
25% tariff a negotiation tool; India must use August talks wisely: Anurag Singh
The US has imposed a 25% tariff on India, a move seen as a pressure tactic to push India into trade negotiations. While surprising, it's viewed as manageable, with potential for Indian exporters and American importers to absorb the impact.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
"Ultimately, the 25% tariff — half of it could be absorbed by Indian exporters, and the rest by American importers. So, again, it's manageable. I see it as a conscious decision by the Indian government, and one we should be okay with," says Anurag Singh , Managing Partner, Ansid Capital.I'm a little surprised by the notion that India was in the best position to strike a deal. Every other major trading partner among the top 10 with the United States has already struck a deal — except India. So, it was inevitable that some kind of tariff was coming. Threats only work to a certain point. Once a deadline is set, if Trump had deferred even this one, it would have looked weak on his part.So, in that context, it's not a big deal. This is a choice India made. Yes, it is a pressure tactic, of course. If tomorrow India agrees to what the US administration wants — say, opening certain sectors — then the tariff could be reduced from 25% to 20%, even down to 15%, depending on what India is willing to offer.But the problem is, it's not very clear what India was actually willing to put on the table. We've heard about India's red lines — what it wouldn't accept — but not much about what it would concede. In that absence, this decision doesn't feel like a big loss. If this is the choice India made, that's fine. We should accept it and move on.Ultimately, the 25% tariff — half of it could be absorbed by Indian exporters, and the rest by American importers. So, again, it's manageable. I see it as a conscious decision by the Indian government, and one we should be okay with.No, there's no breakdown here. Let's understand this — most countries already face around 20% tariffs. So India getting hit with 25% isn't out of the ordinary.Look at countries like the Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam — even the European Union. The EU accepted a 15% tariff after essentially opening its economy to near free trade with the US.So in comparison, if India got 25% and didn't have to open much more of its economy beyond what it's already importing, that's not a bad outcome.That said, when the US delegation visits, the focus will likely be on addressing the $40 billion trade deficit the US has with India. India exports about $85 billion worth of goods to the US and imports around $45 billion — leaving a gap of $40 billion.I'm sure the US administration will push for India to buy more to help bridge that gap. Likely suggestions will include buying more aircraft from Boeing or more energy products. But the latter might not work, as US energy prices may not be competitive for India.So realistically, buying more aircraft or defense equipment is what's likely. And that's not unreasonable — India does need both. So if those purchases help balance trade, it could be a win-win.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
20 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump increases tariff on Canada to 35% from 25%, cites fentanyl ahead of August 1 deadline
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order raising tariffs on Canadian goods from 25% to 35% for all items outside the USMCA agreement. Canada, which relies heavily on the U.S. market, is expected to respond with countermeasures. Trump has also set new tariffs on 68 other nations and extended negotiations with Mexico. The White House has tied Canada's new rate partly to fentanyl concerns, sparking further friction between Ottawa and Washington as broader trade tensions continue to mount. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Blaming Canada for fentanyl and "retaliation" Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Carney reached out but no talks happened Canada's response remains divided Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A vulnerable trading partner Wider global impact: 68 countries affected Mexico granted a 90-day breather USMCA under strain as Trump signals shift Multiple deals in motion US President Donald Trump signed an executive order late on Thursday raising tariffs on Canadian goods not covered under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) from 25% to 35%, the White House confirmed.A separate 40% levy will apply to goods that are re-routed through third countries in an effort to dodge the new tariffs, according to a White House fact measure came just hours before Trump's self-imposed deadline for nations to strike new trade deals with the United White House has partly linked the decision to what it described as Canada's "continued inaction and retaliation", referencing concerns about fentanyl trafficking. Although Ottawa maintains that only a tiny fraction of the drug entering the U.S. originates from Canadian territory, officials say they've already taken steps to tighten border however, sees it differently. 'Well, they have to pay a fair rate – that's all. It's very simple. They have been charging very, very high tariffs to our farmers, some over 200% and they've been treating our farmers very badly,' he said when asked about the new Prime Minister Mark Carney reportedly reached out before the tariff hike took effect, but no conversation took place.'We haven't spoken to Canada today. He's (Carney) called and we'll, we'll see,' Trump told reporters at the White House just hours before the new rates were made office did not respond to media requests. On Wednesday, he said that while trade talks with Washington had been 'constructive,' a final deal by the deadline was added that a complete rollback of U.S. tariffs was not on the no clear agreement in place, pressure is mounting inside Canada. Carney must coordinate with ten provinces, each pulling in different directions. Some want a strong counter-response, others a more measured Doug Ford of Ontario, Canada's industrial powerhouse and the province most exposed to U.S. trade disruption, pushed hard for retaliation. 