FTC sues ticket reseller, saying it illegally exceeded purchase limits for Taylor Swift, other shows
In a lawsuit filed in federal court in Maryland, the FTC said Maryland-based ticket broker Key Investment Group has used thousands of fictitious Ticketmaster accounts and other methods to buy tickets for events, including Taylor Swift's Eras Tour.
According to the FTC, Key Investment Group – which does business under brand names like Epic Seats and Totally Tix – purchased at least 379,776 tickets from Ticketmaster between Nov. 1, 2022, and Dec. 30, 2023. The company spent nearly $57 million to buy the tickets and resold them on secondary marketplaces for approximately $64 million.
For just one Taylor Swift concert, Key Investment Group allegedly used 49 different accounts to purchase 273 tickets, dramatically exceeding the Eras Tour's 2023 six-ticket purchase limit per event, the FTC said. Fans were so frustrated by the difficulty getting tickets for Swift's tour that the U.S. Senate wound up grilling Ticketmaster in a 2023 hearing.
In a statement released Monday, Key Investment Group said it will vigorously defend itself against the FTC's lawsuit.
'The case threatens to dismantle the secondary ticket market for live events, further consolidating power in the hands of the industry's largest monopoly,' the company said.
Key Investment Group said the FTC is misapplying the Better Online Ticket Sales Act, a 2016 law which it said was meant to target malicious software, not legitimate resale businesses. Key Investment Group sued the FTC in July to try to prevent the agency from using the law against it, saying it uses human employees — not bots — to buy tickets.
But the FTC said that law also prohibits anyone from circumventing security measures and other controls meant to enforce posted ticket limits.
In March, with Kid Rock by his side in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing U.S. officials to ensure ticket resellers are complying with Internal Revenue Service rules. The order also directed the FTC to ensure 'price transparency at all stages of the ticket-purchase process' and to 'take enforcement action to prevent unfair, deceptive, and anti-competitive conduct in the secondary ticketing market.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How to check if someone opened a bank account in your name (and what to do next)
Key takeaways Fraudsters can open bank accounts using stolen personal information like your name, address, Social Security number, and existing account details. Check for unauthorized accounts by reviewing ChexSystems, Early Warning Systems, and credit reports every 3-4 months. Fraudulent accounts are used to bounce checks, store illegal funds, overdraw accounts, and damage your banking reputation. If you're a victim: Contact the bank immediately, file FTC and police reports, dispute fraudulent transactions, and secure all existing accounts. Unfortunately, it's possible for someone to open a bank account in your name using stolen personal information. In fact, fraud has skyrocketed, with incidents jumping 25% to $12.5 billion between 2023 and 2024 according to the Federal Trade Commission. While you can't completely prevent this type of identity theft, you can detect it quickly and minimize the damage with the right knowledge and tools. To check if someone opened a bank account in your name, request free reports from checking account reporting companies. You should also monitor your credit reports monthly, as new bank accounts may appear there. Look for unfamiliar addresses, accounts you didn't open, or hard inquiries from banks you've never contacted. Why criminals open bank accounts in other people's names Banking fraud isn't random — criminals have specific, profitable reasons for opening accounts in your name rather than their own: Money laundering: The primary motivation is creating a 'clean' account to hide dirty money. Criminals use stolen identities to open accounts, deposit funds from illegal activities, then withdraw or transfer the money before authorities can trace it back to them. Your good credit history and clean banking record provide the perfect cover. Check fraud and overdraft schemes: Fraudsters often bounce checks or deliberately overdraw accounts opened in victims' names. Since the account isn't theirs, they face no consequences for the negative balance or returned check fees. Building fake identities: Some criminals combine real Social Security numbers with fake names and addresses to create entirely new identities. They may open multiple accounts across different banks, building a financial profile that can be used for larger fraud schemes like mortgage or auto loan applications. Read more: 5 common types of bank account fraud and how to protect yourself The hidden cost of banking identity theft Banking identity theft often goes undetected longer than credit card fraud because people check their bank statements more regularly than their credit reports. By the time victims discover fraudulent accounts, criminals may have used them for months to launder money or commit check fraud. The damage compounds because these accounts can destroy your ChexSystems record, making it nearly impossible to open legitimate accounts when you need them. How to find out if someone opened bank accounts in your name Unlike credit monitoring, most people don't regularly check for unauthorized bank accounts. Here's how to discover if you're a victim of banking identity theft. Check your ChexSystems report immediately ChexSystems is like a credit bureau for banking — it tracks your checking account history, including accounts you didn't authorize. Banks use ChexSystems reports to decide whether to approve new account applications, so fraudulent accounts can block you from legitimate banking. How to get your free ChexSystems report: Visit or call 1-800-428-9623 Request your free annual report (you're entitled to one per year) Review all listed accounts, addresses and personal information Look for accounts at banks you've never used Monitor your credit reports for banking inquiries While fraudulent bank accounts don't