South Africa steadfast in negotiating US trade deal
In a joint briefing on Monday in Germiston, minister of international relations Ronald Lamola said the South African government had been engaging the US at various levels with a view to ensure predictability in trade. However, the US decided to impose a 30% unilateral tariff on South Africa despite these efforts.
South Africa faces the highest rate in sub-Saharan Africa, and from August 7 products exported to the US will have the 30% tariff. Lesotho and Zimbabwe were hit with a 15% tariff.
'It is unfortunate that this government's efforts in resetting the relationship with the US has been undermined by some actors within South African society,' Lamola said.
Lamola added the unilateral tariffs have been implemented despite South Africa's submission of a comprehensive and ambitious Framework Deal in May, aimed at addressing the US trade deficit.
'The US is South Africa's third-biggest trading partner, with the EU and China being the first and second-largest trading partners,' he said.
SA faces the highest rate in sub-Saharan Africa. Countries like Lesotho and Zimbabwe were hit with a 15% tariff. Minister Lamola says SA continues to negotiate with the US. @SowetanLIVE
— Jeanette Chabalala 🇿🇦 (@J_chabalala) August 4, 2025
'South African exports do not compete with US producers and do not pose a threat to US industry. On the contrary, our exports are crucial inputs that support America's own industrial base. Our agriculture exports are even counter-seasonal, meaning they fill gaps in the US market, not replace domestic products.
'South Africa isn't just a trading partner — we're a major investor in the US, with our companies sustaining American jobs. Similarly, over 600 US companies in South Africa contribute to our industrial growth and create employment. Our goal is to preserve and grow these mutually beneficial relationships.'
Some of the measures taken by government was the establishment of an export support desk, which Lamola said would serve as a direct point of contact for companies affected by the US tariff hike. 'The aim of this support measure is to support the diversification of export markets for increased resilience, and facilitate the entry into alternative markets for affected exporters.
Jeanette Chabalala 🇿🇦 on Twitter / X
'The desk will provide updates on developments and tailored advisory services to exporters on alternative destinations, guidance on market entry processes, insights into compliance requirements and linkages to South African embassies and high commissions abroad.'
There were also measures to assist companies to absorb the tariff and facilitate long-term resilience and growth strategies to protect jobs and productive capacity in South Africa.
Lamola said the details of these measures were being finalised would be communicated soon.
He added that the localisation fund support (LSF) stood ready to contribute to the national effort to support South African companies impacted by the imposition of 30% import tariffs by the US.
'In collaboration with the department of trade, industry & competition, the Industrial Development Corporation and other agencies — LSF will issue an open call from firms operating in affected value chains, with the aim of providing targeted competitiveness and efficiency support.'
Lamola also said they were working with the department of labour on measures to mitigate potential job losses, using existing instruments within its entities that can be adjusted to respond to the current challenges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
34 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
Expats, beware the pitfalls of property ownership abroad
Before committing to buying property offshore, several tax complications need to be considered. Question: We are South Africans working abroad with all our savings in our offshore bank. As we sold our property when we left SA and no longer own a house, we are thinking of buying a property in Europe and using it as an Airbnb. This should provide us with a better return than we are getting at the bank. Is this wise, or should we do something else? Answer: There are several important factors to weigh up before you buy property abroad. What appears to be a straightforward investment can become complex – and sometimes costly – if not carefully structured. Understand the tax landscape Offshore property ownership often comes with layered taxation. Beyond the purchase price, you may be liable for municipal, regional and national taxes, as well as regular property levies. Rental income is also typically taxed in the country where the property is located, sometimes at higher rates for non-residents. If you eventually sell, capital gains tax could also apply according to local laws. Before committing, consult a professional who understands both the local tax framework and the cross-border implications. This step can prevent unpleasant surprises that erode the returns you were expecting. Beware of situs tax on death One of the most overlooked aspects of owning property abroad is 'situs' estate tax. This is a tax levied by the country where the property is situated upon the owner's death. In some European jurisdictions, situs tax can be substantial and is often required to be paid upfront before heirs can inherit. If your beneficiaries are based in different countries, accessing and settling this tax can create additional complications. This makes estate planning around foreign property ownership a lot more intricate than most people anticipate. Forced heirship rules Another factor to consider is forced heirship. Several European countries enforce rules dictating how assets are distributed upon death, regardless of what your South African will stipulates. This can undermine your ability to choose who inherits the property and may conflict with your broader estate planning goals. If you decide to go ahead with the purchase, get expert legal and financial advice on how to structure the ownership to minimise these risks. The alternative: offshore investment portfolio Instead of locking your capital into a physical property, you could consider building an offshore investment portfolio