
Former lawmaker gets life sentence for murder of father and son during 1984 anti-Sikh riots
An Indian court sentenced former lawmaker Sajjan Kumar to life imprisonment for orchestrating the murder of two Sikh men during the 1984 riots targeting the minority community.
The politician was convicted of inciting a mob that killed Jaswant Singh and his son Tarundeep Singh in the aftermath of then prime minister Indira Gandhi's assassination by her Sikh bodyguards.
Special judge Kaveri Baweja delivered the ruling on Tuesday.
The prosecution had sought the death penalty, but the judge opted for life imprisonment.
Investigators had accused the former Congress party lawmaker of leading a mob that burned two Sikh men to death and looted their home during the anti-Sikh riots.
The prosecution argued that he orchestrated the attack while Kumar's lawyers questioned the reliability of eyewitness testimonies that were taken after a delay of seven years.
'The present case is more serious than the Nirbhaya case. In that case, a young woman was targeted. Here, people of a particular community were attacked,' the prosecution said, stating that Kumar's crime fell under the 'rarest of rare' category which deserved the death penalty.
Sectarian riots erupted in Delhi and elsewhere in India after Gandhi was assassinated by her Sikh bodyguards in 1984. She had angered the minority Sikh community by sending the military to storm the Golden Temple – the holiest Sikh shrine in Amritsar in Punjab – to eliminate militants holed up there.
'We will not accept anything less than the death penalty. We are not happy with the verdict of the court,' Sikh leader Gurlad Singh was quoted as saying by India Today. 'We will appeal to the government to go to a higher court and announce the death penalty for Sajjan Kumar.'
Kumar is already serving a life sentence following his 2018 conviction by the Delhi High Court for the killing of five Sikhs in Raj Nagar Part I, Palam Colony, on 1-2 November 1984, and for orchestrating the burning of a gurdwara in Raj Nagar Part II of the capital.
In September 2023, a Delhi court acquitted Kumar in a case involving the killing of seven Sikhs during the 1984 riots in Sultanpuri.
He still faces a pending case in a Delhi court while two appeals against his acquittal are before the High Court. An appeal against his conviction in another case is pending in the Supreme Court.
For decades, families of the victims of the anti-Sikh riots struggled for justice, facing repeated setbacks due to alleged political interference and police inaction.
Despite multiple inquiries and commissions, little progress was made and key accused, including Kumar, remained untouched by the law. It was only in 2018, after sustained pressure from activists and families of the victims, that the Supreme Court intervened and ordered a fresh investigation and fast-tracking trials. This led to Kumar's conviction and life sentence.
The Indian government set up the Nanavati Commission in 2000 to investigate the 1984 riots. Headed by Justice GT Nanavati, the commission submitted its report in 2005, naming key political figures, including Kumar and former minister Jagdish Tytler, as instigators of the violence.
The report, citing official estimates, says 2,733 Sikhs were killed in Delhi between 31 October and 5 November 1984. It notes, however, that Sikh community representatives dispute this figure, claiming that over 3,000 Sikhs were killed.
The report notes that most of the deaths took place on 1 and 2 November 1984. 'Big mobs armed with weapons attacked the houses of Sikhs,' it says, 'male members were assaulted and beaten mercilessly and many of them were burned alive or cut into pieces.'
'Many dead bodies were removed in vehicles and it is alleged that they were thrown into river Yamuna,' it continues. 'Large number of shops and business establishments of Sikhs were looted and many of them were subsequently burnt as well. Many taxi stands and taxis were burnt as mainly Sikhs were in that business.'
A Sikh community leader expressed disappointment that Kumar was not given the death penalty but acknowledged that justice had prevailed with his life sentence, even after 41 years.
'We are upset that someone like Sajjan Kumar was not given the death penalty. I believe if he had been given a death sentence, it would have been better, and we would have felt satisfied,' Jagdip Singh Kahlon, general secretary of the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee, was quoted as saying by the news agency ANI on Tuesday. 'After 41 years, even if he got life imprisonment, justice has prevailed. I respect the verdict of the court.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Greta Thunberg attempts to reach Gaza despite Israel's chilling threat
Israel's defence chief has vowed to prevent an aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists from reaching the Gaza Strip. Israel Katz said Israel will not allow anyone to break its blockade of the Palestinian territory. He said: "To the anti- Semitic Greta and her fellow Hamas propagandists, I will say this clearly: You should turn back, because you will not make it to Gaza." Mr Katz added: "I have instructed the IDF to act so the hate flotilla does not reach the shores of Gaza - and to take any means necessary to that end." Greta, 22, is among 12 activists on the Madleen, a British-flagged boat operated by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition. The Swedish activist has previously denied anti-Semitism. She added: "We are a humanitarian aid ship." An attempt last month by Freedom Flotilla to reach Gaza failed after another vessel was attacked by two drones off Malta. Yesterday, 13 people were killed by Israeli fire near an aid station in Rafah, Gaza. Witnesses said the shooting occurred at 6am, when they were told the centre would open.


NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Gas station looted, car set on fire in anti-ICE protests
During anti-ICE protests in California, a gas station was looted and a car was set on fire. Officials deployed pepper spray and flashguns to control the 8, 2025


NBC News
7 hours ago
- NBC News
Trump aims to slash Pell Grants, which may limit low-income students' college access
For many students and their families, federal student aid is key for college access. And yet, the Trump administration's budget proposal for fiscal year 2026 calls for significant cuts to higher education funding, including reducing the maximum federal Pell Grant award to $5,710 a year from $7,395, as well as scaling back the federal work-study program. The proposed cuts would help pay for the landmark tax and spending bill Republicans in the U.S. Congress hope to enact. Roughly 40% of undergraduate students rely on Pell Grants, a type of federal aid available to low-income families who demonstrate financial need on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid. Work study funds, which are earned through part-time jobs, often help cover additional education expenses. President Donald Trump 's 'skinny' budget request said changes to the Pell Grant program were necessary due to a looming shortfall, but top-ranking Democrats and college advocates say cuts could have been made elsewhere and students will pay the price. 'The money we invest in post-high school education isn't charity — it helps Americans get good jobs, start businesses, and contribute to our economy,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., told CNBC. 'No kid's education should be defunded to pay for giant tax giveaways for billionaires.' Pell Grants are 'the foundation for financial support' Nearly 75% of all undergraduates receive some type of financial aid, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. 'Historically the Pell Grant was viewed as the foundation for financial support for low-income students,' said Lesley Turner, an associate professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy and a research fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research. 'It's the first dollar, regardless of other types of aid you have access to.' Under Trump's proposal, the maximum Pell Grant for the 2026-2027 academic year would be at its lowest level in more than a decade. 'The Pell reduction would impact the lowest-income families,' said Betsy Mayotte, president of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors, a nonprofit. More than 92% of Pell Grant recipients in 2019-2020 came from families with household incomes below $60,000, according to higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz. How Pell Grant cuts could affect college students If the president's cuts were enacted and then persisted for four years, the average student debt at graduation will be about $6,500 higher among those with a bachelor's degree who received Pell Grants, according to Kantrowitz's own calculations. 'If adopted, [the proposed cuts] would require millions of enrolled students to drop out or take on more debt to complete their degrees — likely denying countless prospective low- and moderate-income students the opportunity to go to college altogether,' Sameer Gadkaree, president and CEO of The Institute for College Access & Success, said in a statement. Already, those grants have not kept up with the rising cost of a four-year degree. Tuition and fees plus room and board for a four-year private college averaged $58,600 in the 2024-25 school year, up from $56,390 a year earlier. At four-year, in-state public colleges, the average was $24,920, up from $24,080, according to the College Board. The Pell program functions like other entitlement programs, such as Social Security or Medicare, where every eligible student is entitled to receive a Pell award. However, unlike those other programs, the Pell program does not rely solely on mandatory funding that is set in the federal budget. Rather, it is also dependent on some discretionary funding, which is appropriated by Congress. The Congressional Budget Office projected a shortfall this year in part because more students now qualify for a Pell Grant due to changes to the financial aid application, and, as a result, more students are enrolling in college. Cutting the Pell Grant is 'extreme' Although there have been other times when the Pell program operated with a deficit, slashing the award amount is an 'extreme' measure, according to Kantrowitz. 'Every past shortfall has been followed by Congress providing additional funding,' he said. 'Even the current House budget reconciliation bill proposes additional funding to eliminate the shortfall.' However, the bill also reduces eligibility for the grants by raising the number of credits students need to take per semester to qualify for the aid. There's a concern those more stringent requirements will harm students who need to work while they're in school and those who are parents balancing classes and child care. 'These are students that could use it the most,' said the University of Chicago's Turner. 'Single parents, for example, that have to work to cover the bills won't be able to take on additional credits,' Mayotte said. 'If their Pell is also reduced, they may have to withdraw from school rather than complete their degree,' Mayotte said.