German government looks to roll back tax hike on flights
Airlines have long complained that the charges in Germany - aimed in part to reduce carbon emissions - are among the highest in Europe, harming competitiveness.
'The increase in the air travel tax must be reversed,' said Christoph Ploss, the federal government's tourism coordinator, in an interview with the Bild daily.
'Hard-earned holidays to Mallorca must not become unaffordable,' he added, refencing the Spanish island which is a popular holiday destination.
Germany last hiked the duty in May 2024, with the levy for short-haul flights hitting 15.33 euros (S$22.90), up from 12.73 euros, and that for long-haul routes soaring to 70.83 euros from 58.06 euros.
For comparison, France is planning to increase its tax on economy-class flights to destinations within Europe to 7.30 euros, up from 2.63 euros now.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Last year's increase under Germany's then-chancellor Olaf Scholz has brought in almost two billion euros since it was imposed but also led to anger from airlines.
Irish budget carrier Ryanair and German rival Eurowings warned late last year that they were considering cutting numerous routes to and from Germany, citing what they called excessive taxation.
Reversing the tax rise as part of the 2026 budget is now being discussed between Germany's ruling coalition parties, the conservative CDU/CDU and the centre-left SPD, Bild reported.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz of the CDU has tried to forge a pro-business course to revive a sluggish economy, introducing tax breaks for business investment and promising to reduce bureaucracy. AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Trump may look like he's winning the trade war, but hurdles remain
[WASHINGTON] At a glance, US President Donald Trump appears to be winning the trade war he unleashed after returning to the White House in January, bending major trading partners to his will, imposing double-digit tariff rates on nearly all imports, narrowing the trade deficit, and raking in tens of billions of US dollars a month in much-needed cash for federal government coffers. Significant hurdles remain, however, including whether US trading partners will make good on investment and goods-purchase commitments, how much tariffs will drive up inflation or stymie demand and growth, and whether the courts allow many of his ad-hoc levies to stand. On inauguration day, the effective US tariff rate was about 2.5 per cent. It has since jumped to somewhere between 17 per cent and 19 per cent, according to a range of estimates. The Atlantic Council estimates it will edge closer to 20 per cent, the highest in a century, with higher duties taking effect on Thursday (Aug 7). Trading partners have largely refrained from retaliatory tariffs, sparing the global economy from a more painful tit-for-tat trade war. Data on Tuesday showed a 16 per cent narrowing of the US trade deficit in June, while the US trade gap with China shrank to its smallest in more than 21 years. American consumers have shown themselves to be more resilient than expected, but some recent data indicate the tariffs are already affecting jobs, growth and inflation. 'The question is, what does winning mean?' said Josh Lipsky, who heads economic studies at the Atlantic Council. 'He's raising tariffs on the rest of the world and avoiding a retaliatory trade war far easier than even he anticipated, but the bigger question is what effect does that have on the US economy.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Michael Strain, head of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said Trump's geopolitical victories could prove hollow. 'In a geopolitical sense, Trump's obviously getting tonnes of concessions from other countries, but in an economic sense, he's not winning the trade war,' he said. 'What we're seeing is that he is more willing to inflict economic harm on Americans than other countries are willing to inflict on their nations. And I think of that as losing.' Kelly Ann Shaw, a White House trade adviser during Trump's first term who is now a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, said a still-strong economy and near-record-high stock prices 'support a more aggressive tariff strategy.' But Trump's tariffs, tax cuts, deregulation and policies to boost energy production would take time to play out. 