in a tax-friendly jurisdiction such as the Channel Islands or Bermuda. This strategy offers several advantages over property ownership, especially for expatriates. Unlike a property, an investment portfolio can be partially liquidated if you need access to cash. You are not forced to sell an entire large asset or incur debt to unlock a portion of your capital. An offshore portfolio allows you to diversify across asset classes – equities, bonds, property funds and cash – spreading risk and smoothing out returns. You can adjust the risk level depending on global market conditions or personal life changes. In contrast, a single property ties you to one asset class in one location, leaving you exposed if the local property market underperforms or if local tourism demand declines. Properly structured offshore investments can simplify inheritance for heirs and help to avoid the complications of situs taxes and forced heirship rules. Working abroad gives you a wonderful opportunity to build wealth. The key is to structure your investments smartly to preserve both returns and flexibility. Buying property abroad can work, but it carries hidden risks that are often only discovered later. An offshore investment portfolio in a tax-friendly jurisdiction can provide liquidity, diversification and estate planning advantages that many expatriates overlook. Before making any decision, consult a financial planner who understands cross-border tax and estate rules. Professional guidance can save you not just money, but also administrative and emotional headaches down the line. DM Kenny Meiring is an independent financial adviser. Contact him on 082 856 0348 or at Send your questions to [email protected] This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Why South Africa is emerging as a leading hub for global executive search
Image: Supplied South Africa is known for many things – mineral wealth, natural beauty, innovation, and sporting excellence. But, increasingly, it is also becoming recognised as a high-value hub for global executive search services. What sets South African firms apart is not just the quality of their work – but the business model they use to deliver it. In a global industry dominated by the outdated norm of charging a percentage of a candidate's total cost-to-company, South African executive search firms are offering international clients a compelling alternative: a flat-fee model that provides predictability, transparency, and significant savings – particularly for companies based in the US, UK, EU, and Australia. Image: Supplied Breaking from tradition: why the pricing model matters Most executive search firms globally charge between 25 and 33 percent of the candidate's annual total compensation. This means that the higher the salary, the higher the fee – regardless of the complexity or duration of the search. South African firms like ours are challenging this norm by offering flat-fee executive search services, which have been decoupled from the candidate's salary. Instead, pricing is based on the scope, complexity, and level of the search – not on how much the successful candidate will earn within their executive job placement. Here's what that means for our clients based in the UK, USA, EU, and Australia: What global clients gain by partnering with South African firms Transparent, upfront pricing Our flat-fee approach provides cost certainty from day one. Whether you're hiring a US$100 000 CFO or a US$300 000 CEO, your fee stays the same – based on the complexity of the search, not the compensation of the candidate. Meaningful currency advantage Even though the flat fee isn't tied to salary, it is priced in South African rands (ZAR), which creates a powerful arbitrage opportunity for clients paying in stronger currencies such as USD, GBP, EUR, or AUD. Global standards, local expertise South African executive search consultants bring international experience, global compliance, and advanced assessment tools to each assignment. Many are trained to the same standards – and use the same methodologies – as their counterparts in New York or London. Deep access to African and frontier market talent South African firms offer strategic insight and sourcing strength in hard-to-reach African markets , which is ideal for multinationals expanding into emerging economies. These firms know how to identify culturally aligned and resilient leaders, who are able to thrive in complexity. High-touch, partner-led delivery Unlike large global firms where you may be handed off to those in junior roles, South African firms typically offer more senior consultant involvement and a tailored, relationship-first approach – without the overhead-driven fees. Image: Supplied A better business model for a changing world In today's market, businesses want more than just results – they want value. They want to know that their executive search partner is aligned with their interests, not incentivised to inflate salaries or extend timelines. The flat-fee executive search model provides this alignment. It shifts the focus away from compensation-linked commissions and towards what matters most: delivering the right leader, in the right timeframe, for the right reasons. Why partner with us For international companies seeking to fill senior management jobs, working with a South African executive search firm on a flat-fee basis isn't just a cost-saving tactic. It's a smarter, more transparent way of doing business. You get global-quality service, faster turnaround, and partner-led support. Most importantly, South Africa is no longer just an offshore talent destination. It's a strategic partner in building high-performing executive teams, that are able to raise the impetus of your business offering. Written by Jeremy Bossenger, the managing director at BossJansen Executive Search.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Red flag raised over US plan to dump high-risk deportees in Africa