'Canada shouldn't settle for anything less than the right deal. Now is not the time to roll over. We need to stand our ground,' he said in a post on has called for a 50% counter-tariff on U.S. steel and aluminium speaking in June, warned that if no deal was reached by the August 1 deadline, Canada would likely impose new levies on American steel and ships around three-quarters of its exports to the U.S. The country's manufacturing-heavy export sector, including cars, steel, and aluminium, stands to be hit 90% of Canadian exports to the U.S. in May qualified under the USMCA, according to government data. But those that don't comply now face steep new figures also show a significant shift: the share of Canadian exports heading to the U.S. dropped by 10 percentage points over the last year, falling to 68%. Analysts say the shift reflects a push to diversify, as some companies seek new markets to avoid the uncertainty of U.S. the tension, economists believe the Canadian economy will avoid a recession, citing unexpected resilience and trade order didn't just target Canada. New tariffs were imposed on 68 nations and the European Union, with a baseline rate of 10% for unlisted will now face a 20% tariff, Pakistan 19%, and Lesotho — initially threatened with a 50% levy — will now see a 15% rate. The same 15% tariff applies to imports from Israel, Iceland, Ghana, Ecuador, Fiji and Guyana.A senior U.S. official, speaking anonymously, said the rates were based on each country's trade imbalance with the U.S. and their regional economic Thursday, Trump held a phone call with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Following the conversation, he agreed to a 90-day negotiation window, averting a planned tariff increase to 30%.During this period, Mexico will continue to pay the existing 25% duty on non-USMCA goods.'We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow and we got 90 days to build a long-term agreement through dialogue,' Sheinbaum wrote on described the call as 'very successful,' saying the leaders had 'got to know each other better.' He said that under the arrangement, U.S.-bound Mexican imports of copper, aluminium and steel will face tariffs of up to 50%. Cars will be taxed at 25%.He also claimed Mexico had agreed to eliminate its 'non-tariff trade barriers' without offering goods continue to be protected under the USMCA, the three-way deal Trump negotiated during his first term. But he now appears to have cooled on the deal is up for renegotiation next year. Trump, in recent comments, indicated frustration with both Mexico and Canada, accusing them of taking advantage of the U.S. on trade.U.S. Census Bureau data shows the trade imbalance with Mexico reached $171.5 billion last year, up sharply from $63.3 billion in 2016, the year before Trump took flurry of tariff activity on Thursday capped days of deal-making. Trump said, 'We have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country,' though he declined to name the nations agreements have reportedly been reached with the European Union, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea, Cambodia and Thailand. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Fox News that the deals with Cambodia and Thailand came after both countries agreed to halt a border Union officials were still working on the framework for taxing imported vehicles. Meanwhile, Switzerland and Norway were said to still be awaiting clarity on their own current tariff strategy has evolved quickly. Back in April, a previous round of tariff announcements triggered a stock market slide and recession fears. To contain the fallout, Trump introduced a 90-day negotiating period, but as deadlines passed without enough deals, the White House ramped up pressure unpredictability has rattled markets and governments. While Trump sees tariffs as leverage, economists warn that the costs will eventually filter down to U.S. consumers and businesses. For now, the pressure has shifted to America's biggest trading partners — and they'll need to decide how to respond.(With inputs from Reuters)


Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Tariff war delays Tata Steel UK breakeven, says CEO Narendran
Mumbai: Tata Steel's plans to turn around its loss-making UK operations have been delayed by at least six months due to global trade disruptions and the spillover effects of US tariffs, the company's top executives said in an interview. Despite the setback, the executives expressed confidence about the company's broader international strategy, including securing Dutch government support to decarbonize its Netherlands operations, and defended its capacity expansion plans in India amid global concerns of steel overcapacity. India's second-biggest steelmaker by capacity had earlier guided for an Ebitda (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization) breakeven in the UK by the end of the second quarter of FY26. The new target is the final quarter of this fiscal year. In its April-June quarter results announced on Thursday, Tata Steel reported that its UK operation's Ebitda loss narrowed to £41 million in the June quarter of this fiscal compared to £80 million reported in the last quarter of FY25. The company's chief executive officer T.V. Narendran said while there was a delay in achieving Ebitda breakeven due to the direct and indirect effects of the tariffs announced by US President Donald Trump, the company was moving in the right direction. 'Because of tariffs, our exports to the US (from the UK) are impacted," Narendran said. Even the company's customers like British carmakers were facing the heat from the tariffs, compounding the business impact for Tata Steel, he added. An influx of steel from other countries also made a difference. 'Japanese and Korean steel, which would have otherwise gone to the US, is looking for alternate markets. It came to the UK because the UK has not been as fast as the EU in setting tighter quotas for imports," the chief executive said. Chief financial officer Koushik Chatterjee added that the journey from Ebitda breakeven to net profit breakeven for Tata Steel UK would not take that long. 