'I think history will judge these policies, but he is the first president in my lifetime to make major changes to the global trading system,' she added. Deals so far Trump has concluded eight framework agreements with the European Union, Japan, Britain, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines that impose tariffs on their goods ranging from 10 per cent to 20 per cent. That's well short of the '90 deals in 90 days' administration officials had touted in April, but they account for some 40 per cent of US trade flows. Adding in China, currently saddled with a 30 per cent levy on its goods but likely to win another reprieve from even higher tariffs before an August 12 deadline, would raise that to nearly 54 per cent. Deals aside, many of Trump's tariff actions have been mercurial. On Wednesday he ratcheted up pressure on India, doubling new tariffs on goods from there to 50 per cent from 25 per cent because of its imports of oil from Russia. The same rate is in store for goods from Brazil, after Trump complained about its prosecution of former leader Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. And Switzerland, which Trump had previously praised, is facing 39 per cent tariffs after a conversation between its leader and Trump derailed a deal. Ryan Majerus, a trade lawyer who worked in both the first Trump administration and the Biden government, said what's been announced so far fails to address 'longstanding, politically entrenched trade issues' that have bothered US policymakers for decades, and getting there would likely take 'months, if not years.' He also noted they lack specific enforcement mechanisms for the big investments announced, including US$550 billion for Japan and US$600 billion for the EU. Promises and risks Critics lit into European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen after she agreed to a 15 per cent tariff during a surprise meeting with Trump during his trip to Scotland last month, while gaining little in return. The deal frustrated winemakers and farmers, who had sought a zero-for-zero tariff. Francois-Xavier Huard, head of France's FNIL national dairy sector federation, said 15 per cent was better than the threatened 30 per cent, but would still cost dairy farmers millions of euros. European experts say von der Leyen's move did avert higher tariffs, calmed tensions with Trump, averting potentially higher duties on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and cars, while making largely symbolic pledges to buy US$750 billion of US strategic goods and invest over US$600 billion. Meeting those pledges will fall to individual EU members and companies, and cannot be mandated by Brussels, trade experts and analysts note. US officials insist Trump can re-impose higher tariffs if he believes the EU, Japan or others are not honouring their commitments. But it remains unclear how that would be policed. And history offers a caution. China, with its state-run economy, never met its modest purchase agreements under Trump's Phase one US-China trade deal. Holding it to account proved difficult for the subsequent Biden administration. 'All of it is untested. The EU, Japan and South Korea are going to have to figure out how to operationalise this,' Shaw said. 'It's not just government purchases. It's getting the private sector motivated to either make investments or back loans, or to purchase certain commodities.' And lastly, the main premise for the tariffs Trump has imposed unilaterally faces legal challenges. His legal team met with stiff questioning during appellate court oral arguments over his novel use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets, to justify his tariffs. A ruling could come any time and regardless of the outcome seems destined to be settled ultimately by the Supreme Court. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Senior EU official says Gaza crisis ‘looks very much' like genocide
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Israel has repeatedly rejected accusations of carrying out genocide in its war in Gaza. BRUSSELS - A senior member of the European Union's executive said the displacement and killing in Gaza looked very much like genocide, the first commissioner to level that accusation and publicly break with the body's position on the conflict. "If it is not genocide, it looks very much like the definition used to express its meaning," Ms Teresa Ribera - the European Commission's second-highest ranking official - told Politico in an interview published on Aug 7. Israel has repeatedly rejected accusations of carrying out genocide in its war in Gaza. Israel's mission to the EU did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ms Ribera is the European Commission's Executive Vice-President, second only in seniority to President Ursula von der Leyen. The Spanish socialist, whose portfolio includes climate and anti-trust issues, is not responsible for EU foreign policy. "What we are seeing is a concrete population being targeted, killed and condemned to starve to death," Ms Ribera told Politico. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Liquor licences for F&B, nightlife venues extended to 4am in Boat Quay, Clarke Quay Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds Singapore Wastewater overflow in Bedok and Chai Chee due to choked sewer at BTO worksite: PUB Singapore Fine for man who damaged PAP campaign materials on GE2025 Polling Day Singapore Jail for driver who drove over leg of special needs woman in accident on church driveway Singapore Teen's love of dance powers her through cancer to perform at NDP 2025 Singapore Ex-Hyflux director fined over firm's failure to disclose Tuaspring info Business S'pore firm looks to buy SMEs lacking successors, launches CEO training programme to foster renewal Her statements went further than the European Commission, which has accused Israel of violating human rights in Gaza, but stopped short of accusing it of genocide. The Commission last week proposed curbing Israeli access to its flagship research funding programme after calls from EU countries to increase pressure on Israel to alleviate the humanitarian crisis in the enclave. In that proposal, the Commission said Israel had violated a human rights clause in an agreement that governs its relations with the EU. "With its intervention in the Gaza Strip and the ensuing humanitarian catastrophe, including thousands of civilian deaths and rapidly rising numbers of spreading extreme malnutrition, specifically of children, Israel is violating human rights and humanitarian law," it wrote. Israel has fended off accusations of genocide, including a case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice in the Hague that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned as "outrageous". The war was triggered when Hamas-led militants attacked Israeli communities and military bases near Gaza on Oct 7, 2023. About 1,200 people, including more than 700 civilians, were killed, and 251 hostages were taken to Gaza. Israel's military response has devastated the tiny, crowded enclave, killing more than 61,000 people, mostly civilians, according to Palestinian health authorities. Israel has repeatedly said its actions in Gaza are justified as self-defence and accuses Hamas of using civilians as human shields, a charge the militant group denies. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Singapore shares rise, mirroring regional gains despite tariff kick-off; STI up 0.7%
[SINGAPORE] Local stocks closed higher on Thursday (Aug 7), extending their winning streak to a fourth consecutive session, in line with broader gains across Asian markets. This came even as higher tariff rates imposed by US President Donald Trump on dozens of trading partners took effect. The Straits Times Index (STI) ended 0.7 per cent or 30.45 points higher at 4,258.15. Across the broader market, gainers outnumbered losers 320 to 201 after 2 billion securities worth S$2.1 billion changed hands. Yangzijiang Shipbuilding was the top gainer on the index for a second straight day, climbing 8 per cent or S$0.21 to close at S$2.84. The rally came after the Chinese shipbuilder on Wednesday posted a record-high net profit of 4.2 billion yuan (S$752.6 million) for the first half of 2025 , marking a 36.7 per cent jump from 3.1 billion yuan a year earlier. The counter surged more than 11 per cent in early trade , hitting S$2.92 by 9.35 am, up from Wednesday's close of S$2.63. This marked its highest level since February, when it reached S$3.30. Thursday's biggest decliner on the STI was UOB , falling 1.8 per cent or S$0.64 to S$35.81 , after reporting a 6 per cent year-on-year drop in second-quarter net profit to S$1.34 billion . BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The weaker result was attributed to a decline in net interest income amid narrowing margins, and missed the S$1.48 billion consensus forecast from a Bloomberg poll of six analysts. The other two local banking stocks closed higher on Thursday. OCBC edged up 0.3 per cent or S$0.05 to S$17.09; DBS , meanwhile, soared after it announced a rise in Q2 earnings to S$2.82 billion ; the counter briefly touched the S$50 mark before closing at S$49.75, up 1.8 per cent or S$0.90 on the day. Elsewhere in the region, key indices closed higher. Malaysia's Bursa Malaysia KLCI rose 0.4 per cent; Japan's Nikkei 225 and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index both grew 0.7 per cent. South Korea's Kospi gained 0.9 per cent, and Taiwan's Stock Exchange Weighted Index surged 2.4 per cent. The gains came as US President Donald Trump announced 100 per cent tariffs on semiconductor chips, with exemptions for investments made within the US. This explains the seemingly counterintuitive Apple-led rally in US tech stocks, said Vishnu Varathan, head of macro research for Asia (excluding Japan) at Mizuho Securities. 'The cognitive dissonance involved in the Apple-led tech rally firing up Nasdaq bulls on one hand and Trump's 100 per cent tariffs on semiconductors is remarkable,' he added. More broadly, Varathan sees trade partners possibly using their American investments as bargaining chips to mitigate the impact of US tariffs. A prominent example is China, whose control over rare earth materials and dominant industrial position '(afford) concessions and partial immunity' from tariff pressures.