Immigration expert Professor Loren Landau from Wits University says South Africa should be concerned about the deal between the US and Eswatini, after the US deported a group of 'dangerous' criminals to Eswatini. Image: Henk Kruger / Independent Newspapers An immigration expert from Wits University, Professor Loren Landau has called on South Africa to speak out against the treatment of people outside the normal legal system, following a controversial deal that saw the United States deporting dangerous criminals to Eswatini. 'South Africa should be concerned about the US deal with Eswatini, as it should be about similar arrangements with South Sudan, Rwanda, Libya and other countries,' Landau said. 'This is not because those deported will directly harm South Africa or its citizens, but because of the harm to regional integration, prosperity, human rights and the rule of law. In an era where we seek to reverse the effects of colonialism and imperialism, these arrangements reinforce hierarchies where wealthy countries extract value from Africa while using it as a dumping ground.' Speaking with IOL News, Landau added: 'South Africa should also object to people being treated outside the ordinary rule of law and constitutional orders.' His comments come after the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) raised concerns over an agreement between the US and South Africa's landlocked neighbour Eswatini, which would see the Kingdom take in dangerous deportees from America. Spokesperson for DIRCO Minister Ronald Lamola, Chrispin Phiri, confirmed that concerns were formally communicated to Eswatini after reports emerged that a group of high-risk criminals of various nationalities had landed in the country. The group was transported from the US on a special flight, with more deportations of similar individuals potentially to follow. 'Their arrival was also followed by an announcement from the United States Department of Homeland Security indicating that this group of individuals from several countries, some of whom have been convicted of serious offences and crimes, have been deported from the United States and have arrived in the Kingdom of Eswatini,' said Phiri. He added that the department, on behalf of the South African government, noted the joint statement by Eswatini and the US, which said they would work with the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) to facilitate the transfer of these inmates to their countries of origin. 'DIRCO also noted that the countries of origin of these deportees are unlikely to receive them,' he said. 'While respecting the sovereign decision of the Government of Eswatini, the South African government is deeply concerned about the profile of these individuals and the potential adverse impact on South Africa's national security and immigration policy, given the geographical proximity between the two countries.' Three weeks ago, IOL News reported that the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had announced the transfer of five 'dangerous' men from Laos, Cuba, Jamaica, Vietnam and Yemen to Eswatini. The men have criminal records, including convictions for murder and sexual assault. When asked about the potential implications for South Africa, especially given its porous borders and existing security challenges, Landau said: 'Obviously, we don't know who will be sent to Eswatini or the conditions under which they will be held, so we can only speculate at this point. 'That said, the people being sent to Eswatini are to be imprisoned, not released. Even if they eventually come to South Africa, it is unlikely they would want to stay here or commit crimes against the country or its people.' Commenting on DIRCO's response to the matter, Landau said the department should object on moral and ethical grounds. 'This also drives a wedge between South Africa and its neighbours as SA seeks to regain preferential trading arrangements with the United States.' The deportation of the group followed the introduction of harsh 30% tariffs on all South African exports to the US by President Donald Trump. The 30% export tariff comes into effect on Thursday. Landau however, acknowledged there are potential threats from highly dangerous individuals entering South Africa, but said immigration has not been a primary challenge to safety or sovereignty. 'Instead, DIRCO, the police, and others should focus on the rise of (Operation) Dudula, March on March, and the gangsterism that effectively governs many townships. Were these domestic groups controlled, it is unlikely that even foreign mercenaries or marauders would have the opportunity to cause trouble here.' Landau further questioned the involvement of the IOM in facilitating the deportation process. 'The IOM's involvement in these arrangements - effectively a UN (United Nations) body endorsing what is clearly an extrajudicial and amoral programme - should worry us all about the future of multilateralism and the acute return of imperial manipulations.' Last month, Eswatini announced it had agreed with the US to house five of the most dangerous criminals in its prisons, with the possibility of more than 150 terrorists to follow. Meanwhile, AFP reported that Rwanda has agreed to accept up to 250 migrants from the US under a new agreement with Washington, government spokesperson Yolande Makolo confirmed on Tuesday. Makolo said Kigali would retain 'the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement' and that arrivals would receive training, healthcare and accommodation. Further details, including a timeline, have yet to be finalised. The US State Department did not confirm the deal but said the two countries were working on 'a range of mutual priorities.' A spokesperson added that enforcing former President Donald Trump's immigration policies was a 'top priority.' The deal follows Trump's controversial strategy of third-country deportations, previously involving countries such as South Sudan and Eswatini, to bypass delays in repatriation. Critics warn such transfers may violate international law by placing migrants at risk of abuse. This latest arrangement comes after Rwanda's now-scrapped multi-million-pound deal with the UK to receive asylum seekers, which was abandoned following the Conservative Party's electoral defeat last year. Makolo told AFP that Rwanda agreed to the US scheme because 'nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement.' IOL Politics