always appear on credit reports, hard inquiries from banks you didn't contact often do. Check your credit reports from all three bureaus (Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion) for unfamiliar banking inquiries. You can get free credit reports weekly at Look specifically for inquiries from banks, credit unions, or financial institutions you don't recognize. Here's a guide to reading your credit report. Watch for unexpected mail and communications Fraudulent accounts often generate paperwork that gets sent to your address. Be alert for: Debit cards from banks you've never used Account statements for unknown accounts Welcome packets from financial institutions Overdraft or fraud notifications from unfamiliar banks If you receive a debit card in the mail from a bank where you don't have an account, don't ignore it. This is often the first sign that someone has opened an account in your name. How fraudsters obtain your personal information Scammers are able to obtain consumers' personal data on the black market or through data breaches, including: Data breaches: Major corporations, healthcare providers and government agencies regularly suffer data breaches that expose Social Security numbers, addresses, and other personal information. The 2017 Equifax breach alone compromised 147 million people's data — information that's still circulating on criminal networks. Phishing scams: Fraudsters send emails or texts that appear to be from legitimate banks, asking you to 'verify' account information or update security settings. Never provide personal information via email or text, even if the message appears to be from your bank. Legitimate financial institutions don't request sensitive information through these channels. Dark web marketplaces: Stolen personal information gets sold on dark web marketplaces for surprisingly low prices. This makes identity theft accessible to even low-level criminals. Physical theft and 'shoulder surfing': Criminals also obtain information through old-fashioned methods like stealing mail, going through trash for financial documents, or observing people enter PINs and passwords in public places. What to do if you're a victim of bank fraud Time is critical when dealing with banking fraud. The faster you act, the more damage you can prevent and the easier recovery becomes. Contact the fraudulent bank immediately: Call the bank where the unauthorized account was opened and speak to their fraud department. Explain that you didn't open the account and request immediate closure. Get confirmation in writing and ask for a letter stating the account was fraudulently opened. File reports with federal agencies: Visit to file an official identity theft report. The FTC will create a personalized recovery plan with pre-filled forms and letters you can use to dispute fraudulent accounts. While local police may not investigate banking fraud directly, having an official police report strengthens your case with banks and credit reporting agencies. Secure all your financial accounts: Change passwords for all your legitimate bank accounts, credit cards and financial apps. Use unique, strong passwords for each account — consider a password manager to keep track of them securely. Dispute fraudulent accounts and inquiries: Contact ChexSystems and any credit reporting agencies showing unauthorized banking inquiries. You have 60 days to dispute fraudulent information, though you can still dispute beyond this timeframe — it just becomes more difficult. Here's a guide to clearing your ChexSystems report. How to avoid becoming a bank fraud victim While you can't completely prevent identity theft, these strategies significantly reduce your risk and help you detect problems early. Monitor your accounts and credit regularly: Check your bank account activity every day, not just when statements arrive. Most banks offer mobile apps with real-time transaction alerts — use them. Set up credit monitoring through the major credit bureaus or use free services like Credit Karma to watch for new accounts or inquiries. Protect your personal information: Never share sensitive information like Social Security numbers, account numbers, or passwords unless you initiated the contact and know exactly who you're dealing with. Avoid posting personal information on social media and be wary of public Wi-Fi for banking activities. Use strong financial institutions: Choose banks and credit unions with robust fraud protection and monitoring systems. Many online banks offer advanced security features like biometric login and real-time fraud alerts. Look for institutions that offer account alerts, transaction monitoring and 24/7 fraud support. These features can help you detect and respond to fraud faster. Consider credit freezes: A credit freeze prevents new accounts from being opened in your name without your explicit permission. While this doesn't stop all banking fraud, it makes it much harder for criminals to open accounts that require credit checks. Freezing your credit is free and can be done online with all three credit bureaus. You can temporarily lift the freeze when you need to apply for legitimate accounts. Bottom line Monitor your financial accounts and credit reports regularly, protect your personal information carefully and don't hesitate to act quickly if you suspect fraud. The sooner you detect and report banking identity theft, the easier it is to resolve and the less damage criminals can cause. Remember that legitimate banks will never ask for sensitive information via email or text. When in doubt, hang up and call your bank directly using the number on your account statements or debit card. Sign in to access your portfolio
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Employees in Baltimore's Fells Point say they were fired for protesting co-worker's dismissal