'The good thing is that there is no tax implication in the UK because we have a huge amount of unabsorbed tax losses. The asset value is low, so the depreciation is low and debt is mostly working capital," said Chatterjee. 'So once we get to Ebitda positive with sufficient cushion, it's not a big ask (to achieve net profit)," he said. Earlier this month, at the Tata Steel annual general meeting, Tata Sons chairman N. Chandrasekaran set a new goal of achieving net profit from the company's UK operations in the current fiscal year. 'I feel that the UK should be PAT (profit after tax) positive, so the company is working towards making it profitable," said Chandrasekaran, who echoed shareholder concerns. 'We expect the UK this year to perform much better than last year and it will definitely be Ebitda positive." Tata Steel shares closed 2.12% lower on Thursday on the BSE at ₹157.92, underperforming the benchmark Sensex, which fell 0.36% on the stock exchanges. The Netherlands' Scenario Meanwhile, the steelmaker said its negotiations with the Dutch government were progressing well for fiscal support to overhaul its steelmaking operations in the Netherlands towards more environmentally sustainable processes. It plans to replace two blast furnaces over the coming years with electric arc furnaces (EAFs)–like it did in the UK–to cut emissions. All stakeholders, including Tata Steel India, Tata Steel Netherlands, the Dutch government, and the local provincial government will soon sign a non-binding letter of intent. That will be followed by a binding agreement once the Netherlands elects a new government later this year. 'Even though the current Dutch government has fallen and elections are scheduled for October, our project is part of a Parliament-endorsed initiative. That allows us to continue negotiations and proceed with the non-binding agreement," said Chatterjee. The agreement on the blast furnaces involves two phases. During phase one, the company will install an EAF and then shut down one blast furnace. The second phase is planned for the mid-2030s when the remaining blast furnace will be shut. Blast furnaces are large units that use the heat from coke to convert iron ore into purified molten metal for further processing into steel. EAFs do this process using electricity without any coke, thus cutting emissions. India needs more capacity The oldest steelmaker in Asia responded to theNew York Times'claim that there was oversupply of steel in the world and that Tata Steel's operations were suffering due to this overcapacity. The two executives defended the company's strategy to expand capacity. 'The larger question isn't about overcapacity,"said Narendran. 'It's about where that capacity exists and whether it's in a competitive geography. For a country like India, which will consume 500 million tons of steel, should we really import 300 million tons from China? And what happens if China stops supplying tomorrow?" Steel is a strategic resource for national infrastructure, automotive, defence, and capital goods sectors, making self-sufficiency critical, Narendran pointed out. 'Even Europe, which was unsure about keeping its steel industry alive, now wants to retain capacity," he said. 'Every geography wants to ensure it can meet its own demand." The top executive questioned why high-cost steel producers like Japan and South Korea export significant volumes of steel despite lacking cost or raw material advantages. 'At least China offers cheap steel. But why should Japan or Korea be exporting steel when they're not low-cost producers?" he said. According to Chatterjee, overcapacity discussions, particularly by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), often ignore ground realities. 'Europe and the US de-industrialized by outsourcing to China," he said. 'Now, with changing global priorities like supply chain security and carbon taxes, countries are reassessing. For India, with its abundant raw materials, skilled labour and growing infrastructure needs, not building capacity would be foolish." The issue of overcapacity exists in regions where it's no longer needed. Rationalizing it globally is the real issue. Steel should be produced where it's most competitive, said Chatterjee.


Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Investors react to Trumps new reciprocal tariffs announcement
SINGORE, - President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday imposing reciprocal tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on U.S. imports from dozens of countries and foreign locations. Rates were set at 25% for India's U.S.-bound exports, 20% for Taiwan's and 30% for South Africa's. Trump also signed an executive order on Thursday increasing tariffs on Canadian goods to 35% from 25%, the White House said. TONY SYCAMORE, MARKET ANALYST, IG, SYDNEY: "At this point, the reaction in markets has been modest, and I think part of the reason for that is the recent trade deals with the EU, Japan, and South Korea have certainly helped to cushion the impact, as has Mexico being granted a 90-day reprieve. And Trump said that trade talks with China are doing reasonably well there. "So on top of all of that, you have the TACO trade type situation whereby, after being obviously caught on the wrong foot in April, the market now, I think, has probably taken the view that these trade tariff levels can be renegotiated, can be walked lower over the course of time." BRIAN JACOBSEN, CHIEF ECONOMIST, ANNEX WEALTH MANAGEMENT, MENOMONEE FALLS, WISCONSIN : "Just because we now have clarity on the tariffs, that doesn't mean we have certainty about their effects. "There are those who think that tariff-induced consumer price inflation will slowly build as businesses work down inventories and test how strong their pricing power is. Others think the tariff-induced inflation will peak earlier, showing up mostly in crimped profit margins and resulting in slower growth. "However, what tariffs take with one hand, maybe tax incentives to invest and more open foreign markets can give with the other hand." This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.