheduled on Monday, August 11. The ruling sends a signal that the court potentially views Newsom's claims—centered on the alleged unlawful federalization of the California National Guard in 2025—as legally viable. Trump's legal team had argued that the claims under the Posse Comitatus Act "fail as a matter of law," but the judge rejected that argument, allowing the trial to move forward. Why It Matters The case could shape up to be a significant constitutional test of presidential authority. At issue is Trump's decision in June 2025 to take control of California's National Guard and send troops to Los Angeles following protests that sprung up following federal immigration raids. Newsom said the move was unlawful, violated the Posse Comitatus Act, and infringed on California's sovereign control of its National Guard. Trump's legal team argues the deployment was justified under the Insurrection Act. The outcome could set an important precedent for how and when a president may use military forces domestically, especially in politically charged situations. The case is being closely watched for its implications on civil-military relations. California Governor Gavin Newsom at Downey Memorial Christian Church in Downey, California, on July 16, 2025. California Governor Gavin Newsom at Downey Memorial Christian Church in Downey, California, on July 16, 2025. Patrick T. Fallon/Getty Images What to Know Why Was the National Guard Deployed? In early June 2025, following unrest sparked by immigration enforcement operations, Trump ordered the federalization of the California National Guard, citing what he called a breakdown in law and order. The administration said the deployment was necessary to protect federal property and maintain public safety, invoking the Insurrection Act. Newsom, however, insisted the state had the situation under control and accused the administration of overreach. Legal Framework: Two Laws in Conflict The Posse Comitatus Act, enacted in 1878, prohibits the use of the U.S. military for civilian law enforcement unless expressly authorized by Congress. It is designed to preserve civilian control and prevent the use of military force for domestic political purposes. The Insurrection Act, originally passed in 1807, serves as an exception. It allows the president to deploy the military in limited situations, such as to suppress rebellion, enforce federal authority, or address serious obstruction of the law when states cannot or will not act. Filed shortly after the deployment, Newsom v. Trump challenges the legality of the president's decision to take control of the California National Guard. California argues that the criteria under the Insurrection Act were not met, saying that there was no rebellion, no state request for help and no breakdown in governance. Therefore, they say Trump's order amounts to an unlawful use of the military and a violation of both constitutional and statutory protections. This picture taken on June 8, 2025 shows California Highway Patrol using smoke grenades to advance and push protesters off the 101 freeway during a demonstration following federal immigration operations in Los Angeles. This picture taken on June 8, 2025 shows California Highway Patrol using smoke grenades to advance and push protesters off the 101 freeway during a demonstration following federal immigration operations in Los Angeles. BLAKE FAGAN/AFP via Getty Images The Stakes Though the case is being heard as a bench trial—which means without a jury—the implications could be broad. If the court rules in Newsom's favor, it could reaffirm limits on when the federal government can intervene in state-managed military affairs and reinforce protections against domestic use of force. A ruling for Trump could expand the scope of presidential authority in crisis situations, potentially weakening restrictions intended by the Posse Comitatus Act. What People Are Saying Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom, said June 9, 2025: "Donald Trump is creating fear and terror by failing to adhere to the U.S. Constitution and overstepping his authority. This is a manufactured crisis to allow him to take over a state militia, damaging the very foundation of our republic. Every governor, red or blue, should reject this outrageous overreach. This is beyond incompetence—this is him intentionally causing chaos, terrorizing communities, and endangering the principles of our great democracy. It is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism. We will not let this stand." Democratic California Attorney General Rob Bonta, said at the same meeting: "Let me be clear: There is no invasion. There is no rebellion. The President is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends. Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the President's authority under the law—and not one we take lightly. We're asking a court to put a stop to the unlawful, unprecedented order." U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer, said in his June 12 order: "His [Trump's] actions were illegal—both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith." Adding: "We're talking about the president exercising his authority. And the president is, of course, limited in his authority. That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George." What Happens Next The trial is scheduled to begin Monday, August 11, with evidence presented first and legal arguments expected to follow the next day. Both parties have been ordered to submit updated witness lists and exhibits in preparation. The case will be heard in San Francisco before Breyer. Whatever the outcome, the case is expected to influence future interpretations of federal power in domestic security matters—particularly when political conflict intersects with military authority on American soil.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store