More than half a dozen workers at a popular Fells Point restaurant say they were fired after protesting working conditions this past weekend. Several concerned employees at Bunny's Buckets and Bubbles organized a protest after they said a co-worker was abruptly fired for refusing to take off a pro-Palestine pin. Sydney Browne says she was off the clock Sunday when she protested on behalf of her former co-worker whom she believes was fired. Bunny's Buckets and Bubbles said on social media that it doesn't allow political, religious, or divisive attire at work, and it wants to promote an inclusive workplace. "It was OK to just be who you wanted to be, because it was Bunny's, and everybody was welcome," Browne said. "And then in a matter of days, that all just kind of crumbled and fell apart." According to a social media post by the restaurant, a customer complained about a staff member wearing a Pro-Palestine pin with their uniform. The customer claimed it was impacting their dining experience. When asked to remove it, Bunny's says that the employee did and continued working. A week later, another employee, wearing a Palestinian pin, was asked to do the same, but refused. The restaurant says that the employee quit, but former co-workers say the employee was fired. Sydney Browne says the restaurant didn't have a dress code before the incident, allowing employees to wear pins supporting Pride. That changed after an optional meeting the next day. "The meeting in which it was discussed with an optional meeting where less than a third of employees were even present, where this new dress code was announced and things were explained," Browne said. Then, some employees protested in support of their former coworker on Sunday. Browne says she went after her shift and not in company clothes. She was fired the next day. "The vast majority of people who were fired were off the clock, and the people who did walk off the job who were on the clock, some of them still have jobs," Browne said. "There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason as to who was fired and who was not," Browne said. Labor attorney Howard Hoffman isn't involved in the fallout at Bunny's but calls the case complicated. Hoffman says the workers who wore pins and refused to remove them have fewer rights than those allegedly fired for protesting. "Any employee that's been fired for wearing a pro-Palestinian badge or pin is going to have to show that it… that that badge or pin has some connection to the terms and conditions of employment in order to be protected," Hoffman said. "That secondary act of protest… I would say that that appears to be plausibly protected by the National Labor Relations Act." WJZ was at Bunny's as a former customer walked by, reading the sign on the restaurant's door saying it was closed for the day. She says she refuses to eat at Bunny's because it has supported Israel in the past. "I will be boycotting," said Catherine, who preferred to go by her first name in this story. "To fire employees who are speaking up about that again, they are allowed to make those decisions, and the fact that they do have that double standard, I personally do not support any organizations that fund Israel's genocidal behavior." Bunny's is regularly open on Tuesday, but it was closed Aug. 19. Browne said that if she's offered her job back, she won't return. "I don't feel safe working there anymore," Browne said. "Because ownership has shown us that they don't care about us like we thought that they did." Browne told WJZ that she isn't sure what comes next for her and her co-workers who were fired, and she isn't sure if she will pursue legal action.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Abrego Garcia's lawyers want smuggling charges dismissed on grounds of vindictive prosecution
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia asked a federal judge on Tuesday to dismiss a human smuggling case against him, saying the government was prosecuting the Maryland construction worker to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador. Their motion filed in court said attempts to dismiss indictments on the grounds of 'selective or vindictive prosecution' are infrequent and rarely succeed, 'but if there has ever been a case for dismissal on those grounds, this is that case.' The attorneys said senior cabinet members, Justice Department leaders and President Donald Trump mounted unprecedented public attacks on Abrego Garcia and that 'vindictiveness is clear from the record.' Acting U.S. Attorney Robert E. McGuire in Tennessee, where Abrego Garcia is in jail, said in an email prosecutors would have no other comment beyond what they file in response to the motion. No prosecutor motion was filed as of late Tuesday. Abrego Garcia became a prominent face in the debate over Trump's immigration policies following his wrongful expulsion to El Salvador in March. Trump's administration violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that shields Abrego Garcia from deportation to El Salvador because he likely faces threats of gang violence there. The administration claimed Abrego Garcia was in the MS-13 gang, although he wasn't charged and has repeatedly denied the allegation. Facing mounting pressure and a U.S. Supreme Court order, the Trump administration returned Abrego Garcia to the U.S. in June to face the smuggling charges, which his attorneys have called 'preposterous.' Tuesday's motion alleged the government was trying to paint Abrego Garcia as a criminal to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador and to avoid 'the embarrassment of accepting responsibility for its unlawful conduct." The motion said the government also aimed to change public opinion about Abrego Garcia's deportation. Abrego Garcia's attorneys asked the court at least to order a hearing on the government's motives. The smuggling case stems from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding, during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. Police in Tennessee suspected human smuggling, but he was allowed to drive on. A federal judge in Maryland last month prohibited the Trump administration from taking Abrego Garcia into immediate immigration custody if he's released from jail. The judge ordered the government to provide three business days notice if Immigration and Customs Enforcement intends to initiate deportation proceedings against him.
